Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The Mammut Men’s Monolity GTX Boot is a tough yet flexible boot that can handle the punishing approach hike and go right into the technical pitches. The Gore-Tex membrane seals out moisture when you’re post-holing up a snow field, and the crampon-compatible Vibram sole is ready for everything from granite slabs to vertical ice. The Hybrid Shell gives you the perfect balance between support and flex, and the Internal Motion Control locks your foot in place on rough terrain.
Bottom Line: The Monolith stands alone as the perfect all-around mountain boot.
The description says that these can be used on vertical ice, does anyone have any experience with that. I am looking for first and foremost a vertical ice shoe but I would love to have the versatility of something that I can comfortably hike long distance in. From the specs and reviews it looks like I may have found the right one. Once again just curious about the vertical ice performance, are there any other shoes that can handle vertical but still be comfortably hiked in?
The flex of these boots is rated as B2, so you can use C1 or C2 crampons. These boots have a fair amount of rocker though, so the sole won`t be as parallel to the crampon as with flatter soled boots
I have narrow feet with high arches, plus slightly arched toes. Mammut Monolith boots fit my feet in a way that La Sportiva and Scarpa offerings never did. Try on as many brands as you can before committing to a purchase, obviously.
The monoliths have a little more ankle flex than some, and this combines well with the stiff midsole to make for a boot which excels at tricky scrambling where good dexterity is required. The ankle flex and stiff midsole also make hopping from rock to rock quick and fun. The walk in and out is easy due to the excellent rolling action, low weight and low external bulk. The stiff midsole was a great benefit at all times, and the deep-lugged Vibram Teton outsole gives excellent traction
One downside to the comparatively flexible ankle is that you cannot be as carefree when descending steep stuff quickly. But good scrambling ability is my main priority, so I can live with the compromise. This is the only downside, but it`s also the upside!
Overall, I`d say these are great allround 4 season boots which excel at scrambling.
Hello everyone, I am trying to decide between between this boot, the Sportiva Trango S Evo, and the Garmont Tower, anyone have any opinions on these 3 boots?
How does the Mammut fit?
I have a medium to wide foot, and am probably considered a higher volume foot. Also, I have 0 arches left, they have totally collapsed...any input would be welcome!
I tried a pair of Mammut boots and found them medium in width. La Sportivas have a narrow heel and a wide forefoot. Scarpas are for wide, high volume feet, so I think you`d be better with scarpa boots, Steve
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
The raichle boots I owned before this pair is the best footwear I've ever worn. This boot by Mammut/Raichle is just as fantastic. I'm very pleased with the craftsmanship and quality, the durability and comfort of the Monolith GTX boot. These have been great for 4-season hiking on any terrain you may find in Colorado, and specifically the boots have served me for showshoing this winter.
There does not appear to be a toe welt, so no. Check out Scarpa or La Sportiva, they both have a wide range of boots that accept semi-automatic crampons.
Great boot especially for the sale price. Just used them goat hunting in Kodiak, Alaska. Great for sidehilling and steep uphill climb. i do agree though they should come with better foot soles for the price, but no big deal. also no hot spots or pain spots, break in friendly. as for fit i found ordering regular shoe size to work fine. overall would definetely reccomend and hope to purhcase mammut again in the future.
I assume you mean Forbidden Peak in the Cascades? Likely the West Ridge?
That route features a steep snow couloir, to a long 4th-low 5th knife edge ridge with a single 5.7 move. These should do quite well, as they are lightweight boots with grippy soles. You probably wouldn't regret getting something warmer though, these are not very highly insulated.
You'll also need crampons for the couloir section (at least). Make sure to get ones with a rear heel bail but a front toe strap, like the Black Diamond Sabretooth Clip, Item: BLD0491
At first loved them and they are good but---not my foot. I have a very high arches, stiff ankle, little dorsal movement. Coming down steep slopes I could not lock the heels down, hence toes hit the front. I think that the material used to make the boot is too soft and moved with my foot vs locking it down. Never had this problem with the Makalu. Boot is stiff yet enough rocker that they were comfortable carrying 50+ Lbs for the 38 mile trip. Great 3-4 class climbing as they are nice and light weight. Too as someone else noted a little of the toe cap rubber came unglued. Not good as more may follow? Would I recommend these boots? Yes for some one with a flexible medium foot width and normal arch.
Mountaineering boots--looking down from Seven Gables summit, 13,075 from lake Lou Beverly. Class 3-4 according to Roper's book. California Sierra mountains. nothing finer
Archi, these will be excellent boots for Mount Rainier. The key is making sure they fit you right, making sure you get the right size. When it comes to ordering boots online (that I have never tried on), I always check with customer service and see if I can order 2 sizes. This way I make sure I found the best size and then return the other pair. If you check with backcountry customer service, they may provide a note with your order for a free shipping label for return and refund.
At first I loved the boot, seemed to be just what I was looking for. Then I took them on a hike in Alaska's Brooks Range for about a week. The boot performed well, no complaints there but the rubber piece that wrapps the toe began to come unglued. It is streched tight enough that it did not peal back but began to collect dirt and debris. Just a matter of time before a sharp rock splits the rubber and the toe comes appart.
Recommended for moderate to light use, not hardcore sheep hunting.
Caddidy, that depends on your activity of choice. For general mountaineering and glacier travel, check out the Black Diamond Sabretooth Clip. If you're into more technical terrain, such as waterfall ice climbing, the Black Diamond Cyborg Clip are an excellent option. Hope that helps.
This is my first mountaineering boot so I have nothing to compare it to except trail hiking boots that I have previously own. When I put on this boot for the first time, I felt like if I stomped too hard on the ground that I would put a hole in my floor. The soles are nice a stiff, perfect for kicking steps in the snow and walking through a rock fall. These boots are really nice off trail and when climbing. I would recommend this boot to anyone looking for a good deal on mountaineering boot. It has solid construction and rigid soles.
Hi. I'm looking for a boot to use for scottish winter use. I don't do any climbing at present but would like to have the option of doing a bit at some point.
My question pertains to crampon use with these boots - the Mammut site states they are compatible with strap on crampons. Given the obvious abscence of a toe welt full step ins are a no go, but I can't tell from the pics if the heel / sole unit would accept hybrid types such as Grivel new-matic bindings.
These boots look like an attractive alround mountain usage option, especially as my current B1 raichle boots fit well and the price point is appealing (and they're stocked by a shop I can wrangle a discount out of), however I'd rather avoid full strap-on crampons. Any experience / comments gratefully received.
These puppies work best with strapon's. Stepin's will work but not as good. Not as tight a fit. Air Tech's & G10's also work great. Best of all, they go well with a wee dram. Make sure you're prepared when in Scotland.
These boots are a bit of an enigma. Where to start....
First, Sizing. I wear an 11.5 or 12 US, depending on the maker. I ordered both sizes, and had real trouble deciding which boots fit better. My immediate reaction was that BOTH were terribly uncomfortable, but after varying the tension in by lacing the zones differently, and after spening a couple days walking around the house switching between the two, I decided on the 11.5.
My first trip out I went up Mount Baldy late March to test them out. They were almost flawless; great ankles support, no blisters, no hotspots...but once again, damn are these boots uncomfortable. The soles of my feet felt just beat. I don't know where Mammut gets off talking about a memory foot bed. I immediately got some Dr. Scholls inserts, which for the price of the boots, I think Mammut owes me for. Still, I thought I had a winner.
I did another test up San Gorgonio early April on the South Fork trail preparring for Mount Whitney, and this time got some nasty blisters on both heels/achilles tendons. This perplexed me after having no problems the first trip, but I attributed it to the thicker Dr. Scholls inserts being broken in.
Did the Mountaineer's Route on Whitney in late April, I had my heels taped up(taking all precautions), and everything went pretty well. And the Dr. Scholls were well worked in and my feet felt great. Course, I also think that's because it was almost all snow climbing.
Getting to my last logged experience. Took them up the San G via Vivian Creek to watch the July 4th fireworks over LA. Got caught it bad weather, and ended up logging all 16 miles and 10,000 vertical feet in one day(too much?), which resulted in disaster for my feet. Tragically painful and ripped open blisters on both heels (forgot my tape), PLUS both big toes were solid purple under my toe nails, one of which I ended up loosing. I'm guessing this was because of all the hiking on dirt/exposed rocks rather than the snow climbing my feet were used to.
In conclusion, I thought I had a winner at first, but the boots continue to frustrate. They are certainly not the all-around, all season mountain boot. They cannot handle a long approach. Short climbs in the snow only for me. Great looks, support and protection, but killer on the feet in a number of ways. And even though I put in the thicker inserts, I still think I got the right size. My feet always had plenty of room to move around.
I'm still thinking about sending the photos of my feet to Mammut and asking for my money back. The boots shouldn't perform anywhere near this poorly for the money...not to mention their blister free guarantees.
What removable liner? I've only had these for a few months but I'm pretty sure there isn't a removable liner in them. Also, you can buy them for $180 on Amazon.com from Altrec. Save you $70.
Love the Monolith GTX. Made by Mammut but used to be Raichle. Super high quality and great fitting. Fits medium width and locker heel fit. LIke the lacing, supportive and you can easily isolate the upper part from the lower partfor a perfect feel hiking in these and allowing the ankle to flex without having your foot slip around in the lower boot. Pretty darn light also.
I'm looking for a dedicated winter mountaineering boot that will perform well in New England in the winter while climbing through the presidentials but would also be up for a early spring trip to Mount Rainier and the occasional vertical climbing. It seems like these might be more of a year round boot and not as focused on winter mountaineering. I was also looking at the Mammut Mamook, but that is kind of out of my price range. Will this boot fit my needs? Thanks
If you're looking for DEDICATED winter boots, don't buy these. Buy a pair with a plastic shell (like a pair of Scarpas). These boots have Gore Tex but the leather on the outside soaks up melted snow all day and freezes to ice when you wake up in the morning. You also want a boot that's a bit warmer. These will keep your feet warm pretty well but will also keep you comfortable in 60 degree weather, they're made to be flexible. You might find a plastic boot with removable liners.
You're going to hate me for saying this, but you can't put a price on good footwear. Buy the boot thats fit not only your foot but your needs. It's not like you're spending money on something that will result in you being sedentary and getting fat. Boots are always worthwhile.
I have had a pair of asolo latitude boots for years and love em. Last trip out they started to separate at the sole..Iam having a hard time deciding on what to replace them with. I don't hike all that much but when I do I like to have a really good boot for volcanic rock and water. Thanks for your input. Steve
correction to my previous answer, having now bought the mamooks...sorry! The mamooks have a traditional looking sole with deep tread. The Monoliths have a more modern shallower tread. Both adequate but the Mamooks will last longer. With the top laces slack they are ok to walk in despite being utterly rigid. They are a very snug fit and hence not very warm unless you buy a bigger size (and then wouldn't be so amazingly precise and dextrous).
The Mamooks are a more rigid boot, better suited to vertical ice, rock or on trips where you are likely to have a crampon on nearly 100% of the time. The Monoliths on the other hand have a bit more flex and would be much more comfortable on the approach. Though the Monoliths offer more flex they still are stiff enough for crampon use.
There are subtle differences, the main one being that the monoliths have upgraded technologies. Raichle just basically changed it's name to Mammut and improved a number of things when they went from the All Degree Sl to the Monolith.
These are insulated with GoreTex's Duratherm insulation/membrane/wicking liner. They don't really give them a tempurature but these are great for lower 48 mountaineering boot and also would be acceptible for winter day ice climbing. The insulation is equivalent to 200G Thinsulate.
I have narrow feet with high arches, plus slightly arched toes. Mammut Monolith boots fit my feet in a way that La Sportiva and Scarpa offerings never more...
The raichle boots I owned before this pair is the best footwear I've ever worn. This boot by Mammut/Raichle is just as fantastic. I'm very pleased more...