- Home
- Brandon
Brandon
Camper/Hiker // AT Skier // Skier // Mountain Biker // Road Biker // Climber // Biker // Alpine Skier
Brandon:
#276
of 174,454
22 Reviews:
Helpful?
5 Yes
5 Questions:
Helpful?
0 Yes
36 Answers:
Helpful?
0 Yes
0 Photos:
Helpful?
0 Yes
0 Videos:
Helpful?
0 Yes
3 Comments:
Helpful?
0 Yes
1 Wishlists:
Helpful?
0 Yes
0 Field Tests:
Helpful?
0 Yes
-
Stomping Grounds:
Snowbasin, Alta, The Canyons UT, Alyeska AK -
Bio:
My life is skiing. My home is outside, on the mountain. What personally drives me is my lust for adventure. If someone can do one thing, I want to be able to do it better. If I see a someone on the slopes, creating a line that I hadn't thought of, I'm one of the first to make my line just as good if not better. But i will never brag about my accomplishments. The self satisfaction is enough for me.
Rankings 
- #8 of 1,867 - Alpine Fat Skis
- #13 of 2,190 - Big Mountain Freeride Skis
- #26 of 1,205 - All Mountain Skis
- #78 of 1,079 - Alpine Ski Bindings
Use your real name to add some legitimacy to your content. Real names mean real community, and real community means real knowledge. Gear Gurus who use their real names get bumped up 1.5x for each contribution - you deserve the credit. For more info check out the Help Center.
This is how you compare to all the other Gear Gurus on Backcountry.com. You earn one point for each list / review / question / answer / gear photo / comments / votes you contribute. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up, but you lose a point for every thumbs down. Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x—you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Change me.
This is how you compare to the other Gear Gurus within a group of products. You earn one point for each of your list / reviews / questions / answers / photos / comments / votes. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up (killer), but you lose a point for every thumbs down (filler). Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x-you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Salomon Shogun Ski
October 19, 2011
Shogun is going to give you everything you need. Its wide enough to make powder skiing simple, but still narrow enough to really have fun on groomers. If you are focusing on powder and trees then get a ski that was made for that and more. Powder skiing is great. And its even better with the right ski. This is the perfect all mountain ski. It will do everything you ask.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Line Sir Francis Bacon Ski
October 19, 2011
If you want a go anywhere ski the bacon is it. Its got a 108 underfoot so skiing powder is a piece of cake. It won't be as fun to ride on the ice. But it will do alright. And as for jibbing in the park. This is working on the bigger side of park friendly, but it will get the job done. After all it does jib pretty well in the backcountry.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
DAKINE Heli Pro 20L Backpack - 1200cu in
October 18, 2011
I have used camelbak in mine. It fits a little weird at first but you soon forget about it.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Atomic Bent Chetler Ski
October 18, 2011
Practically the same ski. Both are used for the same type of skiing. Both have comparable stiffness. I like the chet cuz its a little wider, but you can't go wrong with either ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Atomic Bent Chetler Ski
October 18, 2011
If you like to play around in the powder go 183. I am 5'10" 150lbs and there is no doubt that I would go 183. This ski is made to be playful. Its not supposed to be a big mountain type ski. This ski is more for the playful skier. But like will said. 192 is a better all around powder ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Atomic Bent Chetler Ski
October 18, 2011
For a better powder experience go with the 192. If you would rather play around, throw some gnarly tricks go 183. This ski is meant to be played with in the powder so personally I would go maybe a little shorter. You won't lose any float. You will just be sacrificing the ability to really open it up and charge hard.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Atomic Bent Chetler Ski
October 18, 2011
I have never heard of it but I don't see why not. This is a light ski and I think it would work great as a bigger tele ski. The rocker will definitely help. I say go for it.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Dynastar Legend Pro Rider 115 Ski
October 18, 2011
Any brakes on any bindings can be bent. Plus if you are skiing a ski like this you must be a good skier. So you wont need brakes all that often. Get the 110 and bend them. A 125 is too big. If you are really railing the edges on these skis you will hit the brakes cuz they stick out farther than the ski and that will cause you to lose your ability to lay down a solid turn. 110 will be perfect for these skis.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
K2 Pon2oon Ski
October 18, 2011
K2 has precut skins for these skis. As you can see the rivets in the tip and tail are what you hook your skin up to. So there is no need to guess. As far as tele skiing on these. These things are massive. Which makes it a lot of ski to carry up the side of the mountain. What a lot of people dont understand is that tele skiing isn't always a powder day. So you need a ski that can ski it all and get you out of tight situations. I would look at K2's other skis such as the darkside, sidestash, or coomback. Those are good big mountain chargers, but are also geared to be good tele skis as well.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Salomon Rocker 2 Ski
October 18, 2011
Someone who wants to ski the 192 is going to be going big 110% of the time. They will be the hardest of chargers. Go with the 184 if you don't ski aggressively. Also I would maybe look for a ski thats not so stiff. Skis like the Bentchetler and Armada JJ. A softer flex will be a less aggressive ski and you will be able to go with a bigger ski without being afraid.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Sold Out
K2 Kung Fujas Ski
October 18, 2011
This ski has turned into an allmountain ski that is really good for backcountry booters. K2 always has tended to have heavier skis, so for a park ski I would say this ski is about 50/50. 50% park 50% everything else. It will do the job but I would take collins advice and look into some other skis. Once you get into a width of over 100. It tends to lean towards an allmountain powder ski. And less towards a park ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Line Influence 105 Ski
October 18, 2011
Like collin said they would be easier to ski in the trees. I also believe they are a little bit stiffer than the p100. Making this a good big mountain ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Line Influence 105 Ski
October 18, 2011
I would actually say go for the 186. I am 5'10" 150lbs and I would go for the 186. Its going to give you more of that hard charging big mountain ski feel. It will also help you more in the powder. Go bigger. It will make you an even better skier than you already are.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Line Blend Ski
October 7, 2011
This ski features an early rise tip and tail. So you can mount it a little forward without losing float. But it really depends on the type of skiing you are doing. If you plan on hitting backcountry booters or playing a lot in the park with these skis, I would mount them dead center. If you just want more of a playful ski then +3 is great. Plus a great binding for you if you can't choose would be the schizo's from marker. The squire would probably suit your skiing the best but the jester and griffon are good too. And the schizo's allow you to move forward or back 3cm depending on what type of skiing you will be doing.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Salomon Czar Ski
October 5, 2011
Decide what you plan on skiing more. And your type of skiing. If you like to make long turns, go fast, and just charge, then go 190. If you want a ski that is more playful in the powder, then go 182.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Rossignol 2011/2012 Super 7 Ski
October 5, 2011
Depends on how you want to ski. If you want a ski you can play around with then mount at the 0. But for a more hard charging type ski mount -2. Personally with the super 7's. I would mount -2. Its not the type of ski you are going to be throwing a lot of tricks with. And at -2. You will be forced to stay forward on your skis putting you in a better skiing position.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Rossignol S3 Ski
October 5, 2011
Definitely the 178. I am 5'10" 155lbs and i ski the 178. Its a great size because the rocker makes the ski a little shorter than normal. And when in the trees, you can shut it down before you even realize it. The 186 might be too big just because its going to be a lot more ski to have to carry up the mountain.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Marker Jester Ski Binding
October 3, 2011
Trying to find the right freeride/big mountain binding for my new RAMP Peacepipe's. I have looked at Marker Jester & Griffon, Salomon STH 14 & 16, Rossi FKS 140, and some other bindings like the Look Pivot and Atomic FFG. I am not big by any standard (only 5'10" 155lbs) but I do plan on competing and consider myself advanced but not quite expert. I have never been binding shopping so anyone who could shed some light on what binding is the best choice for the best price. (Under $350)
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Salomon STH 16 Driver Ski Binding
October 3, 2011
Trying to find the right freeride/big mountain binding for my new RAMP Peacepipe's. I have looked at Marker Jester & Griffon, Salomon STH 14 & 16, Rossi FKS 140, and some other bindings like the Look Pivot and Atomic FFG. I am not big by any standard (only 5'10" 155lbs) but I do plan on competing and consider myself advanced but not quite expert. I have never been binding shopping so anyone who could shed some light on what binding is the best choice for the best price. (Under $350)
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol FKS 140 Ski Binding
October 3, 2011
Trying to find the right freeride/big mountain binding for my new RAMP Peacepipe's. I have looked at Marker Jester & Griffon, Salomon STH 14 & 16, Rossi FKS 140, and some other bindings like the Look Pivot and Atomic FFG. I am not big by any standard (only 5'10" 155lbs) but I do plan on competing and consider myself advanced but not quite expert. I have never been binding shopping so anyone who could shed some light on what binding is the best choice for the best price. (Under $350)
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
K2 HellBent Ski
September 29, 2011
I just bought that same model. From what I have heard that model is way floaty. Full rocker underneath you. And at 122 waist and full rocker. There is no way anything is floatier.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Armada ANT Ski
April 23, 2011
They would be. Armada makes some of the lightest skis in the business. I wouldn't see why they wouldn't be. They are the ideal size for backcountry travel.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Armada ANT Ski
April 23, 2011
Even with a smaller 181, this ski is goin to be a lot to handle. If it had a softer flex I would say maybe. But this is the stiffest of the stiff. Unless you're a strong experienced skier, I would say check out some other skis like the JJ's or something along that line.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Black Diamond Megawatt Ski
April 23, 2011
Even at an older age tele isn't going to make it easier to ski. Always dropping your knees. and if your knees aren't what they used to be, I wouldn't go tele. AT is the way to go. You get all the versatility of goin up the side of a mountain, but you have more control, and less wear and tear on the knees on AT bindings. Plus, when you are feelin a little crazy, you are able to charge a little bit harder with the AT.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Line Blend Ski
April 14, 2011
They'll do good. But they are a little too wide to use them as an everyday park ski. This is more 50% park 50% everything else.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Line Blend Ski
April 14, 2011
great ski for starting out. Another ski similar to this one is the Rossi S3. Both skis are great in the powder and trees. As far as length goes, I would probably go for the 183 in the blends or a 186 in the S3's
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Line Blend Ski
April 14, 2011
168 I think would be a little short. Unless you plan on skiing a lot more park than backcountry. If you like backcountry, your safest bet is the 173. It may be long in the park, but you'll get a lot more benefits out of it.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Line Blend Ski
April 14, 2011
Depends on your style of skiing. If you are looking for this ski to be more playful, mount it in the center. If you want more of a traditional hard charging ski, mount it behind the center line.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Moment Belafonte Alpine Ski
April 14, 2011
It'll ski short. But I'm 5'10" on rockered 177 Rossi S3's and they are perfect length. Just be prepared to charge hard. Cuz with a ski that is that long even with rocker it might be a little much to handle if you have never skiid that big of a ski before. I suggest demo'ing it before you buy. Moment skis are made for the hard chargers.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Moment Belafonte Alpine Ski
April 14, 2011
I'm 5'10" and it clears the top of my head. So around 6' probably
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol S97 Ski
April 14, 2011
This ski is goin to be a little on the burly side. If you are a hard charger who likes to go fast, and carve turns then this is a good ski. Its more powder specific and the east coast isn't known for their powder. The S80 is more of an east coast ski. The S3 is also a powder specific ski which is a lot more playful than the S80 and the S97.
In conclusion, if you are an east coast skier stick with the S80. But if you plan on making a couple trips out west during the season, go for the S97. It'll make skiing a lot more enjoyable during the deep powder days out west.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Atomic Bent Chetler Ski
January 9, 2011
I'm on a pair of Rossi S3's right now. And I love them. But Rossi's are still too heavy for me. I'm 5'11" and 150lbs and wanting to get a ski that I can throw tricks in the backcountry with. I'm getting into Freeride comps and need a ski that can throw it down no matter what. I've been looking at the Bent Chetlers along with the Bluehouse Maestro, Rossi S7's, K2 Obsethed, and whatever other ski I come across with the same dimensions. I would just like something that is playful, easy to throw around, can huck 20'+ cliffs and allows me to ride away like a pro.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
CoreUPT Candide Pow Ski
December 18, 2010
There's not much of a catch. On the website they go for about a little over $500. But most CoreUPT skis are cheaper than a K2, Salomon, or Rossi ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
CoreUPT Candide Pow Ski
December 18, 2010
They don't ski as short as a rockered ski would. Its a traditional design with full camber and full side cut. So if you're lookin to hit backcountry lines then 175 would be good for you, but don't expect it to tear it up in the park like a true park ski.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol S3 Koopman Alpine Ski
November 11, 2010
Its a trade-off. . . The S3's are heavier than the line prophet 100. But line doesn't come with rocker which the S3 does. So it all depends on the features. If you're looking strictly for weight. . . go check out some of the line skis. If you want something with more features unique to powder skiing then the S3 is a good choice.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol S3 Koopman Alpine Ski
November 11, 2010
If you're looking for a more traditional feel. . . I would say anywhere back of center or 0. My skis are mounted center and even though they perform great in Utah powder. They are mounted to also tear it up in the park. So for what you're looking for I would say -2 line is your best bet. It will give you that more traditional powder ski feel.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol S3 Koopman Alpine Ski
October 14, 2010
Well I own the O9/10 S3 model and I'm pretty sure they have rocker. Just looking at them you can see the rocker clear as day. It has amptek so its a mix between rocker and camber. But thanx for your answers.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol Super S7 Ski
October 14, 2010
The super s7 has a layer of titanal in the core which the regular s7 does not. This allows the ski to be more playful. Its poppier and stiffer that the regular s7. The super s7 is for the guy who is looking for a hard charging ski in the deeps, and steeps. Someone who is going to go hard every run, stomp big cliffs, and just be a all around hard charger. This ski excels in the big lines on the alaska spines. And in wide open bowls.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Backcountry Access Traverse EXT Shovel
October 12, 2010
I usually carry my shovel on the outside of my Dakine Heli pack, it fits great. It can also fit inside the pack if you wanted to carry it that way.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Rossignol S3 Koopman Alpine Ski
September 18, 2010
Does anyone know whether or not they changed anything from the 2009/2010 S3 Koopmans to these 2010/2011 S3 Freerides?? It seems like the dimensions are the same, but what about the Rocker??? Last year Rossignol mentioned nothing about the Rocker dimensions. Just wondering if anyone knew?
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
K2 BackLash Telemark Ski
September 17, 2010
My personal opinion is to go with the BackLash. For one it has All-terrain Rocker. Which will allow you to rise up on top of the snow. And it will allow you to trek up a mountain with ease. They are also lighter than the Havocs. And if you ever decided to take a trip out west. You're going to definitely prefer the larger dimensions. The only draw backs are going to be with size comes less quickness from edge to edge. And they may be a tad bit harder to muscle a turn. But in the long run. You will learn to appreciate the larger dimensions. Plus. . . with a ski like the backlash you'll go from intermediate to advanced in no time.
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >
Temporarily Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{elseif product_status == 'poos'}
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{else}
View Product Details >
{/if}
Read all Reviews about this product
Sold Out
{/if} {/if}

