Tommy Gordon

you don't need these for those skis, they cost almost as much as the skis, put some look/dynastar px12's on them instead.

true dat willie; but to complete, as long as you have 76mm underfoot, width isn't an issue

you can ski them all over the mountain but there a symetrical ski( u porbaly already no this) which means that all mountain performance would be slightly worse than a ski with more "normal" dimensions. it would also help if the skis were not center mounted. If you like k2 and want a good all mountain ski id go with the extremes there more geared twords all mountain.

These skis also have a VERY soft flex; you can (using your poles for balance) easily stand on the tips or tails.

the threats are basicly just a yonger version of the suspects so its depends on your hight weight etc.

hi. The guy above me doesnt really no what hes talking about. the threats are not the same or even very similar to these skis. The suspects have edge armor and are just a more solid built skis. They will stand up in the park better and will also hold their own all mountain. The threats are made to with stand less stress and are truly a junior ski, just like salomons web site says. they are taking the place of the flyers which were salomons kid freestyle ski. so if ur six and think ur dope get the threats if you plan to ski park and you are actually decent, go with the suspects. if you just cruise groomers it doesnt really matter... also groomercrusiers r not really skiiers. there just rich people who fly in from some rich city and pretend they can ski for 5 minutes then go inside and get a glass of champane and a 5 course dinner.

Hope this helps... except for the groomer cruiser part..

true dat bro. This isn't exactly an answer, but worthwhile. The guy at my local shop says these are actually the same as the dumont, except the stringers that go between the edges don't form an x pattern (like shoelaces), but instead simply go back and forth. but even so they are more than enough to keep the edge on the ski; I've never seen anyone tear their edge out. but it does help with the torsional rigidity and edge power; bottom line is don't worry if you can't spend an extra hundred dollars for a pro model

The information listed here and on libtechnas.com is now correct. This is probably their most versatile ski; that is park, groomers, and powder. If you look now, this is the same as the jib nas except for graphics and the recurve, which helps just about everywhere.

They are designed to have a similar flex but the new core material (wood now instead of the foam core) makes it nearly impossible to replicate. The wood core adds just a little weight but gives you a much longer-lasting pop.

I dont know about the ski but I will recomend a binding I know more about Rossignol Dynastar and Armada. For bindings go with look px 14's or rossignol's 140 check those out or even look into the 150 or 200 binding. For look and dynastars 150 and 200 its Px 15 and Px 18. sorry that i dont know about this ski. peace.

These skis are really nice; they're light and the unheard of edge hold is not a myth. On this model though, they have a low tip, which gives you more contact area and a lighter ski, but its easier to get buried in deep snow. For bindings, look/rossi/dynastar bindings are the same thing, so you would get whichever fits your din range and how much lift you want. I would also check out the marker series with the short toe piece (duke/griffon). Those bindings are way lighter and let the ski have a more natural flex

ps the pics for this ski are incorrect. the left ski is pictured here, the right one is not. look at libtechnas.com to see the correct graphic, which looks even cooler in person.

in CM: 12/8.6/11.3
The manufacturer's catalog can be found online (just copy/paste): http://www.libtechnas.com/
This has dimensions, explanation of the recurve, and fun propaganda.
They updated this recently (November 2008), so check it out.
These are actually called the Pipe NAS (not park) by the mfgr.

My son rides ar6's and has look px12's on them and loves them, I have px14's (same as rossi 140's) on my line bacon's and i love them. We have both gone away from solomon bindings after breaking them,plus the rossi's are cheaper. (I'm Just adding to this.) Yeah the 140's are probaly the safest out there to ride i personaly love salomon boots and skis but hate there bindings and Atomic has the same bindings as Salomon.

(This is a third answer)
My friend has these skis 08 model; he rides with the look px 12 (no lift). They lay down a good edge on-snow and feel solid when landing. Whether you get 12 or 14 depends on your weight and riding style, but the px or rossi scratch are solid mounts. If these are going in the park, you may want to at least look at those new markers; idk that much about them but I've heard good things like better flex; they're also WAAYY lighter than the px12/scratch 120 (by a lot)( adding) the only problem with the new markers is that they only have 2 mounting screws in the toe piece so they could rip out easy. but they light

hey, I ride jesters, and i hit the biggest jumps at Park City all day long last season, and my bindings were in such good shape still that I mounted them on my new skis. They are way light, get em.

They require you to mount them at the midsole (The boot center will be aligned with the narrowest part of the ski, or in this case with magnetraction, aligned with the center of the **largest** bump); which is farther forward on this ski than even most park skis. Mounting ahead or behind the midsole messes up the bumps. So no, but almost.

Really the options there are numerous. There are dozens of types of alpine bindings you could mount on these, as well as tele, though they won't work as well. I would advise not putting snowboard bindings on them, but that's just my suggestion.

You want something that will not bring a lot of extra weight; just make sure not to spend more than you do on the ski