Jeff, Medium for sure! This jacket will accommodate plenty of layers without being too tight.

The Arc'teryx Venta LT does not have zips, but the underarm panels are made from a really breathable softshell material (Epsilon fabric). If you insist on pit zips, check out the Venta SV, but it is a bit warmer due to the fleece lining.

The Arc'teryx Fission SV would be another option, and if you don't need full on wet weather protection , I have the Arc'teryx Kappa SV (it will shed light rain and snow is no problem).It uses soft face fabric, and isn't restrictive, but still warm and windproof, plus it breathes better than a Gore Proshell, so better comfort range when it's not bitter cold.

The Arc'teryx Fission SV is the warmest. It's got 200gm Primaloft, and the Fission SL has 120gm equivalent. Thermatek is basically Primaloft that has been saturated with water repellent for even more wet weather loft protection. Additionally, the Fission SL has a lighter face fabric, shorter cut and pit zips.

A Large pant would fit you best

It's actually a solid black. The photo here shows contrast, but it doesn't look that way in person.

The Suunto t3c will show current speed, but you'll need to see average after you finish, as it's only shown in the logbook.

The Arc'teryx Rampart could be used for snowshoeing as it's got some weather resistance, is breathable, and dries quickly. I think it might be a little less weather resistance than would be ideal for winter sports, and I'd recommend the Gamma LT instead.

The older Stingray pant had a slightly more trim fit, angled zip cover, and less re-inforced insteps. A note, this pant is fully waterproof and has flannel lining, which adds a bit of insulation.

The Arc'teryx Blade 15 will fit a 15" lappy nicely, the sleeve is adjustable so you can make it fit exactly, and not have the computer bounce around. I've used mine without a protective sleeve, and the combo of a snug sleeve, smooth nylon and foam padded back and bottom, have kept my rig looking good.

From your description, I'd think the Arc'teryx Sidewinder in a large would be the way to go, unless he likes a really baggy fit. These are cut to accommodate layers, so you typically don't need to size up.

This Arc'teryx Solo would be OK for cold winters, but as a stand alone jacket, I'd suggest looking at the Kappa SV which has a bit thicker insulation, and Windstopper in the face fabric and a hood, but is in between thickness of the Dually and Solo.

There was a bad batch of Polartec fabric that was discovered during 08/09. The fabric on current pieces should be back to highest quality, and not subject to pilling. My older one is going on 4 years old, lots of wear, and very minimal pills.

For layering under the Arc'teryx Theta AR, my first choices would be the Hercules jacket or the Atom LT Jacket, they both layer better than a Venta AR , but still work well as stand-alone jackets for mild weather (Hercules blocks about 50% of wind and has good water beading, Atom is basically windproof and really compressible)Other good options- Tau Jacket or pullover.

The Arc'teryx x350 does have a haul loop for tag lines- not body weight.

The Arc'teryx Solo does have a DWR on the face fabric. Therma-Tek, which is used in this and the Dually, is basically Primaloft that Arc'teryx saturates with DWR, so it's incredibly water resistant both inside and out. You are correct that the 2.7oz Thermatek is equivalent to 133gm Primaloft. The Solo is basically wind-proof due to a very tight face fabric. Compared to the Kappa, the Solo is lighter and more compressible. I prefer the Solo, plus the black with gold logo looks really tough!

This is a shell jacket and as such, doesn't have insulation. It's great with a fleece (Delta SV is super warm and low bulk). If you want a more insulated version, check the Arc'teryx Scarabee, Venta SV, or Easyrider. Ideal warm coat is the Kappa SV or Fission SV, but the trade-off for super warm, is that they are more bulky; still super comfy though. The Arc'teryx patterning tends to move well, so a puffy doesn't feel restrictive.

I'd recommend a medium. It's cut to accommodate layers.

pilling will be covered under warranty, and is probably due to a bad batch of fabric from Polartech. I've had mine for a couple years with almost no pilling

Yes it does

Dimensions for the Khazri 35 are:
28.5” x 12” x 9” (LxWxD)

The Khazri 35 does have a light hipbelt. It is made with dual density foam "pods" that can be placed directly over your hipbones so you still get some padding. This design is used so as not to inhibit highsteps and other Alpine climbing moves (including the moon walk).

The Arc'teryx Gamma LT jacket doesn't have a liner per se, but it uses a plated fabric, which uses nylon and polyester threads. The weaving technique used puts the nylon on the outside (for durability and weather resistance) and the polyester inside
(for moisture management and softness). It makes it a cool piece because it has multiple performing fabrics in a light, stretchy textile. great jacket for the money!

See the comp for the Accelero to complete these answers. Comparing the Gamma LT pullover to the Gamma LT jacket. These use different fabrics, with the Gamma LT PO being a single layer of stretch woven fabric and the Gamma LT jacket a "plated" fabric using nylon on the face and polyester inside-this is a really cool fabric that is a single layer, but with different threads. Nylon-durable; Polyester-moisture management. So, the PO is lighter, and more stretchy, and a tiny bit more breathable (minor difference) Gamma LT jacket is really tough, still breathes really well, and sheds weather, but is a bit bigger if it's rolled up in your pack. Hope these help!

Here's a comparison on the Arc'teryx Gamma LT pullover and Accelero. Gamma LT has more stretch, and weather resistance and abrasion resistance, but is less breathable. I've got one of each, and I wear the Gamma for ski touring and climbing, and the Accelero for running, cycling and as a light mid-layer. Accelero is better at moisture management.

I've put in about 60 days on a Arc'teryx Theta AR and it works well as a ski jacket, as the above answer indicated. I think a small would work perfectly for you, as this jacket is cut to layer underneath, no need to up-size.

Dimensions for the Blade 15 are:
18.5"/47cm x 12"/30.5cm x 6"/15cm (LxWxD)

outside dimensions of the Arc'teryx Bora 95 are:
36.5” x 15” x 16” (LxWxD)
Man, that's a big pack!

El Salvador. Don't be concerned, the quality is equivalent, regardless of where it's made, Arc'teryx insists on this.

The Suunto T6c does have a barometer which measures altitude, but it doesn't show barometric readings. Looks like the specs are all correct here. I've had both the t6 and the t6c, and the t6c is better because of the comfort belt, the customizable displays (two of them) and a few additional body parameter measurements (training effect, cadence-ability)

The current Arc'teryx Sidewinder SV is made in Canada. Just a note, Arc'teryx uses exclusive factories, so quality is equivalent regardless of country of manufacture.

For colder days, the Rho AR bottom (reg length or boot cut) is the ultimate. It's got a smooth face fabric so it won't bind against the fleece in your Stingray pants; for warmer days, I'd go with the Rho LT or LTW (merino wool). And for the really bitter days, wear both and you'll be out all day.

This is it! The Arc'teryx Theta SV is made using Gore ProShell with Arc'teryx construction and face fabric. For perspective, the Theta SV is designed and built in Vancouver, BC, which has an annual rainfall total of 44"- that's a lot of all-day rain. The other great quality of this jacket is that it will maintain it's performance for years if you keep it clean and follow the care instructions.

Sorry for the misstatement, the Arc'teryx Sentry does use 100gm, and the Sceptre (women's version), 133gm.

The fit of the Arc'teryx Alpha jackets compared to the Beta AR: Both styles are fairly trim fits (about the same as the Beta), but not so much as to feel tight. The Alpha Jackets are about 1.5 inches longer on the bottom hem. The Alpha Jackets are both a bit lighter because of the face fabric, with the Alpha LT being the more durable/breathable of the two, due to the use of Gore Pro-Shell vs. Paclight.

Hey Jeff, You could go with either size in the Arc'teryx Delta LT, depending on how you like it to fit. As a layer under your Sidewinder, I'd go Lge, if you'd like a looser, more sweatshirt type fit, and XL would work but maybe be a bit long in the sleeves. I'm 6'175# and wear Med in this one.

The Delta SV is not wind-resistant. This jacket excels at insulating under a shell without being bulky or stiff. For wind-resistant insulation, my favorite is the Arc'teryx Hercules; it's got a high-loft fleece inside and Powershield 02 face fabric (this blocks about 60% of wind, light moisture and slides nicely under shells without being stiff like windstopper fleece) It's really comfortable and versatile. The Delta SV is a super insulator, but not as versatile to wear by itself. Another wind-resistant fleece is the Accomplice, but only about half as warm as these two.Hope that helps!

There are a couple versions of Power Stretch, and it's not obvious who's using which one. The better version has a higher nylon content which helps it hold up for longer. Arc'teryx uses the higher quality version of this fabric, and this, in combination with the fit and construction, are what separate the Arc'teryx Power Stretch pieces, like the Rho AR, from power stretch from other brands.

Contact the help desk:
http://www.suunto.com/suunto/support/main/ask_article1.jsp?CONTENT%3C%3Ecnt_id=10134198674750334&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=9852723697949391

The Foot pod will give you a running total of the distance. You can see it in real time, as well as speed- then you can see max and average speed on the logbook after you're done. You can see all this on the watch without uploading to the computer. The PC Pod allows you to put logs on the computer, and graph it.

I've had better accuracy with a foot pod, plus it's a smaller unit. Both the GPS pod and Foot pod can be calibrated, to increase accuracy (I've got mine to about 98% accurate)Just do 4 laps on a track (or other known distance)then adjust the mileage on the watch. Once you've done this it should be almost exact.

The Suunto GPS pod will transmit through clothing, but the less, the better for accurate signal reception. This comes with an arm band, and I've put mine in my bike pack outside pocket and had good results. The t6c does have a good backlight, and, this is one of my favorite features, you can choose which values are displayed on 2 different screens, so you can put your HR as the main readout, which displays it in bigger size numbers.

To compare the Arc'teryx Miura 50 and Silo 40. These two packs are designed for different purposes, but both work across a wide variety of uses. The Miura is built to carry a heavier load, with a slightly more padded hipbelt, and foam-lined bottom, and sides (to help protect the fabric and the gear inside)I like the Miura's loading options (top or panel). The Silo is lighter and carries skis and snowboards better because of the wrap system. The Silo is also a bit more streamlined in shape and has more organization options. If you're using it more as a climbing pack- Miura, for winter sports- Silo. Both are pretty sweet, though, and can be used year-round.

Great for Moto, and anything else you do where you want warmth, comfort and not to smell like a stinky hippie.

I wear the Arc'teryx Rho LTW as my primary base layer (I've got 2 of them) because they fit close and are long enough to stay tucked in, even when I pitch into a tree well. I also like these because they get way less stinky than my synthetic baselayer. I'd recommend a Lge for you. I'm 6'170 and the Med fits close and has long sleeves. If you need a mid-layer the Tau Pullover is amazing-and has long bottom hem for layering.

I've got a pair of Gallileo, and they don't smell. Not because of the shoe, but because I wash them, regularly. Buy some soap and a fingernail brush, and get to scrubbing!

The main difference is the weight of the face fabric. The LT uses a super-fine filament fabric that saves weight but still maintains good durability, although not quite as much as the thicker Beta AR fabric.

Compared to the Arc'teryx Beta AR, I see a few differences. The Beta AR is made from Gore Pro-Shell, these are made with Performance, which is a less breathable/durable Gore product. Arc'teryx Beta AR pants also use full length side zips for max ventilation and putting on over boots. Kevlar insteps patches on the Beta AR add huge durability. Lastly, and this may answer your last question. 5 year warranty on the Norrona; Lifetime warranty on the Beta AR.

difference between the Arc'teryx Sidewinder SV and AR is the amount of reinforcement fabric, the AR uses this extra durable fabric on shoulders down to lower arm and across the bottom hem. The SV is made entirely from the higher thread count fabric.

I you'd like a stow-hood the Sidewinder AR offers that feature.

The Arc'teryx Alpha SV is THE bomber mountain jacket; it will more than get the job done for the trips you've got planned. It is a bit longer than the Arc'teryx Beta AR, and also uses the more durable fabric through out, instead of as reinforcement. Sizing wise, you could wear a M if you want a more trim fit, but for really layering up, the L would give you a bit more room, but not fit like a sack. Have fun out there!

The front pocket on the Arc'teryx Khamsin 50 is a bit small for a shovel blade. It's a perfect spot to carry skins, though. I put my avy kit just inside the side zipper for quick access, while keeping it out of the way and secure.

The Arc'teryx Khamsin 50 can be lightened up a touch by removing the stays, and back panel foam (I'd say fit precedes weight, in that a good carrying pack lightens the overall load feel). For 3 day climbs, if you pack right, a 50 liter should be plenty (I did a 3 day Grand Teton ascent with a 45L Arc'teryx Naos; and that included 3 liter of Cabernet)For day trips, this pack can be compressed from the sides, removing the lid, and by closing down the front pocket. So, No.
You do have another good option in the Khazri 55- 5oz lighter, 5 liters bigger, and still compressible; the trade off is features and harness plush.

the Arc'teryx Accelero isn't waterproof, so it won't keep you dry when it is raining. It will shed a light drizzle, but it's really built to block some wind and wick moisture off your skin or baselayer.A good jacket to inspect for a combination of water resistance (if you buy a waterproof jacket for Extreme Power Walking you'll end up soaked from sweat, as truly waterproof jackets can't keep up with really high output sweating) is the Arc'teryx Venta LT. The Venta LT is made with windstopper, which is highly water resistant, but with a highly breathable material under the arms for excellent breathe-ability and moisture transfer. I'd recommend the Gamma LT pants for water-resistant, or the Alpha LT for waterproof pants (make sure the pants have vents if you're getting extreme)

The Arc'teryx Beta AR (as well as all Arc'teryx Gore Pro-Shell) is made with 3-layer construction- to clarify- any Pro-Shell piece only uses one layer of Gore-Tex; the other layers are the face fabric and woven backer. 2-layer construction does away with the woven backer, and typically uses a hung nylon or mesh liner. Arc'teryx uses 3-layer construction exclusively because it is typically more durable, less bulky and easier to layer. Additionally, the backer won't soak up excess moisture like a liner can.

I've been wearing the Medium (5'11,170) and it fits close enough to layer under shells, but loose enough to be comfy. If you want a more casual fit the Lge would also work.

Check out the Arc'teryx Bird Head Touque- it's my fave 'cause it's deep! definitely covers the lobes.

Goaty, the Arc'teryx Gamma MX pants don't have an internal gaiter, but do have reinforced instep, and a cinch on the bottom cuff. These work really well to keep the bottom hem in place through snow, and lots of dynamic movement. Killer pant!

The Arc'teryx Gamma MX has a bit more length than the Sigma AR(I want to say about 1.5 inches)The large in this jacket will fit you really well, and it's a good deal more breathable,stretchy, and lighter than the Sigma. Enjoy!

on the surface, these two jackets look very similar. The Arc'teryx Beta SL has a drop hood, which leaves the collar in place, and the hood out of the way, when it's not on your head. I'd say the main differences would be the super high quality of Arc'teryx construction, and a more durable face fabric. Plus, and this is just personal preference, the Beta SL has more interesting colors.

The Arc'teryx Sidewinder SV does not have a stow hood, but the Sidewinder AR does. I think the 3 positions, may have been a reference to the adjustability, 2 peripheral, 1 head circumference.

Sounds like the XL in the Arc'teryx Theta SV would fit you well. This particular jacket has long sleeves and bottom hem, but not too much circumference in the torso.

From what I can see, it looks like these three jackets stack up like this on the warmth scale- Koven, Sentry, then Hoback. The Arc'teryx Sentry has a couple details to consider. Highest quality face fabric and Gore Pro-Shell (this will keep the jacket performing longer than any other waterproof/breathable membrane)Primaloft is 130gm, whereas the Hoback is 100gm. I found the Sentry to be a great warmth level for a wide variety of conditions; I've skied in 700 fill down jackets, and I'm always too hot, unless I'm standing around, not skiing (which is why I wear slightly less insulated jackets now; not too much standing around) If you want the absolute highest level of protection and warmth, check the Arc'teryx Fission SV.

The Arc'teryx Stinger doesn't use a zip-in liner (none of the Arc'teryx jackets do)because it creates a stiff panel down the middle of your chest, as well as a potential cold spot where your insulating layer gaps. I'd suggest wearing a separate insulating layer(I like the Tau pullover or the new Atom jacket)which also gives more options for fine tuning your warmth.

The Arc'teryx Alpha LT has a lot of buzz for a couple reasons. The fit and finish on Arc'teryx is unmatched. Super tiny seams, no external stitching, and no rough edges on the seam tape make for excellent fit and great durability in a lightweight jacket. Also, the face fabric is of higher grade than any other coat; it uses tiny threads, that are tightly woven for a smooth hand but high abrasion resistance, this also helps hold the DWR finish much longer. The similarities on paper will quickly fade when you pull on the Alpha LT.

The Coffee Bean color on the Arc'teryx Contrail is closer to a brown, sort of Coffee bean-like.

The Arc'teryx Alpha SV is a superb all-year jacket. The breathability difference between the AR and LT version is minimal, and almost un-noticeable. For a jacket you want to use hard for years, the Alpha SV can't be beat.

The Arc'teryx Silo 18 will fit a tall torso better than the Miura 20 due to strap and frame design. It's still a bit of a stretch for the Silo 18 to fit a 6'3" frame correctly. That being said, the Arc'teryx Silo 30 comes in torso lengths, so a tall size in that pack would be the best fit, and can be compressed for small loads. I've got a couple tall buddies who use the Silo 30 and love it.

The Arc'teryx Gamma SV compared to the Venta SV: Gamma SV-more breathable, higher level of insulation due to high loft fleece inside, less wind-resistant (still blocks about 90%) a touch more stretch, less water resistant, but still can be out in a snowstorm for hours and keep you dry.
Venta SV: less breathable due to Windstopper membrane (still moves excess heat, and has pit-zips)higher weather protection due to membrane, taped seams (nearly waterproof, except in a protracted downpour. These two are pretty close performance wise. If you want a softshell for medium output activity, with a high level of weather protection, that will be used primarily as an outer layer the Venta SV can't be beat. Gamma SV excels in slightly higher output activities, and as a really warm layer under a water proof shell.

The Arc'teryx Sentry is the most similar to the old Patriot. The Sentry uses a bit less insulation (130 gm compared to 200gm in Patriot) Also, has an even better face fabric, and uses Gore-Tex Pro Shell, so better breathablilty, durability, and drape. Additional, Arc'teryx added the roll-away hood, a better powder skirt, and pit-zips.

What you should look at if you want the slimmest, most packable Arc'teryx jacket, in Gore Pro-Shell, is the Alpha LT or Beta LT. This Beta AR will be a bit lighter than an Alpha SV because it uses less of the super tough fabric and has a slightly shorter cut. The LT versions are significantly lighter, more packable and have a softer feel. For reference on the Arc'teryx naming scheme: SV-severe, AR-all 'round, LT-light. Don't worry though, they are still sized for layering, tough, technical and equally well built.

The Arc'teryx Alpha SV titanium is the same color all over, no shading differences.

you must not be looking at the Arc'teryx website, because they never list items at sale prices. If you've seen this on sale somewhere, it's because it's an older color.

The x9i strap isn't replaceable, you'll have to return the watch to Suunto for replacement, since it's a one piece design.

This Suunto GPS pod isn't the answer. I'd suggest looking at the Suunto bike pod, and Cadence pod, witch add speed and distance to the t3c, t4c and t6c. You can attach the spoke magnet to the wheel, and calibrate it so it's accurate.

I assume you've seen that this Arc'teryx sidewinder sv is in stock in medium in all 3 colors.

I wear a Med in the Arc'teryx Rho LTW, and I'm nearly the same size. It will still fit closely, but not be constricting.These are sweet shirts!

Here's the company line from the Arc'teryx Head of Softgoods Design:
"This is a highly debated area with more spin than a your average roller derby.

We have generally tried to stay clear of these numbers because our cumulative years in the field has taught us that true performance/comfort in waterproof breathable fabrics comes from a synergy of many different elements:

· Face fabric.

· DWR.

· Membrane/Evaporative resistance.

· Resistance to oil and other contaminants.

· Internal moisture dispersion/ backer.

· Garment design, fit and construction.

……and the longevity of each of these elements.

For those driven by figures: all our Gore-tex fabrics have a Hydrostatic head of at least 28 000mm which equates to 40PSI.

Gore prefers to use as RET values as they, like many, believe that it gives a better correlation to human comfort than Mvtr.

Our Values here are all lower than 6 but I do not have a specific number for each fabric. RET values are affected by the weight and density of face and backer fabrics. The Pro-shell range of fabrics spans RET values from 4 to 6. (lower is better) I believe eVent claims an RET of 4.5, but this figure must change with each individual fabric combination.

Best figures that I’ve been able to dig up is Gore 28 000 Hydrostatic head 17 000 MVTR again the inverted cup method used to measure MVTR has very little correlation to human comfort."

With that being said, I've seen a few tests comparing eVent to Gore Pro-shell. Initially the eVent does breathe better, but since it lacks the oleophobic (oil hating) membrane of Gore-Tex, the eVent membrane tends go get clogged quickly, which in a short time, greatly reduces it breathability. Arc'teryx has tested every WP/B membrane out there, and still uses only Gore Tex Pro-shell and Paclite, because it maintains the highest level of performance for the longest amount of time. The more important consideration in buying a jacket is Design, Construction, Materials. Both Gore and eVent make great products, it's what the manufacturers do with those membranes that count.
whew, that's a mouthful

For the Arc'teryx Windstopper jackets (Venta SV and AR) the seams are "finish taped" this means they have more weather resistance than an untaped seam (not totally waterproof by Gore standards, but will keep leaks out in all but heavy rain, great for snow). This finish taping allows using narrower seams and eliminating exposed stitching on the outside of the jacket for better durability.

I can speak to the Arc'teryx question. For comparison, the Venta AR. The face fabric used by Arc'teryx are chosen for their durability, and performance. The face of a Venta AR has a smooth, tight weave, and just a bit of stretch. Construction is superior: no exposed stitching, and super narrow, internally taped seams for better durability and fit. The extra cost of an Arc'teryx jacket will more than justify itself over the life of the piece. Longer lasting, but also, better performance every day.

The Arc'teryx Solo has a water resistant shell, and insulation, but as a stand-alone jacket for moto, you'd be better served to check out the Fission SL, AR or SV, because they have a Gore-tex Proshell face fabric, and are totally water/wind proof. For pants, the Titan is the warmest waterproof pant, but I'd probably look at a shell/fleece pant combo. Beta AR or LT would be good options- lightweight and packable, trimmer fit, and easy to get on over boots.

The Arc'teryx Arrakis 40 carries avy gear quite well. Shovels, skins and avy kit will all fit in the front pocket (yes, you need to break it down). There are wand pockets internally for probe and handle. The Silo 40 is also a good option, but doesn't have the waterproof fabric or the super nice suspension that is featured on the Arrakis.

This Suunto face shield will work for any of the t-series watches, including the t4c

The real difference between the Arc'teryx Stinger Bib and Theta SV: fit; Stinger have a fuller cut in the legs. Features; Stinger has thigh pockets, and thigh vents, as opposed to full length zips on the Theta SV. Both use the stretch-woven back panel that breathes well, but still sheds show- it's the same fabric used in the Gamma MX, but with a slightly lighter fleece backing.

The Arc'teryx Griffon is more of a slim fit, as it's designed to be layered, but also works great as an outer layer in mild weather. Blocks about 50% of wind, sheds light moisture, and breathes really well. Also, the face fabric is smooth, so it doesn't bind under shell jackets. Versatile, tough, and comfortable.

The Arc'teryx Scorpion is about mid-hip length, and, like all Arc'teryx jackets, the arms are long enough to keep cuffs in place through a full range of motion. Arc'teryx also uses gussets under the arms to compliment the sleeve length, keep underarm bulk to a minimum (laminated zips also help this), and keep the hem down where it belongs. Enjoy!

I'd suggest trying XXL...

Sounds like you need to go into the Suunto t3c menu and change the speed reading to mph from mi. This is in the general settings menu

The Suunto t6c doesn't have repeating countdown timers, but it does have chrono and lap timers.

The Arc'teryx Griffon does have a hem drawcord.

for the Arc'teryx Alpha LT hood, the pros of the storm hood (no separate collar) better coverage on your face, especially when the hood is up. It really seals up, and you can tuck in really deep when the wind and snow are howling. if you wear it in milder weather, the front part doesn't lay as flat as a collared version. The Arc'teryx Beta LT is the alternate version of this jacket with a collar and roll-hood,if you prefer that style.

You can choose either system for display.

the Suunto PODs will work with T-series watches only (except t1,t1c)