Runs smaller than MH Pacer (nonAdvance)

By reddirt Ranked #55 - Women's Shorts April 2, 2009

I had both the Pacer (5 in inseam) Pacer Advance (3 in inseam) in small. The Pacer Advance were significantly smaller than the Pacer, although both were labeled small.

The design is great but if you're in between sizes, consider ordering up. This Pacer advance is not very forgiving & is cut close.

For reference: I'm 5' 8", 135ish pounds, usually a 6 or 8 in MH bottoms, always a 6 in Patagonia bottoms, a 4 or 6 in Royal Robbins bottoms.

View Details: Mountain Hardwear Pacer Advance Running Short - Women's

Helpful Votes: 2 Yes | 0 No