James Molnar

*Available for US shipment only.
Says it in the item description.

650 fill

This jacket isn't too slim fitting, it's meant to accommodate layers. You seem to have a similar build to my dad and he wears xxl in most mountain hardwear stuff so I would go for that.

It'll be water resistant but not waterproof and there is no hood.

The large sleeves will be shorter than on an extra large. This should be perfect for layering under a shell.

http://www.backcountry.com/store/sizingchart.html?sizing_id=302&sku=HYH0566&pg_id=200&subcat_id=20&cat_id=11

This jacket will definitely stand up to all snow conditions and is completely windproof, but it is more lightweight and not as durable because it is made from paclite. To be warm down to -5 degrees F, I would say you would need a down sweater like the mountain hardwear phantom layered underneath with a midweight baselayer.

nope

Yes the hood will be pretty big without a helmet, but they have enough adjustments to cinch down to your head.

Just search for it on google shopping. I've seen them on there before, but probably not many of them. Not sure why you're looking for the 2007 model but I would just get the current version.

Yes, all mountain hardwear down items come with one.

Just read the instructions on the tag. It shouldn't be much different than you're normal laundry.

Those two jackets aren't really comparable. The absolute zero is meant to be worn on the coldest possible expeditions. It has 800 fill down and is completely waterproof. Its really only for the serious cold. The dually should be pretty warm but not nearly the level of the absolute zero. The arc'teryx is also filled with synthetic insulation instead of down. It is made more for extra warmth on climbs when you are just standing around, put on over your climbing layers.

Mountain hardwear monkey man has great loft for layering. Or the mountain hardwear tech jacket if you want something more versatile because it has windstopper. Of course if you want The North Face, there is always the denali and the denali wind pro.

No way to get one from this site. You could try another site or a local retailer.

The gascans won't just fall down if you're sitting still, but you might have some slippage if you're doing vigorous activity. They aren't really made for that though. They should be fine for day to day activities and will be more or less slippery depending on the finish you get.

Nope, not the same lenses.

Sure

that would be a negative. But it is supposed to be super breathable.

It will keep you warm down to those temps and then some because it is a pretty heavy weight fleece. I would go with the non hooded version though if you're planning on layering.

white and gray/silver

They are all the same zipper but there are multiple zipper pulls so you can either vent or open the drop seat.

Its the same material as the stingray.

This would probably be good for Kilimanjaro if properly layered. Its lightweight and completely waterproof.

you probably just tried on the smaller size(asian fit) ones. Go to another store, they should have the regular size.

No I would definitely look for some gore-tex shell pants and layer underneath them. These are not nearly substantial enough in terms of waterproofing and durability for high altitude mountaineering. If you are going to be doing this kind climbing I would look to mountain hardwear or arc'teryx and find something with gore-tex pro shell. You won't be sorry you spent the extra money when you stay dry in a rainstorm.

I have to disagree with J. Troxell on this only because I have seen this used as a mid layer with success. My father uses an Alchemy along with a Gore-tex shell for one of his skiing jackets. It keeps him warm and is great because you can just shed the shell and use the softshell if it becomes warmer. Using this as a mid layer will not disappoint. If you're looking for a very high level of breathability this may not be the best choice, but for downhill skiing I think it will be more versatile. If you're looking for something even more breathable, you should check out the monkey man fleece, it has high loft and high breathability but lacks versatility.

I would probably go with a large, especially if you have long arms and want to be able to layer. I think a medium would be all around too small.

Depends on how much you want to spend, but for an overall, any condition shell I would get something with gore-tex pro shell. I think a good jacket would be the mountain hardwear beryllium, its not cut too tight and would go well with this down.

It depends on what you plan on doing in it. If its for just casual wear or hiking, it should be warm enough for those temps. If you're skiing it should be pretty good below 50 degrees, over that it would probably be too warm, not to mention lacking snow. If you're doing something more active like climbing or biking it would be too warm. It also depends on the wind.

I would say this jacket will perform well for your needs. Polartec Power Shield is very breathable while blocking most of the wind. I think this should be light enough for some warmer temps. Something with windstopper will probably be too warm for 50 degree temps especially if you are doing something active. It doesn't breathe quite as well and it provides a substantial amount of warmth.

Powder cuffs are just built in gaiters that will work perfectly for skiing.

contact arc'teryx, they have a lifetime warranty. Not sure if this would be covered, if not they can probably send you patches or something.

Anything with windstopper will be moderately warm on its own. Power stretch will be more air permeable and not wind resistant, which will be best for layering. Windstopper will be good for layering as well as on its own. The MHW windstopper tech jacket will be more comparable to this jacket and more substantial than the Power Stretch Jacket. I would go with a windstopper jacket for your needs.

If you liked the fit of the large in the other jackets I would probably go with a large in the tech jacket also. If for some reason it doesn't fit right you can exchange it very easily through backcountry.

You could go below zero with a fleece and midweight base layer, especially if you are moving.

Lol I would wear it.

Paclite is the lightest material gore makes, but it is extremely tough for rainwear. I think it should be able to take a lot of abuse, but if you need something even tougher I would look for something with gore-tex pro shell.

The hood is not removable and this jacket is windproof and has a hood and the serendipity does not.

I just tried this on in a store and the inside is a light fleece that is pretty soft. I don't think the hood was lined with fleece and I don't think the hood was big enough to accommodate a helmet.

It has zippers, but what do you mean by up zippers?

It is waterproof using conduit sl membrane. It should definitely handle rain, but you would probably be burning up in this coat if it is warm enough to rain.

Probably so it won't get in the way of a harness. If you want a longer version you should get the sub zero sl parka. You can probably exchange for one pretty easily.

This should be a great substitute, especially if you plan on wearing it as an outer layer because it is completely windproof. It is also great for layering and should be warmer than your previous fleece.

The collar isn't huge, but it does have the non removable hood. This makes it open up a little more when not fully zipped. When fully zipped it comes to about the chin, but if the wind is blowing you can retreat below the collar a bit. I have never had a problem with the size of the collar.

The breathability should be close to the same, maybe even a slight advantage to conduit. The Gore-Tex fabric will be even more waterproof and durable. It just depends on how much you're willing to spend.

Gore-tex paclite is extremely light and weatherproof. It should perform excellent for both tasks. It will also be a good shell for skiing with layers.

It seems like the extra large would be the right choice if you want to layer.

This jacket has wind pro which is quite wind resistant, but if you want something totally windproof, you should get something like the venta lt or mountain hardwear alchemy. Those have windstopper but are a bit more pricey, this jacket seems like it would do a pretty good job keeping you warm on the links.

No but it probably has a DWR coating on it making it water resistant.

This has performance shell which is not as breathable and a bit heavier.

Wearing them seperately is usually more comfortable anyways, because they don't bunch up. Also if you get warm you can take off a layer more easily.

It seems pretty incredible that you have that much room in a small. I am the same height as you and 20 pounds heavier and I usually wear a large in mountain hardwear jackets. I do have extraordinarily long arms, but I've never had a problem with it being too baggy, even without any layers underneath. I'm not sure what to tell you, maybe try another website to see if they have XS. Also ask a friend or family member if it looks too big, maybe it just feels that way but isn't actually that puffy.

Thanks for the info. I was only wondering about the tabs because I've read a bunch of complaints on here about them.

A pair with fire or ice iridium lenses would probably be good or titanium lenses which are mirrored.

How was Paris?

Buy a hat. Or exchange it, backcountry will take returns even if you've used it.

You should probably just talk to someone at marmot. They have a lifetime warranty so they should be able to fix it for you.

If you're buying it from somewhere sketchy looking, its probably fake. Most actual gear shops should be safe.

It is probably a better choice to spend the extra money and get the gore-tex, you will not be dissappointed. Mountain hardwear also has the typhoon jacket which has paclite and it is the same price as the outdoor research.

The red color from MHW is usually pretty bright, but its not overwhelming. It's pretty true to color in the picture. I have never seen the green color in person though.

Considering the whole shell is made to be waterproof with the conduit laminate, I would say the seat should follow suit. There isn't a zipper on the back so you shouldn't have any leaking.

They are the same fleece weight, so they are probably about the same warmth. MHW may have a little more loft but your decision is just up to company preference.

nope. This is just a regular, non-windproof denali with a hood.

A small would probably be better. My brother has these in medium and he's is like 5'7 or 5'8

they're open. Check out the picture.

You could probably look on ebay.

They are probably about the same warmth, both being 800 fill down. Both pants are made for serious cold so it would have to be extremely cold to need a lot of layering. Also if it is that cold you won't have to worry too much about water getting in, but they do both use laminates so you should be good without a hardshell.

I'm thinking you would get much too hot if you tried using these for skiing. But unless you're going through trees, these should be able to handle a fall on snow.

In terms of stand alone warmth, this jacket is much warmer than the denali. Its windproof and seems to have a more durable fleece material bonded to the windstopper membrane. It's also great for layering and has pit zips, which the denali wind pro doesn't have. If you're planning to wear it on its own, then this is definitely the fleece you want.

I would tentatively say no. Most of the zip in system use the zippers with the larger teeth, the apex softshells have the zippers with really skinny, close together teeth.

If your looking for something really durable and waterproof I would definitely go for the gore-tex pro. Its super light and tough.

the hooded version has the conduit waterproof laminate while this just has a DWR finish to repel water.

For running I wouldn't recommend using it unless it was below freezing. I've used it under 20 degrees for running and still had to open it up, but that's what the pit zips are for.

Just by looking at the zipper, standard YKK, I would say you could zip this into any TNF jacket that has the zip in capability(it says whether it has it in the tech specs). Zipping it in may not be very good though because of the thickness. It may be too bulky if zipped in. I would just put it on under a shell instead of zipping it in.

it'll probably be about the same warmth as the alchemy. its not as water resistant either. it can be worn on its own on warmer days but i use it as a layer much more often in the winter

you will definitely have room for layering, the arms are also a little longer for added room. i have this jacket and it fits the windstopper tech jacket underneath with room.