- Home
- Camp/Hike
- Backpacks
- Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
- Osprey Packs Ariel 55 Backpack - Women's - 3400cu in
- Weekend Packs (3000-4500 cu in)
- Backpacks
- Camp/Hike
Osprey Packs Ariel 55 Backpack - Women's - 3400cu in
More
Osprey Packs Ariel 55 Backpack - Women's - 3400cu in
With its incredibly breathable AirScape suspension, the Osprey Women's Ariel 55 Backpack is perfect for carrying big loads in hot weather. Weighing only 3lb 11oz (small), this supportive pack has a back panel that's entire mesh, giving it ventilation that standard packs cannot match. Welded front and side pockets provide easy access to items on the go, and external sleeping pad straps let you overload this bag when it's time to extend your trip past three days. The IsoForm CM harness and hip-belt can be molded by authorized dealer for a perfect fit, eliminating pressure points and dead spots for a comfortable carry unlike any you've ever experienced.
Bottom Line: The Ariel is light, cool and comfortable.
Ask Questions. Write Reviews. Give Answers.
I was comparing the Ariel 55 to the Luna 70. I realize the Luna...
I was comparing the Ariel 55 to the Luna 70. I realize the Luna is twice as heavy (6lbs vs. 3.75). And, the Ariel I tried on feels great. But, I'm only 5'1" tall and small boned. I was attracted to the Luna. For only $40 more, it comes with a adjustable torso, detachable pack, and a petite (XS) frame. I'm new to backpacking, but wanted a bag that would last me awhile. Do you think at my height, and small torso length, the Luna would fit me better than the Ariel? I'm wondering if I should go with an XS bag vs. the S. I guess there is really no way to know unless I try both of them on, huh.
By: arizandrea2166014 (1)
April 10, 2008
Did you get someone with an Osprey back measurer to check your torso length? It's key if you want to adjust heavier loads appropriately, and the inch or so too big really can make a difference when you get it loaded up. I'm not much taller than you (5'4"), and my torso is a S. I know that when I have the M packs on, it just doesn't work well for me when they're heavy (I don't notice so much if they're not heavy, so make sure wherever you go to try out packs that you load them up well--your gear will probably be better than their sandbags for trying stuff out, although that could simulate some water weight for you). If you truly are an XS, you probably want a pack that fits you. Size-wise though, you are looking at two different packs (55 litres vs. 70 litres), so you want to keep that in mind when making comparisons. Oh, and it looks like the Xenon replaced the Luna this spring, so either you'll get a good deal on a Luna 'cause it's on it's way out, or you may want to see what improvements they made to it with the creation of the Xenon. I have a Luna 90 from 2001, when they first created it, and I love it still, but I bet there are all kinds of good improvements and updates. Not sure if you're familiar with the "hip-belt, shoulder straps, load adjusters" method/order of adjusting straps, but that's key for a good fit too. Hope that helps! I'm in the market for a smaller personal pack myself right now and it can be time-consuming to make sure you truly get what you want. In the end though, I've found the only way to know for sure is to get it out and use it, so good luck!
By: aglamb1443810 (1)
May 20, 2008
Tech Specs:
| Material: | Nylon |
| Volume: | [Small] 3200cu in; [Medium] 3400cu in |
| Suspension: | AirScape |
| Back Panel: | AirScape |
| Hydration Compatible: | Yes |
| Torso Adjustment: | No |
| Detachable Pack: | Available |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment: | No |
| Rain Cover: | No |
| Access Types: | Top |
| Gear Loops: | No |
| External Pockets: | 1 Front, 2 side |
| Snowboard Carry: | No |
| Ski Carry: | A-Frame |
| Recommended Use: | Backpacking |
| Weight: | [Small] 3lb 11oz; [Medium] 3lb 14oz |
| Warranty: | Lifetime |





