Lola Insulated Pant - Girls'
Size:
Quantity
Why We Like The 686 Lola Insulated Pant
Built to last, the 686 Lola Insulated Pant keeps our grom shredding in comfort through multiple seasons. The reinforced hem and scuff guards hold strong through years of abuse, while the Youth Evolution system provides an additional 1.5 inches of length to grow with them. From frigid winds to deep fluff, the waterproof construction and heat-trapping fill keep them cozy and dry.
Details
- Cozy insulated ski pants for your young shredders
- 2-layer construction provides waterproof performance
- Synthetic insulation traps heat even when wet
- Integrated gaiters stop the deep stuff from packing in
- Rugged hem and double-layer kick panels boost durability
- Belt loop eyelet offers an attachment point for lift tickets
- Regular fit allows ease of movement and layering
- Youth Evolution extends legs to grow with your grom
- Item #SESZ6H3
- Material
- [membrane/laminate] infiDry (2-layer), [face fabric] synthetic, DWR treatment, [hem] 500D binding
- Insulation
- 120g infiLoft (synthetic)
- Waterproof Rating
- 10,000mm
- Breathability Rating
- 10,000g/m²
- Seams
- critical seams sealed
- Fit
- regular, Youth Evolution (1.5in leg extension)
- Inseam
- [x-small] 18 - 20in, [small] 20 - 24in, [medium] 24 - 26in, [large] 26 - 28in, [x-large] 28 - 30in
- Pockets
- 2 hand, 2 cargo, 1 back
- Waist
- adjustable hook-and-loop tabs, belt loops, tricot lined
- Gaiters
- integrated
- Manufacturer Warranty
- 1 year
- Activity
- all-mountain skiing, all-mountain snowboarding
Reviews
Q&A
Overall Rating
5 based on 1 ratings
Review Summary
Fits True To Size
Screen reader users: the following list provides a visual scale to illustrate the product fit. Please refer to the heading above for the fit type in text.What do you think about this product?
View
Selecting an option will reload the available reviews on the pageFebruary 3, 2023
Near-Arctic Tested
- Size Bought:
- L
- Height:
- 4' 9"
- Weight:
- 800
Bought these pants for my daughter, not knowing the first time she would wear them would be in brutally cold conditions, skiing Whitefish in MT. Overnight low temps at the base were -23, and that's real, not real-feel. She layered a couple of thin layers of leggings underneath and never complained about her legs being cold (I asked because I thought she hadn't layered enough). I can't speak to their moisture resistance, because we never saw a snowflake melt on that trip.
Need Expert Advice?
Our Gearheads Can Help