- Home
- NSu2705450
NSu2705450
Rankings 
Use your real name to add some legitimacy to your content. Real names mean real community, and real community means real knowledge. Gear Gurus who use their real names get bumped up 1.5x for each contribution - you deserve the credit. For more info check out the Help Center.
This is how you compare to all the other Gear Gurus on Backcountry.com. You earn one point for each list / review / question / answer / gear photo / comments / votes you contribute. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up, but you lose a point for every thumbs down. Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x—you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Change me.
This is how you compare to the other Gear Gurus within a group of products. You earn one point for each of your list / reviews / questions / answers / photos / comments / votes. You gain an extra point every time someone gives one of your contributions a thumbs up (killer), but you lose a point for every thumbs down (filler). Bonus: if you use your real name, your point total increases by 1.5x-you deserve credit for putting your neck on the line to make this community better. For more info, check out the Help Center.
Mountain Hardwear South Col Backpack - 4200-5000cu in
July 23, 2009
Has anyone bushwhacked with this pack yet? I'm curious how the lightweight fabric holds up to this kind of puncture/abrasion (on long gnarly approaches).
Also, what are peoples' opinions of the fancy ice-tool/bottle-opener gizmos, having used them in the field? Were your tools held down tight, or did they flop around? Did the adze of your axe protrude beyond the side of your pack and get caught on things? Would the little attachment-thing get ripped out easily if the axe gets stuck on a branch or rock?
Lastly, has anyone actually packed this thing to capacity - like expedition-stuffed full? It looks from the photo that this pack has that "hourglass" shape that is increasingly popular (you know, skinny waist and lumpy hips) -- my experience is that hourglass-shaped packs are challenging to fill efficiently. While packing, did the lightweight fabric lead to more lumps and bulges on the surface (because the fabric is stretchier)?
So far, I'm considering this and the Arc'teryx Khamsin 70 - anyone else have 60-80L recommendations (of packs withOUT a separate sleeping-bag compartment)?
Helpful Votes: 0 Yes | 0 No
{if product_active} ${title} {else} ${title} {/if}
{if image_url_small} ${image_el_small} {else}{if product_active} ${product_title} {else} ${product_title} {/if}
${display_date}
${body}
Helpful Votes: ${helpful_count} Yes | ${unhelpful_count} No
{if product_active} {if product_status == 'toos'}Temporarily Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{elseif product_status == 'poos'}
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{else}
View Product Details >
{/if}
Read all Q&A about this product >
Sold Out
{/if}Answer to: "${title}"
{if answer.image_url_small} ${answer.image_el_small} {else}{if product_active} ${product_title} {else} ${product_title} {/if}
${answer.date}
${answer.body}
Helpful Votes: ${answer.helpful_count} Yes | ${answer.unhelpful_count} No
{if product_active} {if product_status == 'toos'}Temporarily Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{elseif product_status == 'poos'}
Permanently Out of Stock -- View Product Details >
{else}
View Product Details >
{/if}
Read all Q&A about this product >
Sold Out
{/if}