- Home
- Under Armour Boxer Jock - Men's
- Question and Answer
Gear Question
Under Armour Boxer Jock - Men's
How do these compare to the Under Armour or Nike compression...
By tato
Ranked #687 - Men's Underwear
April 24, 2009
How do these compare to the Under Armour or Nike compression shorts? They are cheaper (by $5), are they a similar fit and product?
View Details: Under Armour Boxer Jock - Men's
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
By sambammatt1383703
Ranked #307 - Men's Underwear
April 25, 2009
There are many differences between the Under Armour Boxer Jock and the Under Armour compression short. 1. Material: The boxer jock's material is thinner and stretchier than the compression short. 2. Fit: The boxer jock is meant to be fit tight against the skin, but the compression short is much tighter in the thighs (because that is what compression shorts do). 3. Functional Fly: The boxer jock has one, the compression short does not. 4. Length: A normal length pair of the compression shorts are 2-3 inches longer in the leg than the normal length boxer jock. As for the Nike compression short, I have no clue.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Change me.