About 10".

Probably not. It would put your center of gravity too high and be pretty tough to strap down to a sit-on-top deck. The Paddler chair (http://www.travelchair.com/the-chairs/1679V/) would be a much better option.

Yes. It is BPA-free. BPA was typically found in the hard plastic bottles ("Lexan") and as a liner in aluminum bottles. Pretty much all soft plastics, i.e. hydration bladders, bicycle bottles, etc. are BPA free, but you can get that plasticy taste/smell.

Yes. They are fully Gore-tex lined including a cover over a floating tongue.

Dynafit has no specific recommended weight limit. For a light shoe, they run pretty damn solid. As always, "you mileage may vary..."

You may be in between sizes. It is definitely an "athletic" cut. I am 5'6" & 150lbs. and it fits me in a small with a lightweight layer under it.

Jeff, If you are still interested in this jacket, the black color will be coming to the US this fall (2012).

Best guess is that it is a drain if you put snowy/wet items inside.

The last is in the mid to narrow range. They also have a multi-layer footbed which allows you to adjust the volume. Typically they are true to your running shoe size (at least for me). I would lean toward the 11.5 as a starting place.

Yes. The last is the same for the Ravens and the Mtn Trainers. With a thinner sock, the 10.5 may be perfect. As a point of reference, I find that the Salewas match pretty closely my typical running shoe size.
Hope this helps!

Fitwise, either the Alp Trainer or the Firetail should work well for you. They run on the med to narrow side, plus you can adjust the volume with the included multi-layer footbed. The Alp Trainer is a bit beefier in general and has a deeper lugged outsole. The Firetail is a bit more designed as an "Approach" shoe (stickier rubber, no deep lugs). The call may depend on the terrain you are in and whether you like a lighter or a stronger shoe. Enjoy!

The temple pieces twist to open the frame. Pop the lens out, make the switch and twist the temple piece back to normal position. Much easier than other interchangeables I have used.

Blisters typically come from movement/rubbing within the shoe. Do you have any movement in the heels? If the blisters are on the outside (not underneath) are you getting movement on the uphills? I'm guessing you purchased these in the sam size as the Raven's. Do you think a 1/2 size smaller might work? In the end, the last on the Alp Trainer just might not fit your foot. The Mtn Trainer is a similar last and would not likely make a difference, all other things being equal. Salewa does offer a "Blister-Free Guarantee". Combined with Backcountry's excellent return policy, you should be all set if you need to make a return.

It's definitely personal choice, but the weight and cushioning of these leans toward shorter events/runs.

How well they hold depends on both your skiing style and what you ski in-bounds. Watch Hoji, he may be super-powerful, but he's always smooth. If you are slammin' VW-size hard bumps all day, tech bindings may not be the call. They will hold for some cranking skiing, but they don't have the elasticity of an alpine (or alpine-style) binding.

The Lange Banshee has a 98mm wide last. Officially the Titan is 102mm, but everyone agrees it feels much tighter. Obviously, last width isn't the only measurement that defines "fit". My guess is that these would feel pretty similar. Differences could be worked out by a good bootfitter. Plus, Backcountry has an awesome return policy.
Enjoy!

The current (2011-2012) Radical series has an internal pin which prevents ghost rotating except in extreme circumstances where the internal pin will shear before the binding housing breaks. For Fall 2012 this is being replaced with an external device to prevent ghost rotating (see image). No maintenance is required.
Hayden is right (partly) about re-mounting. You can use 6 of the 8 holes from an older (Vertical Series) mount. The only new holes are the front 2. These are spaced farther forward on the ski.

Yes. Here's the link: http://www.backcountry.com/smartwool-midweight-bottom-mens

Correct. Backcountry has it misprinted.

Go with the 6'. If you are too big for a bag, you will over-compress the insulation and lower the temp rating.

Yes & No. The recommended width/length would be a 130mm short. G3 makes this, but it looks like Backcountry is out. The G3 Alpinist skin (http://www.backcountry.com/g3-alpinist-climbing-skin) is the exact same skin (graphic change only) and they have some in that size.
Enjoy!

The answer will vary for different brands and sometimes models within a brand. The Zzeros have the same shell size in a 29.0 and a 29.5. The liner thickness will vary.

It is compatible with full Alpine DIN bindings (replaceable toe and heel units are in the box). It is also compatible with any AT binding, tech system (Dynafit, G3, Plum) or frame system (Duke, Baron Marker Tour, Fritschi).

The 92s should work. That's only 1mm per edge. 4-5mm extra is usually a safe max.

Best solution may be to order the 11.5s before sending the 12s back and do a direct comparison. You can always send the pair that doesn't work back (assuming you take care not to scuff them). Backcountry.com has a great return policy. Make sure to use the same sock combo you are likely to use in the field. You may also be able to tweak the fit of that left side heel with some lacing tricks. Enjoy!

Since you are car camping and want to use it for a number of situations, I would go big and get the 16'. More coverage, more fun!

These boots run narrow. Officially it is a 98mm last, but many feel it is tighter. Conversely, the BD last is known to be the widest BC boot. The length for you (27.0-27.5) may be the same, but if you have a wider foot, you may need to work with a good bootfitter. It will be well worth it!

It's likely that you received one of next year's skis. A few have been shipped early to fill inventory. The only difference is no binding inserts. Enjoy!

Officially it's 98mm. Definitely a snug, low-volume fit.

About 98-100mm underfoot would be the max. That would require @4mm of extra spread per edge. Any more than that and you can tweak the brake. Wider brakes are available (up to 130mm): http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon

Graphics only. If you like 'em, go with it!

Joshua, Glad your stoke is high. Keep it going! Of course I am going to say that the Rad FTs will work great on the Rocker 2s. Those are big boards, but the Radical FT has more beef (wider toepiece support, power towers, stiffer wings) compared to other Dynafits. BC-yes. If you are going to slam these boards hard in-bounds, consider a full alpine rig.
Enjoy!

Sit on top kayaks typically have these holes to allow water to drain out of the cockpit.

The Zzeus shell runs a bit narrower (2mm) than the Zzero. The last shape is essentially the same. With a good boot-fitter / liner-cooker you should love these just as much as your Zzeros.

Rep opinion... Check out the Salewa Alp Trainer. 2011 Backpacker Ed.s Choice winner - http://www.backcountry.com/salewa-alp-trainer-mid-gtx-hiking-boot-mens

They run pretty true to size. I am typically a 9 in running shoes and a 9 in Salewa. If anything, go up 1/2 size.

With a 100mm waist, I would use the 100mm brake. If it rubs you can always bend the arms 2-4mm.

No. The base plate doesn't match up with the brakes.

Slightly biased answer from the Dynafit rep... Yes. These bindings will hold up to the skiing you anticipate. I have seen guys your size absolutely slay it on Dynafits. And yes, one issue with any tech binding is extreme ski flex. The tolerances in tech bindings are smaller than frame bindings. Therefore, when the ski is flexed past a certain point, they may be more likely to release. Hope this helps.

Josh, The Speed Superlite only tours in the raised-heel mode. The idea was to have a race-weight and lower cost binding with DIN release.

Depends how old. Most likely it will not work.

125mmx167-174cm. If they are out, take a look at the G3 Alpinist in a 130mm Medium.

If you want full coverage (better grip), you should go wider. The Rocker 2 is 144mm in the tip (I think). You should look for a 140mm skin. Check out the G3 Alpinists.

No metal edge. For the Canadian shipping question you will need to talk to customer service.

I haven't seen the kind of leakage you are experiencing. PacOutdoor will definitely take care of you. Give them a call at 406-586-5258.

James, Atomic nordic rep here. They are the "Hard" flex. 184s are suitable for 110-135 lbs. and 198s will work for 145-165 lbs. These ranges are based both on the current tech manual and our experience this season.

John, Arthur is right on target about clearing the toe piece and rotating your boot in the pins. Other things to check: proper DIN setting, proper forward pressure (the Dynafit "spacer" should fit btw boot and heel piece, but should be a bit stiff to pull out). Only a few mm either way can mess with your release. I'm not sure about the brake coming off. Possibly check all screws for tightness, etc.

It should fit. Delta's official dimensions are 22" x 14" x 9". So it's .6" big on one side, but will likely work if not over-stuffed. Of course that is for the full size compartments on larger planes. Commuter planes usually have smaller compartments and you may need to "gate check" it.

Yes. Same hole pattern.

It is possible to adjust both vertical and twist DIN on these bindings. On the rear of the heel piece are 2 adjustment screws. One is the large screw on the "outside" and one is a small screw recessed above the large one. The windows which show your settings are on the side of the heelpiece (clearly seen in one of the closeups above). There is a DIN calculator at http://www.dinsetting.com/. Whenever possible it is STRONGLY recommended to have any adjustments done by a qualified Dynafit shop technician.

Do you know what your typical US running shoe size is? I may be able to help narrow it down with that info.

In a word: Carbon. The Green Machine has a full carbon back-cuff and carbon insert in the tongue. This makes the Green Machine a bunch stiffer for the same weight (actually 10 grams lighter/boot). Everything else is the same.

The size is right. May be a bit narrow for turning, depending on snow depth. There is enough sidecut to have some low-angle fun in the right conditions. Another good option may be the Atomic Rainier (http://www.backcountry.com/atomic-rainier-posigrip-ski). More sidecut will make it a better turner.

Long is the right length. Width depends on the widest point on your Armadas. Get them within 10mm of the widest spot and trim to fit with the enclosed tool.

Martin, No problem removing the brake. It may look funny since the heel of the boot is "floating" on the pins when in DH mode, but this is normal for tech bindings. As far as the carbon plate goes, that's a bit of a personal judgement call. It makes a bigger difference on a fatter ski, but it's not a huge deal. The other factor is whether you want/need to go to a 12 DIN.

Yes, it is definitely punchable. Pebax shell material is more difficult to work with for the shop (compared to PU) , but most "better" shops can handle it. Stretching is more common than grinding.

No. The TLT5 series of boots (Mountain & Performance) have toe and heel overhangs that are too short for a frame binding.

Hi, I understand your confusion. The red line is part of the Tibetan graphic, not the boot centerline (though it looks like it should be). The binding position has been determined to be the best overall spot for the ski for most people. You can remount outside of the inserts as long as you stay within the very slightly raised area which has a titanal insert for binding retention. If you move your bindings forward, it typically makes the ski initiate quicker, but some may feel that it is "hookier" and it may not float as well. Hope this helps.

Total range=25mm. If your heelpiece is adjusted to the center of the plate, you have 12.5 mm fore or aft to go.

It may depend on how long you are going to stay a beginner/intermediate. If you are young(ish), strong(ish), do well at other sports and are planning on "gettin' after it", then you may want to look at the 166. Otherwise, the 157 will work great.

If you want a skin with greater adjustability, the Expedition (http://www.backcountry.com/g3-expedition-climbing-skin) is completely adjustable at the tip in addition to the 10cm at the tail. Width is another issue.

Retention on a tech-system binding is a function of the heel in combination with the toe. It's not really designed to be able to tele-turn. 2 other thoughts. It's good practice whenever you step in to rotate the boot 3-4 times. This will make sure the toe pins cut out any snow/ice in the metal boot inserts. Also, there are a couple of "clicks" when you pull the toe lever up in walk mode. More clicks = more retention, though still not truly enough for tele.

John, The Radical will work great with your Havocs. No issues running them on skinny skis (to a point). If you are concerned with the brake overhang or catching in a deep carve, you can replace it with a narrower one - 92mm or 100mm (http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon). Don't worry about the "Vertical" in the name. They are compatible with the Radical series.

Even at your size, pretty much all rando racers are rocking 160-165cm skinny skis. The theory is that you can make up considerably more time on the uphill (with a light stick) than you will lose on the downhill even if the ski is a bit sketchy. If you are sticking to the rec series races, another ski to consider would be the Dynafit Broad Peak. It goes up to 176cm and is 74mm underfoot with a snappy feel. Great corn/couloir ski. Much more versatile, but still pretty light.

Despite being pretty stiff, the downside could be a loss of torsional stability (and hold) when only one side of the crampon is engaged on a side hill or traverse.

The typical difference between men's and women's US sizes is one size. In your case, you may be right that a 1/2 size down will be perfect.

The tabs can give you something to grab on to help set the pole in its sleeve. They also act as tie-down points for extra lines & stability.

Are you talking about a Silvretta 500 / Pure / 404 AT binding? If so, it should work without a problem.

The most universal, self-adjusting skin tip is the G3 Alpinist. It fits most everything out there.

The weight note is wrong. It's 690 gr. per ski. Typically manufacturers will use a smaller (but not the smallest size for measurement. The 206 would likely be about 20 grams more.

Yes. No problem.

75mm or lightweight tele rig will work. Also a systems BC binding (NNN-BC or SNS-BC).

The widest AT boots are typically BDs. The last on these is stated as 103mm, but can feel narrower. Dynafits typically run medium to narrow.

This boot is a unisex boot. If you are a 22.5 in a woman's boot, you will be a 22.5 here. Typically "women's" boots may have a narrower liner and/or a wider cuff. I can't say for sure if it will fit your foot, but it's worth trying. This is a great lightweight but powerful AT boot.

Jim, 1" may be too far to move without remounting. The current TLT heelpieces have an adjustment range of 25mm, usually 12.5mm forward or back if mounted in the center of the range. Forward pressure is crucial to binding performance as tech system bindings do not have any elasticity. The correct forward pressure is measured by using a spacer slipped between the heel of the boot and the heel piece of the binding. Current TLT Verticals and Radicals use a 5.5mm spacer, current Low Tech Race & Low Tech Radical use a 4mm spacer. Older Dynafits also used a 4mm spacer.
Sorry for the long answer - Hope this helps!

JJ, 3 potential issues to consider (you may have already covered these). First, double check your DIN setting. Second, always rotate your boot in the toepiece 3-4 times before locking your heel. This will help to remove any snow/ice/debris that is lodged in the insert. Third, check brand and condition of your boot toe inserts. Only Scarpa and Dynafit boots have the licensed inserts and I have heard of other brands having difficulties. The Radical is a bit beefier in the toe, especially with regards to side impact forces. Markers have greater elasticity (allows the boot to move off-center without releasing), but a big trade-off in weight and torsional stiffness.
Hope this helps.

One more item to double check: Correct forward pressure is crucial to release values. The Dynafit 5.5mm spacer should fit between the boot heel and the heelpiece with a bit of tension.

BD's tech-system boots should work fine with Dynafit. The only "official" Dynafit toe-bars are found in Dynafit and Scarpa boots. These can work a little better, but any tech-compatible boots should work. Always be sure get all snow/ice out of your toe inserts by stepping into the binding and then rotating 3-4 times.

If you are a fairly aggressive skier, I would go with either the Radical FT or the Vertical FT, but leaning toward the Radical. Both have DINs that go up to 12. The Radical is the new version with a beefier toe-piece, wider & stiffer plate underfoot and easier elevators.

John - Full disclosure: Dynafit Rep here. For power to weight ratio, you can't compete with the Dynafit vs. a frame binding. Plus, as a former instructor, you'll notice the greater torsional rigidity in ski mode. Skip the gateway drug and go right to mainlining Dynafit!

Short turns vs. long turns? Bumps/trees vs. screaming open fields/groomers? 168-169cm would probably be a good length if you lean towards the more open turn/terrain. Go shorter if you want something quick-quick-quick.

Henry, The Radical FT has the same max DIN of 12 as this Vertical. But, it is beefier overall and has a wider platform under the toe piece. This will give you more power for wide sticks. The issue for big drops is that tech system bindings do not have any elasticity. They have the best torsional rigidity, but no give. Drive them as hard as you want, but be aware of extreme ski flex.

The Raven is a great boot for your spring/summer goals. It will be plenty warm enough, especially if paired with a gaiter. Be careful of extra-thick socks. They may compromise the fit and end up making her feet colder or promote hot spots. Only drawback to summer glacier travel would be truly wet sloppy conditions. Nothing beats a plastic boot for that.

Jody, As there are no standards for flex index, Dynafit's boot designers prefer not to use them. I have skied these boots and if you have to have a number, I would give them about a 110. Solid, but not race-boot stiffness. The carbon stringers give a ton lateral stiffness.

Yes. The Titan series of boots comes with alpine DIN sole pieces in the box. They should work with all alpine bindings.

Technically, yes. It will fit into an SNS Profil binding. If you are using this boot for classic skiing and not skating, it won't work correctly as it does not flex under the ball of the foot. If you have an older skate ski with a Profil binding, this will work.

Correct. 1/2 pair of size 27.5

Suggested Retail is $49.99

A Titanium alloy used in skis to dampen the ride and give some extra power. It's usually what people are referring to when they say, "this ski has (a sheet of) metal in it".

There is a small difference in flex, with the wmns being a bit softer. The men's core has beech and bamboo stringers which are not in the women's. The women's is also about 20grams lighter in each of the matching lengths.

If you truly want good glide, get either a mohair/nylon mix or a pure mohair. Both G3 and BD make the mix. BD makes a pure mohair. Or you could go with one of the European companies that specialize in mohair, e.g. Pomoca or Coll-Tex.

Chris, Salewa rep here. These shoes are not waterproof, but the same model is available in a Gore-Tex version that is waterproof (http://www.backcountry.com/salewa-alp-trainer-gtx-hiking-boot-mens).

2 main differences to consider. Brake (ST) or no brake (Speed). For in bounds you may prefer a brake. The ST offers a bit more beef for a wider ski: supporting plates under both the toe and heel pieces. Either binder will work great, your call. (IMHO: With a 50/50 split, I'd go with the ST. It's still a darn light rig.)

Dynafits (and all tech-system bindings) lock you in hard. The extremely torsionally rigid connection to the ski can't be beat by any other AT system. The drawback is that they have no elasticity. An alpine binding will allow your boot to move and then return to center if the force isn't great enough to release. With the tech system, you are either in or out. Ski hard-yes, huck cliffs-land smoothly!

Definitely the 191. Weight is the crucial factor and the 191cm is recommended for anyone over approx. 175 lbs.

Jim, With the Sport Classic you can disengage by lifting the toe-piece. From a fallen position, this is much easier than trying to use a pole tip. The trick is to be lifting the toe-piece and raising your boot toe at the same time. Hope this helps.

You can use a pole tip in the center of the toe-piece. The added leverage should help to free up the mechanism. Hint: (though you may already be doing this) Keep your heel down and lift only your toes. This can be harder when raising the release lever (toe-piece) with your hands.

Hope this helps.

Duke now. Salomon in fall.

Hi. Dynafit rep here. It's not likely as Dynafit North America is out of stock on these sizes as well. The TLT5 Performance will return to dominate again next year.

103mm.

These are a great cross between a full-blown storm Gore pant and an ultralight "race" pant. The fit is not baggy, but not euro-race tight either. The front is Gore Windstooper and the back breathes super well. I have used them in the Wasatch all season (not such a good one) and am fully happy with 'em. The dollar value ? is up to you, but for touring, I like them better than a $450 Gore Pro Shell pant.

Yes. They are cross-compatible between the Radicals and Verticals.

Yes, but you may want to consider a sock with a higher percentage of synthetic. This will move the moisture away from your foot better, especially if you have sweaty feet. Try the Teko Synrgi series. http://www.backcountry.com/teko-midweight-hiking-sock-mens.html

Medium length (171cm-181cm), 100mm wide.

With only the 80mm left, I would try the G3 Alpinist skin. Get a 130mm Med. length (171-181cm). http://www.backcountry.com/g3-alpinist-climbing-skin.html

Jonathan,
Heel riser issue was fixed. The pins on which the risers rotate now have heads on them.
No weight savings between winter 10/11 and winter 11/12 (no penalty either).
Brake was fixed in winter 2010. Brake does not have a sliding AFD.
G3 Onyx has 33mm of adjustment. But the Dynafit Radical actually has 25mm of adjustment (12.5mm each direction).

One other factor to consider. The Jam has an early rise tip. That will shorten your effective edge, making the longer length easier to handle.

Must be a misprint. G3 warranties are typically 1 year (like most ski co.s).

Atomic does make a women's version, the Ashera 30, but Liz is correct, there is no difference in the sizing.

Tech system bindings (G3, Dynafit, etc.) all have great DH performance as you are truly locked into the ski. The one drawback for hardpack and bumps is that they have zero elasticity (the ability of the boot to move off center in the binding and then come back without releasing). That said, I would rather have the better skiing and lighter weight of these bindings than any other backcountry system. They ski better and tour better.

The Atomic RT86 followed the Kailas, but that is also now out of production. The Atomic Aspect is the ski currently carrying on this tradition of a quick turning Tele/AT ski.

Yes, but you need to do a simple modification to your SNS Profil binding. If you have the SNS Profil Auto (step-in), you need to modify the flexor (bumper). With an exacto knife or razor blade, cut off the first section of the bumper closest to your boot toe. If you have the SNS Profil Plus or Profil Classic, you need to cut off the first 2 sections.

Changing to the Pilot binding will give you more control over the ski, with its 2 attachment points. Changing is easy, as all the holes in the Pilot binding match the Profil, plus you need to drill one more.

Hope this helps.

This binding will work great for your needs. If anything, it may be on the "heavy" side for touring with the skis mentioned. You may find that skis with scales are not much fun at the resort.

Nordic boots in general do not breathe very well. Even so, given the temps they are used in, it is rarely an issue.

If you want light weight and a solid torsional lock to the ski, go with Dynafit. Check out either the Radical ST of FT(higher DIN & burlier).

G3 dropped the price a bunch on these skins this year, but they also dropped the bag and skin saver.

You may also want to consider the Radical FT. If you are super aggro and/or are pushing a DIN setting of 9.5-10, then the added beef (and higher DIN) of the FT would make sense.

Yes. It got an early rise tip and reduced camber underfoot. Slightly narrower shovel. New ultralight cap construction. Overall weight dropped 300 gr. (11 oz.)!!

Right underneath the "Select Options" button (upper right of this page) is a link to the Smartwool Slipper size chart. Hope this helps!

Yes. As the kid progresses and maybe gets into racing, you will want to get them a dedicated skate boot/binding set-up.

Yes. This will work fine with a normal downhill ski with tele bindings. It has plenty of beef to drive even the wider skis out there. But, this will not fit into into alpine bindings.

If your Superfeets are also 10 years old, they are probably dead. I would try the boots without new insoles first. They have good arch support built in. If you feel you still need Superfeets, grab a new pair.

Either 130 or 140mm will work great.

Yes, but don't put them in the dryer!

You Betcha!

130mm would also work with less to trim and only missing 4-5mm for part of the tip. Can't say about the length without knowing which length you bought.

Your best bet is to head to a retailer who has a Salomon jig. If that's not possible contact Salomon directly (support.us@salomon.com).

The Toko Green Base Binder can be rubbed on and corked in without heating. For the longest life, it is best to rub on and then iron it in. Here is the Toko Tech Manual (http://www.tokous.com/Manuals/Nordic%20Tech%20Manual.pdf) and a video specific to the base binder (http://www.tokous.com/Grip%20Waxing%20Videos.htm#Base%20Green%20Binder%20Application).

For me, yes. I am typically a US 9.0 from most brands and fit the Salewa 9.0 perfectly.

Long 140mm will be perfect. The ski tapers quickly so that the open 4mm on each side at the tip won't make a big difference in skinning. Enjoy!

I have one and it works great for my Bernese Mtn Dog - i.e. a lot of fur! The top breathes reasonably well. The panniers not so much. My best advice is to closelt monitor you dog. If your dog seems hot, take it off and give him a break or slow way down.

It's all about weight. The weight chart on this page is not correct for this specific ski. Here is the weight chart from the Rossi website: 166 (90-120 lbs) 176 (120-150 lbs) 186 (150-180 lbs) 196 (180 lbs +).

It may depend on your use. Hucking 40-footers may stress the binding a bit... The new Radical FT has more beef. There is a support plate under the toe piece and a larger, stiffer carbon connecting plate between the toe and heel. They should be back on the Backcountry.com site in a few days.

The biggest Dynafit gets is 30.0. The largest volume/width series is the Zzero/Green Machine. BD has a reputation for wider fits. They stop at 30.5.

Eric, Your best bet is the G3 Alpinist Split Board Skin size medium (158-174cm). They are shaped to fit boards, not skis and have a better tail connection for boards. Backcountry.com was carrying them. Maybe they are temporarily out. In lieu of the split-board skins, get these in a short 130mm width and get the twin-tip tail attachment.

130mm short for best coverage. Twin-tip connectors really help keep the skin tail on the ski. They're worth every penny. The skins come with a cutting tool. Well-designed and easy to use. There is a good cutting video on G3s website (http://www.genuineguidegear.com/life/video/trimming-g3-alpinist-skins).

Wall-to-wall: Better grip, but heavier.
Straight: Lighter, easier to fold, but less grip.

No. This is a telemark binding. Any AT binding will work. If you want to go light, a tech-system (i.e. Dynafit system) binding is the best. Your ski choice will depend on many factors: In-bound vs. backcountry, aggressiveness/ability, lightweight vs. DH performance. Most skis will work, but keep in mind that the Megalite is a lightweight boot that may not drive bigger/stiffer skis well.

Yes. Get the 125mms and trim them to fit.

No. It will not work with this binding. The Rossi X-8 Skate (not classic) boot will work in any NNN skate binding, including the NIS. If your skis don't have a plate, you will need a non-plate NNN binding for these boots (e.g.: http://www.backcountry.com/fischer-racing-r3-skate-binding). Current NNN bindings are branded either Rossignol, Fischer, Madshus or Rottefella.

Not really. The material is waterproof, but the seams are not taped and it does not have a waterproof top-closure.

Yep. I believe the Koi has a 134mm tip. The 120mm should work great.

Yes. Lifetime warranty against material defects.

There are 4 viable options. A tent can be easily attached to the side using the compression straps. However, you will lose the use of that side pocket. Outside or underneath the sleeping bag compartment using the vertical compressions straps will work. You can also attach it under the top lid.

It will work for both the Vertical and Radical series.

They are made in a walnut (dark brown) color, but are sold out until the spring season (approx. mid-winter). You can see a photo just below in the "Dream Boots" review.

115mm Longs will get you up the hill.

The 180cm should be the right size for her.

I would recommend sizing down. Especially with a metal-edge touring ski, it can be hard to get enough grip from the waxless pattern. You give up a little downhill performance and/or glide for secure uphill grip. Herringboning, when you shouldn't have to, sucks!

Need to know length / width?

You'll want the 65mm, then trim to fit.

Skate skis are sized primarily on weight. There is a weight chart on this page. At 5'10" he/she is likely to be on the 192cm. The weight chart recommendation is where you should go, unless he/she is exceptionally light for his/her height and/or not very athletic. If so, you might lean towards the 187cm.

No. I've been skiing with polarized for a few years. Easier on the eyes!

XS(153-163cm) in a 115mm will be the ticket.

It sound like the flex would be similar to your Nordicas. The Gaia's traditional alpine-style overlap construction will feel great at the resort, plus it gives you the flexibility for your Baron's or you can use tech system bindings if you want to go lighter.

Yes. Backcountry is temporarily out of stock.

Yes. With a 124mm tip on your Mt. Baker's, get the 120mm size.

That's about the most I recommend. Your only going about 2.5-4mm wider. Any more and it's possible to damage the brake.

I'd recommend the 140mm and trim them to fit (cutting tool is included). Much better grip. Go straight only if your focus is light weight.

XS=153-163cm
S=162-172cm
M=171-181cm
L=180-190cm
XL=189-199cm

The top skate ski brands are Atomic, Fischer, Rossignol, Madshus and Salomon. Each brand offers a "World Cup" level model that is the same as their top racers use. Typically these skis cost $550-650. Backcountry.com does not carry any of these models. You can get a ski that is very close to World Cup performance at the second price point, usually $300-450. Think of it as Dura-Ace vs. Ultegra in road bike terms.

The X5 should fit the NNN-BC binding. Try rocking your foot forward as you push the bar into the slot.

This boot or any of the other lightweight tele boots sound like they will match your plans. Try also the Scarpa T4, Crispi Antarctic, Fischer BCX875 or Rossi BCX11.

These are great tights. I live in SLC and wear them for both fall/spring training runs and winter XC skiing/racing.

If you are looking for light day touring you can use either BC system binding (SNS-BC or NNN-BC). Either system is fine, getting the boot that fits best is most important. If you want to go deeper in the woods with a heavy pack and/or want more downhill turning performance, a 3-Pin lightweight telemark binding will be best.

Backcountry's sizes (listed above) are the European sizing. Drop one size for U.S. (i.e. XXL=US XL). That said, as of last week there is only one pair of US smalls left in the Dynafit warehouse. Backcountry may be able to order those for you if they are still there.

No need for a shim.

I think the S3 has a 128mm tip. For full coverage you should get the 115mm short.

Definitely a good idea. The skis will run smoother and faster. Just don't put any hotwax into the Positrack pattern.

The women's model in this series is the Gaia (http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-gaia-tf-x-ski-boot-womens). It's lasted to fit a woman's foot and calf shape. If you want to go lighter with similar power, there is the Zzero4-U (http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-zzero4-u-tf-ski-boot-womens). You do lose the ability to switch soles between AT and alpine bindings.

Mediums cover 171-181cm. I'd stick with that. 130mm is the right call for a 135 tip.

Both shell and liner are a bit thinner than typical to keep the weight down. If you re-cook, make sure you have room over the instep where your blood vessels run. This can make a big difference in the warm blood getting to your toes. Check for excess pressure by locking into the boot with a thin sock for a few minutes. Then step out of the boot, pull off the sock and note the red/pink areas. Attach pads to these areas directly on your skin, then re-sock and re-cook. Possibly use a thicker toe cap as well. These adjustments shouldn't affect the performance or loosen your heel fit.

Crystal, The Mustagh ATA ski comes in a 169cm (or 178 or 187). The 169cm skin here will match this ski exactly. Is this an older model ski you have? If so it may not work with this skin as there is no length adjustment and the skin is pre-cut to match the ski.

The biggest difference is stiffness. Although I hate to use them as there are no standards, the flex index for the Titan is about 120-130. This Zzeus is more like 100-110. Your decision will depend on what you're used to (what you like), how aggressive you ski and you in-bounds vs. out-of-bounds mix. Hope this helps.

Ideally, if your pins are off-center, you should have the release values checked by a ski shop that works with Dynafit. That way you can be sure. It's only your knees!

Ditto on "true to size". The fit leans toward the mid to narrower side, but the volume is adjustable with the Multi-Fit footbed.

Your call. Either will work for your size/ability. The bigger questions are: Do you prefer shorter/quicker turns or hi-speed arcs? And, do you prefer trees/bumps or wide-open spaces?

The absolute minimum anyone should have in avalanche terrain is a beacon, shovel and probe. An avalanche airbag is a excellent addition that can save your life. All of these items can be bought on backcountry.com.

No problem for going out the gate or short trips. Not as much fun if you are truly touring!

Yes.

2607 SOUTH 3200 WEST - STE. A West Valley City, UT

No tools needed. With you foot in the boot, place the boot into walk mode and flex forward hard a few times. Switch into ski mode and stand up gradually. You will hear (and feel) it click into the forward position (21 deg). To set the more upright position, switch into walk mode and straighten up. Then switch back into ski mode and flex forward. It will lock into the 15 deg slot. Enjoy!

Shell fit wil be very slightly different. The EVO changes length on the 1/2 size and the TLT5 changes on the whole size. The boot sole lengths may help you. 27.0 & 27.5 TLT5s are a BSL of 297mm. Both 27.5 and 28.0 EVOs are a BSL of 299mm.
Hope this helps. Enjoy!

The Zen comes out of the same mold as the Hombre (same sidecut). It runs both a little bit softer and a bit lighter. It's still a pretty solid ski, but if you want a stiffer stick to rage on you may want to consider the Manhattan. It's got the juice (with 2 sheets of Titanal) for mach 5.

The G3 splitskins have articulating hooks at both ends, not loops. I haven't seen any boards they won't work on.

Yep. Long's the ticket (180-190cm). 130mm wide will work with trimming.

You could try a restaurant supply business.

Skate boots should be snug and worn with a relatively thin sock. Think about how you would want a running shoe to fit. You might need to size down to the UK7.5. The Salomons tend to run on the big side. I typically wear a US Mens 8.5 or 9.0 and am skiing in the UK7.5

These boots will be great as far as weight goes. They will not be as stiff as the Factors. The limiting issue may be availability. Backcountry only has size 25.0 and 23.0 left. Based on your height/weight, I bet you have bigger feet than that. A better option for the descent would be the Zzero4 U-TF (stiff & more affordable) or the Zzero4 C-TF (lighter and a bit more $).

The Radical FTs w/ 110mm brakes will be back in stock within the next week. Jamie is right - the biggest issue will be drag in the powder/skin track or potential "boot-out" on hardpack. Best to wait for the 110s. Brakes are available separately: http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon

That would be best. You will not get a consistent accurate release from your alpine bindings with the AT sole.

It depends on what you are doing & where you are going. Heavier touring, with a pack and/or a greater focus on downhill would be best served with a lightweight 3-pin/tele setup. Cruising the logging roads with the dogs and you could use a beefy NNN rig.

Here is a great primer on DIN setting: http://www.wildsnow.com/1549/dynafit-release-adjustment-tips-tricks/
The large screw has a distinct ridge on it that lines up with the DIN setting marks on the binding housing.

Plenty wide enough for Manaslu (or wider) skins. Dynafit North America does not bring the dark color into the U.S., sorry.

Disclosure-Dynafit rep here. I've never had a problem with the Dynafits' in-bounds performance (even before I was the rep). As an ex-east coast racer, I have always been impressed by how rigid the connection to the ski is with tech system bindings. The new Radicals improve that with a wider interface under the binding (pressed carbon power-plate) and with a beefier toe-piece that includes side towers to mediate off-center shocks.
Ski 'em fast and reckless!!!

They are only available in the 92mm and 110mm versions. The 130mm brake is available separately: http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon. Ignore the "crampon" in the name. These are the replacement brakes.

Sounds like you need a really good bootfitter. The Mtn Trainers don't taper in the toe quite as much as the Alp Trainer. They also have the advantage of the Multi-Fit footbed which can help with low-volume feet. I can't be sure about "sloppiness" from an extra 1/2 size. Backcountry has a great return policy, so you may want to try ordering both your regular size and a 1/2 size up.

I don't know about "controlled", but they will shrink a bit when washed in hot water and dried at full heat in you dryer.

They are pretty close. The Sierras have a bit more sidecut and will turn better. They are also lighter. Your call.

Basically, yes. It may also depend on your use and tele-ability. If you are only going to use the teles for backcountry and you like the trees/tight spots you may want to go one size shorter. Similarly, if you are a beginning tele-er. Hope this helps.

Torso length. Most people under 5'6" will fit the s/m.

Plus, you'll be amazed at the light weight, with no sacrifice in power.

They run in the medium width range, but have an adjustable volume feature that may work for you. By lowering your foot in the shoe, you get both more volume and a small increase in width.

The current version has some nice tweaks. Larger toe pin screws for a beefier attachment. Toe pins now have ice-cutters built in. The spot on the toe lever for your pole is softer plastic for easier use. Your call on if it's worth the price.

Atomic or Salomon. Either the SNS Auto Universal (http://www.backcountry.com/atomic-auto-universal-touring-ski-binding) or the SNS Pilot Sport Classic. NNN bindings will not fit.

Yes - no problem with Fritschis. You can also use the alpine sole if necessary.

I skied on these a ton last winter in the Wasatch-both inbounds and out. The first fatty I really liked. A lot of energy. Mach 5 no problem. Quick turning for such a big boy. A little heavy for a true BC set-up. Don't know the Czar, so can't make a direct comparison. I you want a bigger ride that doesn't ski like a log, you'll love these.

Depends a lot on terrain choice, turn preference and how aggro you are. If you like the trees, bumps and slalom turns I'd stay with the 170s. If you prefer to arc it out at mach 7, get the 180s. Bindings: AT or Alpine? If AT I'm a believer in the light weight and bomber turning of the Dynafits. Enjoy!

The Speed Radical will do you fine, but, f you want more power, both the Radical ST and the Radical FT have a plate under the toe piece which delivers more juice.

You may want to check out the Salewa models. Here is one link (http://www.backcountry.com/salewa-alp-trainer-hiking-shoe-mens). They typically run a bit narrower and have an adjustable volume system.

No. The size range for women's Salewa boots is 6-10(by 1/2 sizes) and 11. Sorry, but no 10.5. The forefoot runs med to narrow and it has an adjustable volume insert. Perhaps a 10 or an 11 may work for you.

Yes. Should be no problem. The 75mm "duckbill" toe hasn't changed in 70+ years.

It's got a 110mm brake, so you will need to bend the arms 3-5mm on each side. You should be OK, but no guarantees.

Personally, I'd go with a lighter setup, but the Dukes will work fine on them.

Nope. Philippines, I believe.

This boot would be a bit much for what you say you are looking for. If you want a tele-binding boot, take a look at the Scarpa T4, the Crispi Antarctic (leather), Fischer BCX-875 or the Rossi BCX-11.

I would stick with the 169. If you go to the 179 you'll likely end up slipping on most uphills.

No. Alpina boots are all on the NNN binding system which includes NIS.

Hmmm.... Possibly.... The crampons do not bend as easily as the brakes, but we are only talking about 1-2mm per side. I wouldn't want to guarantee it, but you may be able to pull it off.

I would opt for the 176cm. The weight difference for racing would be negligible, but the extra stability for your size and ski style will be well worth it.

It's possible, but not likely. It's not part of the design to allow the leash to release.

This is a unisex boot. It's last year's model. For this season Dynafit has a women's model with a women's specific cuff and liner. http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-zzero-4-px-tf-ski-boot-womens-dnf0078

It's a pair.

If you want full coverage, get a long in a 130mm.

Yes, if you are referring to problems with the mechanism that locks it into place for touring. Any probs you have should be taken care of as a warranty.

Nope. Old school camber line. This year's model got the early rise.

Not yet. But I wouldn't be surprised to soon see a software upgrade that would allow it.

Depends on the glasses. I have relatively small, but not tiny, frames that fit. Larger glasses probably won't work. It helped to notch a spot in the foam for the temple pieces.

Very slick system. Almost identical to the old Yoko/Toko system from a few years back. I have used it racing/training/touring for a while and can easily get at my bottle while skiing and replace the pole after drinking without a pause.

It should be great, assuming a good fit to your foot shape. The flex is stout, both forward/back and laterally. Approx. 130 if you are comparing with other brands.

The smallest size for the Green Machine is 25.0 Those are available. At present, there are no plans to make this in a smaller size.

Longs run 180-190cm. Probably too short even accounting for stretch. Best bet would be the XLs (189-199cm).

No. You would need to get that separately or order a non-brake (leash) version of the binding.

Yep. With a 121mm tip on the Moments, I'd grab the 120mm skins.

You should switch, mostly b/c the TLT5s have a smaller toe and heel lips than other Dynafits and won't hold properly in the Fritschis. You needn't worry about the resort performance. Tech system bindings are more torsionally solid than anything else out there.

130mm XS should work best. Your length is on the border with the short size, but it is better to be on smaller side as the skin and tail have some stretch, but you can't make a too-long Alpinist skin any shorter.

At 68mm in the tip, these are just a bit too big for tracks at the nordic center. The tip tends to catch the sidewalls of the track and want to pop out. Widest skis for groomed tracks should be around 59-60mm.

Yes. There is a leash loop just behind your pup's neck.

Full disclosure: I am the Atomic rep. That said these should work well for you. The Atomic boots come out of the same factory as Salomon but are lasted 2mm wider at each model.

285-340mm (from BD's site)

No unless your Moments have a significantly raised tail.

These are the winter 10/11 version. All 1st gen issues have been worked out. 11/12s have a few improvement tweaks.

You can definitely fit either size. There is no appreciable performance difference (the small may weigh a bit less). You may want to think about who you may let borrow your rig or which may be better for re-sell down the road.

Paul, A couple of ideas. Double check that your DIN setting is correct for your height/weight/sole length & ability. Always make sure you are clear of any ice in the tech fitting by rotating the boot 3 or 4 times in tour mode before locking into the heelpiece. If you are truly in an "I cannot fall" situation, you can significantly increase the DIN by lifting up on the toe lever. Just remember to leave it in ski mode for most of your downhill time - your knees will thank you!

The new Radical series has added "Power Towers" to the toe piece (metal towers next to the pins) that increase the side impact resistance.

Hope this helps!

Sheryl, 130mm-Short would be the call. Enjoy!

I would go with the 120mm version (http://www.backcountry.com/black-diamond-fritschi-diamir-freeride-pro-binding-120mm). 108mm to 127mm is way too much bending.

That's a bit of a stretch. You can bend most brakes a bit, but usually no more than 2-4mm per side. You're asking for 6mm. BD makes wider brakes. Backcountry may just be out right now.

These are the widest Dynafits. If they fit, of course depends on how wide (and volume) your foot is. A pro bootfitter should be able to make these work for you if there any issues. BD typically runs the widest, but that may be too much.

Depends on head size. The Smartwool's have run a bit small in the past.

The "wings" on the buckle look like you are supposed to squeeze them. As you probably found out, this does nothing. Press them both in towards the boot and the ratchet will release. Side benefit: If you press one at a time towards the boot, it will loosen by just one notch. Nice if you want a slight adjustment.

Though they may technically work, these are not skate bindings. The big difference is in the flex of the bumper (these are way too soft). Salomon still makes a Profil skate binding: the Profil Plus. If she is at all serious about skating, it's best to trade up to the Pilot boots/binding.

They are available now at http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon. The brake is the same as the Vertical model. They are interchangeable. The Radical bindings are coming into the US with a sliding AFD plate, but Dynafit does not have that available.

No difference between this and last year's models. There are 2 available (and a new one coming in November). The 2 available now are the same except one has a polarized AND photochromic lens and the other (this one) has just a polarized lens, henece the price difference. Backcountry has the description wrong here. The SPX model is not photochromic. I'll let them know.

You may want to give Alpina a try. They typically run the widest of the XC brands.

For the extra loads you are working with, I would take a hard look at the NTN binding. Of course, it means you will need to change boots as well.

The Radical ST is only shipped with the 100mm. 110mm or 130mm (or smaller) brakes are available separately. http://www.backcountry.com/dynafit-ski-stopper-tlt-vertical-comfort-crampon

Corn, mank, deep pow, chowder...These will take anything you can throw at them. Super solid, direct connection to the ski. Enjoy 'em.

You can definitely climb/tour with it, but a long climb is more comfortable with it pulled. You can also ski without it, depending on your "power preference".

Brad, you are not nuts. BC has the specs wrong. The Green Machine should be listed as 3lb 7.9oz (converted from 1585gr). The gain/difference with the Titan UL: full carbon cuff-amazing lateral support/stiffness, lighter weight, greater cuff rotation-easier touring. Not necessarily a "gain", but the Green Machine last is 2mm wider so it may fit you better. Essentially, the Titan UL is the best-in-class for side-country and the Green Machine is the same for power turns in the backcountry. The Titan does have the ability to change soles for alpine bindings if that's your pleasure.
Enjoy!

Meme - I have to disagree. (Disclosure-I am the Rockies Dynafit rep) The new Green Machine is absolutely stiffer than the Zzero CT-F (last years Green machine). Most of the increase is in lateral stiffness, the kind that matters when driving a big ski at speed. Plus that increase comes with lighter overall weight and better cuff rotation for more comfortable touring. Unfortunately all this goodness does come at a price. Dynafit still makes great boots for under $600. That's less than most AT boots on the market. Don't give up on your first love!

The Naxo will work, but there are a number of other bindings that will match the downhill performance and be significantly lighter for the tour. Check out the Dynafit Radical ST.

Go with the long. If necessary, there is some stretch in both the skin and the tail strap. If the XL is too long, there is no good way to shorten it.

The Stoke has an insert plate which matches the Dynafit bindings. It is possible to drill into the ski/plate at any point, but is definitely not recommended and will violate the ski's warranty.

Yes it is compatible. Depending on your binding position, the tech (or you) may need to drill 2 holes into the plate. These are clearly marked with dimples in the topsheet.

The 110mm should work fine. You only have about 1mm extra ski to clear on each side. A little bending of the brake arm is OK.

Great general purpose boot. Especially if you are going anywhere wet: summer snow, Pacific Northwest, streams, etc. The extra support from a mid-height boot is great for carrying a pack or if you have weaker ankles. In dry warm weather they will be a bit hot.

The only concern about re-drilling is that you avoid making new holes immediately adjacent to the old ones. No problem on the sizing for smaller boots.

140s would give you the fullest coverage, but 130s would work fine. You generally want to leave 2-3mm exposed on each edge.

2 things to consider. The plate will give you a bit more torsional stiffness and can be "locked out" to stiffen the ski length-wise. Also, the FT DIN runs up to 12 (ST goes to 10). If you normally set your DIN at 9 or above I would get the FT. It's best not to have your DIN at the max setting.

Downhill performance and durability are well-attested both here and on other sites (see WildSnow.com).
There are a number of upgrades from the Vertical series to the Radical series:
-The Radical FT/ST toepieces have "Power Towers". These help align the boot for entry and make it a virtual step-in binding. They also beef up the binding for side impact (bumps/heavy crud) making it considerably less likely to prerelease.
-The toepiece rests on a beefier and wider (75mm) plate giving you more support to drive the ski.
-The elevators on the heelpiece have been completely redesigned to make deployment much easier.
-The pressed carbon plate connecting the toe and heelpieces (FT models only) has been redesigned on the Radical allowing you the choice of locking it to stiffen the ski or leaving it open for natural flex.
-FT models (Radical or Vertical) are 5-12 DIN and come with carbon connecting plates.
-ST models (Radical or Vertical) are 5-10 DIN with no connecting plates.

Sorry for the long reply...hope this helps!

125mm will be perfect. You will need to trim them to fit your skis shape. Your weight is not really a factor.
Enjoy!

Yes. Depending on your bindings, etc. it can hold as many as 10-12 pair of alpine skis.

Yes. http://www.backcountry.com/g3-onyx-binding

Per boot. Backcountry Mag lists them at 7lbs 13oz/pair.

Unless you have very little stuff inside, any 65L pack will need to be checked.

Full disclosure, I'm the rep, but you may want to try the Salewas, they run narrower in the heel and fit most midfoot shapes. The Alp Trainer GTX or Mtn Trainer GTX would be the comparable models.

As often as you want/need. Just be careful not to strip the screws.

As many times as you want, as long as you don't strip out the connecting screws.

Smartwool vs. Icebreaker is pretty much even on a piece like this (baselayer). Both are best-in-class New Zealand Merino with great fit and attention to detail. Shrinkage depends on how you wash. If you wash and dry with the rest of your clothes, which I do, you can expect 5-10% shrinkage. If you treat it carefully, gentle cold water wash and air-dry, there is almost no shrinkage.

Yes. The 140mm refers to half the pair. I'm guessing that your 292mm width is the board in downhill mode and that a half pair is 146-126-146. You will need to trim the outside edge of the skin to match your boards sidecut. G3 includes an awesome trim tool with the skins.
Enjoy.

These run approx. 102mm at the metatarsals. Both of Dynafits other series run narrower. The women's models to check out are the Gaia TF-X (@ 100mm) and the TLT5 MTN TF-X Women (@ 98mm).

Overall durability is comparable. The Speedskins lean towards light weight, so the plush is a little thinner (slightly less grip), but they should last as long.

No changes to the design. Typically you do need to step out to change from ski to tour. Some people can use the following method, shamelessly cribbed from Lou Dawson's Wild Snow website.

"Some people say the biggest problem with the Dynafit is that you have to take your boot completely out of the binding to change from latched heel to free heel. Is this really a big deal?
If you're in rolling terrain, perhaps skiing a long, low angled run with your skins off, it's nice to switch a randonnee binding between modes by simply reaching down and flipping a lever, as you can with most other randonnee bindings. With the Dynafit, you can easily drop into fixed heel mode from touring mode, but changing from fixed to touring usually requires removal of boot from binding. Thus, if you do a lot of rolling terrain tours you might consider this a problem, otherwise it's a minor annoyance -- or less.

TRICK: If you don't use brakes with your Dynafits, it may be possible to pull your heel up out of the binding while in alpine mode, thus going to touring mode WITHOUT removing boot from binding. To do this, first lock the toe into touring mode, then pull up your boot heel while twisting the binding heel piece to the side with your ski pole, as if you were changing heel lift mode. Works for some people...doesn't work for others. Do not try this if you have brakes installed, as doing so places too much stress on the binding."

Fit: The size is likely to be the same unless you are right at the edge of fitting in the 26.5. Typically, the BD boots have a little more volume/toe width than Dynafit. If necessary, everything is modifiable with a good bootfitter.
Stiffness: The Factor comes in a 110 and a 130 this year. The Titan is at least as stiff as the 130. Be careful with these stiffness ratings. There is no standard, so the numbers really only reflect relative stiffness within a single brand.
Hop this helps! Enjoy AK

At 168cm and 68kg I wear smalls from Smartwool. Sorry, but I don't have access to measurements of the L or XL.

I am not as familiar with the Icebreaker sizing. Most of my gear is Smartwool, but I would guess it to be similar.

This is an adult hat. Backcountry carries the kids version (http://www.backcountry.com/smartwool-popcorn-cable-hat-kids) as well as other Smartwool Kids hats.

You got that right! Good catch. I'll contact the Backcountry folks and get them to change the heading & description. Thanks!

By your handle, I'm guessing you live in Salt Lake. The Manaslu is a great one-ski BC ski, especially if you are looking for something a bit quicker than the typical over 100mm ski. Unless you love the wide rides, it is probably a more versatile stick than the Stoke for your conditions, though either one will work great in the Wasatch fluff.

I usually find that any energy bar or gel takes 30-45 min. to fully kick in. It needs to get digested and work its way into your bloodstream and then into your muscles. Always best on longer events to eat early and often.

If you have reasonably warm feet, this is great for winter day climbing in CO, but may be too cold for expedition or multi-day use.

Any "Tech-Fitting" boot will work. Dynafit, Garmont, Scarpa, BD, Technica, Dalbello are all making boots with these fittings.
Enjoy!

Small is likely the call. The skin and the strap have some stretch, but you can't make the Medium any shorter.

For a neutral, smooth feel you can't beat the G3 Targa. For more aggro big heavy boots, hucking, etc. the 22Designs Hammerhead is the beef. If you are touring in either case get the free pivot version: G3 Ascent, 22Designs Axl.

Justin, For best grip size them just narrower than your tip dimension (139mm) and trim to fit. That would be the 125mmx167-174cm on these skins.
Enjoy!

at 6'10", definitely the large, unless you have an extremely short torso for your height :)

Maybe you just need a longer handle on the spoon! It's designed for a kayak compass.

The Dynafit crampons will work. Not sure about aftermarket ones.

If you are looking for quickness (trees, slalom turns) definitely go 178. If you usually open it up and are pretty aggro, I might lean toward the 187. 178 will be more versatile at your size.

Your sizing from the Langes should cross over, though the Titan sole length may be shorter. 29.0 & 29.5 are 332mm and the 30.0 & 30.5 are 342mm.

The UL version has a few differences: Carbon heel booster (lighter & 40% stiffer laterally). Shell & upper cuff material is Pebax instead of PU-Polyurethane (lighter and less reactive to temp changes, but just as stiff). Liner is a bit lighter. Overall, 250Gr. lighter, but just as stout, esp. in warmer temps.

Yes. Men's LG runs from 9-11.5.

The blade length is 10.5". The handle length is 18". This shovel os also available in a T-Handle version. That handle length is 15".

The Baltoro does NOT have the inserts. Good catch! I'll get Backcountry to update the description. Thanks!

You should be able to buy the wider brakes separately. http://www.backcountry.com/black-diamond-fritschi-diamir-ski-brakes

The Radical FT will be 2+ lbs. lighter and still ski better. It gives you a considerably more torsionally rigid connection to the ski.

This is a binding only, not a ski. The crucial factor for x-c ski sizing is weight. You should find that out before making a purchase. He might need a small adult set-up, esp. if you want him to get a couple of years out of it.

Yep. It is a kids cross-country touring boot. It just looks rad.

Here's a quick way to check:
How do I know if mine are polarized?
Very easily done. Just look through the glasses at the reflection of any object on a window panel (but not at yourself! you have to look at an angle to the glass). Then, turn the sunglasses around as if they were the hands of a clock facing you. If the intensity of the reflection doesn't change with respect to what you see through the window, they are not polarized.

It may depend on how solid/aggressive an alpine skier you are. That said, I would lean toward the 166cm.

Yes, but it may not offer enough support for your use and/or it may not match with your boot.

It depends on how you are using them and how much support/control you need. For off-track, more support, I would recommend a BC-style boot which means a BC-style binding(either NNN-BC or SNS-BC depending on the boot brand). If you are mostly on groomed or skied-in tracks and are pretty stable, you could go lighter with the bindings on this page or the SNS Auto Touring, again depending on boot brand.

The 4 straps you see in the pic clip onto your deck lines.

I have a pair of these from a couple of years back. For 25-32 I might use a lightweight merino layer. If the wind is really kickin', I'll put on the midweight merinos. Anything colder and it's definitely midweight. With synthetics (capilene, etc) I might go mid and then heavy or "expedition" weight.

Yes, but with a ton (actually about 2-1/2 lbs) more weight!

The FTs will give you more juice for hard-charging (wider platform, lockable carbon connection plate). A second consideration is DIN. It's best to be in the middle of the DIN range on the binding (FT=5-12, ST=4-10). Either will work and be awesome.
Enjoy!

Nope. Sole length on the 25.0 (the largest available of last year's boot on this page) is 286mm. The Baron large runs 305-370mm.

Good question. We had no issues on last year's boots (Zzeros and TLT5 Performance) with carbon cuffs or hinges. Of course, it will get banged up and anything can happen, but it seems not to be a problem.

Your best bet will be a euro website or a trip over the pond. The wides are not coming into North America at this point.

NTS=Next-To-Skin - Smartwool's baselayer pieces.
TML=Thermal Mid Layer - A heavier weight usually layered on top of NTS.
PhD=Refers to their top level (highest degree of performance) socks. Introduced a few years ago.

If you are in cold conditions, I would recommend NTS midweight as the base layer. That is what I use until the temp goes above 32F.

At 110mm you will have to do a bunch of bending. The 132mm will only be 6.5mm wider than the ski on each side. I'd lean towards the 132mm.

The fit runs on the middle to narrow side, but volume is adjustable with a 2 layer Multi-Fit footbed. Plus the lacing goes to the toe. Heel-lock is great. The "Y" system really works. Durability should match or better your Raichles.

If you want full coverage (best grip), get the 125mmx173-180cm.

Any independent bladder (70 oz or more) will work. Camelbak, Platypus and a few other choices are all good.

The skis you mention are all great for a touring orientation and great for the Catamount and Eastern backcountry. If you are looking for more downhill performance and for deeper snow I would lean a bit wider, skip the fishscales and get some skins.

I believe this year's NTNs come in 95, 100 and 125mm versions. 125 is the call.

These will work with your bindings, but it is not ideal. They are designed to work with the SNS Pilot system which has 2 bars under the toe.

These boots use the NNN-BC binding system. Unfortunately they will not work with your current bindings. Try the Atomic Mover 30 on this site or a Salomon. If you are looking for a beefy, "BC" touring boot, you will need to change your Salomon bindings anyway.

All companies bas their fit on different lasts or foot shapes. Unfortunately, Keens may not work for you no matter what model.

Inflate: open the valve, let it inflate naturally, add a few puffs to get the right stiffness. Close valve
Deflate: Open valve & roll the air out. Kneeling on it while you do this can help. Close valve.

Storage: It is best to store it semi-inflated with the valve open.

Dynafit Titans run 102mm at the ball of the foot and the TLT5 is 101mm. Most people describe them as running narrow. Some Garmonts have also leaned narrow over the years.

It should work fine. It fits everything I've seen out there unless there is some really fat tip protector.

Jeremiah, It will work great for the resort and hard snow. It's torsionally very rigid, so you get a solid connection to the ski. As far as boots go, it will ONLY work with those that have tech binding fittings in the toe & heel. This means specific models from Dalbello, Tecnica, Dynafit, Scarpa, Black Diamond, Garmont.

Keep an eye out. They should be coming to Backcountry any day.

Now that it has been 2 years, your best bet may be ebay, ski swaps, etc. Most shops will have sold off their last green ones last winter. The only difference is the color.

S=145-159cm
M=159-173cm
L=168-182cm

Yes. It is not as good a fit as with Pilot bindings, but you can get by.

No problem. 110mm brakes will easily fit a 90mm waist.
Enjoy!

Large for snug fit. XL for loose fit.

These skis would be great for a lighter weight set-up, for exploring the backcountry and touring. If you are hitting deep snow, esp. heavy, deep snow, you may want to consider a wider ski. Also if downhill turning is more important, wider with more sidecut may be better. Awesome Catamount trail ski, as well as eastern huts.

I use 1.75s and can read most of the info. For smaller images it helped to pull the goggle slightly off the face. The current speed was easy to read at all times!

These skis would be great for a lighter weight set-up, for exploring the backcountry and touring. If you are hitting deep snow, esp. heavy, deep snow, you may want to consider a wider ski. Also if downhill turning is more important, wider with more sidecut may be better.

Could be. It depends on 3 things: how aggro you are, what kind of turns you like (short or long radii) and terrain you like (bumps/tight trees vs. wide open spaces). If you're pretty aggro and used to longer sticks and like big turns in the open, then these could work. Otherwise, I'd lean shorter for your weight/height.

John, Probably not insulated enough for your use. Fine for winter day use where you are moving/climbing, but not warm enough for winter camping in those temps.

Should be no problem - 3mm of clearance on each side.

G3 and BD are the top skins out there. Check out mohair or mohair mixes for best glide. For full coverage get a skin that is 140mm wide.

Most of the touring (AT) bindings out there have wider brakes available. Look at the Dynafit, G3 and marker systems.

164cm sounds about right for your size, use and skills. Really fun ski - enjoy them!

They hold the shaft end of an ice axe.