Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Gear Review

Osprey Packs Variant 52 Backpack - 2990-3356cu in

Item #OSP0151 | 20 in Stock
4 Star Rating

First Trip Feedback

By Ranked #386 - Daypacks - Technical April 8, 2009

I used this pack to summit Mt. Shasta via the Casaval ridge. In general, I prefer this pack to my osprey atmos and gregory triconi packs and will continue using it. I'm glad I bought it.

The framesheet/aluminum suspension is flexible - mine got bent after cramming gear into my trunk. I bent it back into shape by hand. It is the only component that I feel is a bad compromise for weight reduction. The aluminum tube should have crossmembers or stiffners. There is a shovel/hydration pocket inside that is wide and tall. Loading the bag takes some care to prevent asymmetrical bending from the shovel head. This bag has 2 collars to close the top before the well-made lid goes on. I found that filling the pack much beyond the lower collar makes it feel unbalanced side to side. The side pockets are shorter than any other pack I have seen - the side compression straps are needed to hold nalgenes in place (could be improved). There are gear loops for skis on each side below the pockets that I used to secure snow shoes, also using the upper side compression straps. This worked great. The front ice axe/tool holders work well. You will still need something to carry your crampons in to protect the pack. The outer pocket forms a pouch between itself and the main bag, which is convenient for easy access. I loaded ~39 pounds of gear (no rope) in the pack and was very comfortable taking it to horsecamp.

I stripped the lid and framesheet to reduce weight for summit day. The framesheet is NOT easily removable, and I will never remove it in the future. I easily fit all my gear inside the pack. The pack carried well even without the framesheet. The cushioning of the shoulder straps and hipbelt is the best I have used. I liked the feel of the back cushioning better than the airspeed suspension for climbing and descending. It is also warmer. No hipbelt pockets. Didn't miss them.

After glissading down a several thousand feet, I noticed that the fabric on the bottom of the pack had started to fray in 6 small spots. There are 2 layers of fabric, but the outer layer will probably need a patch after the next trip. This fabric should be replaced with something more abrasion resistant.

I give this pack 4.5 stars because it carries weight much better than my other packs, even though I think the bottom fabric and suspension will wear out relatively quickly. I think this pack does an excellent job, and I hope it is improved.

Helpful Votes: 6 Yes

Close This Window

3 Comments Last Reply: February 16, 2011 By:

By: February 16, 2011

Philip, in winter try putting your water bladder inside your jacket to keep it from freezing.

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes

By: February 2, 2011

But Jacob - they should be designed for water bottles. How are you supposed to carry water bottles in winter?

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes

By: December 20, 2009

Great review, but fyi, the side pockets are not designed for water bottles, just for bamboo wands for marking trail on glacier or in snow. And the outer pocket/pouch is perfect for crampons and/or shovel blade, definitely abrasion resistant enough.

Helpful Votes: 1 Yes

Tech Specs:

Material:
420D nylon, 210D nylon 
Volume:
(small) 49 L, (medium) 52 L, (large) 55 L 
Support/Suspension:
HDPE frame sheet, aluminum stays 
Waist-Belt:
yes, removable 
Hydration Compatible:
yes 
Rain Cover:
no 
Access Types:
top 
Pockets:
1 front zip 
Ski Carry:
yes 
Snowboard Carry:
no 
Ice Axe Loops:
Weight:
(small) 1620 g, (medium) 1700 g, (large) 1790 g 
Recommended Use:
touring, backcountry skiing, mountaineering 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime 

Change me.