Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Gear Photo

Patagonia Ultralight Down Shirt - Men's

Item #PAT2461 | 68 in Stock

packs down smaller than a bottle of beer

By Backcountry.com Vendor Rep Ranked #9 - Men's Down Jackets January 18, 2011

The Patagonia Down Shirt is the latest in Patagonia's lightweight insulation collection, and as far as we know it's the lightest down piece on the market right now. It's truly a shirt - no pockets, but comes with it's own stuff sack. In comparison to Patagonia's Nano Puff, the Down Shirt is half the weight. Feels like nothing when you pick it up or put it on, and is super comfortable to wear. Throw it on over a long sleeve base layer and you're good to go into some pretty chilly temps. The shell fabric is a lightweight nylon that's very durable and abrasion resistant. Just a little bit of 800 fill down gives you great warmth without overheating, and once packed away the shirt takes up practically no room in a pack.

Helpful Votes: 6 Yes

Comments Last Reply: February 29, 2012 By:

By: January 19, 2011

If you're looking for a down piece lighter than this jacket, check out Mont Bell's Ex Light Down jacket, which weighs in at 5 grams lighter, and has a full zipper. Also costs $85 less. http://www.backcountry.com/montbell-ex-light-down-jacket-mens

Helpful Votes: 6 Yes

By: January 20, 2011

The MontBell does look nice but is probably little overly puffy to really be a direct comparison to the UL Down Shirt. Plus, the down that Patagonia uses comes from humanely raised birds and the garment is recyclable at the end of life. That is worth the premium to some.

Helpful Votes: 4 Yes

By: January 23, 2011

I feel like a dork for talking 1/10's of an ounce, but Patagonia has actually measured the medium Down Shirt to be at 5.6 oz.

Helpful Votes: 4 Yes

By: January 23, 2011

You're not a dork. Simon is touting the five gram difference, so it's obviously important to someone. It's nice to have someone give us a hard number on the Patagonia piece. You have always been the go-to-guy for firm info on Patagonia gear, and we appreciate that. Thanks Ty.

Helpful Votes: 9 Yes

By: January 23, 2011

Obviously, a 5 gram difference between garments matters only to the vast minority of ultralighters. My point was only to highlight the (in my opinion) outrageous pricepoint of this jacket in comparison to comparable garments. The post was entered twice as a glitch, and I found that BC.com won't let you remove comments.

Helpful Votes: 1 Yes

By: August 9, 2011

Nice! And a great beer, too.

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes

By: November 8, 2011

even on sale, Patagonia is over priced. I see a lot of woman wearing they're stuff? Maybe its a coincidence but most Patagonia colors I've seen on garments look to be a bit feminine to me?? To each there own I guess....

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes

By: February 29, 2012

Some things to consider: the Mont-bell's larger baffles provide about twice the lofted thickness compared to that of the Patagonia. So for basically equivalent weight, the Montbell is a warmer piece and full-zip. The lighter fabric in the Mont-bell is possibly less durable, but then again, neither option would hold up very well to constant abuse.

Helpful Votes: 0 Yes

Tech Specs:

Material:
[shell] nylon coated with DWR; [lining] nylon 
Insulation:
800-fill down 
Fit:
slim 
Powder Skirt:
no 
Hood:
no 
Weight:
167 g 
Recommended Use:
skiing, snowboarding, climbing, hiking 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime 

Change me.