Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Get Your Profile Dialed

skiaddict

Skier

skiaddict: #16,105 of 94,092 More Information

1 Reviews:

Helpful?
1 Yes | 0 No

0 Questions:

Helpful?
0 Yes | 0 No

1 Answers:

Helpful?
0 Yes | 0 No

0 Photos:

Helpful?
0 Yes | 0 No

0 Comments:

Helpful?
0 Yes | 0 No

0 Gearlists:

Helpful?
0 Yes | 0 No

Flag

Un-Flag

Close

Something wrong with this profile?

Thanks for pointing it out. We'll take it down immediately and send it to our clean-up crew.

This profile was: (Optional)

Use your real name to add some legitimacy to your content. Real names mean real community, and real community means real knowledge. Gear Gurus who use their real names get bumped up 1.5x for each contribution - you deserve the credit. For more info check out the Help Center.

This is how you compare to all the other Gear Gurus on Backcountry.com. You earn one point for each list / review / question / answer / gear photo / comments / votes you contribute. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up, but you lose a point for every thumbs down. Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x—you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.

Change me.

This is how you compare to the other Gear Gurus within a group of products. You earn one point for each of your list / reviews / questions / answers / photos / comments / votes. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up (killer), but you lose a point for every thumbs down (filler). Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x-you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.

Line Sir Francis Bacon Alpine Ski

February 17, 2009

I think the bacons would be a better backcountry set up, with the early taper they hook less in powder/soft snow and are lighter and quicker, In my opionion rossie tried to copy the bacon when it came out with the steeze last year same as the s6 this year. The bacon is more versatile then the s6, heck i was riding them in the pipe 2 days ago and they worked great plus they float a little better, I would get 2 pairs of bacons at that price or get 1 and wait till the 2010's come out because they will have a slight early rise/rocker, even better for skinning.If you're getting a two pairs of fat skis, mount the backcountry pair with something other then dukes, fritschis or naxos maybe. The duke just isn't great for the backcountry unless you are using it at the resort all the time as well. Another note, unless you are setting your skin tracks every time you head out in the backcountry, rocker/early rise isn't always a good thing, and reverse camber is definitely bad.

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 0 No

Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Q&A about this product >

great ski

Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski

Dynastar Huge Trouble Ski

Rating for this product: 5 February 17, 2009

I demoed this ski at at Alyeska AK the other day. It is such a sick ski. The only other big ski experience I have is a pair of last years 189 Seths with dukes, and though they bust crud and anything else like a steamroller they just seem huge and clumsy lengthwise a lot of the time. When the demo guy handed me the 185 Huge Troubles, I was worried the same thing would be true. Instead, the skis felt light, nimble, and fun. The width is too much if all you do is ski groomers (the ski doesn't lie flat if you aren't bowlegged), but it handles them satisfactorily. They float great over any soft snow, and if you like air, these skis will help you stop anything. I took an air I thought was like 10-15 feet and it turned out like 30, but these skis are stable enough to pull out anything. A heads up I'm 5'10", 135 pounds.

Helpful Votes: 1 Yes | 0 No

0 Comments

Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
Read all Reviews about this product