Gear Review
Arc'teryx Acrux 40 Backpack - 2100-2500 cu in
Waterproofing for less weight than the Naos series.
By Tommy Hunke
February 23, 2009
I once was in love with the Naos series of packs, and after owning one, I decided that it was too heavy for me (had the 70L). I came across a deal on the Acrux 40 and decided to give it a try. I have found that it has all of the features that I wanted in the Naos packs has but with less weight. I use it backpacking for all of my treks where water/rain is an issue. I am able to fit all of my stuff into the 40L of space, but I am not a Jetboil kind of guy so I would recommend that you experiment with packing it before you buy if you are thinking of using as a long distance hiking pack like me which is not it's intended use. I attach my z-lite sleeping pad to the back using the rear bungee. The only thing that I miss from the Naos was the strap that brought the top of the pack closer to my shoulders which made a noticeable comfort difference. So, if you are like me and you want a solid backpacking setup that is neither too heavy nor too cheap (quality wise), I would recommend this pack.
View Details: Arc'teryx Acrux 40 Backpack - 2100-2500 cu in
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 0 No
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- 420D Seam sealed VaporTight fabric
- Volume:
- [S] 2100cu in, [R] 2320cu in, [L] 2500cu in
- Suspension:
- Pre-formed shoulder straps and removable Binary Hippods on waist-belt, Monoframe back panel with two aluminum stays
- Hydration Compatible:
- Yes
- Torso Adjustment:
- No
- Detachable Pack:
- No
- Sleeping Bag Compartment:
- No
- Rain Cover:
- The whole bag is waterproof
- Access Types:
- Top
- Gear Loops:
- No
- External Pockets:
- 1 Lid
- Snowboard Carry:
- No
- Ski Carry:
- No
- Ice Axe Loops:
- 2
- Recommended Use:
- Lightweight alpine climbing
- Weight:
- [S] 3lb 5oz, [R] 3lb 8oz, [L] 4lb
- Warranty:
- Lifetime
Change me.