Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The Asolo Men's Power Matic 200 GV Backpacking Boot has a waterproof Gore-Tex lining and fatigue-reducing technology to keep you moving for your hardcore winter hikes. The Power Matic sole's front density gives you maximum support, and a heel density that reduces shock and fatigue. Cylinders throughout the outsole and midsole absorb jarring from your steps, so you can take on the trail and have more energy for the long haul. The waterproof Gore-Tex lining protects your feet from those soggy spring days, and provides high breathability for the long haul. A wide fit gives your feet more comfort without sacrificing support—less squashed toes and more stability.
Bottom Line: Give long lasting power to your stride with Asolo's Power Matic 200 GV Backpacking Boot.
These shoes absolutely rock!! It is true they do take a little time to break in- don't return them cuz you think they don't fit right, cruise around in them for a couple days and you'll agree. Spend your loot on these puppies. Had to replace my old Asolo 520 Gtx's with these. Never buying any kind of hiking boot but Asolo's again. My whole sole came off from my 520's(due to dry rot and 5 years of hiking, not equipment failure)- and continued to hike down hill in sloppy water logged trail for about 1/2 mile and unbelievably my feet were totally dry. Asolo 1, Trail 0
They are actually similar in construction. Both use the same thickness leather (2.6 - 2.8mm thick). Both are lined with Gore-Tex. Both use the same lasting board. The difference is in the sole. The 520 uses the TPS (triple power structure) which uses shock absorbers in the areas of the foot that receive the most impact. The sole of the 200 uses 3 different densities of PU that are strategically located for different things: stability, comfort and shock absorption. The 200 has pulleys in the lacing system, and are a bit lighter in weight than the 520s. Lastly, the 520s have a deeper lugged sole. I would give a slight nod to the 520 as being a bit heavier duty.
When I first bought these boots my mentality was, "If I'm spending this much money on a pair of boots they had better last FOREVER and go ANYWHERE!" And the latter is definitely true! I've only had these boots a couple of months, so I cannot yet comment on how long they last. However, they are waterproof, and they do go anywhere.
I did a two-night hike which included going over Roan Mountain, TN; descending into Hughes Gap; and descending into Iron Mountain Gap where I put these boots through snow, ice, mud, leaves, pine needles, roots (both wet and dry), rocks (both wet and dry), dirt, gravel, grass, and every combination above--and I do mean EVERY combination. To top it off, I did all this with my dog tied to the hip belt of my pack and pulling me up the climbs and down the descents. These boots held their own! They didn't slip on anything. Even on slick, wet, rugged descents when my dog yanked the leash right as I took a step, these boots kept great traction.
If you face the same dilemma I went through where you can find the TPS in stores, but you can't find a store with the Power Matic in stock anywhere, this is my advice to you: The TPS is the same sizing as the Power Matic. So, go into a brick-and-mortar store and try on the TPS. Once you know what size fits you in the TPS then order the same size in the Power Matic. The Power Matic is definitely worth it!
Another thing to note about this boot, the arch support is noticeably more prominent in the Power Matic than in the TPS. This being said, the way the arch support is constructed in the Power Matic will force your feet into a proper gait and stride--especially with YOUR TOES POINTED FORWARD! If you walk with your toes pointed inward (pigeon-toed) or if you walk like I used to with your toes pointed outward (duck-footed), then your feet will throw a fit. Once you point your toes forward and assume a proper gait and stride then these boots will be one of the most comfortable boots you'll ever wear.
The micro-pulley system is great for keeping even pressure around the foot, and it does wonders in helping you get your foot in and out of the boot on cold mornings when the leather is stiff.
These boots do take some time to break-in, but all boots do. If you need to treat them at all, use Sno-Seal.
Last but not least, before I bought these boots I read many reviews talking about how the toes scuff easily. The scuff marks don't change the functionality of the boot. If you are the kind of person who does not like to get your hiking boots dirty, these are not the boots for you.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
It depends on how many miles you put on them and what terrain you are on but that is pretty fast. I have had mine for 2 years now and I still has ok tread, definately some worn spots but no holes.
I don't like reviewing boots when I haven't worn them much, but I have to put out there, for my fellow wide toed hikers out there, but these boots might not work for you. I special ordered a pair in 15W and although the quality of the boot is very apparent, my two smallest toes smash up something fierce against the side. I've walked a few very unobtrusive miles in them, not enough to show any signs of wear(enough to accidentally step in dog poo tho), but the narrowness of the toe box is too much of an issue to keep them. It's to bad too because they really are a handsome boot.
How much do these boots actually weigh? The site here says 785 g for a pair which is obviously a misprint. The Lowa Banff that I had were something like 3 lbs.11 Oz.(1678 g.) and made my ancient knees hurt after 8-10 hours.
The 785 grams is per boot. On Asolos website, a mens US8.5 weights 1lb 11.6oz. Which makes the pair weight just over 3lb 7.38oz. These are a durable thick full grain leather boot. They are going to be quite heavy.
THese boots were truly put to the test on my last hike through Pisgah Nat. Forest. I wanted to know if these boots were as tough as they looked and they did not let me down :). Truly waterproof! i was wading through water and mudd for hours and my feet stayed totally dry (it felt good knowing i could charge through puddles without gettin wet)the boots will scuff from hittting rocks ,but gives them alot of charactor :) I would recommend that you change the footbeds, the ones that come with the boots seem useless. the boots are a little heavy and get a little hot, but it didnt bother me that much. Take a little time to break these boots in, they are a little stiff right out of the box. all in all these boots are tough and im sure they will last for many years! Worth every Penny!! JD LEAF
Can someone speak in everyday terms about the difference between this and the TPS 520? I've seen plenty of citations of the difference in soles, and then a description of the materials of those soles right off the product page. But can someone explain the difference in how they feel? Is one better suited to backpacking with a load vs one more geared toward lighter hiking or something?
I'm looking for boots for backpacking, and they'll be replacing my TPS 535's (same as the 520 but they're just leather, no gore-tex). Never had a problem with water proofing on those.
In addition to how the sole feels, is there a difference in breathability between this and the TPS 520?
The TPS 520 is going to be a heavier boot with less technology advances - simply put. Both would be good for backpacking - and it depends more on preference than it does load to a large degree. Both are heavy backpacking boots. The 520, along with it's weight, has a slightly deeper lugged sole.
Old school thought is that backpacks have to be heavy and you need a heavy boot for support - been down that road. I can speak from experience I like to carry no more than a 45 lb pack and even over the roughest terrain for longer distances, I like a boot that weights less - every step you have to take expends less energy with a boot / gear that weights less - light is right. That said, some people still prefer a traditional boot (I have a pair of 520's - they are bomber) and some people prefer a boot that incorporates more technology ie: the 535 (they are going to provide support with a little less weight and have a slightly different feel).
If I were to make a recommendation, if you don't already know why you WANT the 520's, go with the 200's.
i literally put these boots through hell in my last hiking trip to Gorges waterfalls and Pisgah nat.forest N.C. I really wanted to know if these boots were as tough as they looked and they did not let me down :) Truely a great boot and worth every penny spent.
These boots are beasts but were surprisingly painless to break in. I received them as a present last Christmas to replace a pair of TPS-520's that I had finally worn out and I must say, I'm really pleased with this choice. The lacing system has been upgraded from the older 520's, allowing one to get a uniform, snug fit. Additionally, they flex alright at the ankle when you're striding, so it's not uncomfortable to walk all day in them, and vibram outsole is quite adept at keeping me from slipping on slick surfaces. I even used them hiking around on the slopes of Mt. Rainier this summer and never slipped or slid in the snow at all. Make sure you buy some after market insoles to dial in the fit...the provided "insoles" should immediately be discarded.
My one qualm is they're heavy, but I knew this going in and I feel like the positives this boot provides in comfort and durability far outweigh (pun!) the weight.
How breathable are these boots? I've got my choices narrowed down to these, the Zamberlan 996 Vioz, and the Asolo Fugitive GTX. I know that the Fugitives are most likely the most breathable, but I really like the classic look of the 200 GV's.
Primary use would be spring-fall on/off trail hikes in the mountains of Colorado, in all conditions including snow.
Very nice boots.. just replaced my GTX's that were 10 years old and this was a great upgrade. Fit great right out of the box. The full leather means fully waterproof.. a nice 4-season boot if you don't get too gnarly with the mountaineering. Compatible with universal crampons, although wouldn't use them on ice. Great for everything from snowmobiling, hiking, whatever. Used them for roughly a year and although the leather toe area shows signs of wear, that is expected with 120+ days on the trail. The sole is in great shape still and I'm confident these boots will outlast the previous pair!
The big difference is in the sole. The 200 GV uses a "Power Matic" sole which consists of a rubber bottom, Asolo/Vibram midsole in PU triple-density. The 520 GV uses a "Triple Power Structure" Asolo/Vibram rubber sole in PU (dual-density). The 200 GV is also slightly lighter.
This is from the manufacturer about the 200 GV: "Highly technical and one-of-a-kind, the Asolo POWER MATIC sole is comprised of three different PU densities that are co-injected and molded together. The high-density front portion secures and guarantees maximum stability. The medium-density heel reduces shock and resulting fatigue during take-off and landing. Further shock absorption is obtained through the four strategically placed low-density cylinders that are linked from the outsole to the midsole. Gripped with a dual-density molded rubber outsole produced in conjunction with Vibram®, the arch area uses a very high-density rubber to maximize support over the long-haul while the balance of the outsole has self-cleaning lugs designed for optimum performance on varying types of terrain."
This is from the manufacturer about the 520 GV: "The new TPS sole, designed by Asolo in partnership with Vibram®, incorporates three shock absorbers that correspond with the areas of foot that receive highest impact during activity. These shock absorbers can be identifi ed by their different color respect to the sole. The shock absorbers are created by combining two polyurethane layers - one of high and one of low density. These layers are individually coloured using a new and innovative technology. The TPS sole improves comfort, stability and has a very distinctive look."
I've been hiking and snowshoeing on some pretty varied terrain with these. They're great for mild scrambling, stiff enough to keep rocks from hurting your feet and are even good with strap-on crampons (not stiff enough for good front pointing though).
I purchased a pair of these boots two days ago at a local outfitter. These are the first hiking boots I've purchased since I was a teenager while in Boy Scouts (I'm 46 now). I wanted to get back into the nature scene for that's where I have some of my fondest memories. Ok, enough of my history. My question is in regard to sizing. When I initially began trying on these boots I tried on a size 10.5. Almost immediately I felt my toes touching the inside end of the boot; not that they were curled under but still, I knew enough to know that wasn't good. So I tried on a size 11 and my toes didn't touch the end of the inside of the boot. They felt comfortable and I purchased them. As I walked around in them that day I began to concern myself with the size and thinking about once I got on a trail and actually hiked on differing types of terrain if my toes would start hitting the end of the inside of the boot (although at the time they werent). So the next day I went into the store and asked to try on a size 11.5 so I could ease my concern one way or the other, but they didnt have one in stock and if they ordered one it wouldnt be in the store for a week. Well, I went ahead and had them order one and they will contact me when it arrives. So, now here I am waiting for this size 11.5 to arrive while I am at a standstill not being able to go on a trip to the Southwest for a few days like I had planned. I suppose all this boils down to the question of whether I am overanalyzing this size issue and perhaps the size 11s I have right now will be just fine. They fit nicely and my toes dont touch or hit the inside of the end of the boot unless I over exaggerate going downhill on stairs and then my toes may hit the end of the inside. I dont know HELP!
I slipped these on the other day for the first time and took off for the Glacier. I was worried: who takes brand new boots and stomps around on a galcier? Verdict: no bumps, no blisters, not even a hot spot! It felt like a glove and I love them. Total worth the cash! Do your feet a favor.
I have the same problem you do. My right foot is size 11 while my left foot is 11.5 wide. My answer was to buy the shoe that fits the larger foot and wear a second sock on my right foot. Don't forget you should always buy a slightly larger shoe size than you would normally wear, about half a size, to allow for you foot to expand while on the trail. These are excellent boots and they will treat your feet well for hundreds and hundreds of miles.
Love the fit, hate the grip. That's the short version.
I bought these (exact same model) back in July of 2006 and they've been begging to be replaced for a couple of years now. The boots I wore extensively before these were the Italian made Vasque Sundowner but when production of the Sundowner moved to China that boot never fit me as well so I moved on.
I was happy to find another GoreTex, full-grain leather boot that fit well in the Asolo Power Matic 200 but within the first few months of use I was missing the grip of the Sundowner and from there the grip of the Asolos slowly went down hill.
I put a lot of miles on my hiking boots and the Power Matic 200s haven't held up as well as the boots they replaced. Just over 5 years, with a few years of me slipping and sliding is not going to let me consider these again. I give them 4 stars rather than 3 because they are very comfortable and a more fair weather hiker on dry trails will have little or nothing to complain about.
they're not really designed to keep your feet any warmer in the winter than any other full-grain leather boot. the goretex membrane does keep in some residual warmth but if you're going out in some real cold, you may want to look at some insulated boots. all this being said, they work fine for me in the mild winters of the Southeast.
I've been using CAMP Ice Rider Universal carmpons with these boots on Glaciers in Patagonia. The universal straps on, no clip binding. I've had no problems what so ever, so sliping, or torquing.
I placed an order thru Amazon and I recieved a message the order was cancelled. I am still keen to purchase these have shipping to Australia Size 9 US dark grafite in medium last Account name megan lay
So after three years of wear. Great condition. Just make sure you use nikwax to protect these babies. I have gotten tons of extra use out of them by simply cleaning them regularly and coating them with water repellent.
These are the best boots I have ever worn, plain and simple. My feet are size 10 and medium-width and these boots fit them perfectly. They do take a little while to break in, but I have yet to have any issues with blisters or hotspots while wearing them. The pulley lacing makes tightening the boots effortless and no amount of sand or dirt that I encountered this summer could make it less smooth. The bulk of the action that these boots have seen was a 23-day backpacking trip through the Alaska Range and they can probably take many more trips of that magnitude. They are a bit scuffed up now from rocks and more bushwhacking than I would care to remember, but I didn't buy these boots to look pretty.
I would think about avoiding goretex altogether for a hike in a warm, arid place like that (unless you knew you're going to have rain, were going to be crossing some rivers, or were going in the winter)
I've owned Asolos for the last 15 years and have never been let down. From hiking to working for the USFS, I've put all four pairs through the ringer and am not let down. This pair, just like my others, the TPS 520 and and the predecessors of that boot are comfortable and enduring. I have had the Gore-Tex waterproofing component of one pair kind of falter after four years, but generally an annual mink-oiling helps fend that off. Like my rating states, I love Asolo.
I love these keep my feet nice and dry and I didn't have any trouble braking them in like other people did. Used them to climb 2 of the 46'ers in the Adirondacks this weekend and had no complaints
ah yes......Dave Page, Cobbler in Seattle, also an authorized Asolo repair specialist. in business since 1969 and one of the best in the country and right here is Seattle.
Check out Rock Mountain Resole - authorized repair specialists for Asolo products. Per their website, prices for hiking boot resoles range from $60-$75.
with any boot that now has several layers built into it. This boots has three alone. The cobbler is going to one. hate you if he tries to resole these successfully And second. Charge you a pretty penny. I once had the same question. I got a quote from the cobbler for these. 120$ to resole these. Might as well get a new pair!
Awesome boots! These are the first pair of Asolo boots I have owned and I am now a true believer... Right out of the box they fit great; no blisters or hot spots at all. Purchased them primarily for spring/fall sloppy hikes which with gore-tex, makes these boots perfect. Def. plan on having these boots for many more seasons and when the time comes to replace, I have a feeling it will be another pair of Asolo's.
These boots work better with traditional (strap-on) crampons. Step-in crampons work better with plastic boots. For winter hiking on ice & snow I use slip-on traction devices like Yak Trax or micro spikes.
I first bought the gv 500 thinking it's the same with a rubber toe cap..... nope not even close. way more leather in the upper make them really hard to break in and even then I didn't trust them. I now have the gv 200 and am loving life. I miss the toe cap because the leather gets beat up a bit, but whatever it's a way better boot. love the micro pully laces also and the tread is kinda cool too.
Update: I've put many miles on these and they have held up well, but comfort has never been real good. I will not buy another pair. I still get blisters in these after they are totally broken in wearing dual socks.
These boots obviously were engineered properly. I just bought a pair as it was time to get something beefier than my trail shoes for some trips that are coming up. I have only put 5 miles on them so far, but let me tell you what seems to be good about them. With a light-weight wool sock my feet did not over-heat and I am currently in Tulsa, OK and was walking in +100 degree temps. They work great if you have a slightly narrow foot. These being my first pair of technical boots all I can say to people that are looking is consider everything. When you get into top in boots they are all going to be quality products so don't limit yourself to a specific brand. Try on as many pairs as possible. In August I am planning on doing two 14ers in Colorado and then the following week I have roughly 50 miles of trail to cover in Glacier National Park (Montana). I will update my thoughts on the boot after these trips. Hope this helps.
So, after Colorado and Montana i am still very pleased with the boots. The boots were completely waterproof on all my climbs and were extremely durable in my week in Glacier National Park. The only complaint I have with the boots is when scrambling and/or climbing in boulder fields the leather does get chewed up around the toe area, at least with me. Support is great and would say for a pair of boots they are comfortable, we did 18 miles one day and my feet were ready to go come the next morning. Solid pair of boots, would say they are a good investment.
These boots are pretty bad boy, son. They are heavy, tough, full grain leather and have the wicked Powermatic lacing system. Actually that was the thing that impressed me most. You can get a tightly laced boot with ease, with those things. However, they just didn't fit right. I'm getting a lot of that with the boots that are manufactured in China. Somehow they just don't quite work. Even a few days around town showed me that I would get a wicked hot spot on my right heel if I was out on the trail. So, in the end I opted for a very similar pair of Zamberlan's (the 996 Vioz GT) and they fit me like a glove right out of the box. Italian's know how to make shoes and for the same price it was a no-brainer.
*Offtopic* Thank you so much for mention of Zamberlan's, with several of my old Italian makers moving production to China, finding a new Italian maker from your mention - Is very Helpful to me.
I'm not a mountain climber, although have spent time above 12,000 ft in my old Asolos. I've had my current pair for about a month. So far they have seen rain, hiking in 16'' of snow, been drenched in salt water (science experiment), skated around a frozen trail, traversed over a frozen cow pasture chasing my city dog who wanted more freedom, etc. These are my do everything boots. Comfortable right out of the box, yet sturdy enough to withstand my--by BMI index standards---obese frame of 240lbs. Love the color as well. Makes me happy that I have great pair of leather boots that aren't brown.
These are great boots. Heavy duty, great stability/support, comfortable, quick break in period. I had similiar Asolo's for ~10 years and decided to breakdown and buy another pair after the tread pattern was running low. Personal preference would have been brown, but black will do. I just have to put up with comments about me looking like the 'techno viking' now. if your not familiar, youtube it.
Boots are put together very well. I have taken them over some very rough and rugged terrain. The bottoms of my feet have never hurt by the end of the day even on the 6 and 7 day trips. Feet stay very dry and warm. My only complaint is that they seem to take quite a bit of time to break in. This is one of the only boots I've owned that I actually got a blister while wearing even after logging over 300 miles on them. My dad owned the same pair and ended up taking them back after deciding that he would never be able to break them in even after several trips over about 15 months. All in all a very well made boot that performs at a high level just not quite as comfortable as a few others I've owned.
I have a couple pairs of Asolo boots. I swear these guys broke into my room while I was asleep and took molds of my feet, all their size 11 boots are made on this model. For me, the the fit is perfect! I can't say enough about these boots. I've used them for long multi-day trips, short hikes, snowshoeing and scrambling. My feet always feel great when I get back to the rig at the end of the day. My feet have stayed dry and never get hot in these boots. I hope they're still making this model when these wear out!
I had my mate bring these bad boys to me from the states and don't regret spending the money at all. These boots have been very comfortable and rugged during the treks I have done in OZ. They take a little while to break in but once they are broken in they feel real good.
Some friends and I did half of the John Muir Trail last year . I loved the boots but still got blisters on my back heels . I wore the boots after the hike and now being bowed legged have wore a 3/16 wedge on the back heels of the boots . The boots are still in great condition , I would rather not pay $ 250.00 dollars for a new pair .
When I first bought these boots my mentality was, "If I'm spending this much money on a pair of boots they had better last FOREVER and go ANYWHERE!" more...