Obviously you're not going to want to lug this around the backcountry (hence the weight and size), but yes, this pad completely owns. It's meant for car camping for the most part... however, I sleep on this pad at home and on the road. It's practically a portable bed.

We have a few... don't know if these sizes fit your needs!

This is a frameless pack. First hand, I can tell ya that this is a great pack for day hikes. Never taken it skiing, but I can't imagine it not being bad.

Hey Matt,

How big is your son? Any info on height, weight, waist size, etc would be helpful to decide if this pack is a good fit. This is a big pack, so it wouldn't fit an 8 year old, but if your son is in high school or older, it would probably work.

- Greg

Definitely like a dark purple color. I'd probably best describe it as "dark purple" or "plum".

Good point - thanks for the quick response, Ed!

Go 163s. I am 5'4" 120lbs and the 156s were way too short. These skis are a beast, but the 163s will be tame for what you're looking for.

As far as the year models go, they are pretty similar. Both models are a great ski... you probably wouldn't notice a big difference between the two.

Hey Mike,

Glad you like the tights! Your best bet to have your request met as soon as possible would be to either call our customer service line @ 1.800.409.4502 or chat with our gearheads by clicking on the "chat now" icon on the top right of the page.

Hope this helps!

- Greg

Haha - yes, it seems you got your answer, but small would be your best bet. I've had several of these tights for a few years and remarkably, they stay pretty snug. In general, your kneecap should be in the diamond for the best support. Enjoy!

Why does Radio Shack ask for your phone number when you buy batteries? I dunno...

Not specifically sure if the venture jacket runs smaller, but I have several North Face jackets, and I am 5'4" 120 lbs. For what it's worth, their Mens small jackets fit me great.

No sweat, John... let us know how the trip goes!

Hey Hal,

First off, these tights get a lot of questions being asked, so no big deal. It's probably the most confusing pair of pants you'll ever buy :-)

1) Your best bet is to go with the Medium. You're in between sizes from a weight perspective, but you're way out of your range on the height. You'd rather have the tights be... well, tight than too long. I was the same way when I had to choose what size I bought. I sized down and was very happy with my decision.

2) If you are going to use these for running most of the time, which is what it sounds like, I'd get the Pro, however, truth be told the difference between the Pro and Stabilyx is very small. But you're right, the Pro is made more specifically for running. You're going to get knee and calf support (maybe you'd get a little more knee support with the Stabilyx), but I feel getting the Stabilyx for knee support if you're going to be primarily using these for running is overkill. Plus, the Pro gives you much better hip, quad, and hammy support, which is equally or more important for runners, in my opinion.

3) Depends on where you are located... I'd probably shy away from the insulated tights only because I wear these tights in the spring and fall seasons, and sometimes the summer. They are tights, so they'll give you a good amount of warmth in the winter, but you can still get away with wearing them in warmer weather too. The non-insulated tights are more versatile (unless you live in MN or someplace that is REALLY cold in the winter!).

Hope this helps... happy running!

- Greg

They run pretty close to the sizing chart listed above. If you are in between sizes, I'd go the size down.

They run pretty close to the sizing chart listed above. If you are in between sizes, I'd go the size down.

The super stretch is great for people who move around a lot... I like to sleep on my side and stomach and with one knee up, so I require a lot of room. The super stretch makes it so the bag stretches out, but still hugs your body. Personally, I think you lose a little temperature rating with this feature, but I sleep way more comfortably. The stuff size of the spiral is also a tad smaller, but not by much. It's worth the extra 4 oz of weight, in my opinion. I don't know if price is a difference to you, but the spiral 30 degree is $50 less. Only you can figure out if the weight, the comfort and the price matters. If it were me, I'd still pick the super stretch, mainly because I don't think you can put a price on the comfort this bag provides.

John - as long as if this isn't packed to the max, you can bring this on the plane as a carry on. I own this pack and its a great pack for what you are looking for. If I had to make some recommendations to you for your fear of it getting lost, remember you're allowed two carry on bags. If you have this bag packed close to it's capacity, I'd take half of the stuff in the pack, and put it in another bag and stuff it under the seat in front of you. I used this strategy when I flew to California for a 3 night trip in Sequoia... I mailed my fuel canisters, knives, tent stakes, lighters, etc. If you are super organized, I've seen people mail their entire backpacks packed with supplies (other than perishable food).

I've attached a pic of this pack completely packed to the brim... I couldn't fit another ounce of gear in there. I am 5'4" so if this bag looks big, it's because I am smaller than the average joe.

Last but not least, you could not check this at the airport front desk, go through security, and then check it at the gate. I've had great luck with that... saves you the baggage fee and most of the time you can pick up the bag as soon as you de-plane. At least you know that it made it on your flight safely.

Yes, very quiet.

I don't know the specific dimensions, but yes, you can carry this on every airline. I know from first hand experience... even if you pack this bag to the max load, it'll still fit in an overhead. After traveling with it on many flights, it makes for a great carry-on!

There are a lot of good shoes out there, but I am happy you're going with the Cascadia (sorry we don't sell them!). But you'll love them... you have my word :-)

Yes, sir. Works on hot water and on cold. I've taken this filter on many trips before I sold it to a buddy of mine. It's a great filter.

You bet. These tabs will get the job done. Enjoy your trip!

You bet. I think the only difference in the men's and women's models are the sizes and maybe the colors.

I have both shoes and have run about 30 ultramarathons... if I have to choose one shoe for the rest of my life, it would be the Brooks Cascadia. It is a bit heavier than some shoes on the market, but it feels like running on a cloud. I've never worn a more comfortable and versatile shoe than the Cascadia.

For what it's worth, I am 5'4" 120 lbs and I have a pair of CW-X tights in size Men's S. They fit really well.

I think getting these socks for that specific trip is a tad extreme. You can easily get away with some Smartwool running/hiking socks. I personally love the Smartwool Adrenaline sock line, particularly:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/SmartWool-Adrenaline-Light-Mini-Sock/SWL0009M.html

I'd personally recommend getting a few pair of those and some trail runner shoes, but everyone has their own hiking style. I've done most of the AT in the Smokies, along with many of the side trails there... beautiful area! Enjoy!

It doesn't look like we do... I am not sure if I have ever seen us sell that map, unfortunately.

Yeah - go here:

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pro+bar+Koka+Moka+ontario+canada

I probably wouldn't go as far and say that these are the "right" tight for IT band issues, but these would be the "best" tight from the selection of CW-X tights that we offer. These tights would help IT issues (I know first hand) but it won't completely solve your problems 100%. Specific stretches, as well as some rest time and some icing will all be beneficial.

Having said that, these tights will help deter IT band issues along with the treatment above. I have a pair of them and I find them very helpful, especially for those long runs and downhill sections when your IT band can flare up the most. If you are hesitant on what size to get, I'd recommend the XS. I am in between sizes as well, but I felt sizing down was the best choice I could have made.

Hope this helps!

Enjoy!

In my experiences, they run true to size. If you got a size 10, I'd be confident that they would fit you.

Yes, get the XS. I have a pair of these, and the sizing chart above is accurate. The S would be a little too big. It's better for these tights to be tight than loose.

Yes, I've done over-nighters with bags smaller than this. As long as you pack relatively light, you can easily get away with it.

I've never slept in this with 4 full size adults, but if I had to, I'd honestly say it would be a little tight. You'd be able to squeeze in there, but there wouldn't be much room left over. You would have to sleep head to toe I bet.

I am not sure how to fix this - I had a friend who has this shoe who had the same issues and we couldn't figure it out. Assuming you bought the shoe from Backcountry, you can always return it and get a full refund and get another pair of the shoe or a different shoe.

Both jackets are excellent and very popular. If I had to choose one, I'd pick this jacket as it is 5 oz lighter (17oz vs 12oz) and packs down a bit smaller. You'd be happy with either, but I'd prefer the PreCip over the Resolve.

Yes, second the Smartwool PhD ski socks. I have the thin ones and they still keep my feet warm.

Hey Andrew,

If you buy through Backcountry.com you receive an 'unconditional 100% guarantee'. We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time -- now, next month, in 30 years -- you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked.

- Greg

I agree with Jeff, get the regular hands down. Your size is perfect for the regular bag.

I agree with Jeff, get the regular hands down. Your size is perfect for the regular bag.

Haha - burned.

After all those years in Asia, I don't have to do promotion anymore. We just release a Jackie Chan movie and - Boom! - people go.

I highly doubt someone using this pad will be using it with a neo-air and vise versa. It's contradictory.

I constantly hike in my trail-running shoes, and I don't see these shoes as being any different. Good traction, nice support, I agree with what Dave has stated.

If you bought shoes from 2007 for $115, you got hosed. I'd return them.

Brad - the Osprey 70 has 3 sizes, the medium, large, and XL.

The medium is 4300 cu in, the large is 4500 cu in, and the extra large is 4700 cu in. Our tech specs on the right size of the page matches with the same information that Osprey provides on their site:

http://www.ospreypacks.com/detail.php?productID=123&colorCode=632&tab=specifications

Depends on where in Glacier, but I went there in August 2007 for a week long backpacking trip and I had a 20 degree bag. I was very happy with this temperature rating because it did get pretty cold at night (easily in the 30s). I never got cold at night with a 20 degree, but I think I would have been pushing it with a 30 degree. Some campsites were colder than others. Personally, I'd be hesitant on getting a 35 degree bag. I've seen websites that say the average low is 45 degrees in July and August, but that's for West Glacier. When you get more into the mountains (granted it's not the highest elevation in comparison to other parks in the US), you can get some cold spots.

Speaking from personal experience, I'd be safe and fork over the extra $ and extra weight and get a 25 degree bag.

Awesome protection... I feel like you can kick over a tree with these shoes. I've run in both Inov-8s and Montrails so I know where you are coming from. My personal opinion is that these shoes are more similar to Inov-8s. You feel more connected to the trail with these shoes more so than you would with Montrail CDs or Brooks Cascadias, but not to the point where you feel every rock like you said. You do feel the ground more-so than you would with the CDs, but there is still a good amount of cushioning to be comfortable.

David,

Check out this headlamp by Black Diamond:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Black-Diamond-Icon-Headlamp/BLD1034M.html

It's about a third of the price and gives you two different types of LED lighting for different conditions. It's lightweight, water resistant, has 200+ hours of burn time, and very comfortable. Karl Meltzer uses this headlamp, and he knows a little bit about running 100 milers at night :)

My personal idea for this pack and the AT is this... you can easily thru-hike the AT with a pack half the size and half the weight. The beauty of the AT is that you have road crossings quite often, which means many different places for re-supplies: grocery stores, post offices, smaller outfitters. You don't need to carry a pack that is this large. Yeah, it's cheap and large, but you'll be wishing you got another pack before you even make it out of Georgia.

My suggestion: one of the more popular packs on the AT would be the Granite Gear Vapor Trail - rides like a king, extremely comfortable, easy to set up and use, and easily large enough for your AT needs:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Granite-Gear-Vapor-Trail-Backpack-3300-3900cu-in/GRG0014M.html

Best of luck!

This pack is meant to go around your waist - hence a 'lumbar' pack. It also has a shoulder strap option. However, I am not sure how it would support his back... I also don't think this will hold a ton of books. If I had to recommend a pack, I would say check out the Jansport Kilowatt:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/JanSport-Kilowatt-Backpack-2100cu-in/JAN0418M.html

Jansport packs are very durable with a lifetime guarantee. It's 2100 cu in meaning its pretty roomy and has an adequate number of compartments for many books. Again, not sure on the back pain though. From the item description:

"This pack provides ideal storage for a day hike or a school day. The fully padded back panel has molded foam cushioning pods that ease the load of heavy textbooks and the ergonomic AirCore shoulder straps keep your pack snug when you slog up a steep, rocky trail."

Hope this helps!

Red... definitely red.

I have a full length version of the CW-X pants and I don't really see that much support in the calves. I doubt there will be that much support on your calves with these pants, especially at the 3/4 length.

Have you tried the compression socks? I find that those help a good amount.

I've never slept in this tent, but I've seen it set up. Let's just say that you better be good friends with the other person you're sleeping with, because it's a tight squeeze.

From personal experience, Merrell shoes run true to size.

Yes, this is made in the US... just an error on our part.

"Cast Away" - starring Tom Hanks - brought to you by FedEx.

Nah, these are easy to get into (unless if you have really cold hands). Unfortunately, you've probably figured out that bears sometimes get into these as well. I was in Sequoia NP a few weeks ago and some of the rangers weren't big fans of this particular canister. I prefer (as well as some park rangers prefer) using a different bear canister, but we don't sell that kind on Backcountry, unfortunately.

The maximum height for this bag is 6ft 2in.

Todd, its my opinion that you can use any trail shoe for running on the road. However, there may be some features in trail shoes that aren't necessarily needed for road running, such as a stronger toe-box area for when you kick rocks and roots, and extra grips/treads on the sole of the shoe to help you make those steeper climbs. Because of these features, you may find some trail shoes to be a bit 'clunky' or heavy for a road run.

While you may have that feeling of driving an SUV down a flat paved road, you can still run on the road with these. I am not sure about these shoes for heavier runners, but I do know that Vasque shoes are among the best in the business so I can't imagine you having a problem with these not being supportive. If they felt great, go for it!

This is a waist pack... I guess for those who don't like carrying bottles in their hands. Pretty simple design... a pocket in the front and a sling bottle holder in the back.

Ditto what Jeff said. Winter camping above treeline in the Sierras... you don't always know when the weather would turn for the worst.

The regular would be perfect and be pretty comfortable for your height. The large would probably be too big and leave you with some cold spots.

It certainly is.

I have several MontBell bags and find that their temperature ratings are fairly accurate (not to mention they are durable, light-weight, and very comfortable). I am not certain why this bag doesn't come in a women's version.

If I were in between sizes, I'd personally size up... I like the 'just-in-case' extra room. A good piece of advice if you get cold spots by your feet: heat up some water about 15-30 minutes before you go to bed and put it in a nalgene or a plastic gatorade bottle and place it at the bottom of your bag. Just make sure the bottle doesn't leak. The water will stay surprisingly warm most of the night. However, if you are 5'9", you would fit well in the regular-sized bag. It's preference if you want to size up.

Down is graded according to fill power—meaning the number of cubic inches one ounce of down will displace. The higher the number, the better the insulation.

So an ounce of 600-fill down will fill about 2.5 gallons of volume and the 800-fill down will fill about 3.5 gallons.

Hope this helps!

Hey Bev,

I've used this model in countless number of 5+ hour runs in the Wasatch and several 50k/50 milers:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/LEK0081/LEKI-Carbonlite-Aergon-Antishock-Trekking-Poles-1-Pair.html

I've been very happy with their performance. They are easy to adjust, very lightweight, and in my opinion, give you an advantage in those tough climbs you may encounter in any mountain race.

Unfortunately, it looks like we don't have any left in stock. That said, I stand behind LEKI poles... I love their locking mechanisms and shock absorbing abilities. I don't know if there are any trekking poles specifically made for ultras, but I'd check out these other models by LEKI, as they are lightweight and are simple to manage:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/LEKI-Diva-Aergon-Antishock-Trekking-Poles-1-Pair-Womens/LEK0084M.html

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/LEKI-Devine-Aergon-XL-Antishock-Trekking-Poles-1-Pair-Womens/LEK0083M.html

I've tried both the flip-lock offered by the Black Diamond poles and the twist lock offered by the LEKI poles, and I have to say I like the twist lock much better. Just a personal preference. Hope this helps!

Steve - yes, this would work for shorter road runs, but if that would be your primary use, I'd probably check out this camelbak:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/CamelBak-Hydrobak-Hydration-Pack-15L/CAM0144M.html

It's a little smaller, probably more suited for runs under 120-150 minutes. Its 12 oz compared to 19 oz, has a smaller pocket, and carries 50 oz of water vs 70 oz. Hope this helps!

Andrew,

These are not cork grips... the description is wrong. I don't have this specific set of poles, but I have a very similar model of LEKI trekking poles. I cannot confirm if the the grips are smaller than standard trekking poles.

What I can tell you is that my poles have the twist-lock method. Every now and then, maybe once a hike, the twist-lock comes 'un-twisted' so you have to reset the locks. But other than that small complaint, I am in love with the twist lock method. Super easy to use, and very easy to reset the poles to a different height depending on the uphill/downhill terrain.

Here is a picture of the grips and locking system on my trekking poles. Hope it helps!

PS Here are the poles that I own: http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/LEK0081/LEKI-Carbonlite-Aergon-Antishock-Trekking-Poles-1-Pair.html

To make a comparison, the Wildcats are half way between the Fireblades and the Cascadias. They have more of the "softer" feel (but not as soft) that the Cascadia offers, but it also feels lower to the ground (but not as low to the ground) that the Fireblade offers. The soles aren't as flexible as I would prefer, but it didn't take me long to get used to that aspect of the shoe. When you try them on, they have the same feel as the Fireblades; a little more narrow near the toe than what you may be used to in the Cascadia.

Hope this helps!

If this bag is packed to the brim, it will be very tough to carry this bag on. I have carried bags on planes around ~3200 cu in, but ~3700 is where it starts becoming iffy. If it wasn't packed all the way, I think you could get away with it.

probably not... i've seen your nose and it's bigger than mine

Takes me about 17 breaths to fill it up all the way (I have the small sleeping pad). Just to make sure you know, this isn't a self-inflating pad.

Good observation... I am a big GoLite fan, and it looks like they went from the Jam to the Jam2 back to the Jam. It's almost impossible to find an original "Jam". I think they discontinued those in ~2006/7. Ditto what Matt said.

Yes, in fact I've done that before. Pack up my bag, put the pack cover on it, and then send it on it's way. Unfortunately, I've done this twice and the 2nd time, the pack cover got cut to the point where I can't use it anymore. But it does keep the straps and everything safe from being snagged.

Can I recommend the Granite Gear Vapor Trail pack?

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/Granite-Gear-Vapor-Trail-Backpack-3300-3900cu-in/GRG0014M.html

It's one of the more popular packs on the trail... it rides well, it's relatively lightweight for a full framed pack, and can hold ~3800 cu in. This pack, in my opinion, is a little too large and clunky to use it for the 100+ days you'll be on the AT for. GoLite also makes some great packs... check out the GoLite Quest if the Granite Gear line of packs doesn't give you enough cu in of space:

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/GoLite-Quest-Pack-4400cu-in/GOL0155M.html

Hope this helps!

27

If the bag is checked, I think it is fine. Unfortunately I am not for certain, but I've traveled with stoves similar to it in checked bags without fuel canisters and have had no problems. Sorry I don't have a better answer!

At 4600 cu in, all bets are off. This past weekend I saw a kid having a hard time getting on with a North Face Terra 60 backpack, and that pack is ~1000 cu in less than this one.

Meg -

Check out this page right here... these are CamelBak reservoirs ranging from 45 oz to 100 oz. Hopefully this helps!

http://www.backcountry.com/outdoorgear/CamelBak-Omega-HydroTanium-Hydration-Reservoir/CAM0031M.html

- Greg

Yes, this can fit a sleeping bag, but keep in mind that @ 2135 cu in, its definitely a day hike/overnight bag. It'll be able to fit enough gear for an overnight trip, but probably a little too small for any adventures lasting longer than one night. The sleeping bag would fit at the bottom of the bag.

Depends, what kind of sleeping bag do you have? I own the Granite Gear Vapor Trail backpack which is very similar to this pack, and I have never had a problem fitting my sleeping bags in the bottom of the pack (I have 15, 25, and 35 degree MontBell sleeping bags). Still plenty of room to fit other stuff.

There isn't a compartment for the sleeping bag so-to-speak like you may find in larger packs, but I've never seen this as an issue. As far as this pack goes, I can speak from experience with the GG Vapor Trail pack that these are great packs. Definitely the most comfortable pack I have worn, and a great bang for your buck.

Yes, this does come with a red, triangular hard case. I just bought one last week. I don't think it came with a stuff sack, though.

Hey Mary - this pack is actually way too small for a 2 to 3 night trip. Even though it looks like it could work for an overnight pack, this is meant for a day pack. You'll have a lot of trouble fitting in your gear for that length of a trip.

I'd eye some packs that have between 3000 - 4000 cu in. My "weekend" pack is ~3300 cu in and in my opinion it's the perfect size.

If I understand your question correctly, you want to know if you can fit two 5'6" people in this tent at the same time? If that is the case, it would be very difficult to fit both people in there. It would be VERY tight. I'd recommend against it.

On the bright side, this is a great 1 person tent!

Hi Peter - this bag weighs 1 lb 15 oz.

I haven't carried this particular bag on an airplane, but I have carried on similarly shaped bags (both ~3200 cu in) and have had no problem.

I had my Baltoro packed almost to the rim when I flew to Montana several years ago. I had to check it... there wasn't any way around it.

I have no idea, but from a once maroon Volvo 240 owner, I am giving you a "thumbs up" for owning a Volvo 240.

I am 5'4" and I got the small. Yeah, my feet hang off the end, but it doesn't bother me... I'd rather save the weight. If that doesn't bother you, I'd personally get the small.

For storage you are supposed to store the sleeping pad unrolled, filled with air in a dry place with the valve open. I usually put mine in my closet or under the bed.

I found my small NeoAir weighed a little less than on the specs. No worries though - mine still works well :)

Yes - I move around A LOT when I sleep. The noise is non-existent... I thought this was going to be an issue too but it ended up being no problem at all.

Ditto what Jason said... great pad!

This webpage will help answer your question as well:

http://www.trailspace.com/forums/gear-selection/topics/34517.html

Read all about it here:

http://www.trailspace.com/forums/gear-selection/topics/34517.html

I hear ya dude. ULers unite!

Weight 1.3 oz / 37 g
Diameter 2.7 in / 6.9 cm
Length 1.5 in / 3.7 cm

I've carried about 45 lbs in the Baltoro on a trip to Glacier NP about a year and a half ago. Being 120 lbs myself, I will say that it was relatively comfortable for being over a third of my body weight. I try to go light when possible but if I need to carry a bit, Baltoro is my choice. The reason why I bought the Baltoro to begin with was because it was the most comfortable pack I had tried on that could carry that load. Of course, everyone is different.

I don't have experience with the Bora 65, but I can say that you'll be able to carry a larger load in the Baltoro simply because it has more capacity.

I think you are supposed to tie them to a stake and stake down the fly. In the many nights I have spent in the SL1, I have never done that... never saw the benefit.

I'd even consider the small. Yeah - it's small, but in my opinion it is all you really need. Just food for thought.

Obviously a 4 person tent would hold up better, but I've been in some 60 - 70 mph gusting winds in a 3 person tent before and it held up very well. Just my 2 cents.

I wear my Oakley Half Jackets for everything - running, biking, going to the store, sitting in the hammock. Love 'em for all activities.

This bag would be way too large for a carry-on bag. For reference, I can get away with carrying a 3500 cu in bag onto the plane, but anything over that I usually have to check. 5200 however is a definite non-carry-on bag.

Judging by where you live and for the 3 seasons you'll be using your bag, it sounds like a 30 degree bag is a good temperature rating for you.

If you are set on Big Agnes sleeping bags, check out these 30 degree BA sleeping bags we carry:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/BAG0097/Big-Agnes-Crystal-Sleeping-Bag-30-Degree-PrimaLoft-Down.html

http://www.backcountry.com/store/BAG0093/Big-Agnes-Fish-Hawk-Sleeping-Bag-30-Degree-Down.html

I personally prefer down to synthetic bags... you pay a little more, but they are generally a bit lighter and you can stuff them to a smaller size. I also like the feel of them better. If I had to make a recommendation outside the line of Big Agnes sleeping bags, I love my Mont-Bell sleeping bag to death, and recommend Mont-Bell products:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/MTB0047/MontBell-UL-Super-Stretch-Hugger-3-Sleeping-Bag-30-Degree-Down.html

http://www.backcountry.com/store/MTB0088/MontBell-Super-Stretch-Burrow-3-Sleeping-Bag-32-Degree-Synthetic.html

The first bag is pricey, but is worth every penny. The weight of this bag is next to nothing, and it stuffs down to a very small size. Great for backpacking. I have this bag in the 35 degree and love it to death. The second bag is a synthetic 32 degree bag. Both of these bags feature the stretch feature, which is nice for those slide sleepers who would like a little more room in their bag.

Hope this helps - let me know if you got any other questions!

It honestly depends on where you are planning on using it. Hiking in the Smoky Mtns, it may be a little too warm, but hiking on the Colorado Trail? Maybe a little too cold.

If you happen to be hiking where you think the low temperatures won't get below 30 degrees, it would be fine, but it could be too hot. Where are you planning on going?

I have a pack that is 4500 cu in and I have never been able to carry it onto a plane. Just a bit too big. I am not so sure about this specific bag though.

Damn straight it'll get the job done. This is one of the more popular packs on the AT. It rides great, packs well, and is extremely comfortable. Check out my review on this page for more info on this pack relating to the AT.

Moving on what Lisa said, I tend to agree with hiking with trail-runners. If you can get your pack under 30 lbs, any sturdy trail runner should do well (Montrail Hardrocks, Brooks Cascadias, La Sportiva Fireblades, etc.) I have a lot of miles under my belt from trail-running, but when I backpack, I primarily go with my most comfortable trail-runner with some superfeet insoles. I personally think trail-runners are the way to go.

But I am sure other folks will disagree. As you may know the saying though, Hike Your Own Hike!

I am 5'5" and got the small. My feet dangle off the end... while it doesn't bother me as much as other folks, I will take another approach to what other folks answered and say that 5 ounces is significant. I will admit I am an ultralight backpacker, but if you start shrugging off 5 ounces here and 7 ounces there, you'll wind up with much more weight than you thought.

It's just a matter of weight vs. backcountry comfort. Because I don't mind my feet dangling off the edge, I opted to get the small as the discomfort of carrying 5 more ounces is more than the discomfort of my feet hanging off the end. I know it sounds kind of nit-picky, but that's the way I measure all my gear. Hope that makes sense!

There is a repair kit that would work on this pad that we carry as well as a stuff sack:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/CAS0517/Therm-a-Rest-Fast-And-Lite-Repair-Kit.html

http://www.backcountry.com/store/CAS0513/Therm-a-Rest-NeoAir-Stuff-Sack.html

And you are correct, the stuff sack is sold separately. I haven't heard any cases of this pad breaking and needing to be repaired with the kit, but I talked to a friend who asked a rep whether or not this repair kit would work on the new pad and he said that it would work just fine.

Doesn't come with the canister, but you can pick one up here:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/CAS0375/MSR-IsoPro-4oz-Premium-Fuel-Canister.html

At 3000 cu in you should have no problem using this as a carry-on. I have used packs between 3500 - 4000 cu in and been fine.

We actually just had them several days ago but it looks like we ran out :(

You can get on live chat by clicking on the icon at the top right of the screen and ask for a better answer, but if I had to guess I think we'll get another shipment of larges in a week.

This is an unbelievable top-notch bag but I would keep it away from water as much as possible as it is filled with down. If you were specifically looking for water-resistant bags, I'd probably check out some synthetic bags with the same temperature rating... they may be a little heavier, but they could withstand water much better.

Of course if you keep it dry under a tent, like any other down bag it'll perform great. The Mont-Bell hugger series bags are the lightest bags on the market and ultra-comfortable.

It's available now actually... looks like we got a shipment in.

Great socks... not sure why the sizing chart is on here. If you are a 7.5, get the small... the medium would be a little too big for they way you describe your foot.

Yup.. I have brought my GoLite Jam 2 on the plane many times.

You're lucky... I have this bag (35 degree though) and I grew up in NJ. :)

Assuming you're starting somewhere close to the Delaware Water Gap, it can get down to 40 degrees at night in June and 50 in July... however this is worst case scenario, my experiences with my 35 degree hugger is that it sleeps very close to the 35 degree rating.

If you have a sleeping pad and the base layers with you, you'd be fine with the 35 degree bag as I am sure these would add a little to the temp rating, even if you do sleep cold (I tend to sleep a little cold as well). However, if you plan on using the bag in climates a little cooler from time to time, going down to the 30 or 25 degree bag wouldn't be a bad idea.

I have used many sleeping bags, and I gotta say that this is my favorite one because of the size it packs down to, the weight, and the comfort... you'll be satisfied with this bag.

Yeah - this pack would be an ideal carry-on item. I have carried packs onto the plane up to 3000 cu in. You'll have no problems with this pack.

I recently had a buddy do a 6-night 50-mile trip with this on the AT without any issues. Depending on the climate you'll be traveling in, you should be ok.

Both are great backpacks. While I don't own the Osprey Argon, I do own the Gregory Baltoro and can vouch for the durability and comfort of this pack. On the same note, Osprey makes quality packs, and I've only heard good things about Osprey packs around the office.

If I had to choose between the two, I'd get the Gregory Baltoro only because I have first hand experience with it and I know that it could be run over by an 18-wheeler and probably survive the blow. Also, the baltoro provides a comfortable ride, and allows you to keep organized with all the pockets it provides. Last but not least, the baltoro will save you a little extra money to spend on other gear.

Yeah - I second Jeff. This is too large of a pack for a carry-on.

Yeah - one is last year's model and then this one is the 2009 model. As April hits, a lot of new products are introduced, creating some crossover between 2008 and 2009 gear.

You'd have to pack light only because ~3000 cu in. is doable as you mentioned, but is still tight on size.

Arc'teryx makes great products and I am sure you'd be extremely satisfied with this pack, but take a peek at some of the Granite Gear Packs, particularly the Vapor Trail:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/subcat/8/b31/Granite-Gear-Backpacks.html

While it has a great amount of support, it will give you ~500 cu in more, boasts 2 pounds lighter than the Bora 50, a little easier on your wallet, and is probably one of the most popular packs on the AT (mainly due to it's perfect size and unbelievable amount of comfort). I do have this pack myself, and I am very happy with it. That's my recommendation... hope this helps!

On the right side under "tech specs", it shows:

81% Polyester, 14% cotton, 5% spandex

Agreed with John. This is a small pack and if you pack light, you could get away with it for a night. But despite it's size, it is durable as ever... Osprey makes top of the line packs.

I constantly bring these socks on backpacking trips. They do dry faster than most socks, and while I love these socks to death, for the terrain you are covering I'd be more inclined to bring Smartwool socks only because I think those are the fastest drying sock I've ever owned.

Don't get me wrong though, I have run many races and hiked many hikes in wet environments in these socks and have never been less than satisfied.

The regular weighs 2 lbs and the large weighs 2 lb 11 oz (see they tech specs on the right side of the page).

I have a few pairs of CW-X tights (which I love, by the way), and judging by your dimensions, you'd be much happier with the XS in my opinion. I fall in between sizes as well and I sized down. They won't be too tight on you to the point that they are uncomfortable.

There is a review below of someone buying the XS who is 5'2" 118 and said that they fit perfectly. Hope this helps!

Hey Jason,

Osprey makes great packs, but for trips up to 3 nights, for a more "non-minimalist" approach, I would probably recommend a pack more in the 4000 - 4500 cu in range. If you are comparing this pack to the Atmos 65, I'd recommend the Atmos 65 due to it's size. You would probably find the packs are equally as comfortable, but the Atmos 65 has 1000 more cu in space.

I have done a lot of long weekend trips with my Gregory Baltoro as well:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/GRE0059/Gregory-Baltoro-70-Backpack-4149-4638cu-in.html

While I prefer lightweight backpacking, I use this pack when I want to pack more stuff to be comfortable (ie bigger tent, bigger sleeping pad, more clothes). The Gregory Baltoro is a little bigger, can hold more weight than the Atmos 50 and 65, and is a little heavier at 5 lbs+, but it is very comfortable and has a lot of pockets to keep well organized. It does cost $100 more than the Atmos series, however.

Let us know if you have any other questions... hope this helps!

It could hold a 15 inch laptop, but 17 inches is pushing it... if you are looking for a laptop bag for a 17 incher, I'd probably find another bag.

This bag is too small to hold a 17" laptop.

Hey Susan,

Check out the product page from this water filter's official website:

http://www.generalecology.com/category/portable/product/first_need_xl_portable_water_purifier-new

They have a product guide on there that may help answer some of your questions. I am not too familiar with this particular water filter, but hopefully this will give you a little more info on the filter.

- Greg

I am 5'4.5" and 120 lbs... If I were buying this product, I'd get the small with 100% confidence.

If I had any say in it, I've done several 50ks in the La Sportiva Fireblades, and they are a narrower fit compared to other shoes I've run in:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/LSP0075/La-Sportiva-Fireblade-Trail-Running-Shoe-Mens.html

It has a "low-to-the-ground, fast" feel (feels a lot like a trainer), and grips like an animal. This probably isn't a heavily cushioned shoe, but I run with this shoe with superfeet insoles. I haven't run in this shoe in particular, but I've run in the Montrail Hardrocks and the Continental Divides and I like the La Sportivas much more because it feels "less clunky" and more race-ready I guess. For running on dirt and grass, I have to send my shout-outs to the fireblade. It's a beast!

Out of curiosity, what 50K are you planning on running?

Hey Matt,

This pack would be too small for a 2-3 day overnight trip... you'd have a lot of trouble fitting in your gear needed for a trip of that length. If you are looking for a pack specific for a 2-3 day trip, I'd recommend looking into a pack that is from the 3000 - 3600 cu in range. Here are some packs that I've hiked with and absolutely love for long weekend trips:

http://www.backcountry.com/store/GOL0324/GoLite-Jam-2-Pack-3100cu-in.html

http://www.backcountry.com/store/GRG0014/Granite-Gear-Vapor-Trail-Backpack-3300-3900cu-in.html

Hope this helps!

- Greg

Well, first and foremost, you probably know that if you buy this tent through Backcountry, you'll get a 100% guarantee...we guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time -- now, next month, in 30 years -- you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked.

$350 is a good price for this tent though... sometimes other sites have sales when we don't. Not to shoot down other smaller companies, but I've had experiences where I've ordered from mom and pop shops and it took me two weeks to realize that it wasn't coming because it was back-ordered. We currently have 8 of these in stock, and chances are high that this tent will ship out today if you order it today. Hope this helps!

http://www.backcountry.com/store/BLD1058/Black-Diamond-Mesa-Footprint.html

This would be a good choice... enough space and relatively light. I have a buddy doing a thru-hike of the PCT this summer and he is planning on using the Granite Gear Nimbus Ozone Backpack (Granite Gear packs are relatively well known for thru-hikers). http://www.backcountry.com/store/GRG0015/Granite-Gear-Nimbus-Ozone-Backpack-3400-3800cu-in.html

If you are planning on carrying a tent and a sleeping bag, this pack is too small. This would be a nice daypack, but it wouldn't be able to carry larger items. I'd recommend looking into packs that are about 3000 - 3500 cu in if you are planning 2-3 day trips.

Just out of curiosity, what kind of sleeping bag is it? Do you know the brand/model/weight?________________It is a Coleman 20 degree bag (39"x81"). It weighs about 5lbs. I am beginning to think that an external frame pack would work the best. The internal packs require sleeping bags that stuff into nearly nothing.__________________Hey Mike,Depending on how serious your son is and what kind of budget you have set, this is what I would recommend: I'd look into getting a new bag, which would save a lot of space, be much lighter to carry, and give you the ability to carry an internal frame pack such as this one, which in my opinion, is much more comfortable than external frame packs. The North Face Terra 60 is a very solid pack for someone getting into backpacking. The reviews on this page really tell a good story.Back to the sleeping bags, is it safe to assume that you have something like this?:http://www.campingcomfortably.com/coleman-colossal-sleeping-bag.htmlFor car-camping, this sack will do the trick, but if your son is planning on some overnight trips and eventually longer trips, this sack wouldn't do well against the elements. If it gets wet, it will trap the water like a sponge, and you could be looking at a 7+ lb sleeping bag, a loss in temperature rating, and an uncomfortable night sleep.Depending on how tall your son is and what temperatures he'll be camping in, there are some bags on the site that would work well with this pack, and make any trip much more enjoyable than the current sleeping back you have. If you are looking for a good bang for your buck, I'd check out the Kelty Light Year bag:http://www.backcountry.com/store/KEL0587/Kelty-Light-Year-XP-Sleeping-Bag-20-Degree-Synthetic.htmlIt's half the weight of your current bag, it comes with a stuff sack, and can fit in any internal pack. It's also 30% off right now. Also, depending on your budget, we're running a deal on a 20 degree down bag:http://www.backcountry.com/store/LAF0069/Lafuma-Warm-n-Light-1000-Sleeping-Bag-20-Degree-Down.htmlWhile a down bag is more expensive, they are lighter, can generally pack down further in it's stuff sack (this particular bag stuffs to 16x6 inches), and in my opinion, more comfortable. One of those sleeping bags along with this pack would work well. We have a great variety of sleeping bags in stock on our site, so look around to see if any of them fit your needs (I have owned about 6 different sleeping bags in my few years of backpacking, so let me know if you have any questions on them ). I hope this helped - Let me know if you have any other questions on bags, packs, what have you!

It is possible on the value you have a little yellow switch called a hydrolock. Flip this switch and let the good times flow.________________________________________________Also, the first time I had a camelbak, I put the bladder in my pack upside down. I couldn't figure it out for the longest time until someone said "You're bladder is upside down, son!" Also, check for kinks in the hose when you put it in your pack. Hope this helps!

I am not sure if it will fit into the top, but in general the water on the AT is relatively clean - I have never needed a backup water filter on the AT, you should be fine with hiking with just one water filter. I know this doesn't answer your original question, but I have hiked with the SteriPen many times and never felt the need to carry a backup.

We got a new shipment in as of 3/3

Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a way you can do that. I've had this pack for a few years and I don't believe this is a feature of the pack.

Looks like they've discontinued this product... if you are looking for this exact pack, I'd check eBay for any used packs. If not, Backcountry sells many packs similar to this one.

Arc'teryx makes solid bags, if it is in good shape and it fits well, I'd give them $175... just my personal opinion.

I mean... it could be, but it probably wouldn't be as compressed as much as it could be if you did have a compression sack. 1850 cu in is plenty of room to fit a sleeping bag in there.

Hey Andrew - this pack should be fine. I have carried on packs up to 3000 cu in without any problems in the last 3 months. - Greg

The medium would fit the Sawtooth the best.

No, this is a frameless pack.

If you start sleeping on this bed, maybe your dog will sleep in this bed also. Then again, your bed would be completely free, so maybe not!

Just to make sure, you do know that this bag comes with a compression sack already, correct? If you did want to get a granite gear sack, the large would work well with this bag, but with this bag costing $40, I'd just check out the compression sack it comes with before getting a compression sack that costs half the amount of the bag. Hope this helps!

Yes, this bag does come with a stuff sack.

The Argon's suspension is probably a little better than the Aether. You may find the Argon more durable as well - while this pack is a little heavier, it can carry more (300 more cu in space and a 5 lb difference in carrying capacity).

Really the HDPE frame is similar to most packs that have plastic frame sheets. The difference with Granite Gear is how they utlize the foams. The idea is not to separate the different components of a pack (ie. frame vs. pack body vs. shoulder straps vs. waist belt, etc.), but to have them all work together. This is critical with Granite Gear. As you check out most of their packs you will notice the compression systems and the way the waist belt, shoulder straps, and back panel meld into each other. This is the case with the Vapor Trail. Granite Gear uses two densities of foam in the waistbelt and shoulder straps. They also use two types of foam in the backpanel (fiber foam and EVA). This foam is the best money can buy and gives the pack structure and load carrying capabilities, but still keeps the weight down. Compression is key as is durability and you'll notice that all of the webbing is sown into 220D Cordura, not the sil-nylon. This webbing is critical in making sure the load is compressed to the body, or center of mass. You should notice that Granite Gear doesn't use lumbar pads either. Instead the waistbelt is very substantial for a 2lb pack and the HDPE framesheet/foam backpanel comforms completely to the back. Rather than having all of the weight centered on the lumbar region, it's distributed throughout the back keeping pressure points to a minimum. The Vapor Trail is able to carry up to 30lbs (a lot of weight for an ultralighter) and, with this recommended weight, you get an incredibly comfortable pack. The materials are also well thoughtout, especially the Schoeller w/ Nanotech backpanel material. This is the real stuff, the exact material that $220 pants are made out of. It's very abrasion resistant, stretchy, and dries super fast. All the materials on the pack are either Schoeller or Cordura. Hope that helps...______________________________________Wow, thanks for the great response, Jason. I just ordered this pack... your answer to my questions certainly helped. I have several packs with internal frames, several frameless ultra-light packs (SMD, Gossamer Gear), but I am really interested in seeing how this one compares - much appreciated.

The Patagonia Lightweight Travel Pack Dimensions are:Length: 11in. Width: 8.5in. Height: 15.5in.

I've seen this tent set up before (some fellow at a campground had this tent to share with this 4-legged friend), and I gotta say that it would be a very tight fit with 3 people. There are some great tents out there that are 3-person that are lighter (the Big Agnes Emerald Mtn comes to mind):http://www.backcountry.com/store/BAG0061/Big-Agnes-Emerald-Mountain-SL3-Super-Light-Tent-3-Person-3-Season.htmlOf course, they are more expensive.

While I don't have any experience with either packs, if I were in your shoes I'd probably go with the Eagle Creek Grand Voyage 90L only because it will hold more, it's lighter, and it is easier on your wallet. Plus many of the attributes are the same. Both get good reviews... you'll probably be happy with whatever decision you make.

The dimensions are specifically made to match the floor of the Sierra Designs Velox 2 tent. This weighs 7.5 oz, and it is waterproof. If you are creative, I suppose you could double it as a tarp, but I probably wouldn't buy this specifically to use as a tarp.

It would work as far as functionality, but it's not that big. Depending on how light you pack, It'll probably only be good for about 4 days of gear/food. "Extended" to me says more like 7-10 days, in which case I'd look at something in the 55-60 liter (3300-3600 cu in.) range.______________IMO, if you plan on using a backpack for being in the wilderness for 7-10 days, unless you can pack really light, I'd look at a pack that has at least 4500 cu in capacity. This pack would probably work well for an overnight trip, but based on it's size, that's as far as I'd be willing to go.

Hey Elizabeth... if you are 9 - 9 1/2, get the mediums.

Hey Alfred,The long pad is 20x78x1.5, while the wide pad gives you an extra 5 inches making it 25x78x1.5. Hope this helps!

Hey Andy,This pillow's weight is 5.5 oz and the dimensions are 13x7x3 in. Hope this helps!

Having trouble finding the dimensions... but this pack can carry up to 40 lbs. Check out the pack on Granite Gear's website... maybe that will help a little more:http://www.granitegear.com/products/backpacks/ultralight/nimbusozone.html

Hey Allan,I'd either recommend the Osprey rain cover in medium:http://www.backcountry.com/store/OSP0131/Osprey-Packs-UL-Raincover.htmlOr the small Sea-To-Summit pack cover:http://www.backcountry.com/store/STS0050/Sea-To-Summit-Ultra-light-Siliconized-Pack-Cover.htmlI have the 2nd one, and love it. It's only a few ounces, durable as anything, and easy to use. Hope this helps!

Hi Jason, The reason that i didn't care for the tarptent contrail was also the durability. I have read and talked to some people that have used them and they love them. As far as the Big Agnes tents go, i feel that they are also not very durable in the long run. The design of them just seemed real flimsy. I also agree that the vestibule is small, and also felt too cramped inside. Thanks for the info and opinion on the MSR Skinny One. I think that it will be the tent that i am going to probably go with._________________________Cool - best of luck on the AT!! - Greg

This are made in Italy. You can read about their products at:http://www.scarpa.com/scarpa.php

Chase - I'd go with the small... should fit it just fine.

Typically, running too large is better in this case than running too small. Correct me if I am wrong, but the Luna 75 is a pack that is about 4300 cu in? If so I'd recommend getting the L pack cover, but a M could fit it, I may be just a little tight. If you are open to other pack covers, I own and can vouch for the Sea-to-Summit pack cover... good product:http://www.backcountry.com/store/STS0050/Sea-To-Summit-Ultra-light-Siliconized-Pack-Cover.html

This is just the net, not the hat.

Heavy bulky items at the bottom,lighter stuff near the top,and keep snacks,water,lunch handy.(SLEEPING BAG AT THE BOTTOM)_______________________________________Like what Mike said... this diagram could help as well:http://dana.ucc.nau.edu/~hiking-p/AA%20images/beta_gregory_pack.jpg

All depends on what you are looking for I guess. This pack is fairly large at 5500 cu in., but the beauty of it is that it can compress well when you don't need all the space. The reviews on this page should help you make a better decision as well.

The tabletop is 15.63 x 11.25in

Yes, it does. It comes with a stuff and storage sack.

Hey Ken,I was in your shoes about 2 years ago when I was getting into overnight backpacking. If you are looking to eventually get a pack for a 5 day trip, I think you are in the ballpark of what size of a pack you should get. In 2007, I did several shorter weekend trips and then a "grand finale" trip to Glacier NP that lasted 7 days in the same pack that is 4400 cu in. Anything in the 4000 - 4800 cu in range should be good for your objectives. If you are not planning on going light as you said, I would hesitate on getting a pack below 3800 cu in. for a 5 day trip unless you are OK with strapping items on the outside of the pack (assuming you are packing a lot). A pack 5k cu in and above would probably be unnecessary unless if you wanted to pack a lot of stuff/go on an extended trip. I'd recommend something like the Gregory Baltoro... it's the size you are looking for, it's extremely sturdy, and very comfortable, and it can hold a heavy load. I used this pack for a year straight on many trips and I've been very happy with it.http://www.backcountry.com/store/GRE0059/Gregory-Baltoro-70-Backpack-4149-4638cu-in.htmlIf you have any questions, feel free to e-mail me directly... I'd be happy to assist you with anything else (ggoodson@backcountry.com) - Greg

We currently have 4 of the olive packs left in stock.

You get only 1 plate for the above price.

From what I understand, the women's running vests by Nathan are relatively new. I will say that don't know much about them. Regardless of which one you choose, you are definitely in the right place as this is the best running vest product on the market hands down in my opinion.I will say that I am 5'5" and while the pack fits me well, it would be a perfect fit on your frame. I've been at several trail races and numerous ultramarathons in the past year, and this is a very popular pack for both men and women alike. I think you'll be very happy with this race vest, but I couldn't say if you'd like one more than the other. Hope this helps!

This pack would definitely be small for a carry-on. While I don't own this particular pack, I've taken packs onto airplanes that have been the same shape and been up to 3000 cu. in. You wouldn't really need to adjust anything to take this on if you didn't want to.

Judging by your height and weight, I would strongly recommend sizing up and going with the medium. It's always tough when you are in between sizes, but I know the M will be a much better fit for you than the S. The M will fit your height much better than the S.

Judging by your height and weight, I would strongly recommend sizing up and going with the medium. It's always tough when you are in between sizes, but I know the M will be a much better fit for you than the S.Actually, there is a review below of someone who owns the M and she is 5'9" 130 lbs and says the M fits her well. Hope this helps!

This doesn't come with a raincover, but a small Sea To Summit pack cover would do the trick if that is what you are looking for:http://www.backcountry.com/store/STS0050/Sea-To-Summit-Ultra-light-Siliconized-Pack-Cover.html

This product is great for keeping your ears warm, but keeping the luxury of not having to wear a hat.

Several review below from December 29, 2008 and December 12, 2008 said that it fit their adult head and that they didn't necessarily know it was for kids. I don't have any personal experience with this particular headlamp, but I can't imagine the band being too small for you.

Hey Rachel,It won't hold ski poles (unless if you get really creative), but I recommend the Nathan HPL race vests, particularly the HPL #008:http://www.backcountry.com/store/NAT0014/Nathan-HPL-008-Race-Vest.htmlIt has two front pockets which allow for easy access... I generally carry my camera in the left with a GU, and my cellphone in the right pocket. In the pack, it has another bigger pocket for extra gels, a light coat, gloves, etc. If I am racing, I'll drop the camera and cell, and fill the front right pouch with 3 GUs and then unwrap some shot blocks and put them in the left pocket. It holds 50oz of hydration.

TNF trail shoes have a good reputation in the trail-running community, even though they are relatively new. Asics makes good shoes also - if I had to recommend trail shoes to anyone, I would encourage you to look into La Sportivas, Inov 8s, and Montrails. Those 3 companies have a strong focus on trail running footwear. I am currently running in La Sportiva Fireblades. Check out the reviews for this shoe and you'll see that these shoes really get the job done:http://www.backcountry.com/store/LSP0076/La-Sportiva-Fireblade-Trail-Running-Shoes-Womens.html

Nope... there aren't any pockets on these pants.

You bet... I travel with my Jam2 all the time, and it makes a great carry-on.

Hey Keith - Unfortunately, it looks like we are out of stock on the mediums and larges. Hopefully they will be back in stock in the next few weeks.

Unfortunately, they do not.

From their website, it says that this tool is made from non-glare, flexible plastic material prevents broken corners or tearing in cold and severe conditions. Based on that, I would think that this is waterproof.

From first hand experience, the GoLite Pinnacle Pack does have room to carry a bear canister. Depending on the exact canister type you own, it should fit nicely at the bottom of the pack.

Hey Ralph,The folded length of the GoLite Adjustible Pole is 42cm (16.5 inches), the shortest extended length is 148cm (58.3 inches) and the longest extended length 178cm (70.1 inches).Hope this helps!

They will be back in the end of Jan. Thank you.__________________________Update: We just got 10 back in stock as of Jan. 14th!

BJ - these socks will do the trick. My entire wardrobe of socks consists mostly of SmartWool socks, and I stand by their products. These socks will be good enough to fight the cold of the northeast :)

Hey Scott - a stuff sack and storage sack included with this.

Unfortunately, I highly doubt you'll be able to get a knee brace underneath these tights. It would have to be a very non-obtrusive brace, and even if it was, it might make these tights uncomfortable.

Funny you ask, I have worn these as dress socks. It's nice because they have a lot of cushion and are much more comfortable than thin dress socks. I don't wear dress shoes that often, but when I do, I always put on dark Smartwool socks.

Montrails run true to size - I've had about 5 pairs of Montrails and never had to adjust sizes.

Personally, no. It's a great basic headlamp for around camp, but if you need distance, like you would when trail running, there are better headlamps available. I would look at the Princeton Tec EOS or the Petzl Tikka XP. One of the neat benefits to the Princeton Tec EOS is that it's made in the USA, has a lifetime warranty, and is considered the best light for burn time vs. light output. Either light would be a far better option than the Tikka when trail running._____________________________________________________________It could be used for trail running, but I use and prefer the Petzl Tikka Plus:http://www.backcountry.com/store/PTZ0197/Petzl-Tikka-Plus-Headlamp.htmlThe difference being that it has an extra LED (brighter) and an option to make the light dimmer (for nights when the moon shines bright). I've used this headlamp during several trail races (2 100Ks, several nighttime trail marathons) and I've gotta say that it has yet to fail me. It's very comfortable, lightweight, and very bright.

Unless you have a different kind of hydration bladder and tube, this mouthpiece will fit any standard Camelbak tube. If the Cloud Walker pack you got was new and came with a Camelbak bladder, this will work for what you need.

I guess it's personal preference, but I am a big fan fan of Gregory Packs as well as GoLite packs. I think the Gregory Baltoro may be Gregory's equivalent to this pack. It may cost more, but it's a solid pack.

Check out Jetboil's website, particularly this link:http://www.jetboil.com/products/cookingsystems/personalcookingsystemThey have instructions on their site for their products. Hopefully this helps!

If you buy it through Backcountry.com, technically you'll get a lifetime warranty: Unconditional 100% GuaranteeWe guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time -- now, next month, in 30 years -- you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked.

Typically, wool is itchy... very itchy.However, most wool apparel these days are made out of "merino wool". Merino wool offers “no-itch” comfort; merino wool fiber is so fine that five strands equal the width of a human hair. Its long fibers guarantee a wool shirt like this won’t itch. If this shirt was made out of 100% wool, yes, it would be itchy like you said, but merino wool is here to stay :)

In my experience, Salomon running shoes usually run true to size.

From personal experience, getting this pack through security will not be an issue.

Hey -This glove has 70% Lambswool, 20% Angora and 10% Nylon. Hope this helps! - Greg

Orvie,There are two pockets in the front and one on the inside of the jacket. Hope this helps, - Greg

Hey Carol,Believe it or not, there isn't any difference between the two. Consider them exactly the same. - Greg

Amy,This pack weighs 1 lb, 10 ounces. - Greg

John,Definitely. I have gotten on planes with 3000+ cu in packs without a problem. Since I started using hiking packs for carry on bags, I haven't used traditional luggage since. With this pack sitting around 2200 cu in, it would be a great fit. - Greg

You bet - dry as a bone. It's very well designed.

I have a pair of Oakleys and a pair of Costa Del Mar that I play golf in. I like the Costa Del Mars in general because they are relatively lightweight and stylish. Granted they don't help my +13 handicap, at least I look good while shooting bogey golf :)

Hey Kathy,I should think so - will you have a sleeping pad in the hammock? Whenever I hammock I always feel like it takes away several degrees as opposed to sleeping on the ground, and sleeping with a pad in your hammock helps with that (that and wearing clothes while you sleep). - Greg

This'll work fine, as will tons of others from North Face, Dakine, Kelty, Columbia, dozens of brands. Did you need something in particular?_____________________________________________________________________If it's just for school, we carry a selection of Jansport backpacks. I bought the Jansport Wasabi backpack for my sister for the holidays(she is still in school) and before wrapping it I checked it out... I got to say it's pretty sharp and it's currently on sale.http://www.backcountry.com/store/JAN0331/JanSport-Wasabi-Backpack-1800cu-in.htmlHere is the URL for our school backpack section:http://www.backcountry.com/store/group/100000030/School-Backpacks.html

Elizabeth,This watch would be a great option. It's lightweight and designed for optimal comfort while running. It's got most all of the options you might be interested in when training for your first half-marathon, and it has a relatively large watch face so you won't be squinting with your hand to your face trying to read it. It would be a purchase I don't think you'd regret.__________________________________________________________Also check out the Triax Mia Watch made by Nike as well:http://www.backcountry.com/store/NKT0076/Nike-Timing-Triax-Mia-Watch-Womens.html

Holly,If you go to the top right of the screen and click on the "chat now" button, our folks can help you pick out a pack that would suit his needs. - Greg

While I can't help on your exact size, I have a pair of these shoes that I run in about twice a week and I wear a 9 ½ shoe, and got this shoe in the 42.5 Euro size. It was a perfect fit and couldn't be happier. Hope this helps!

You should usually size up if you are borderline on the CW-X tights, but in this case I would say that you safely fall in the small category. Go with the small.

Hey Pat,If you want the extra room for whatever reason, get the long, but you'll have plenty of space and be very comfortable if you choose the regular. - Greg

Hey Pat,If you want the extra room for whatever reason, get the long, but you'll have plenty of space and be very comfortable if you choose the regular. - Greg

George,We have an unconditional 100% guarantee. We guarantee complete satisfaction and an unlimited lifetime warranty. If at any time -- now, next month, in 30 years -- you're not 100% satisfied, send your gear back for a full refund. No questions asked. If you scroll to the bottom left of our page, check out the "100% Guaranteed" link for more info. - Greg

Tom,I've seen people thru-hike the AT with this pack. 4500 cu in is a relatively large bag. You'll have plenty of space if that is what you are concerned about for a three night trip.

The size chart recommends you go a size up when you fall between two sizes. So I would pick the Large.________________________________________________________________Agreed - go with the large.

If she is a size 2, the medium would fit best. There is a sizing chart above the "Add to Cart" button that can help you make a decision as well.

If she is a size 2, the medium would fit best. There is a sizing chart above the "Add to Cart" button that can help you make a decision as well.

You could probably strap them in with the compression straps, but the pack definitely isn't designed for skiing or carrying skis.________________________________________While this is a durable pack and definitely a great buy, if you are looking for a pack to carry skis I would advise against it.

The weight of the regular sized bag is 4 pounds and 10 ounces. Check out the tech specs on the right size of the page.

Weight, comfort, and usability. All Nathan vests are above the rest because of these three reasons. It is very easy to adjust, it doesn't bounce around, it is very light at 5.5 ounces (most Camelbaks similar in size are heavier). I've never had a problem with chaffing with this either. Plus the pockets in the front are great for holding gels and other race nutrition. When I am not racing I put my cell phone and ID in there.The back pouch is also great for carrying surplus gear. While it's not a big pouch, I've gone on 10 hour day hikes with this and been fine.

JJ,Yes, this flask is relatively thin as other flasks that you may find. Even though it looks like a sphere from the photograph above, it slips into your back pocket well. Not to mention its titanium so you don't taste metal and it's light as a feather.

3800 cu in can hold a lot of stuff if you pack right. Of course I can't be the judge of how much stuff you are going to bring there and take back, but 3800 cu in seems about right. I've packed for 4 day trips with 2000 cu in and been fine so I think this will be a good fit.

While these gloves are great, if you are outside for hours at a time in subzero temperatures, I'd recommend getting something heavier.

If you're going to be running trails then yes, but for road running you should get a regular road shoe. I have used my Mizuno Wave Riders (9, 10, and 11s) on roads and crushed gravel trails at home as well as mountain trails in Montana. I've never felt like I needed more support or protection than what I got from the Mizunos. That being said, you really should go try some shoes on before you buy anything.___________________________________I will second what Barrett said. These will be great for trails, especially in the mountains. If that's what you are looking at, my I also recommend Montrail Hardrocks:http://www.backcountry.com/store/MON0076/Montrail-Hardrock-Trail-Running-Shoe-Mens.htmlThese are considered IMO the "Subaru Outback" of trail shoes. They are extremely popular, comfortable, very durable, and is the heart and soul of the Montrail trail shoe line. A solid shoe.

They might let you know, but I wouldn't hold your breath. I'd keep an eye on the site yourself too, you wouldn't want to miss them all again.-------------------------Matty TIt looks like we are carrying a 11.5 now. - GregThis shoe is going to be discontinued so I doubt they are going to get any more 11.5's in. It is possible but unlikely. Definitely check back just in case...

La Sportiva is known for running a bit small. If you have some room left in a normal size 12, you'll be fine in a Sportiva 12 but if you fill your regular shoes, consider sizing up.Agreed, if you can get La Sportivas maybe a 1/4 to a 1/2 size up, that would probably be optimal.

mjo,Check out this link for more products from CW-X for men:http://www.backcountry.com/store/subcat/41/b100000085/CW-X-Mens-Pants.htmlI have a pair of CW-X Expert Tights, and while I am not a sprinter, I can tell you that they take away fatigue. These are legal in road marathons that are USATF certified, but not sure about HS T&F (but would imagine they would be).

I have a buddy who is 6'1" 220 lbs and he has no problem fitting into the hammock, nor does the hammock show any signs of giving in. I think he has more than 4 inches to spare so you should be ok.

That's what I thought the first time I used this system, but take my word that the more weight that is in the hammock the sturdier around the tree it gets. I've wrapped my hammock straps around smooth birch trees and it has been fine. I don't know the max weight, but I'd imagine it could hold a good load. My friend weighs 220 lbs and he is held up with ease.

I would say so - you can't find many shelters like this that are as roomy and easy to put up. At 2 pounds 5 ounces, it's tough to beat on the lightweight scheme of things.

I've carried the GoLite Lite-Speed Pack pack onto a plane before without a problem. You should be fine.