- Home
- rich363623
rich363623
Use your real name to add some legitimacy to your content. Real names mean real community, and real community means real knowledge. Gear Gurus who use their real names get bumped up 1.5x for each contribution - you deserve the credit. For more info check out the Help Center.
This is how you compare to all the other Gear Gurus on Backcountry.com. You earn one point for each list / review / question / answer / gear photo / comments / votes you contribute. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up, but you lose a point for every thumbs down. Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x—you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Change me.
This is how you compare to the other Gear Gurus within a group of products. You earn one point for each of your list / reviews / questions / answers / photos / comments / votes. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up (killer), but you lose a point for every thumbs down (filler). Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x-you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Arc'teryx Stingray Jacket - Men's
October 8, 2010
My view is that it depends on how you want to layer it. I'm 5"8 150lbs and have a large Stingray. (for reference - I have a medium Sidewinder SV.) I find the fit of both similar. With both, I can't fully layer up one smaller size down - which for me on the coldest day would be a baselayer, a 100 weight fleece and a Arcteryx Maverick fleece. Even if I drop the 100 weight on a cold but not brutal day, I found the M Stingray too tight. On the other hand, with minimal base, the M is just right. My collection of Arcteryx mid and outer layers is comprised of both M and L for these reasons. In the end it's up to you and you won't really know until you get a chance to play around.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Rossignol S3 Koopman Alpine Ski
March 26, 2010
It depends on you really...the early rocker rise tip/tail does make them ski short in terms of turn initiation, but that is one of the points of this ski...super playful, quick turning, great for trees and bumps and very respectable in the pow...but it is not a pow only pig. If you are leaning towards a pow ski then you would appreciate longer I'd think. But keep in mind at 168 that "shortness" will abate in the pow since the rocker tip/tail will be in use then. They are not the greatest carvers since the there is no traditional tail in that they will not hold an edge for an extended carve..but they carve super quick and good enough for me, since carving is last on my list
I'm a little younger, taller and lighter than you and I love the 168's for the bumps trees and few big pow days I get.
Helpful Votes: 1 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Temporarily Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{elseif product_status == 'poos'}
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{else}
View Product Details >
{/if}
Read all Reviews about this product
Sold Out
{/if} {/if}

