- Home
- Arc'teryx Khamski Backpack - 2500-2870cu in
- Question and Answer
- Arc'teryx Khamski Backpack - 2500-2870cu in
Gear Question
Arc'teryx Khamski Backpack - 2500-2870cu in
Item #ARC0013
|
0 in Stock
I've got an ancient Dana Design Bomb pack (3200 cu. in.)...
By jalepeno4
Ranked #286 - Winter Packs
May 5, 2008
I've got an ancient Dana Design Bomb pack (3200 cu. in.) that I want to replace. It doesn't have a hydration sleeve, isn't water proof and doesn't have a shovel pocket.I've narrowed my choices down to the Arc'Teryx Khamski and Borea.What do you think?
View Details: Arc'teryx Khamski Backpack - 2500-2870cu in
By Jeff Gerhard
Ranked #6 - Winter Packs
October 19, 2008
Depending on your requirements & without comparing each individual feature, I'd choose the Khamski for the following reasons:1. It's lighter in weight,2. It has a hydration sleeve, 3. It's less expensive,4. It's available through bc.com & the Borea isn't @ this time.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 0 No
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- High-Tenacity 630D nylon
- Suspension:
- HDPE Frame sheet and a 6061 Aluminum Stay
- Back Panel:
- Stretch Woven Thermo Molded
- Hydration Compatible:
- Yes
- Torso Adjustment:
- No
- Torso Sizes:
- M/L
- Seam Sealed:
- No
- Sleeping Bag Compartment:
- No
- Rain Cover:
- No
- Access Types:
- Top
- Detachable Daypack:
- No
- Gear Loops:
- Yes
- External Pockets:
- Yes
- Snowboard Carry:
- Yes
- Ski Carry:
- Yes
- Volume:
- [reg] 2625cu in, [ext] 2930cu in
- Weight:
- 3lb 1oz
- Warranty:
- Lifetime
- Recommended Use:
- Backcountry skiing or mountaineering
Change me.