Clothing

Gear

Accessories

Close This Window
Line Blend Alpine Ski

Line Blend Alpine Ski

Item #LIN0013|31 in Stock – Ships Wicked Fast & Free
$498.95
Suggested Retail: $625.00
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

One Color, 168cm (498.95)
One Color, 178cm (498.95)
One Color, 183cm (498.95)
Quantity:
  • Pass It On
3
More

Line Blend Alpine Ski

The Line Blend Alpine Skis mix freeride geometry (like that of the Profit 90) with freestyle construction so you can ski the trees in the morning and then turn tricks in the park all afternoon. The Blend has a solid flex for landing jumps and carving turns, which means support for backseat landings and powering out of turns. This true twin responds to tight turns, and the sidewall construction isolates vibration for a damp feel. Line's Fatty base and edge material doubles the thickness (compared to a standard base) for hits in the park and a long tuning life.

Bottom Line: Mix your freeride and freestyle beats.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

any suggentions on where to mount? I'd like to use them as an...

any suggentions on where to mount? I'd like to use them as an all mountain ski, and I would like to be able to ski the park a little bit.

By:
3 days ago

Flag

I would mount them 2cm FOREWARD of the suggested mounting line on the ski, that would put them at 51/2 cm back from center, a good spot for a all mountain ski.

By:
2 days ago

Tweak This Flag

Thanks WIllie i really appreciate it. I'm 5' 11" 170, how about...

Thanks WIllie i really appreciate it. I'm 5' 11" 170, how about the 183cm for me? Also, any suggestions on bindings? Also I don't really pay attention to weight that often, is 4322g pretty heavy (I think thats around 9 something Lbs)?

By:
3 days ago

Flag

Yes the 183 would be fine, its actually about 179. as for bindings I am the same size as you and i use the look px14 and love them. the rossie sas140 wb is the same binding also the salomon STH14 is a excellent binding. as for weight thats about average for a fat ski.

-thanks willie you've been a really big help

By: ,
3 days ago

Tweak This Flag

I'm wondering how the blend handles high speeds and weather I...

I'm wondering how the blend handles high speeds and weather I would be able to lay down carves on them?

By:
3 days ago

Flag

Henry-- I bet you would have a hard time finding the speed limit on these unless you were charging big open lines, as for carving they lay down fat gs style turns at speed with no problem yet you can snap them quick if you need to, they can handle it all no prob, just like all lines slantwall skis.

-willie your absolutely amazing my friend, keep it up

By: ,
3 days ago

Tweak This Flag

I am currently skiing the line blends in a 90mm waist. I live...

I am currently skiing the line blends in a 90mm waist. I live up in washington where there isn't much pow, so I guess what I'm asking is how does the 09 lines in the 100mm waist hold up in groomers? Also I'm 5'11" 170 would the 183cm work for me?

By:
4 days ago

Flag

The turn radius and ski stiffness are what you need to look at for "groomers"

By:
4 days ago

Tweak This Flag

Need a ski that will work well in the hills of Ohio or the Mt.s...

Need a ski that will work well in the hills of Ohio or the Mt.s out west. Would the prophet 90 be best?

By:
4 days ago

Flag

The prophet 90 is an excellent backeast ski because of its metal, it does well on ice and hardpack and will do ok in up to boot deep powder, The blend is more of a freestyle ski that will float good in powder, ski off-piste,ski park yet still carve the groomers. The 90 will give you better groomer performance and the blend better powder/ off-piste. Both will work for you, just decide which is most important to you.

By:
4 days ago

Tweak This Flag

im 5' 6" about 140lbs. i recently bought these skis in 183cm....

im 5' 6" about 140lbs. i recently bought these skis in 183cm. and was wondering if i should exchange them for the 178cm. im gonna be using them for mostly backcountry and powder skiing with marker barron bindings. any body have any suggestions what size would be better?

By:
November 14, 2008

Flag

A friend of mine who is 6ft and 200lbs just got 183's and they seem ok for him. You could mount 1 inch back from center to make them ski shorter and you wouldn't loose to much pow performance, But if you are a real strong skier and are used to longer ski's keep them they will work better off-piste then the 178, I'm 5' 7" and ski 183 bacons as my all-mountain ski. the 178 running surface is about the same as a 174 ski so that might be to small. IMO i would keep the 183 and mount 1 1/2" back from center.

By:
November 14, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I've been riding 2004 Motherships for the last few years, and...

I've been riding 2004 Motherships for the last few years, and I'm looking at picking up either the Blend or Prophet 100. But I can't decide. I ski in Colorado, and do more in the backcountry than the park. It's basically powder all day, every day for the majority of the season. I'm a bigger guy too-6 foot, 260. Any suggestions?

By:
November 1, 2008

Flag

The line blends in 183cm are only about 179cm in length but are softer the the 100,s they might be to small for you. The 100,s come in a 186cm and might be better for you. How about prophet 130,s or the new motherships for 09, they might work for you also. or K2 obseths in 189cm.

By:
November 1, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I'm a skiboarder that's going to be making the switch to full...

I'm a skiboarder that's going to be making the switch to full length skis so I can ski more powder, I'm almost 6'2", should I start out with a shorter ski until I get use to it or should I just start out with the 183cm?

By:
October 30, 2008

Flag

I suggest going with the 178's, which should have plenty of float in powder if you are under 210 lbs. If you are over go for the 183's.

Other opinion: Go longer for your powder skis at your height. Unless you are a skinny rail, the longer skis will give you more float, but will be a tiny bit slower in turns.

By: ,
November 7, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I'm just getting into twin tips this season and the blend and...

I'm just getting into twin tips this season and the blend and the prophet 90's are at the top of my list. I've been skiing for a while and consider my self pretty advanced. I ski a lot of backcountry and pow but also love ripping up the park. Which ski will do best? Also, i'm about 6 foot and 160 pounds, are 183's too long?

By:
October 27, 2008

Flag

go with the blends the are more of a freestyle ski and the 90,s are a freeride ski, meaning the blends will work way better in the park pluse they are 100mm in the waist so they float well in powder. the 90,s are stiff and are more of a groomer ski. 183cm is perfect for you as they are only about 178cm's same as my 182cm line bacons.

By:
October 29, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I have the Line Blend 2009's. I don't want these mounted too...

I have the Line Blend 2009's. I don't want these mounted too far back on the ski. I want to be able to whip around trees a little easier, and get spins off. Exactly how should I get these mounted?

By:
October 27, 2008

Flag

If you are planning on focusing your ability on spins / skiing backwards, get them mounted true to center.

Everything else is just a gradation. I like my skis about 3 cm forward from traditional mounting. This is just slightly behind the center mark.

Remember that realistically, there is no way you will spend half your time going backwards. I would go with 2 - 3 cm forward from traditional.

By:
October 27, 2008

Tweak This Flag

What is the flex like on this ski compared to the Prophet 10...

What is the flex like on this ski compared to the Prophet 100?

By:
October 8, 2008

Flag

These will have a fair amount more flex than the prophet 100. The Blend is a "All Mountain" ski but still has quite a bit of it's design focused on park. The Prophet 100 is a true all mountain ski for someone who is really going to be skiing all that a mountain has to offer, also all of the terrain that a resort would have to offer (the 100 is for someone who would still be skiing more pow than the prophet 90).

By:
October 10, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I need someone to tell me when the Line Blend 2009 comes in stock...

I need someone to tell me when the Line Blend 2009 comes in stock in 168 cm! If you dont know exact date wil it be before 15. september?

By:
August 27, 2008

Flag

Unfortunately, we do not have specific dates, the best thing I can advise is that you consistently check back with the website, every other day or so.

By:
August 27, 2008

Tweak This Flag

So you dont think I should get 168cms?

So you dont think I should get 168cms?

By:
August 24, 2008

Flag

No, you sould get 178cm. You would out grow 168's before the end of the season. The running surface on 178's is 144cm's so thats about the same as a 173cm ski. If your worried about the length mount them 1 inch forward of the mount line, which would be 2 inches back from center.

By:
August 25, 2008

Tweak This Flag

I am about 170cm tall, how long should my skis be? I think im...

I am about 170cm tall, how long should my skis be? I think im going to grow atleast 5cms this winter. Do you suggest I buy Line Blend 168cm or 178cm? And are there a 171cm?

By:
August 24, 2008

Flag

Right now for your height you sould get 178cm, If you think you will keep growing or an advanced skier I would get the 183cm. Line skis tend to ski a little short.

By:
August 24, 2008

Tweak This Flag

Tech Specs:

Lengths: 168cm, 178cm, 183cm
Dimensions: 132 / 100 / 122mm
Turn Radius: [178cm] 19.8m
Construction: ABS Sidewall
Core Material: Maple Macroblock
Base: Sintered, Fatty base & edge
Tail: True twintip
Binding System: No
Binding Included: No
Recommended Binding: No
Weight: [Pair] 151oz (4300g)
Recommended Use: Park, freeride, freestyle