Like these less than the older model.

By lag100281157 Ranked #1296 - Men's Long Underwear February 11, 2009

I got a couple pairs of these several years ago and loved em. I decided to get a few new pair about a month ago, so I got the 3" inseam boxerjock - thinking that was what I had bought before. Apparently, UA changed the design. What they call a 3" inseam is really about 1.25". With that short of an inseam, I find these underwear bunch up between my legs. The older pairs had just enough leg (about 3") to not ride up. These are acceptable, but I like them less than the older pairs I owned. I'll probably try the 5.75" shorts next time.

View Details: Under Armour Short Boxer Jock - Men's

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 1 No