Gear Review
Under Armour O Series Boxer Short - Men's
Under Armour O Series Boxer Short 6"
By MC
Ranked #187 - Men's Underwear
July 24, 2010
- Bought these by accident and won't buy another pair since I prefer briefs over boxer shorts!
- It's nice and is true to fit unlike the boxer jock which I had to size UP one size!
- Because it's more of a shorts, it should NOT be worn under strenuous conditions that REQUIRE SUPPORT (i.e. running or martial arts); those types of activities are meant for briefs (i.e. boxer jocks).
- It's good for casual wearing but really do NOT see the need to wear boxer shorts!
- It's relatively EXPENSIVE for performance boxers when regular Cotton boxers are at least HALF the price!
- REMEMBER: boxer shorts do NOT offer support so why use them for sports?!
- Lastly, NO, despite what backcountry.com states, it is NOT a relaxed fit as even Under Armour states that it's Form Fitting but not as much as the compression type!!
View Details: Under Armour O Series Boxer Short - Men's
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Change me.
3 Comments Last Reply: May 8, 2012 By: Sid Nitzerglobin
Some of us like to let the package breathe a bit when we aren't planning on being XTREME!!!®
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
This criticism is like damning ice for being cold. Come on people.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Under Armor website actually does not say that they are form fitting they are supposed to be loose according to them.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes