Sean Hermany

Have owned and used Prana Mojo shorts for a decade now. They're great. A staple of people that climb, do yoga, or just want comfortable gym shorts.

At some point in the Mojo timeline, they changed the material, and frankly - the newer version is not as stretchy, or as comfy.

The "Super Mojo" is not only as good as the original, it's better. I hate taking these things out of the rotation to wash them.

Bottom line: If you're skeptical that the "super" claim is marketing BS, you'd be wrong. Try them.

(Sizing help - I'm 5'11" and hover between 168 and 170 depending on how many IPAs I've been enjoying lately. Smalls fit pretty well and were what I purchased, but could have gone medium and been fine. It was a coin toss really.)

I've done a ton of trail running in Salomon, Altra, La Sportiva, and Hoka.
I have wide/high volume feet, especially up front. I was super skeptical Nike would make a trail shoe that fit me, let alone such a good one.

But sure enough, the Wildhorse 4 is a bad-ass trail shoe. It's rugged, fits like a glove, and has great traction. Ultimately, I think that running shoes come down to you trying them on, and knowing what works for your foot, so I'm not going to write an 8 paragraph technical break down that I'm unqualified to write. However, I CAN say that if you fit them, and you're looking for something that works for everything other than super gnarly scree fields and highly "technical" terrain, this is a great shoe to try.

I say the last bit, because, unlike some other shoes geared more for straight up "mountain running", they just aren't as stiff, especially in the soles. However, I think that even in the Wasatch, the majority of trails people spend time on just don't require something as rugged as a Sportiva Mutant, and so shying away from a shoe like this would be a mistake.

Picture was taken in the Southern French Alps.

My first running vest was the S-Lab ADV Skin 12-Set (go big or go home right?), which I wanted for the extra space, and room for a bladder in the back (think adventuring.)

Great pack, but over time I realized it's overkill for the majority of my running exploits. If you're not running in the high heat, 1L of water, an ultralight shell, some food, and maybe a headlamp just in case will take you far.

The Ultra 5L truly hits the sweet spot here, and it definitely feels smaller and lighter than its larger brethren.

The other boon with this years models is the improvements with respect to the soft flasks. The wide mouth top is a major upgrade if you want to use powders in your water. Additionally, they've added very small elastic keeper bands at the top of the water bottle pockets - which keep the nipples (is there a better word here?) of the soft flasks where you want them - at the top! On the previous years models, the soft flasks would sink down within the pockets as they get emptier - so this is a great improvement considering how small of a change it is.

Buy this vest!

I originally bought the Clifton 2 for running when I couldn't make it to the trails, to take the edge off of pounding the pavement. I ended up liking that shoe enough to use it for a good portion of my trail running as well.

Version 3 maintains what was good with the Clifton 2, with a little bit more room up front, and what feels to me like just a bit more bounce in the step - in a good way.

If I had a major complaint, it would be that the shoe is on the lamer side of their collection in the looks department - but then, I think the Huakas look good - so ymmv.

For reference, I hate Euro-fit tiny toebox running shoes, which is most of them - and I'm a mid to forefoot striker. I'd be an Altra fan, but just don't love a lot of their more most recent models. Give these a shot if you want to give the maximalist world a try and you're of a similar mindset.

Finally, while they're not marketed as trail shoes - they work just fine unless you're really getting on gnarly rocky terrain. I do most of my running in the Wasatch, and while I own other shoes for really rough stuff, I can get by on most trails with these. If anything, version 3 has layed down a bit of rubber on the sole where before was just their RMAT foam, so they should wear even better.

My previous cragging pack was a 60L cilogear, that had been working just fine until my roommate's Marmot Retriever chewed through it for her bounty of a used Gu packet. C'est la vie.

Since it was late April and I needed a cragging pack more than a big alpine pack, I bought the Freerider.

This is without a doubt the best cragging pack there is. Simple design, but everything you need. Beefy, without question, without being too heavy. You won't break this thing throwing it around or scraping it up. The closures work just right, and it's easy to throw a rope under the lid if you're almost full (i.e. you have your share of an Indian Creek rack in the thing) since there's a strap to secure the rope.

The way it stands up on its own, and doesn't implode, makes it super easy to pack, and the lid provides pockets for cell phone, wallet, sunblock, etc.

The only reason I can think of not to buy this as a cragging pack is if you NEVER have more with you than a sport rack, jacket, and lunch.

These are awesome. They are lightweight, strong, etc. Pretty much, they're exactly as advertised. Just hoping to help someone avoid my mistake...

30cm == 12", i.e. PROBABLY NOT WHAT YOU WANT.

If you're trying to order your standard, "shoulder length runner", you want the 60cm size. I just naturally figured the smallest size would be shoulder length, then it would go up from there. Well, 30cm means ~12 inches, which is measured end to end, after it's already sewn together.

99% of people ordering will probably not make this mistake, but in the off chance you find yourself unsure, 60cm means shoulder length, 120cm means a "double", and 240 means BIG.

Please note, I'm giving 5 stars, I used my previous set for about 3 years before retiring them (didn't purchase from backcountry), and they worked great. When I went to order new ones, I just assumed the smallest size would be shoulder length, but they're actually not. Not sure what you'd use that size for, since, in that size, we're talking sport climbing quickdraw, where I'd prefer beefy, thick nylon. But I'm not the authority. Anyway, my mistake, not BD's or Backcountry's, but, there ya go...60cm means shoulder.

Other than that, order away.