Gear Review
Arc'teryx Bora 95 Backpack - 5250-6040cu in
Item #ARC0653
|
46 in Stock
Is it worth it?
By jenpiv111977145
Ranked #343 - Backpacks
December 23, 2010
more expensive, no ski carry, 2 pounds heavier than other packs in its category, hardly any internal organizational pockets, but when you are out on an expedition and run into others they will think you really mean business (or have a shit ton of money).
View Details: Arc'teryx Bora 95 Backpack - 5250-6040cu in
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- [body] Invista HT Ripstorm (420D nylon), Invista HT Superpack (630D nylon), DWR coating; [lining] Invista HT Ripstorm (210D nylon)
- Support/Suspension:
- thermo-formed framesheet, aluminum stays
- Waist-Belt:
- yes
- Access:
- top, side, bottom
- Pockets:
- 2 lid, 1 front, 2 side
- Sleeping Bag Compartment:
- yes
- Hydration Compatible:
- yes
- Reservoir Included:
- no
- Ice Axe Loops:
- 2
- Weight:
- [ regular ] 7 lb 8 oz
- Volume:
- [ short ] 5248 cu in; [ regular ] 5614 cu in; [ tall ] 6041 cu in
- Recommended Use:
- expeditions, extended backpacking trips
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- lifetime
Change me.
1 Comments Last Reply: March 21, 2011 By: the outdoors are fun and stuff
Compare it to say--the Denali Pro, which carries 115L in the large size. Per Arc'teryx website, this in a large carries 110L max. So they're in the same class. This is $435, Denali is $499. The Osprey Aragon is also around this price.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes