Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Close This Window
Marker Griffon Ski Bindings

Marker Griffon Ski Bindings

Item #MRK0011|43 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$229.95
Suggested Retail: $295.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

One Color, 110 MM (229.95)
Quantity:
  • Pass It On
1
More
6
Detail Views

Marker Griffon Ski Bindings

Marker designed the Griffon Ski Binding for lighter skiers who ride park, pipe, and all-mountain on fat skis. The Griffon features a wide footprint for maximum power transfer and control on fat skis, while it’s compact mounting pattern reduces swing weight for fluid spins and flips. A flat ramp angle results in a neutral stance that is ideal for both switch and regular skiing. The binding’s composite toe and heel cups minimize overall weight for a light, nimble feel on snow and in the air. Mounting configuration requires skis at least 76mm wide.

Bottom Line: A new-school binder for new-school skiers.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 4

great binding

By:
November 15, 2008

Not a bad binding at all, it isn't quite the same as some of the higher leveled bindings Marker makes, but for the money its great. It still has the great features the higher leveled bindings have, and these can definitly take a beating! (I use mine mainly for powder all mountain stuff)

Was this helpful? Yes (1) No (0)

New to skiing - bought a set of Dynastar's with a 78 underfoot...guy...

New to skiing - bought a set of Dynastar's with a 78 underfoot...guy at the shop recommended these bindings due to their freestyle nature, but never mentioned them being geared towards fatter skis. Should I even bother mounting them, or switch to something more for my ski?

By:
November 21, 2008

Flag

You don't need these for your skis, they are the hyped new binding to get but IMO over rated and not even proven to be reliable. return them and get either the look px12 or dynastar px12 jib there virtually the same binding and designed for that ski and freestyle sking and if you look around you can save yourself some money.

By:
November 21, 2008

Tweak This Flag

what else does the jester have that the griffon does not?, I...

what else does the jester have that the griffon does not?, I know Griffon is primarily plastic, held in by 2(or is it 3?)screws, and does not have the DIN setting that the jester does, is there anything else?

By:
November 16, 2008

Flag

mainly other than the DIN the griffon is lighter. if you plan on hiking a lot and you don't need a DIN of 13-16, the griffin is perfect. it has 3 screws as well. this is a great binding though, if you are a smaller guy or not as aggressive, this binding would be perfect.

By:
5 days ago

Tweak This Flag

Should I buy the Griffon or the Jester? I primarily ski on harder,...

Should I buy the Griffon or the Jester? I primarily ski on harder, not always groomed runs, but love to ski powder and some park as well, will the plastic of the Griffon break on me?..oh, and i am an agressive skier, 160 pounds, using Salomon Lord skis (87 under boot) i love speed (tuck entire runs), so i need a binding to hold me in even if i hit something resonably sized

By:
November 16, 2008

Flag

Sounds like you need more than one pair of skis/binders for your different pursuits.

Jesters are stronger, but heavier.

By:
November 16, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I am an aggressive skier with a racing background. However am...

I am an aggressive skier with a racing background. However am pretty small, I weigh 150lbs. I just got a pair of apache coomba 181's just wondering if the griffon will be good enough or should I go with the jester.

By:
November 15, 2008

Flag

If you have never seen the new griffin binding, it is a lighter version of the jester, It has a lot of plastic in it, one reason it is so light. also the toe piece is held on with only 2 screws. If i was you i would get the jesters or look at salomon STH 14 or 16 or look-rossie line.

By:
November 15, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Hey my skis have a 93 underfoot. Should i play it safe with...

Hey my skis have a 93 underfoot. Should i play it safe with the 110s or will the 90s fit my anthems?

By:
November 9, 2008

Flag

Ya I have some skis that are 98 under foot and the brakes are 90. You can just bend them it will work fine.

By: ,
3 days ago

Tweak This Flag

is it possible to mount the griffon binding on a fat ski and...

is it possible to mount the griffon binding on a fat ski and then use either an alpine touring boot, or alpine boot... after adjusting the toe height? so, i can climb boot packed trails in a three buckle AT boot?

By:
November 6, 2008

Flag

i dont think the toe height is adjustable on the binding. but you could mount it to a fat ski you may have to get wide breaks but its do able

By:
November 7, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Does anyone know how the din is compared to a look/rossi binding?eg....

Does anyone know how the din is compared to a look/rossi binding?
eg. I rode Saomon S912s and Look px12s...the salomons i had set at 10 but for the looks 7 was adequite enough,

i had a friend who had "normal" markers and is the same size as me, and needed the din cranked to 12 before the shit would stay on

but yeah is the din strength similar to old markers or is it in a new range (same a salomon, look)?

By:
November 1, 2008

Flag

The din is a measure that is constant through the entire industry. It is based on skier weight, ability and most affected by the length of ones boot sole. a larger boot requires a lower din than a smaller boot to release properly. With that said rather than cranking the DIN you can adjust the forward pressure a bit to create a tighter fit. By raising the Din you only make sure that the boot will not release properly. A higher Din binding will have stiffer springs allowing for a more accurate release. if you are over the age of 12 look for a 14 DIN.

By:
November 3, 2008

Tweak This Flag

would a 215 lb skier be fine on this binding. Im not super aggresive...

would a 215 lb skier be fine on this binding. Im not super aggresive but the lower price over the jester is appealing. Will i be fine with this binding. Suggestions?

By:
October 26, 2008

Flag

I do not know what non super aggressive means if this means, however this binding should be good to go.

I think you should go with the jester might be more money but you will thank me when your jesters are still intact after 3 or 4 years. 215 pounds is to much for the griffons one hard reck could destroy them.

By: ,
3 days ago

Tweak This Flag

Would a 140-145lbs skier who's pretty good but not super-agressive...

Would a 140-145lbs skier who's pretty good but not super-agressive be better off with the Griffon or the Jester for backcountry skiing? The lighter weight of the Griffon is appealing for carrying skis uphill, but the more burly Jester seems more comforting on the downhill. Ideas?

By:
October 25, 2008

Flag

Either one should be fine... You will be able to set the dim on the Griffon to keep you in. I know a few skiers who are 170-200lbs and are pretty aggressive and they don't have a problem with this binding.

By:
October 26, 2008

Tweak This Flag

How do these bindings perform outside the park?

How do these bindings perform outside the park?

By:
October 19, 2008

Flag

freakin awesome

By:
October 22, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Should I order the 90 or 110 for my Scott Punishers (86 unde...

Should I order the 90 or 110 for my Scott Punishers (86 underfoot)

By:
October 15, 2008

Flag

90 will definitely be fine

By:
October 16, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Will this fit my Armada JJ 175 w/ 115 underfoot??

Will this fit my Armada JJ 175 w/ 115 underfoot??

By:
October 3, 2008

Flag

no. but bending brakes isn't to tough. You can do it by hand. . . . unless your a girly man. Your not are you?

Or if you are a girly man you might be able to find a pair of wider pair for sale online.

Tweak This Flag

Will this binding fit and hold on the Line Pandora's in a 172...

Will this binding fit and hold on the Line Pandora's in a 172 (they are 110 underfoot)?

By:
September 29, 2008

Flag

Yes, you just need to make sure you get the 110mm brake.

By:
October 6, 2008

Tweak This Flag

how do they hold up in the park

how do they hold up in the park

By:
September 9, 2008

Flag

This is a new version of the Marker Jester ski binding which, last year, was the first ever truly park specific ski binding. While other companies would offer "jib" bindings, they were no different then other bindings except for maybe a rubber vibration absorption plate.

The Griffon is different then the Jester in that it has a smaller spring to accommodate lighter skiers who require a smaller DIN.

For park and freestyle riding the Griffon is flat (no incline ramp) so skiing backwards is more natural. It also has a wider platform for bigger skis and for smoother landings. It will definitely "hold up" in the park.

By:
September 9, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Tech Specs:

DIN Range: 4 - 12
Recommended Skier Weight: 80-250lb (36-113kg)
Brake Width: 90-110cm
Weight: [Pair] 4lb 3oz (1900g)
Recommended Use: Park, pipe and all-mountain freeskiing
Manufacturer Warranty: 1 Year