Gear Review
Like these less than the older model.
By lag100281157
Ranked #604 - Men's Underwear
February 11, 2009
I got a couple pairs of these several years ago and loved em. I decided to get a few new pair about a month ago, so I got the 3" inseam boxerjock - thinking that was what I had bought before. Apparently, UA changed the design. What they call a 3" inseam is really about 1.25". With that short of an inseam, I find these underwear bunch up between my legs. The older pairs had just enough leg (about 3") to not ride up. These are acceptable, but I like them less than the older pairs I owned. I'll probably try the 5.75" shorts next time.
View Details: Under Armour O Series Boxer - Men's - 3in
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Change me.



1 Comments Last Reply: May 16, 2010 By: toe3091914
These are the best under ware I have ever owned. I went one size larger and that has worked well for me. The special mesh to support your package is very comfortable. Have held up very well. Highly recommend. Trent
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes