- Home
- Arc'teryx Acrux 65 Backpack - 3900-4270 cu in
- Question and Answer
Gear Question
Arc'teryx Acrux 65 Backpack - 3900-4270 cu in
What's the difference between the Arc'teryx Naos 70 and...
By monroe
Ranked #1210 - Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
February 26, 2009
What's the difference between the Arc'teryx Naos 70 and this one? Is the Naos much better for backpacking?
View Details: Arc'teryx Acrux 65 Backpack - 3900-4270 cu in
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
By zgs2932175
Ranked #1024 - Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
June 18, 2009
well that and this is an alpine climbing pack whereas the naos is specifically for backpacking and/or trekking. know that the hip pads on this are connected only by straps unlike the naos
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
By Angus Bohanon
Ranked #205 - Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
February 26, 2009
The regular size of the Naos is 70L to the Acrux's 65. So it's a bit bigger for when you need that extra space.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- 420D Seam sealed VaporTight fabric
- Volume:
- [S] 3900cu in, [R] 4090cu in, [L] 4270cu in
- Suspension:
- Pre-formed shoulder straps and removable Binary Hippods on waist-belt, Monoframe back panel with two aluminum stays
- Hydration Compatible:
- Yes
- Torso Adjustment:
- No
- Detachable Pack:
- No
- Sleeping Bag Compartment:
- No
- Rain Cover:
- No, entire pack is waterproof
- Access Types:
- Top
- Gear Loops:
- No
- External Pockets:
- 1 Lid
- Snowboard Carry:
- No
- Ski Carry:
- No
- Ice Axe Loops:
- 2
- Recommended Use:
- Extended alpine climbs
- Weight:
- [S] 3lb 11oz (1672g), [R] 4lb 3oz (1899g), [L] 4lb 6oz (1984g)
- Warranty:
- Lifetime
Change me.