Hey Sandrine, Your Rottefella bindings should fit into the insert holes on your K2 telemark skis WITHOUT the adapter plate. the plate is only for 22 designs bindings, which have a different screw pattern than other telemark bindings...

I don't think so. The 176s are fine for someone of your height and weight.

You can buy additional lenses for the I/O here: http://www.smithoptics.com/I-OS_19_1087.html?fl=flase. The goggle does not come out of the box with the Red Fire Lens. It comes with two lenses, the Sensor Mirror and the Ignitor Mirror (Low-light vs High light).

The Line Prophet 100s come in a 172 length. They won't give you quite as much float as the Justice and aren't rockered, but are definitely stiff and can handle high speeds and groomed runs as well as pow and crud...a little more of an all-mountain ski. They have a short turning radius (17m as opposed to the Zealots 33m!) which I like for tele, allows you to make quick turns in tight spaces...

No grip wax, skins only.

Yeah, Hammerheads would work great with these skis. They're my personal favorite for tele bindings, especially if you do mainly resort skiing.

If the 179s feel too short for you, go with the 189s. Especially at your height and weight. The dramatic rocker of the Hellbents makes them ski much shorter than their length. Rocker helps skis initiate the turn, so you can ski a longer ski than you normally would. I don't know what that rep was talking about, but I hardly know anyone who skis the 179s, and I have seen people ski tight lines with the 189s no problem.

# Standard size fits boot sole lengths over 315 mm
# Small size fits boot sole lengths under 315 mm.
Not sure exactly how the TJ measures at a size 25, but you can just take a tape measure and do it yourself. Those boots will fit the O2s, but I'd get the free-flex cartridges, as the bellows on the TJs are very soft, and the O2 is capable of overpowering soft boots.

YES, we've got some on order expected to arrive in the warehouse on 11/13. Hang tight, these skis are worth it.

Volkl Gotamas.

The helmet on this page does not have built in audio, BUT, you can upgrade the helmet with this audio kit: http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Smith-Skullcandy-Single-Shot-Snap-Fit-Audio-Kit/SMI0592M.html

They would be great for all mountain use. They are not a backcountry binding.

Sorry for the delay in response, we don't have a good way of notifying users when their answer is commented on. I have the Smith Maze, but the Variant Brim is a sick helmet, and the works really well with the I/O.

These have the same fit as last year's Smith I/O, I bought a new pair this year and can't notice a difference. It's weird that you thought they fit small, I thought they were big, but maybe it's just my tiny head.

My friend Nick Franchi wears this for biking, and he's a total tool but it still looks good on him. I'd only wear this if you're racing or hucking huge cliffs, otherwise, people are going to wonder why you're wearing a full-face.

Hey man, I know the technique that you're talking about, allows me to keep up with all my alpine buddies on big pow days. I've never seen anyone tele on the JJs, but I've tele'd on a few rocker skis (Kuro, megawatt) and had them right on center and they really worked for me. With the tail rocker in the JJs, I'd be concerned about wheelie-effect if you mount further back, especially if you're weighting and initiating the turn with your front foot. Your weight on that front ski is going to be more rear-wards than an alpine skier's would be, and I'd worry about the lack of stability in the short, rocker tail. If you do try this, post a review on how it turns out, I'm interested...

It includes a binding that is already installed on the ski. In order to attach your boots to the bindings just step in.

The LB weight is correct (not sure where that 380 grams comes from). A pair of size 27s are 4.1 kg or 9 lb 1 oz...

Check these out: http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Black-Diamond-Factor-Alpine-Touring-Boot-Mens/BLD0358M.html Black Diamond Factor. I don't have any info on the plastic thickness, though...

For skinning with twin tips, I'd recommend the Black Diamond STS series. I use the Nylon, but Mohair has better glide on softer, powder snow. Nylon works better on corn and wetter snow conditions (but truthfully, they both work great wherever). The STS attachment system is key for twintips though...

They are adjustable for length. The front loop that hooks over the tip of your skis is manually installed on the skin by feeding the skin through the loop and sticking it back to itself to hold the loop in place. So you can trim down the skin to your desired length and then attach the tip loop and you're good to go.

In terms of fitting your head the same sizing applies. I just got the Maze for the upcoming season and wear the same size I did for my Variant last season. The helmet itself is way sweeter, though, incredibly light and not bulky at all (and a great price).

Factory recommendation is +3, I've also heard people going +2. I believe +3 is 86cm direct pull from the tail. Some people say +3 skis too short, depends on how you ski i guess...

110s. In a pinch, you can also just bend the 90 brakes out with a pliers or whatever...

I'd say 166 would be fine for midwestern tight turn skiing at your height and weight.

I disagree with Shane. I feel that you should absolutely get the 186 for this ski. Line's ski short because of the twin-tip, and they also have a VERY short turn radius (look around the site and compare the 19.5m radius with other skis). Ski length is a function of WEIGHT and height, at 185lbs you should definitely be on the 186 in the Prophet 90. Going longer will also force you to ski a little faster to get the most out of the ski, which in turn will improve your technique.

We have one coming in early November. Sit tight!

Get the skins that fit the widest part of your ski (except for some extreme fatties) and then trim down to the waist. You'll appreciate the extra coverage.

The tip rocker in the JJ's makes it easier to initiate a turn, so the 185 will ski shorter than their length, if you're an aggressive skier you'll appreciate the extra flotation and stability at speed in the longer length. I think the 185s would be just right...

The O1 is a great binding for doing anything. It has a fantastic touring mechanism that switches it to free-pivot at the push of a button with your pole, and the binding itself provides excellent power and control. Mid-stiffs would be a good combo for the Push, but if you are an agressive skier (or want to be) I'd recommend the rid-stiff cartridges.

Yeah I follow you. It looks exactly like the regular Variant Brim, if there was no plug going into the helmet you'd never know it was audio...

Try Geartrade.com

T-Race! T-Race! T-Race! I also ski prophet 100s and prophet 130s, with Hammerheads, I' 6'2" and 170lbs. The lack of a touring mode only bothers me when skinning on flats, (uphill your legs are angled forward anyway), but the difference in performance is well worth it. The T-Race rips, especially with big skis like the 130's, and stiffer flexing skis like the 100s. DON'T get the T1, you'll be cheating yourself out of hard-charging grin-inducing turns.

Hey Jimmy, there's nothing wrong with the base of the boot extending beyond the width of the ski. With any skinny ski you're going to have that problem, whether it's an adult or kids ski. You would have to really put the ski on it's edge in order to contact the boot to the snow, something an 11 year old (and many adults, for that matter) would have difficulty doing. That aside, you might want to consider getting your son a new pair of skis anyway. If he's in adult boots, a pair of adult skis would give him the tools necessary to improve his skiing...

Hey OldDude. The inserts are designed specifically for Dynafit Bindings, BUT, you can mount any binding to the Manaslu by drilling holes away from the inserts. The Manaslus have a Titanal Plate in the binding area, which can be tricky when drilling holes (the plate is thicker than a regular Titanal topsheet. There's a good article at WildSnow about this very issue: "Drilling your own holes and mounting bindings in the Titanal plate area is ok so long as this is done by an expert mechanic who uses the correct bit for a metal top skin, taps the holes, mounts with epoxy and doesn’t over tighten the screws. Last winter, many Manaslu skis were tested with bindings such as Duke and Fritschi, mounted without using the nylon inserts." http://www.wildsnow.com/1457/dynafit-manaslu-binding-holes-mounting/

Yes.

No sir, the same lively, hard-charger they always were.

Hi Marc, Glad to hear you're making the switch and pursuing a more enlightened approach to turns. The Push would be a fine choice to start on, as would the Scarpa T1. Scarpas tend to run a little narrower and BD is somewhere in the middle in terms of width (Garmonts are wider, if you're into touring, the Syner-G might be a good choice as well). The T1 and the Push will be forgiving enough to start out, but will also provide enough performance to stay with you as you improve. Good luck!

Rid-stiff without a doubt. The Prophet 130s are a huge ski and you'll need the extra power to give yourself some control. I'd consider buying a stiffer boot too, if I were you.

That's a bummer Ralph, sorry to hear about your ankle. We've got the Voile Hardwire (http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Voile-Hardwire-CRB-Telemark-Binding/VOL0004M.html) which I've skied on and personally don't like very much. Never skied on the Garmonts, but the movable pivot point on them is similar to the Hammerheads, and will give you the ability to transfer more power to the turn if you are a more aggressive skier. The classic side-of-foot cartridge style is OK for cruising, but I've always preferred the option of increasing the torque and leverage of the binding with a movable pivot point. I'd go with the Garmonts.

Just to put another vote in here, Evan is completely correct, Andrew you are NOT CORRECT, not sure where you are getting your information. There is an international standard for avalanche transceiver transmissions, they all transmit and receive at 457 kHz, all across the world.

Yes it can definitely be an alpine ski, and despite it's light weight the generous width gives it enough surface area to handle your weight for sure. Make sure to get the 185cm length...

Same construction as last year, no rocker. Stiff skis that perform well at high speed.

They are brand-spankin' new, we don't sell any used equipment on this site, there appear to be two in stock for the 136cm at the moment.

If my memory serves me they do come with a clear stick-on template. These work on any ski as a good combo, it's the boot/cartridge combination that's going to make the real difference...

The Zealots are stiffer than the Verdicts. Look no further than the reviews by Noah and Nick, those dudes know what they are talking about.

The SFB is floppy and soft, it's not good on groomers and is primarily focused on soft, deeper snow.

Yeah absolutely, enough flotation for pow, short enough to be manageable in tighter spaces...

They're on order and expected to arrive on Oct 2nd...Hang tight!

The SFB is floppy, great for deep and soft snow, NOT good for eastern skiing Don't buy it if you're going to ski in the east on hardpack, it's not made for it. As for recommendations, what's your ability level? Do you ski mainly groomers? If you like to rip groomers really fast get a long ski with a skinny waist and some substantial sidecut to rail turns on harder snow. I live in Utah, so can't recommend specific models, but the SFB is the wrong direction to go...

The Prophet 100 likes speed, is pretty stiff, and not "forgiving" per se, but is a great ski for hard/soft snow, variable conditions...I ski these for packed powder/hard pack days and Volkl Kuros for the deep stuff. I really like the Lines.

For Prophet 130 Early rise is TIP ONLY, not sure about the mothership...

Unfortunately we are out of large sizes in this pack (the large is the 2400)...

Yes they are compatible, and you should listen to Nick and get the O1s. He knows what he's talking about...

Hey Tom, my head is 56cm and the I/Os fit my face perfectly, they'll be fine for a face that's a little larger too... I've owned two pairs, they are really the best goggle on the market in my opinion...

Prophet 90's are pretty stiff, try the Salomon Lord (http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Salomon-Lord-Ski/SAL1409M.html).

The S7 Barras are AWESOME in trees and tight spaces, the rocker tip and early rise tail, combined with a generous amount of sidecut allow these skis to swivel, smear, and slash turns on a dime.

Same construction as last year. The only change in the "Prophet" skis is that the Prophet 130 now has early rise in the tip.

105

Not sure why we differ from other sites, but I can attest to the accuracy of this sizing chart. I am an 11.5 and wear a mondo 28.5 in Black Diamond boots and they fit perfectly...

HAMMERHEADS dude, they'll change your life. I will never ski another binding. Especially for the Prophet 130s, which are stiff, the hammerheads on position 5 give you incredible power and control. Make sure to pair them with a stiff boot (I ski T-Races and love the combo)...I have HH's on my Volkl Kuros (also a huge, heavy ski) and can't say enough about how great they are. Not the best for touring, but I wouldn't take my kuros on a tour anyways...

I mean, like any ski, it depends on your style. The nearly symmetrical sidecut is suited for a backcountry jib type of skier...if you do choose to mount them tele, be sure to take it to a shop that understands the intricacies of mounting tele on twin-tip skis (especially ones with nearly symetrical sidecuts). Pin line on chrod center isn't going to work for a twin-tip ski. You can find more info on mounting twin-tips with telemark bindings here: http://www.telemarktalk.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=6569&highlight=twin+tip+average+centers

Yes, the Kung Fujas are meant to be a Backcountry jibber ski, so they have a little more flex than your average big mountain ripper. They aren't noodles, however, and can definitely handle big lines...

I've never seen anyone ski these tele, but I'd say go for it (I know a few people who ski them alpine and like them). However, I'd be aware of where you mount because of the twin-tip. Check out this article on mounting tele bindings on twin-tip skis that I found helpful for mounting a pair of Kung Fujas last season. http://www.telemarktalk.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=6569&highlight=twin+tip+average+centers

189 without a doubt.

183. With a narrower ski it's easier to move edge-to-edge, so if you're on the fence between lengths, I'd always go up. 183 will give you stability at speed and a little extra float in deeper snow, plus room to grow into the longer ski length and improve your skiing.

The 2010 Giro Helmets will be coming back in stock in a couple of weeks, so if you wait a little while we'll have the larger sizes.

In the upper right corner of the page there is a "chat now" button that will connect you to one of our Gearheads. Our Customer Service department is the best in the business, if we're able to get an order to NZ, they'll find a way.

Volkl Chopstick. Low profile rocker and a huge waist for the pow, twin tip, and a symmetrical sidecut so you can rip it switch. A ripping ski. A less fatter option would be the K2 Kung Fujas...

The 178s should be fine. But honestly, I'd go for the 183s at your height and weight. You're going to exert a lot of force on the skis, and the 183s are going to provide a big, stable platform for you. Additionally, those skis are going to give you room to improve your technique. The 178s would be kind of a dead end for you, if you start to ski faster or start skiing deeper snow, you're quickly going to max out the performance of that length for your size.

Definitely the 186. It's not so long that you'll lose maneuverability in tight spaces, but long enough that it'll give you the extra float that you want in deeper snow conditions.

Hey Emily. The "clips" that you refer to are called "bindings". You do need bindings on skis to use them, but if your boyfriend has another pair of bindings on other skis they are most definitely transferable. Just take both pairs of skis to any ski shop and they'll be able to remove the bindings from one pair of skis and mount them on the other.

Just buy regular size cartridges and swap them in. (Regular size cartridges don't have an "S" next to them in our drop down menu).

100s should be fine. Personally I prefer to have a little bit of edge on the snow for slippery conditions.

The S7s have significant tip rocker, which makes the extra length very manageable. The 188 will ski shorter than it measures and you're going to be loving the extra float. If you're on the 176 Got, the 188 should be fine for you...

Not quite sure what you mean. The T-Race is a completely different boot, much stiffer, with a stiffer bellows and more forward lean. Do you mean just permanently locking the walk mode in a T-1?

A good energy bar will be high in fat. Fat is essential to fueling long duration workouts because its incredibly high calorie density makes it one of the the most efficient ways to provide energy to the body.

You absolutely should get the 189. The Obsetheds have a little early rise in the tip, but it's nothing compared to the full rocker of the hellbents. They ski short, and at your height and weight, you could be rocking a 189 traditional camber ski. As for the mount position, I don't know much about that, anyone else?

Depends, they are both very quality beacons. The Pieps works better than the Tracker for multiple burial situations, but the Tracker is extremely easy and intuitive to use. For a first time user, I'd recommend the DTS Tracker based on it's ease of use. Multiple burials are rare, especially if you use proper technique when traveling/skiing in the backcountry.

Hey man, if I were you I'd go with the G3 El Hombres (http://www.backcountry.com/store/GGG0079/G3-el-Hombre-Alpine-Ski.html). They are light enough to tour, but stiff enough for a guy of your size. They like to go fast, but at your stage of telemarking you probably want a ski that you can grow into, and will improve your skiing. I'm 6'2" and had a pair of the 185s, which were perfect for me. They make a 192, but that's a pretty big ski for tele, even at your size and weight. Another note, if you weigh 230, don't buy Black Diamond O1s. The O1s aren't made for you. Period. I ripped out TWO pairs of O1s last season. I'd definitely buy a pair of 22 Designs Hammerheads which have a 6 screw pattern, making it virtually impossible to rip out.

Yes. 75mm fits all telemark bindings, including the O3 (except for NTN bindings).

Yeah absolutely. Ease of use is a huge factor for beacons, and this fits the bill. It is a little large, but I've never had any real issues with the size.

Yes, they are compatible with the T2. I would consider buying the G3 Reverend, it's a good all around ski that can handle groomers and also deeper snow that you'd find while touring. It's also pretty light, and doesn't demand a hard-charging skiing style, which seems suitable for you. http://www.backcountry.com/store/GGG0081/G3-Reverend-Ski.html

Have you telemarked before? If so, are you aggressive? Do you do much backcountry touring? I always recommend the 22 Designs Hammerhead for aggressive tele-skiers, but if you are just learning I might go for the G3 Targa, it's a classic, and not that expensive, you can always upgrade. For Touring, check out Black Diamond O1s.

If you ski aggressively, buy the Dukes. The Freerides are lighter, but have a tendency to prerelease when skied hard. Additionally, I've seen a couple of cases of components breaking on the Freerides. Now, if all you're using the bindings for is touring, and you have another pair of skis for resort days, the Freerides are a great choice, but if you plan on using the skis for resort skiing a fair bit, or for really aggro touring runs, the Dukes are bomber.

Depends on your skiing style. If you are very aggressive, you'll be able to handle them, they respond well to aggressive turns at speed.

No not at ALL. I often forget that I have them on and wear them to the bar after skiing.

Comfort.

Not quite sure what you mean by "catching on your boot"... As for the cartridges bottoming out, O1 and O2 cartridges reach their spring limit because over over-tightening. You might have them cranked down too tight. When BD says that only 5-10mms of metal should be showing outside of the cartridge, they mean it. In my experience, aggressive knee-droppers barely want any metal to be showing when clipping them on. With your foot size, the smaller cartridges should be right for you, so try loosening them up. If you feel like the resistance isn't enough, buy the Rid-Stiffs, and if that isn't enough for you, you should get a pair of Hammerheads.

Don't do it unless you've got another pair of skis for non-powder days. Rocker skis aren't fun on hardpack. Period. The S7 doesn't actually ski very well on groomers. In a relative sense, it skis better than most powder-oriented skis, but compared to a ski with traditional camber/sidecut, there's no comparison. If you're only going to ski one ski, but want some better powder performance, I'd look into a look into a fatter ski that still has a regualr cambered profile. The Volkl Gotamas (http://www.backcountry.com/store/VKL0042/Volkl-Gotama-Alpine-Ski.html), the Dynastar XXLs (http://www.backcountry.com/store/DYN0197/Dynastar-Legend-Pro-XXL-Alpine-Ski-08-09.html) which are at an AMAZING price right now, and the Icelantic Shamans (http://www.backcountry.com/store/ICB0004/Icelantic-Shaman-Alpine-Ski.html) are all skis that I've skied, and I can attest to both their powder and hardpack performance. The Icelantics really RAIL turns on hard snow, I felt like I was back on my race skis in NH...

Hey Alec,

The BD Customs have a wider fit than the Scarpas (a little narrower than the Garmonts) and will provide the power that you are looking for. The Ener-Gs are not nearly as stiff in the bellows as the T-Races or the Customs...

How big are you? Skiing style?