Hey Gear Freaks,

My Keen Targhee II's wore out after only a few short backpack trips. Any idea whether the Klamaths are better made?

The Klamanth is certainly a much beefier boot, better underfoot support and has some nylon shank. Can't speak about durability, but the ORegon PCT boots, which are similar to the Klamanth, are much more durable than the targhees.

I haven't tried the Targhees, but I have put alot of hard miles on my Klamaths. Honestly, the sole doesn't look worn in the slightest. I'm actually very impressed with the durability of the sole and upper! My boots are mid to late 2010 boots.

they're made in a better shoe. sometimes the longevity of keen products are unimpressive. they're comfy and wide, but the construction and materials used, more specifically their soles, get worn out real quick. i'm surprised it's such a popular brand, and should only be used for an occasional hiker. if you want hardcore boots go la sportiva, vasque, or any shoe with vibram or skywalk soles.

I concur, the targhee is best described as a light hiker...its weak point being not enough support and not enough rubber sole. I'm very satisfied with the "Mid" cut design. I'm wondering if the Klamath is more durable.