- Home
- Arc'teryx Miura 50 Backpack - 2746-3356cu in
- Question and Answer
Gear Question
Arc'teryx Miura 50 Backpack - 2746-3356cu in
Any comparisons and pros and cons of this pack vs. the Silo?
By Chris Stringer2
Ranked #1035 - Daypacks - Technical
October 10, 2009
Any comparisons and pros and cons of this pack vs. the Silo?
View Details: Arc'teryx Miura 50 Backpack - 2746-3356cu in
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
By Brandon Carlile
Ranked #6 - Daypacks - Technical
October 19, 2009
To compare the Arc'teryx Miura 50 and Silo 40. These two packs are designed for different purposes, but both work across a wide variety of uses. The Miura is built to carry a heavier load, with a slightly more padded hipbelt, and foam-lined bottom, and sides (to help protect the fabric and the gear inside)I like the Miura's loading options (top or panel). The Silo is lighter and carries skis and snowboards better because of the wrap system. The Silo is also a bit more streamlined in shape and has more organization options. If you're using it more as a climbing pack- Miura, for winter sports- Silo. Both are pretty sweet, though, and can be used year-round.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Tech Specs:
- Material:
- [body] Invista Ballistic Superpack (1260D nylon), nylon plain weave (210D), Invista HT Superpack (630D nylon), Hypalon, Hypalon
- Support/Suspension:
- aluminum stays, HDPE frame sheet
- Waist-Belt:
- yes
- Hydration Compatible:
- yes
- Reservoir Included:
- no
- Rain Cover:
- no
- Access:
- roll-top, front panel
- Pockets:
- 1 top, 1 front
- Snowboard Carry:
- no
- Ski Carry:
- no
- Climbing Gear Loops:
- 2
- Ice Axe Loops:
- 0
- Shovel Pocket:
- no
- Weight:
- [short] 4 lb 7 oz; [regular] 4 lb 14 oz; [tall] 5 lb 1 oz
- Volume:
- [short] 2746 cu in; [regular] 3051 cu in; [tall] 3356 cu in
- Recommended Use:
- rock climbing
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- lifetime
Change me.