- Home
- K2 Phat Luv Ski - Women's
- Question and Answer
- K2 Phat Luv Ski - Women's
Gear Question
I am 5'8" 140 lbs and a pretty aggressive skier. I was...
By Mel
Ranked #1980 - Alpine Skiing
March 11, 2009
I am 5'8" 140 lbs and a pretty aggressive skier. I was wondering what size would be better for me, the 160's or the 167's. They will be used both in the backcountry of montana and at the resorts. Also, I plan on mounting diamar fritschi A/T bindings . . . any comments? In terms of the skis, I was suggested the shorter ones for ease of turning in the powder but I already ski 168's that are pretty stiff skis. Is the length really going to make much of a difference where the phat luvs are so soft?
View Details: K2 Phat Luv Ski - Women's
By ESTtoMST
Ranked #66 - Alpine Skiing
March 11, 2009
Given you height and weight, I would reccomend the 167s. Given that you ski 168s already, go for the 167s.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 0 No
Tech Specs:
- Lengths:
- 146cm, 153cm, 160cm, 167cm, 174cm
- Dimensions:
- 135 / 102 / 121cm
- Turn Radius:
- [160cm] 18m
- Construction:
- Torsion Box
- Core Material:
- BioFlex fir & spruce
- Base:
- Not specified
- Tail:
- Raised
- Binding System:
- No
- Binding Included:
- No
- Recommended Binding:
- No
- Recommended Use:
- Powder, all-mountain
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 Year
Change me.



