I am a fan of low-profile brimmed helmets, so my favorite helmets till now were the Bern Watts and Bern Baker. Just got the Riot and I am stoked on it.

PROS:
Really really light. Haven't weighed it but I would rank it among the lightest on the market.
Lowest profile of any helmet I've tried other than the Bern models, and the fit is better.
Liner is soft, stays put, and the ear pads are cush.
Fits as well out of the box as the Smith Maze (best-fitting helmet out there IMO, but everyone and their girlfriend has it). No forehead pressure point.
Strap setup is dead on and easy to adjust.
Chin strap pad is secure and really soft. I usually take them off but not this one.
Top vents are mesh covered (no snow plugs to knock out after you eat it).
Fits great with Oakley Crowbars and the re-issue Pro Frame.

CONS:
In-mold design, so not quite as durable as an EPS-lined hard shell.
The 'windshield' channel up under the brim doesn't fit my goggles, but I assume that's because of the goggles not the helmet.
Rear goggle strap holder should be removable, and it's just a tad high for my taste.

OVERALL:
Super nice. The pros far outweigh any cons, and I am really nitpicking. I fully recommend the Riot if you want a light, great-fitting, low-profile lid with a real brim.

I normally wear regular Helly Hansen LIFA 3/4 pants but I wanted something thicker to wear under shell pants for cold days. In a Medium, these fit pretty loose (I am 5ft 9in, 170lbs and usually wear a Medium) and the legs are too short to create a good fit with ski socks. The fabric is as light as my LIFA pants, and despite being 'double layer' doesn't feel warm enough. I can't recommend these as heavyweight long underwear.

The Night Train, in my opinion, is THE SKI for powder, chop, crud, corn, pretty much anything that you can make a dent in. Fatter than Crisco but never sluggish because it's always on top; super quick when things get sketchy. Light enough that you can lap cold trees, point it to the tram, and hike for more all day long. Super stable in crud, and on groomers the sidecut means you won't feel like a clown. But most important: when it dumps for three days and you get your first untracked line on these things you'll think you died and went to heaven. Lawdamercy.

The Thule T2 is without a doubt the BEST rack out there for mountain biking. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever. Securing it is a piece of cake, loading up two bikes takes under a minute, and best of all you never have to bench-press a bike up over your head, or worry that you won't clear that 9-foot-tall parking garage. Need to check on the bikes? Look out your rear window; there they are. I run HUGE 2.6 diameter tires on my DH bike, and they fit no problem. If you want to buy the locks, go for it, but you don't need them if you have a long locking cable and loops on your hitch mount. Get this rack!

So far, so good. I've had the 876's for a few weeks with Sole footbeds added in for arch support. I can't really speak to them without the inserts, but they felt like they'd still be ok if you didn't have a high arch like I do.

PROS: They're light and fit true to size for running shoes (I go 1/2 size up from all my street shoes). The Debris-Free construction is awesome; instead of a tongue there's just a stretchy gusset across the instep to keep out dirt and pebbles. I haven't had any fit or friction issues with it. The Rock Stop plate also works as advertised, and the tread, while minimal, is great in anything but straight mud. The reverse tread in the heel works well on downhill sections. There's more cushion in the toe than in most trail runners I've tried, which is nice. The locking laces take a bit of getting used to, but once you know you don't have to over-tighten them, they are great.

CONS: The Lightning Dry lining is slippery at first, takes a few runs to break in but you'll have some heel slip at first. Moving from the North Face Fire Road, the 876's are slightly less stable in the heel, possibly because they have more cushioning; it's not a big deal for me but it might upset a heel-striker. They're also a bit hot due to fewer vents in the toe area.

Overall I am very pleased. I have a narrow heel and wider forefoot so it's hard to find the right fit. These remind me of my old Asics Trail Attack 3's but they are lighter, cushier and cooler in hot weather. They also look pretty sweet. I suggest you buy some.

It's low-profile, comfortable, and warm without being hot. Ok, the Brock foam isn't rated for severe impacts, but I have rung my bell pretty hard in this helmet and I'm still here. I can definitely say I'd have been in bad shape without it. Also that means you can toss it around without worrying you'll decrease the protection. The EPS version simply doesn't fit as well.

Easily the best lenses I've ever experienced. I have both the green mirror and the blue mirror. The green mirror has a copper base tint, and in overcast conditions, especially fishing, they make every little detail of your surroundings pop out and look even better than you'd think possible. The blue mirror lenses have a gray base tint and are my choice for bright days. The polarizing is excellent at reducing glare, and the mirror coatings are, so far, really tough. The spring hinges make them comfortable out of the box. My only complaints are that the glass lenses make them a bit heavy after wearing them all day, and I would have expected a hard floating case considering how much they cost.

Perfect width, a bit bigger than you might expect at 1.5 inches wide. Looks burly, feels solid. The yellow gets a lot of compliments. Trimming it isn't hard but Patagonia might have included instructions. I cut it down with scissors, used a lighter to melt the frayed ends, and pressed it against a dinner plate to flatten the melted part back to its original state.

So, the belt itself is cool like pretty much everything Spacecraft makes, but the "made from rice bag" label is lame as dog doo. And you can't remove it. Recycling is awesome, but it's not something I feel like proclaiming to the world on my waist.

Great pack with plenty of room and excellent riding characteristics. I have had Dakine packs and a BD Covert, neither came close in terms of fit, capacity and weight distribution. The accessory pocket on the belt is a huge asset, and the probe pocket on the side is a killer feature. My only issue is that the ice axe loop is too large to function as a shovel handle loop; the ends slip around the T. Thus i carry my shovel handle and probe in the probe pocket. Otherwise, awesome pack.

Gotta say I disagree with Mr. Jepson below. Yes, there are a lot of rails and jib clips in this movie; after all it's Poor Boyz. That said, compared to the other films out this season I think the big mountain segments are pretty rad, and the bc freestyle thrown down is simply in a different class. Think less Hugo and Ian Mac, more Abma, Boronowski, Douglas. I don't jib, at all...and this is my favorite movie of the year.

Tough, light, and good-looking to boot. Scott Series 4 aluminum takes a beating, and the colors are always on point. The trigger grips are comfy and the straps support your hands really well. I recommend the powder baskets for deep days.

I've had Sorel Caribous since I was a little kid and if anything they've only gotten better. Wore them shoveling the driveway during the East Coast ice storms of the 90's, wore them every day as a lift op in Tahoe, standing on the snow from 6 am to 5 pm, and I wear them on the way to and from the mountains here in Utah. NEVER been cold in them. The new(er) liner is reinforced in the heel to be more durable than the old one, and the Air-Bob sole has tiny air pockets in each tread, keeping you up off the ground and adding even more insulation. My only possible complaint is that they're big and clunky, and definitely too warm to wear indoors for extended periods. You can't move quickly while wearing them, and if you buy your normal size it's hard to even drive a car in them. I size down from my normal 10 to a 9 and that's ok, but I still have plenty room for heavy socks. Aside from the size issue though, Sorel Caribous are the only winter boot you'll ever need if you live where it gets really cold.

First, I am a Backcountry employee. If you consider my opinion moot as a result, I can't change that. What I can say is that I have had and used jackets from every top outerwear company, I live and work in the mountains, and I am hyper-critical of our in-house designs. I try to remain as objective as possible and I hope you find this review helpful. I have been testing the prototype Men's Stoic 2.0 for almost a full season (size L, my measurements are on my profile page), and I am very impressed. It's a light, trim, welded waterproof softshell designed for year-round use when layered properly. So far, I have worn it in heavy rain, backcountry touring in good and bad weather, and at the resort when it is dumping. Bombshell, while not quite as breathable as eVent (my membrane of choice) or Gore ProShell, compares in my opinion to Gore XCR with a softer hand and mechanical stretch. I've yet to experience any soak-through, and it's definitely breathable and durable enough for any cold-weather activity. The armpit vents open smoothly every time when hiking or skinning in the sun. The soft mesh hand pockets fit gloves, keys, cell, and a thin helmet liner, no problem. The hood is cut on the trimmer side with a soft brim and a high neck. My Bern Watts helmet fits easily underneath; higher-profile helmets (e.g. Smith Holt) are do-able, but snug. The smooth tricot weave inner face is comfortable, but does not provide insulation. I usually wear a Patagonia R1 Hoody as midlayer, and on very cold days, a size Medium Siphon Primaloft Hooded Jacket. The interaction between the Siphon and the Stoic is flawless, and definitely my favorite feature of this jacket. The welded seams look trick and perform as advertised. The only gripe I originally had was the lack of a powder skirt, but the Stoic is not a 'ski-specific' shell, and I feel the weight savings and packability are worth it. I should also mention that this jacket looks killer; I receive compliments and questions every time I wear it. It’s a solid shell that fits and performs on the level of an equivalent Westcomb or Arc’teryx jacket, and I’m pretty sure you won't be disappointed. Highly recommended.

First of all, if you still have reservations about Ninthward making durable skis, don't. I picked up a pair of the Rory SFS 183's on a great deal, figuring I'd use them as an early-season pow/rock ski, and so far they have been bomber. They are now made in Elan's factory (Slovenia), and mine have taken some beatings without much to show for it. Big thick edges, thick sidewalls, and hard bases. As far as performance, the 'shop flex' out of the box was stiffer than I thought it'd be, but on hard snow it feels like the flex goes through the entire ski, rather than being soft in the tip and tail like most noodly fatties. I've skied them everywhere in all types of conditions, and the best way to say it is that they are big, fat, damp planks that still like to turn in trees and tight spots. They don't feel super-poppy to me, but with Rossignol 150's they are not light, so that could have something to do with it. To be honest I am not a park and pipe skier so that doesn't really matter to me. I wanted a tough, fat ski to run over rocks and stumps during early-season thin coverage, and I am getting everything I want out of them, and more. As a side note, I hated the graphic at first, but it's growing on me in a 'never seen anything like this before' kind of way.

Going from the Smartwool Ultralight to these was a big step up in thickness; some might consider this a benefit, but I didn't. As someone who wears a race-fit boot, I couldn't recommend these for skiing. They're also pretty small in the foot for a Large (I am a street-shoe size 10). I gave them 3 stars because I scored four pairs for next to nothing on SAC, and I use them as tall winter athletic/work socks under pants when I wear sneakers or light hiking boots. If you want a pretty thin, but not micro-thin ski sock for colder days, I suggest the Bridgedale Precision Fit Light instead. And for super-cold days: electronic heated insoles--worth every penny.

I picked up my P4's last year, never having skied a Scott ski in my life, and was totally blown away. What impressed me off the bat was the way you can really whip them around in tight trees, but then open it up and just hammer through a rough run-out like you're on something much straighter, heavier and stiffer. The fact that they carve groomers better than any fat ski since the 4x4 Big is icing on the cake. The "secret" is the metal sandwich that doesn't go all the way out to the tip or tail; soft ends make them forgiving and super floaty, but the Titanal keeps them stiff underfoot. Think "Gotama with a crust-busting extra high gear" and you have the P4 in a nutshell. I think this is probably one of the single best Western skis currently available, and the only reason you don't see more of them is that Scott has limited distribution in the United States.

Like one reviewer before me, I was stuck on the Ultralight Smartwool sock train; nothing else was thin enough in the forefoot, ankle, and heel to feel comfortable in my boots, but they were cold and the texture put hot spots on my ankle bones. I picked up 2 pair of these on a recommendation, and I haven't skied in anything else since. They're softer and warmer than the Ultralights, and they are thin through the ankle and forefoot with fitted "zones" that don't shift or bind up when bootpacking. The shins have some light padding, can't say I notice it much but it doesn't feel bulky. The toes have a bit of extra wool on the underside, again not bulky, but I definitely notice the difference in warmth. All in all a killer ski sock for anyone with a high-performance boot fit.

I've only had the Venta SV for four days now (one star per day), but I'm very happy. I tend to warm up and cool down quickly, and I needed a light, reasonably weatherproof jacket that could cope with my heat output, but still insulate when I stopped moving; I've been putting the Venta through its paces and I think it could be the one. From hiking around trails in Park City in changing conditions (we've had sun, clouds, wind, freezing rain, sleet, and snow in the last 72hrs) to working, napping on the couch (fully zipped) and occasionally grabbing firewood off the porch, this jacket hasn't soaked through, been cold, or been hot, just perfect-I've hardly taken it off. The cut is athletic, but accommodates 2 under-layers (merino tee, Capilene zip-neck) in a Medium (I'm 5'10, 165#; see my profile for body measurements) and the micro-grid fleece lining is not bulky; it feels warm on bare skin in the wind, unlike my hard shells. The face fabric is soft, quiet and stretchy, and the hood cinches down over a beanie fine but will also fit a helmet no problem. The Aztec color is a more muted, orangey yellow, and it has garnered compliments from both sexes. Can't wait to "get serious" with it and wear it touring, but we need a bit more snow to make that worthwhile. Consider this a great first impression, with another review to follow.

I have these in my Sidi cycling shoes and the difference is unbelievable. The support is far better than the stock insoles, the heat molding was easy, and they haven't packed out noticeably after a season of riding. A flexible gel insole (as mentioned by another review) might provide better shock and vibration dampening, but there's NO way it could support your foot alignment better, and support is far more crucial than "gellin like magellan". The Yaktrax won't provide quite as much support for flat arches as Superfeet (because they don't have the flat-bottomed plastic chassis) but they fit in low-volume shoes better, and the bottom layer is a stiff, non-moldable material that has arch support built in. The heat-molding part is in the top layer to give it a custom feel.

I am 5ft 10, 165lbs, and this review is for the 07/08 183cm Missions (same as 08/09, different graphic) mounted around +1 with Salomon S914s. I usually ski the Scott P4 (also an amazing ski) but borrowed a pair of these for a month last spring, and they were a real surprise. For such light skis, they are very stable and confidence-inspiring. The wide, early-rise shovel design (Scott calls it Pro Tip) keeps them from deflecting in crud, and while they don't lay down arcs quite like the P4s, they are quicker in bumps and tight spots. Pretty floaty in pow, too, though I didn't bring them out on really deep days. A great spring choice for the Intermountain West, and would make a fine east coast pow/crud ski but wouldn't be my #1 pick for icy steeps. With an AT setup, they'd kill it. Wish I still had them.

While it's just a tad heavy for its size, I put that down to the 1000D Cordura fabric. This pack fits great, is damn near indestructible, holds plenty of water for a 4 hour session, plus spare gloves, shades, a multitool, tire levers, keys, my phone, a powerbar, spare tube (xc or dh) patch kit and pump, plus a super-packable wind shell. I can strap my shin guards and helmet to the outside, and there's even room for a travel pack of Charmin at the bottom for emergencies. What else do you need?

This is really the best down piece MontBell makes, since it's just a bit tougher than the UL, but warmer and very close in weight. That said...I have the Parka, with the insulated hood, and I would recommend it over the hood-less Jacket (thus the 4 stars out of 5). There is nothing like pulling it out of my pack at the end of a ski tour, when I am waiting for someone to grab a car from Big Cottonwood. It fits easily under my hardshell, and stretches over my softshell. Comes with its own little stuff sack too.

Well, I do wear clothes over them...occasionally. Seriously though, these are the only kind in my drawer, and I used to be a Brooks Bros. boxer man so you know I'm no fool. No bunching, never clammy in the summer or cold in winter, and the new Gladiodor finish is no joke. I have some un-treated ones from before and it makes a HUGE difference.

So...you have two reviews for two different helmets, trashing both helmets and the company with the same "used it 5 times on the mountain" complaint. They're your only reviews on this site, and you didn't even buy them here! What gives?

How droll. Know this: when I see you in this shirt and I laugh, we are not laughing together.

I second JPH; these are great in hot weather. The length is perfect, the bit of stretch is crucial, and the weight is nice and light. I wear them for work, chilling, fly fishing, drinking, hiking, you name it. They are truly the best shorts I have found in a long time. Hey Mountain Khakis...want to go steady?

I didn't see a review for these simple, awesome bags, so I thought I'd throw some props. I've been using a Large Travel Trunk for the last 6 years or so, going everywhere from PA to CA to UT and in-between, with absolutely no complaints. The Large holds enough for a ten-day summer trip, including a folded suit, dress shoes, and dopp kit if you pack efficiently. The stitching and fabric are bomber, and the compression straps on top take the strain off the zipper, which is where most bags give out first. My only request would be that BC stock some of the more vibrant colors (I have red) that make it easier to spot coming off the baggage claim belt. Otherwise you won't be disappointed.

I've been looking for MTB shorts forever but it's so hard to compare them without an in-hand side-by-side, so I went out and did some research for y'all. I put these next to a pair of Fox Sergeants in a bike shop, and there's literally no contest. The Oakleys use burly synthetic ripstop and nylon-weave stretch panels, Fox uses thin stretch cotton canvas. Oakley's vents and pockets are bartacked, with solid metal zips, and all the seams are double or triple-stitched. The liner inside, while not detachable, is longer and far comfier for DH than Pearl Izumi's MTB liner (which is admittedly more XC-oriented). The chamois is plush and sits a bit forward until you hike it in. I'm 5ft 10in, 165lbs with a 32in waist and a medium fits perfectly, going just below the knee when standing and at the knee sitting in the saddle. As a final note, let me say that in my opinion Oakley stuff is generally pretty cheesy, overdone, overpriced stuff, but these shorts sold me. I highly recommend them.

Not much more to say. These pants smoke it.