The Arc'teryx Hercules Hoody has a smooth, tightly woven face fabric;more softshell than fleece (think "hardfleece). Still blocks a good amount of wind, and sheds light moisture, but is really breathable.

The difference between the Arc'teryx Hercules and Gamma SV hoody is in the face fabric. The Hercules uses the 02 version which is less wind resistant, and more breathable. These two jackets will be about similar warmth without wind- Gamma blocks about 90% and Hercules about 50%. For layering Hercules is more comfortable, as outerwear, the Gamma offers more protection.

The Arc'teryx Squamish is fairly light, and will block most wind and light drizzle. Another good option for more protection, and only a bit more weight is the Arc'teryx Venta LT; totally windproof, very water resistant, but still good breathability

Certainly better breathability than Gore shells (either pac-lite or pro-shell) but less weather protection.It wont add much insulation as a mid layer. double hood won't be a problem, simply tuck the under layer into the outer layer hood and they work well together.

I'd suggest you go for a Large Arc'teryx Beta AR. That will give you enough room to layer, but not be floppy. I'm a 32 and the Medium fits me, but if I wear them with base and fleece pants, there is no extra room.

Sounds like you're looking for the Arc'teryx Hercules. The warmest layer is the Delta SV, but has no weather resistance by it's self.

Here's the naming scheme for Arc'teryx:
SV-severe AR-all 'round SK-ski MX-mixed use LT-light SL-super light

My Scarab have kept me comfortable from below 0 up through t-shirt weather. They breathe well, have vents, and you can adjust your underlayers according to temp and activity (I just wear shorts under when it's warm). The fabric is quiet and soft.

The Arc'teryx Stingray is cut to accommodate layers, and you should have plenty of room (one consideration, smooth-faced layers work better than traditional fuzzy fleece due to the fleece lining of the coat-check the Atom or Tau)The Gore-Tex Softshell is totally waterproof. It's the membrance sandwiched in the middle, plus the DWR treated face fabric that keep water out.

Check the other stats in the sizing chart above-If you need a more full cut coat,you could also check the Arc'teryx Theta SV or AR.

The Arc'teryx Gamma LT pullover is more weather resistant, and stretchy compared to the Accelero, but the Accelero breathes better, and is better at wicking moisture. I like the Gamma LT for climbing and ski touring. The Accelero is great for running and biking and Nordic skiing.

On my Arc'teryx Alpha SL Pullover the big side zipper/pit zip makes it easy to get in and out, but it still has to go over your head. Fit is the same as the Alpha SL jacket. One consideration, no hand pockets on the pullover, the jacket has two high hand pockets (for access while wearing a pack or harness).

I'd suggest measuring for your sleeve length (see the sizing chart by size selector) if a Large will have long enough sleeves, do that. XL will probably pretty baggy around your torso.

Craine, the Arc'teryx Griffon is an ideal layering piece, more so than the sigma LT- better breathability, more pliable fabric so it doesn't feel constrictive, and still a good stand alone for mild weather. Blocks about half the wind-not windproof like the windstopper jackets, and has a good DWR so it will shed snow and light rain.

I'm not super familiar with the genesis, but I've used the Arc'teryx Fury SV a bunch- it was my main ski jacket last season. The Fury is made with Windstopper and has taped seams, so I never had any leaking, even in Utah spring snowstorms. It also breathes well, and has a good measure of stretch. Not sure what the membrane Marmot is using, but the WP/breathe specs on that say "not specified" which, to me, means "not very". Also, I asked an Arc'teryx designer why they don't do welded seams, and the response was because it leaves a lip that gets caught and can damage the seam. Arc is using a lo-profile seam that hides the threads, and makes a very flat, clean seam. Plus, I think the Arc'teryx fit tends to be accurate and not boxy. I still love my Fury after 50-ish ski days, resort, hiking, and backcountry.

The Arc'teryx S240 would work as a trad harness, but the Arc'teryx R320 is better suited with 4 racking loops, and a rear haul loop for tag lines. I find the 2 loops don't carry enough gear unless you're running it out, or take a sling along. Both styles pack down really small.

The difference between the new and old Arc'teryx Gamma MX is mainly in the face fabric. They are equally warm (same liner fleece thickness), and wind resistant (blocks about 90%). The current Gamma MX Hoody is a touch lighter, and dries more quickly, if it does get wet.

For the Beta AR pant in Medium, 30.5 in, Tall 33.5. The details can be viewed in the sizing chart above.

You can compare warmth by checking the weight of insulation. The Arc'teryx Atom is designed to work as a mid-layer, as well as a light, stand-alone jacket. It's got stretch panels fleece under the arm to reduce bulk, and add some breathability. This compliments the fairly close fit, so as not to be constricting. I wear a medium in this, just like I do in nearly every other Arc'teryx item.

Adam, this band should fit. I'm average sized, and there is still plenty of room left on my band.

The Arc'teryx Alpha SL could be used as a ski jacket. It will keep you dry and block the wind. If you'll be skiing a lot of days, you may want a jacket with a more durable fabric. This Gore Paclite is designed for maximum pack-ability, and trades super tough face fabric, and inside backer material, to accomplish this. I've used mine as a compliment to a softshell for an added layer in really harsh conditions, but for skiing resort days, I'd recommend the Beta AR, Sidewinder, or Stingray from Arc'teryx.

The Arc'teryx Zeta has a slightly different polyester face from the Epsilon. The difference is the Zeta has a bit more water resistance, but it is quite a bit softer than the Epsilon; almost has a silky texture. Size on these two is very similar, not as close fitting at the Gamma MX (or as much stretch)

Arc'teryx made the Beta AR and Beta SL the same length, it's just fabric and features that differentiate them.

The Arc'teryx Sidewinder would probably be a bit baggy on you in a Large, which is the size that would work best for sleeve length. You may want to take a look at the Stinger, which is cut a bit more trim, still has a roll hood, but a taller, fleece lined collar, and straight zip.

for the Arc'teryx Outline T, I'd recommend an XL for your size unless you prefer a closer fit in t-shirts.

This is not a softshell like the stingray is. It is similar to the goretex shells like the sidewinder in feel and "noise" but it is just a windbreaker. It will breathe a bit better than the sidewinder, similar to the Stingray softshell material and the seams are not sealed. The warmth will be similar to the stingray too since it does have a light liner.Compared to the Stingray, a bit lighter, more breathable, equally wind resistant, and not as water resistant if rain or wet snow is involved. Dry snow, you'll stay equally dry. It actually does have sealed seams, but they aren't certified as waterproof because Gore-Tex doesn't allow that on a Windstopper item. it is much quieter than a Sidewinder as far as fabric goes, and also more stretchy than any of the Gore'tex jackets, like Stingray or Sidewinder.BTW, the Sidewinder is more breathable than the Stingray because of the Laminate and the fleece liner in the stingray.

The Arc'teryx Venta SV also has taped seams and more stretch for a better fit and more weather resistance.

The face fabric is a bit smoother on the Venta, and it has internal seams, so no exposed thread. It does have a bit more stretch than the Sigma, but not as much as the Gamma, which is why it may feel less roomy, they are actually cut almost exactly the same.

Aah, describing color, that's always easy. The Copper color in the Arc'teryx Venta SV here is pretty accurate, the Aztec looks a bit washed out. One other consideration, the Copper is the new version. You get smoother face fabric (no rip stop, but still super tough) much cleaner seams (no top-stitch, seam taped inside, less snagging)and a bit more stretch. Go Copper...

The Arc'teryx Stinger doesn't use a zip-in liner (none of the Arc'teryx jackets do)because it creates a stiff panel down the middle of your chest, as well as a potential cold spot where your insulating layer gaps. I'd suggest wearing a separate insulating layer(I like the Tau pullover or the new Atom jacket)which also gives more options for fine tuning your warmth.

Hey Jeff, I'd recommend a Large in the Delta LT, unless you like a really loose, casual fit.

The Arc'teryx Theta SV would pair really well with a Hercules. In fact, the Hercules is designed to work as an outer layer for moderate conditions, and under a Gore Hard shell for heavy conditions. I find the fit of both the Gamma MX and Hercules work well as layers (the Hercules isn't too relaxed) but prefer the Hercules as a layering piece.

The Arc'teryx Theta SV is made using Gore ProShell with Arc'teryx construction and face fabric. For perspective, the Theta SV is designed and built in Vancouver, BC, which has an annual rainfall total of 44"- that's a lot of all-day rain. The other great quality of this jacket is that it will maintain it's performance for years if you keep it clean and follow the care instructions.

it's not Mac compatible, but there are rumors they are going to a web-based system in spring '10.

The Comfort belt on the T6c won't transfer data underwater, so, no. You can get a memory belt that will record HR data internally while swimming, and send a signal to the watch on dry land. The Memory belt dock allows you to upload the recorded data to the training software when you're done swimming.

The t6c can be paired with 2 different HR belts. The included software, and the community page on the Suunto website, are free of charge (well, once you pay for the watch)

Those x6 alarms were pretty quiet, but this one has a better alarm.

The Suunto t6c uses barometric pressure to measure altitude, but it doesn't offer barometric readings as one of the display options. I guess that's because they consider this a training watch, and added other training specific display options. The rest of the specs appear correctly here.

This Arc'teryx Solo jacket would be a good jacket on a moto. I'd look at some Gore-Tex shells (top and bottom) for wet weather. The Arc'teryx Alpha LT may be a good option.

The Solo has a DWR on the face fabric, and the insulation is DWR treated as well (that's the difference between Therma-Tek and Primaloft-2.7 Thermatek and 133gm Primaloft offer the same loft). Face fabric is totally windproof.

I'd go with the Arc'teryx Solo, as the Dually is cut to fit over all your layers, including a shell, when you're sitting at a belay. It's pretty bulky for daily wear. The Kappa SV could be another good option. Warmer than the Solo, and a longer hem.

The Arc'teryx Kappa SV might be a bit thick under a Theta AR. I've had my Kappa in pretty heavy snowstorms, and the combo of a good DWR, tight weave fabric, and Windstopper with sealed seams have kept me totally dry.

The X6HR and the T6 use the same data cable; this one. It should work just fine. The thing you'll need that is specific to the X6HR is the CD-ROM to load the correct software on to your PC to analyze your logs.

My Arc'teryx Solo hits just below the waist on my pants, so I consider it to be a short jacket. It's designed to work as a layer, so the length is cut this way so as not to hang out from your shell. One consideration in comparing; the Therma-Tek is an Arc'teryx exclusive fabric- water-repellent treated Primaloft. It's basically waterproof in that it will not absorb moisture, and the loft is extra resilient due to this treatment.

The extra cost of the Arc'teryx Alpha SV is due to the face fabric. The SV uses a super durable face fabric that holds up to a ridiculous amount of abuse. The Alpha LT uses a lighter face fabric, that, while not as tough as the SV, is more durable than any other jacket for the weight. Buy the one that will fit your needs- if you're planning on wearing it daily, for years, go SV. I have the LT because I usually wear softshell jackets, and only pull out the gore-tex when it's really nasty.

The Coreloft is used because it has large and small diameter insulation fibers. This adds durability, and also allows using a face fabric that breathes better, since it isn't as prone to penetrating the fabric because of the larger fibers. This compliments the Luminara which is a 20denier ripstop that has good weather resistance but breathes much better than most other nylon fabrics.

Sorry, but no they don't. I had a hard time finding the Slate color anywhere!

This problem is due to the fact that the radio signal emitted by the chest strap can't travel through water. Suunto makes a Memory belt that has internal memory, so can record your HR while swimming, then be downloaded for analysis. The Memory belt will also send a signal to the watch while you're on dry land.

Arc'teryx Blade 24 dimensions:
19"/48cm x 12.5"/31.5cm x 7/17.5cm

The Arc'teryx Kappa SV is much warmer than the Atom. Kappa has 200gm insulation, and Atom, 60gm. That being said, if you need a really warm coat, this will be the warmest jacket for the lowest bulk. This is due to the laminated insulation construction, which eliminates cold spots, and the "michelin man" look that baffled jackets have. Also, the face fabric is fairly soft.

Yeah, I'd say the Arc'teryx Easyrider is too warm for running. A better option for cold running, that is still soft and fleecy, is the Hercules. The face fabric is much more breathable, still blocks about half the wind, and has nice fuzzy high-loft fleece inside. Plus it's cut a bit more athletic than the easyrider

MT Man, I've carried skis on the Silo 30. I used this pack for the past 2 winters and the carry system works well. I didn't find it necessary to re-adjust each time, just don't cinch the straps after removing your skis. I've found that it can be used to carry diagonally, vertically, or A-Frame, with just a bit of strap adjustment. One comment about the internal organization, the separator is designed to have shovel blades stowed towards the outside of the pack (along with probe and handle, for which there are sleeves), and clothing, etc, can be separated by stowing them toward your back, keeping them from spilling out when the panel is opened. This arrangement also keeps your clothes from coming in contact with any snow your blade may carry to the inside. I dig mine!

I'd recommend the Arc'teryx Theta SV as a ski pant. Both use the same fabric in the legs, but the Theta SV uses a highly breathable back panel, lower front (just above belly button), and is built with more ski-specific articulation in the knees, and internal powder gaiters. The Alpha SV has removable foam pads in the knees, and a much taller torso.

Arc'teryx makes the Celeris Vest with a medium density weave,which has a very light urethane coating. It is more breathable than your typical nylon vest due to this combo, and has a bit more weather resistance, too. Hope this helps, it's difficult to quantify breathability.

Hi Doug, The Arc'teryx Stingray has a drop hood, with a collar; it does not stow or remove. It is built with Gore-Tex softshell, which has a light fleece laminated to the inside, which does add a bit of insulation, and also accounts for most of the weight difference. As for which one: if you're primarily using it as ski/board jacket, the Stingray is better, because of features (pow-skirt, etc). The Theta AR is good as a ski coat, but is better for hiking, travel, etc- more versatile, and packable.

The Suunto T1c won't sync to this monitor. The t3c, t4c and t6c do have sync-ability, but I believe it's only to other Suunto pods, for speed and distance.

I always take the Arc'teryx Alpha LT with me on backcountry trips. It seems like a rain coat, but the face fabric is super tough, without being stiff, and it breathes better. Also, it rolls up to about the size of a sub-sandwich. It's the best BC skiing coat I've owned.

Go Medium, the Rho LT tends to run a bit small. And yes, it is awesome, I've got 3 of them.

It's most similar to the Arc'teryx Gamma MX in fit. The Tau jacket doesn't have the same stretch woven face fabric, and instead, has a super thin skin of urethane, which sheds moisture, adds a touch of wind resistance (less than Easyrider), and still allows good breathabilty. It's pretty unique in that it feels like a fleece, but is a lot more versatile and durable.

I'd suggest going with the Arc'teryx Gamma AR if you want to use if for layering. It still blocks about 90% of wind, but breathes, and layers better than a Venta AR, due to the stretch woven fabric, and lack of Windstopper membrane. This jacket will cover a huge range of conditions. I've skied plenty of days in light snow, and it worked great.

I'd say the combo you describe here would be pretty good for mild days. Just make sure to wear a good baselayer (I like the Rho LTW). For colder days check out the Atom to replace the Accelero. It's one of my favorite new Arc'teryx jackets, and really versatile.

the Arc'teryx Kappa SV has 200gm insulation, and the Atom 60gm. So, it's more than twice as thick, and also built with windstopper. The Kappa isn't bulky for it's warmth (laminated insulation means even warmth; no cold spot where the baffles are stitched), but it's more of a stand-alone warm jacket, whereas the Atom is designed to be a mid-layer as well as a light outerwear jacket.

I've been wearing a Medium in the Arc'teryx Stingray, and I'm 5'11, 175. Enough room for a couple layers (as long as they're not floppy fitting) but not too big when I wear just a baselayer. I'd suggest a medium for you as well. In my opinion, the ideal layer for this jacket is the Arc'teryx Tau pullover.

Jeff, Medium for sure! This jacket will accommodate plenty of layers without being too tight.

The Arc'teryx Venta LT does not have zips, but the underarm panels are made from a really breathable softshell material (Epsilon fabric). If you insist on pit zips, check out the Venta SV, but it is a bit warmer due to the fleece lining.

The Arc'teryx Fission SV would be another option, and if you don't need full on wet weather protection , I have the Arc'teryx Kappa SV (it will shed light rain and snow is no problem).It uses soft face fabric, and isn't restrictive, but still warm and windproof, plus it breathes better than a Gore Proshell, so better comfort range when it's not bitter cold.

The Arc'teryx Fission SV is the warmest. It's got 200gm Primaloft, and the Fission SL has 120gm equivalent. Thermatek is basically Primaloft that has been saturated with water repellent for even more wet weather loft protection. Additionally, the Fission SL has a lighter face fabric, shorter cut and pit zips.

A Large pant would fit you best

It's actually a solid black. The photo here shows contrast, but it doesn't look that way in person.

The Suunto t3c will show current speed, but you'll need to see average after you finish, as it's only shown in the logbook.

The Arc'teryx Rampart could be used for snowshoeing as it's got some weather resistance, is breathable, and dries quickly. I think it might be a little less weather resistance than would be ideal for winter sports, and I'd recommend the Gamma LT instead.

The older Stingray pant had a slightly more trim fit, angled zip cover, and less re-inforced insteps. A note, this pant is fully waterproof and has flannel lining, which adds a bit of insulation.

The Arc'teryx Blade 15 will fit a 15" lappy nicely, the sleeve is adjustable so you can make it fit exactly, and not have the computer bounce around. I've used mine without a protective sleeve, and the combo of a snug sleeve, smooth nylon and foam padded back and bottom, have kept my rig looking good.

From your description, I'd think the Arc'teryx Sidewinder in a large would be the way to go, unless he likes a really baggy fit. These are cut to accommodate layers, so you typically don't need to size up.

There was a bad batch of Polartec fabric that was discovered during 08/09. The fabric on current pieces should be back to highest quality, and not subject to pilling. My older one is going on 4 years old, lots of wear, and very minimal pills.

For layering under the Arc'teryx Theta AR, my first choices would be the Hercules jacket or the Atom LT Jacket, they both layer better than a Venta AR , but still work well as stand-alone jackets for mild weather (Hercules blocks about 50% of wind and has good water beading, Atom is basically windproof and really compressible)Other good options- Tau Jacket or pullover.

The Arc'teryx x350 does have a haul loop for tag lines- not body weight.

This is a shell jacket and as such, doesn't have insulation. It's great with a fleece (Delta SV is super warm and low bulk). If you want a more insulated version, check the Arc'teryx Scarabee, Venta SV, or Easyrider. Ideal warm coat is the Kappa SV or Fission SV, but the trade-off for super warm, is that they are more bulky; still super comfy though. The Arc'teryx patterning tends to move well, so a puffy doesn't feel restrictive.

I'd recommend a medium. It's cut to accommodate layers.

pilling will be covered under warranty, and is probably due to a bad batch of fabric from Polartech. I've had mine for a couple years with almost no pilling

Yes it does

Dimensions for the Khazri 35 are:
28.5” x 12” x 9” (LxWxD)

The Khazri 35 does have a light hipbelt. It is made with dual density foam "pods" that can be placed directly over your hipbones so you still get some padding. This design is used so as not to inhibit highsteps and other Alpine climbing moves (including the moon walk).

The Arc'teryx Gamma LT jacket doesn't have a liner per se, but it uses a plated fabric, which uses nylon and polyester threads. The weaving technique used puts the nylon on the outside (for durability and weather resistance) and the polyester inside
(for moisture management and softness). It makes it a cool piece because it has multiple performing fabrics in a light, stretchy textile. great jacket for the money!

See the comp for the Accelero to complete these answers. Comparing the Gamma LT pullover to the Gamma LT jacket. These use different fabrics, with the Gamma LT PO being a single layer of stretch woven fabric and the Gamma LT jacket a "plated" fabric using nylon on the face and polyester inside-this is a really cool fabric that is a single layer, but with different threads. Nylon-durable; Polyester-moisture management. So, the PO is lighter, and more stretchy, and a tiny bit more breathable (minor difference) Gamma LT jacket is really tough, still breathes really well, and sheds weather, but is a bit bigger if it's rolled up in your pack. Hope these help!

Here's a comparison on the Arc'teryx Gamma LT pullover and Accelero. Gamma LT has more stretch, and weather resistance and abrasion resistance, but is less breathable. I've got one of each, and I wear the Gamma for ski touring and climbing, and the Accelero for running, cycling and as a light mid-layer. Accelero is better at moisture management.

I've put in about 60 days on a Arc'teryx Theta AR and it works well as a ski jacket, as the above answer indicated. I think a small would work perfectly for you, as this jacket is cut to layer underneath, no need to up-size.

Dimensions for the Blade 15 are:
18.5"/47cm x 12"/30.5cm x 6"/15cm (LxWxD)

outside dimensions of the Arc'teryx Bora 95 are:
36.5” x 15” x 16” (LxWxD)
Man, that's a big pack!

El Salvador. Don't be concerned, the quality is equivalent, regardless of where it's made, Arc'teryx insists on this.

The current Arc'teryx Sidewinder SV is made in Canada. Just a note, Arc'teryx uses exclusive factories, so quality is equivalent regardless of country of manufacture.