Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 35 Reviews

Stoic Vaporshell Jacket - Men's

Available Colors / Styles

Bark/Burnt
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Never question whether or not to pack a rainshell again\227Stoic\222s Vaporshell Jacket protects like an atmosphere when you wear it, but weighs as much as an apparition when you have it in your pack. This lightweight, waterproof, extremely packable rainshell puts all your past rain gear to shame.

  • Lightweight VaporShell shuns rain, and vents body heat like none other
  • 3-D Ergonomic fit moves with you, not against you
  • Extremely compressible—plays nice with other gear in your pack
  • Stoic Vaporshell fabric’s air permeability and vapor permeability is so shocking you’ll swear its magic

Bottom Line: Lighter than a vapor.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Outside Buyer's Guide - Spring 2012

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 14, 2012

Here's what Outside had to say about the Stoic Vaporshell Jacket:

"BEST FOR: Minimalists pinching pennies. THE TEST: The Vaporshell is made with Stoic's proprietary polyurethane membrane, which testers found to be every bit as breathable as all the name-brand stuff. On a soaking weekend in the Cascades, the pit-zip-equipped Vaporshell never got damp inside, and rain still beaded off the exterior after two straight days of downpours. THE VERDICT: While it's not as full-featured as top-of-the-line jackets, it's tough to beat the Vaporshell's combo of performance and price."

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Superb jacket for all conditions

By:
May 4, 2011

Well I just got it today, and while I will update this review in a month after taking this jacket to the Himalayas, I thought I'd share my first thoughts on the jacket after receiving it.

First off, it's an awesome length. Sits about half way down my butt, also doesn't move at all when you lift your arms and move around. As usual, the 3D Ergo fit is fantastic. This is cut to layer under, and the fabric is actually stronger than I would have expected for an ultralight rain jacket. I wouldn't honestly classify it as such. When you add in the helmet compatible hood, it's a lightweight hardshell that you could take into the mountains or climb with. I found it a little strange to see sewn seams on a Stoic piece, and it just seems so much less durable in that construction than the superior seam welding that they normally use, but apparently this is because of a less durable membrane, and so I don't judge.

This is a 3-layer hardshell. Not one of those crappy 2.5 layer designs with a carbon printed inner layer to protect the membrane. This is the reason for the higher weight, but makes it far more comfortable, and much more breathable than the average lightweight rain jacket. According to BC, their Vaporshell membrane is air-permeable, meaning that it is very similar to eVent, and the jacket is really breathable. I was a little skeptical of their ratings for breathability, and like all ratings, they are dependent on other factors, like fabric thickness and testing conditions, but I can say that this is a very breathable rain jacket. The 68K mm hydrostatic head means the membrane is very resistant to stretching, which is how water sneaks through, so it should perform well in wind. The DWR on my jacket seems pretty consistent, but like any rain jacket, it will wet out eventually in prolonged rain.

Right now it only gets four stars because BC markets it as an ultralight rainshell, and when Marmot and TNF both make jackets that are half it's weight, I think that it doesn't do it's job in that respect.

UPDATE:
So, after getting back from the Himalayas and testing this jacket in real life, I can't help but be amazed. The fabric breathes almost as well as Polartec Powershield Pro, as I found while testing this alongside my North Face Kishtwar. The jacket is not super lightweight, but it does pack well, and I'd much rather have the 3L fabric than shave a measly three or four ounces off of the jacket. To test the breathability, I wore it on a 600 meter climb in 80 degrees and I was very comfortable. The second test was an 800 meter climb in colder, highly windy conditions, and again, I was very comfortable. The jacket beads water well in the rain, and I had no trouble with it wetting out or anything after a couple hours of light rain. This is the next generation of affordable, high quality rain jackets, and it beats the competition by miles. Lovers of Arc'teryx might come after me in attempts to kill me for saying this, but this jacket is superior to the top end Alpha SV in my book. The hood on the Stoic is great, legitimately adjustable to be comfortable with or without a helmet, which is rare, the fit is athletic but with good room for layering, the Polyurethane coated zippers block water well, and the breathability is the best I've ever seen on a hardshell, including eVent. The only points that a jacket like the Alpha would win against the Vaporshell are because of it's pockets. The Stoic is very durable and the face fabric is almost exactly the same as on the Alpha. As is, the Vaporshell is an outstanding rain jacket, and a high end mountaineering shell, but if they remade it with nice big hand pockets and perhaps another chest pocket, it could possibly be the best mountain shell out there. Two thumbs up for Stoic for creating a budget rain jacket that miraculously beats both Gore-Tex and eVent for breathability while remaining inexpensive and durable. Five Stars, no questions asked.

Final test:
I just went outside to walk around in an absolutely torrential rainstorm and it kept me dry, which is the most important part of a rain jacket. As a side note, it doesn't matter whether you're wearing a vaporshell, an Alpha SV, an eVent jacket, or any other waterproof material, if you get caught in a torrential rainstorm, you will get wet eventually. It's part of being in the backcountry, and out there, being dry is kind of a pipe dream. What it comes down to, is that this jacket will keep you just as dry as the next one, and will probably breathe a lot better.

I wrote another review on my website. It can be read here: http://blessedoutdoors.blogspot.com

Was this helpful? (8) (0)

Flag

7 Comments Last Comment: June 14, 2011 by:

By:
June 2, 2011

Thanks for the update James.

Just got back from Wales with mine. Agreed as to all you said, but I still think the Alpha SV is in a different class -- for the only reason that it just feels more solid, and it is certainly more windproof. It's questionable whether one needs the windproofing in a shell, particularly if you already have a windproof softshell or fleece to throw underneath. However, when I was in Wales last week, we had some pretty high winds on the ridges (50 to 70 mph), and I definitely felt the wind through this jacket, which I would not have in my Alpha SV. Nevertheless, the breathability far surpasses the Alpha SV, or any other jacket I have worn. For that reason, as well as its water protection, for backcountry trips I will likely just throw this shell in the pack and wear a softshell while skiing.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 5, 2011

I wonder how well the breathability rating will be once the jacket wet's out.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 4, 2011

I'm 5'8, with a 20" center back. I got a size medium.

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

By:
May 4, 2011

How tall are you, and what size did you get?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
June 14, 2011

I am glad people are digging this jacket as it is a legitimate rain jacket for an excellent price. However, this thing is not even close to an arcteryx SV in terms of face fabric quality. The abrasion resistance on an arcteryx SV garment is insanely high, and though I don't own this jacket, several friends have it and I can already see some light abrasion occurring on high wear points. Kudos to Backcountry for making a good, breathable, affordable shell, but the $600 Arcteryx SV is definitely way more durable.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 30, 2011

Thanks for the update. Sounds like a great jacket...and would be even better if it had hand pockets...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 9, 2011

I'll get back to you on that one, Stick. I'm getting into Kathmandu tomorrow and it's supposed to be absolutely pouring. Most jackets' breathability go down the toilet once they wet out, and I doubt this will be an exception.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 3

Its All Right

By:
May 16, 2011

Well, I have worn the shit outa this jacket over the past 10 days or so while moving all of my stuff from my house to storage.... so here goes:

Pros:

1. Waterproofness is sufficient as well as DWR... I have carried boxes, rubbed up against furniture, etc while it was raining and the DWR is still holding up and no wetting out...

2. Zippers are sturdy; only had a couple of times where the front zipper never caught and I found it undone from the fly up...

3. Hood is great when not on your head and cinched up just around the back of the head.

4. The forward thinking design of the arms. This is my first Stoic product and when you put the jacket on, your arms are most comfortable extended in front of you; the jacket is cut and designed to be this way... in the beginning it felt kinda weird, but now my other jackets feel wrong...

5. Sleeves are extra long, which I like, and the hem length is just right.

6. The hem cinch works great.

Cons:

1. The hood is strange... no matter how I cinched it up it never really felt tight or comfortable; only when wearing a baseball hat...

2. The hood... the foam hood cinch cord keepers are horrible for keeping the cinch cords really tight. Also when the hood is on your head, they rub on my cheeks... like raw... why aren't these on the outside of the hood?

3. The hood... the cinch cords for tightening the hood are inside the jacket and can only be accessed by unzipping the jacket... move these outside the jacket or stick them into some pockets!

4. The wrist Velcro cuffs are to heavy and stiff; the last inch or more of em doesn't stay closed and catch on everything...

5. The breath-ability... I have a love/hate relationship with something this breathable... It first came about when I got into my truck after unloading some stuff and drove away... after a while of my arms resting on the truck console I noticed that my forearms were clammy, thus the sweat had escaped fine, but also had come right back into the jacket because there was no breeze to take it away... This happened every time. Not exactly sure how this will translate into other uses, but never noticed this with any other material...

6. Where the cut edges of the material is exposed, it is starting to fray...

7. Sizing is a bit strange; the sizing chart for me was clearly a L (I am 6'1" 210lbs normally wear XL in everything), but the large was too small through the chest...

8. The sleeve holes are too small around, I can barely get the sleeves past my forearms and definitely not my elbows...

I am gonna continue to wear this jacket until its ready for a dirt nap, and have to say that the material has potential, but the jacket needs some refining... I say steer clear of this and go with something like the marmot Aegis Jacket...

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Any idea if and when the 2012s will be available? Thanks

Any idea if and when the 2012s will be available?

Thanks

By:
December 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

In-house Demo: Stoic VaporShell

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 10, 2011

The Stoic design team demonstrates the wicked breathability of the VaporShell, alongside a few competing jackets. These bubbler tests show air being pushed through the fabric (air permeable) while still remaining completely waterproof.

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

two changes

By:
February 2, 2012

Amazing jacket, ice climbing in Ouray CO all weekend and never got wet. Really wish there was a place to put my hand though. Pockets would be a couple ounces of worth while weight.

The only downside, and it's a BIG ONE, is the wrist adjust velcro, THEY NEED TO BE CHANGED! they continually come undone and get in the way.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This jacket's waterproof and breathability rating is much

This jacket's waterproof and breathability rating is much better than any waterproof/breathable jacket. Is it an error.

By:
November 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

See further down in the comments- there was a scandal about the waterproofness and breathability ratings of this jacket. Originally, a different method of testing (burst pressure) was used. The numbers have been changed from the original purported ratings, preceded by a conversation between backcountry and clients. I would not suspect that a retailer would continue with questionable ratings if they've already addressed questionable testing methods. That being said, only the waterproofness rating was changed.

Would it be more considerate if you asked questions instead of asserting your opinions or accusations?

By:
November 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I've seen higher waterproof ratings. The shell does get glowing reviews for breathability, so I have no reason to doubt the numbers.

By:
November 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

First (albeit tentative) Review

By:
May 3, 2011

Ok, first out-of-box impressions. It's very light, very thin fabric, kind of slippery and seems pretty durable. The fit is clearly intended to allow for layering underneath, it's a little baggy compared to the other Stoic Ms I have. It beads water like a brand-new raincoat should (see photo). Other stuff:

The sleeves are really long. I'm 5'9" and medium Stoic gear has always fit me well, even though my wingspan is about 6'2". These sleeves might even be too long, but mobility is good.

Seams are not welded. I can say that the water beads off them just as well. Presumably they won't last as long though.

The hood is huge, which would be awesome in the rain, where I have not yet taken it. I did stand in the shower with it (on cold) and didn't get any notable condensation, and I rode my bike six or seven miles in 50-degree weather and didn't get swampy. These are not strenuous tests, I'll grant you, but it handled them just fine.

The length is shorter than my current jacket (the backcountry.com Stoic 2.0 shell), but still past my pants pockets.

I don't especially like the lack of pockets, I'll be honest. I don't know why they're left out (maybe a feature of the material like Ben Wheeler was talking about), but it's annoying.

Packs down to about the size of a Nalgene when carefully folded and rolled. Very portable.

Also don't judge the color by my photo, the lighting's weird. That's the navy, but the photo on this page is true to color. Go by that.

Bottom line (with the caveat that I haven't field tested it): Seems like a good jacket. It's relatively cheap and from what I can tell, does the job well. Not mind-blowing, though, hence the 4-star "pretty good."

Was this helpful? (4) (0)

Flag

First Ascent Igniter layered underneath.

By:
May 27, 2011

Plenty of room to layer a 100g primaloft insulated jacket underneath, and still move comfortably. Perfect sizing and fit.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

waterproof, comfortable, odd fit, no front pocets

By:
May 5, 2011

I got it in yesterdady, It was pouring out so I ripped open the package and ran outside. Of course, the limitation of the jacet was not tested but preliminary opinions were this:
The jacket seems to be a little off sized for me, usually XLs fit me great, it was extremely tight in the shoulders, not the chest, which is odd (picture). I called BC and they said XXL will be available in mid may.
Also, I don't think the non front pockets will do it for me, but it might be something to get used to. Even though I know slightly opened front pockets in rain can soak your pockets and core dependant on the liner. I just know I won't be using this jacket just for hiking.
Other than that, the jacket out of the package seemed like a stiff hardshell. When put on, its actually really comfortable, the material moves quite well with your body.
Also, the hood has those foam cord holds, I have a bombshell and skeptical about them then, bu afer using it for a season, I'm a believer, they don't hold th strings at absolute, but only if you get snagged on something it pulls out, lowering the chancs of ripping
Im returning it for a XXL, and the arm length worries me a bit, the length is perfect now...

Basically I'm giving this jacket 4 stars instead of 5, (subjectively) for an odd fit and lack of pockets. Heading to maine at the end of the month to do some real testing so see how the jacket works in real life. Still n awesome looking jacket, seems to be bar none waterproofing, high neck, huge hood, and nifty new velco for the wrists.

Updated: Just got the XXL in. Threw it on and it fits great. Not as tight in the shoulders as before. and the size difference btw a XL and a XXL is surprisingly not that much different in the arms and the back which I was happy about. Still have to try out it on the trails. Until then, the 4 stars will remain until I'm comfortable with the lack of hand pockets.
cheers

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 5, 2011 by:

By:
May 5, 2011

GoLite has been using little foam cord locks on their jackets and I absolutely hate them. I ended up replacing the ones on my GoLite jacket with actual cord locks, and added no weight whatsoever.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

anyone know the CFM rating on this jacket. I already own it.

anyone know the CFM rating on this jacket. I already own it. I'm just curious, given the breathability rating.

By:
September 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The CFM rating is approx 4-7 cfm of air permeability. being a waterproof jacket, this unique quality allows a small amount of air to pass through the membrane, and more importantly, allows the moisture rich air inside the jacket to pass out of the jacket. a Gore-tex jacket has 0 cfm rating, but also performs much less in breathability.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes, cubic feet (of air) per minute. Having worn the jacket on a particularly gusty ridge, I found that wind cut through it pretty easily. The jacket is extremely breathable and waterproof, but in my experience does not do the best job blocking the wind. That's a sacrifice I would make again, however, for the breathability/waterproofness combination that this jacket has. I'm just curious as to the CFM numbers for comparison purposes.

By:
September 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey Shawn, I assume you mean, "cubic feet per minute"? So even with the high breathability, I would expect the CFM to be close to, if not 0... meaning 0% of the wind gets through, or in other words it blocks 100% of the wind like any other waterproof/breathable membrane... maybe we can get a comment from BC.com?

By:
September 6, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 1

Hydrostatic head ("Waterproof Rating")

By:
May 13, 2011

This site advertises that the Stoic Vaporshell Jacket material has a hydrostatic head ("waterproof rating") of 68,000 mm H20, and a breathability of 46,000 g/m2/24hours. These numbers are both about twice the best values ever measured for eVent.

I consulted a person inside the industry whom I consider to be an expert, and he did some research. He discovered that Backcountry.com never did a hydrostatic head test. They did a Mullen burst test and published that value instead, calling it "waterproof rating".

Hydrostatic head tests use water under pressure to test a fabric's resistance to leakage. The Mullen burst test doesn't use any water. It uses oil under high pressure to rupture the fabric. The bursting pressure is measured at the moment that the fabric sample explodes.

The fabric used in the Vaporshell jacket is a laminate that includes a very breathable ePTFE membrane. It has excellent breathability but low hydrostatic head. Rather than publish the low hydrostatic head number, Backcountry.com converted the Mullen bursting pressure, which was about 97 psi, to mm H20 (68,000), and called it "waterproof rating".

I presented this information to Backcountry.com, and immediately recieved an email from Bill Hartlieb, Director of the Brand Division. He conceded that the Mullen Burst test had been used instead of a real hydrostatic head test like the JIS 1092, saying:

"I agree with you however about the test selected. The mullens test is describing a different type of failure, and pressure associated with this failure."

and "... we did use a test that is not consistent with others in the market."

He promised to correct the published "waterproof rating" value, saying this about the actual hydrostatic head for the Vaporshell material:

"I also expect this number to be in the 10,000 to 20,000 range."

So, the "waterproof rating", according to Mr. Hartlieb, is probably 10-20k, not 68k. Mr. Hartlieb also assured me that Backcountry.com always uses the JIS 1092 hydrostatic head test...just not this time.

I noticed this morning that, on the website, the values had been changed from 68,000/46,000 to 68/46.

Many people called to ask about what tests gave these numbers and Backcountry.com representatives told all of them "I assure you, they're accurate". According to Mr. Hartlieb, they usually use the standard JIS 1092, and he clearly knows the difference between that and the burst test. When I called initially, I was told that they repeated the "hydrostatic head" test (actually the burst test) three times in-house and got the 68,000 value every time. So, the misrepresentation wasn't just a mistake. They know the difference.

This practice is ubiquitous, I realize, but we can keep deception by companies like Backcountry.com in check by calling them on it.

Was this helpful? (9) (0)

Flag

17 Comments Last Comment: June 21, 2011 by:

By:
June 21, 2011

I'm just curious as to whether you have even used this jacket? After reading your post (the 16 comments caught my interest) it looks like you haven't even purchased or tried this jacket, or at least you don't mention anything about using it, which says something about the credibility of the post. I guess it's fine that you unveil all the science behind the jacket material in your review, but what about real world performance? When I read a review, I want to know if the product is comfortable, if it kept you dry on your last backpacking trip, if it fits well, etc. The method that was used to produce the waterproof rating is the last thing that concerns me. I want to know about the product's function, not your conversations with backcountry brand directors. All that aside, the review appears to have taken hours to produce. That time could have been spent outdoors having a good time (while testing the jacket), after which, if you weren't pleased, Backcountry would have taken it back without any questions. Just a thought. I appreciate that you took the time to post all of that info, I just don't think it's the info that people are looking for when they're considering buying a new jacket.

Flag

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

By:
June 20, 2011

Great discussion and great work by ckr to keep Backcountry honest about their testing practices and ratings. I must agree with Dan above however as to the reason behind the one-star rating given for the jacket. If you are displeased with the function of the jacket itself, by all means rate it as one-star. However, ratings are meant for individual products, not your experience with the company, service, shipping, etc. Rating a product based on your experience as a customer and not on the product's merit can be misleading to those looking for opinions on functionality, fit, style, etc. There are other channels through which to voice concerns about the company itself, and it appears that you have used them well. Let's just try to keep product ratings about the products.

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

By:
June 14, 2011

CKR, I appreciate your comments and your knowledge of the testing practices used in the industry. As far as BC, I think it stands to their reputation that BC leaves all comments (unless degrading to people) up on their website to show to their customers real reviews from all their customers for everyone to see.
I'm curious however, what your low rating stands for? The misconception that the company is trying to set an industry standard, make a profit, etc. Or because the jacket itself is not up to par even if it stands up to a respectable 28K waterproof rating.
You alone seemed to make the stand and pointed that the company was incorrect in the ratings which I applaud you for, but you had also stated the company contacted you personally and had admitted their mistake and changed their specs
thanks

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

By:
May 26, 2011

You complain about the hydrostatic head test, but mention nothing about the breathability test. How about the industry finally stops using the useless Static MVTR test and mimics the military in their Dynamic MVTR, that would give us nice, useable results. Pity it would shed bad light on Gore, otherwise I think it would be standard by now.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 25, 2011

ckr- I appreciate your diligence. Seldom do I find a set of test results so unbelievable. The 68k number was so far beyond the realm of any other jacket that it either made the proposition absolutely miraculous, or completely useless when trying to make a comparison. With Bill's inclusion of the new specs of 29k, this jacket can now stand on its own merits as a technical piece, instead of a supposed wonder of modern hydrostatic resistance engineering. I do have to add- there is no way that it was a simple oversight (a "mistake"). BC knows what it is that experienced users are looking for as a baseline for comparison, and had nobody called them on it, I'm sure the specs would still be those that were presented initially. Thanks!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 20, 2011

Bill Hartlieb reported today on Backpackinglight.com (and soon here as well, I assume) that correct waterproofness values have been obtained for the Vaporshell jacket. Using appropriate tests, the waterproofness (hydrostatic head) was found to be about 29,000 mmH20.

This is very respectable number, and, as I said on BPL, I am very impressed with both Backcountry's (Bill's) conscientious response and with the performance of the Vaporshell material. This jacket can now be fairly compared to others on the market, and I'm pleased to see that it performs so well.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 17, 2011

I guess we'll know when the new numbers are posted.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 17, 2011

Colin,

I do not have trouble keeping up. I am aware of what you posted; I just don't think that what are you posting is accurate.

Shawn

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 17, 2011

Shawn, you seem to be having a little trouble keeping up. The person I originally consulted who had information about Backcountry's testing said the burst test was used, and Bill conceded this. Bill said in his emails that the burst test was used, and he predicted that the new numbers would be very different from the old numbers. Would that be the case if the two tests were the same? I described all of this in my first post.

There is no way to know (and it isn't important anyway) whether it was an accident or not. I made a fuss about this because I wanted correct information to be available to customers, and I wanted Backcountry to have an incentive to be conscientious about the specs they report for their products. Bill has been very attentive to these concerns and I think Backcountry's response has been admirable. Now we should soon see accurate numbers for this jacket. This seems to me like a good outcome.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 17, 2011

Again, the point is, I'm not sure that the Mullen "burst" test was used here (as opposed to a hydrostatic test -- see below from their website). Does anyone know the answer?

Setting Standards Since 1887
Since its invention in 1887, the Mullen Burst Tester has been the industry benchmark for measuring the burst strength of paper, paperboard, non-wovens and textiles. What started as an innovative contribution to the paper industry eventually served to define the "standard grades" in commerce. The Mullen Burst Tester is cited in many of the TAPPI and ASTM standards - and when it comes to quality control, our tester is an integral part of any well-equipped lab.

For pulp and paper products, the Mullen Burst Tester is relied upon to measure the material's physical strength and fiber bond. And for textiles, our burst testing equipment measures the fabric's strength along with the immediate or eventual effects of dyes, chemicals, and processes. It also demonstrates the results of wear, age, and environment, and evaluates the comparative strength of alternative fibers. We've also extended our testing capabilities to include:

• Ceramics
• Composite webs
• Foils
• Plastics
• A variety of other substrates

Mullen also offers a Hydrostatic Tester that measures the resistance of material to water-for the evaluation of geotextiles and other such products as raincoats, umbrellas, and ski & swim attire. Our Deflectometer Tester gauges the distension and grain cracking of soft leather material for shoe uppers, garments, gloves, and upholstery.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 17, 2011

To be honest, I don't know much about either of the Mullen tests, although it seems that the hydrostatic test can be used to show the water pressure at which a fabric will show water leakage at certain psi, not just a "burst.". I recall seeing at least one website that reported such results. This is an important difference. In the end, I'm sure bc will post what they did.

In the end 68000 v. 20000 does not matter to me, but the integrity of a company like backcountry does.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 16, 2011

As I wrote on the other site where I posted my concerns, I think there is a consensus that results of the Mullen burst test cannot be called "waterproofness". Let's not waste our time debating that. It seems to me that the mistake was probably not an accident, but I don't find that facet of the debate particularly interesting, and I don't see a way to settle that anyway.

To be honest, I'm not too interested in cultivating a debate at all. I'm pleased that Bill Hartlieb has been attentive to these concerns and I look forward to seeing real waterproofness numbers for this jacket.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 16, 2011

Shawn, I appreciate your feedback. Despite the tone of my posts, I have no personal need to vilify Backcountry.com.

I don't understand your most recent post, though. You mentioned in an earlier post that you don't think that the difference between hydrostatic head values of 68,000 and 20,000 are meaningful in practice because 20,000 is enough for a rain jacket.
Is the burst pressure meaningful in practice?

I don't understand your concern. The mullen test measures burst pressure, whether it uses water or oil or air. This gives an indication of the tensile strength of the fabric, but I don't understand how that says anything about waterproofness. It doesn't measure leakage; it just ruptures the fabric. It is just true, regardless of your opinions or mine, that the Mullen test is not accepted by the apparel industry for measuring waterproofness. It isn't used that way because it measures burst pressure.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 15, 2011

Interesting.

I find it hard to believe that backcountry would purposely try to fool anyone. The only type of person who would understand the difference between a 68000 value and a 10-20,000 (predicted) value on the hydrostatic head test would be exactly the type of person who would find these numbers suspicious and check into the testing/rationale behind them (see all of the initial posts).

That said, I would like to see the actual results of the hydrostatic head test when performed, although it would really just be an academic rating. If a shell can withstand a shower's pressure and not leak, it's difficult for me to understand why you would need the type of "waterproofness" to withstand the conditions engineered in a laboratory setting (i.e., over 20,000 mm).

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 16, 2011

I am not an engineer, but from a simple google search anyone can discover that there are mullen testers that perform an air burst, and mullen testers that performs a hydrostatic test -- both of which can be listed as ASTM D751, Procedure A (what BC says was used here in the above posts).

http://www.mullentesters.com/testers.html#modela

Do you know which machine was used here? I would want to be pretty sure about something like that before I posted (on more than one site) that a company was committing fraud.

Perhaps an engineer can chime in.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 16, 2011

I don’t know if backcountry meant to fool its customers, but since some have argued that they didn’t, I should make a couple of points before dropping that issue.

First, they know the difference between the tests. Ben wheeler and Mr. Hartlieb know the difference, and a real hydrostatic head test is used for all of their products except this one.

Second, it may be true that people who are very interested in hydrostatic head values will find very high numbers suspicious and check into the testing. Some people did. And Backcountry.com told them “No, I assure you, nothing fishy. These numbers are completely accurate.” The representatives at Backcountry.com didn’t say “Well, the reason the number is so high is that it represents burst pressure, not waterproofness.” They knew that people were comparing it to real hydrostatic head numbers for other jackets.

Third, some have argued that using the burst test might be a mistake, but it isn’t necessarily deception. I disagree. The burst test is not a waterproofness test. What value does burst pressure have for buyers of a waterproof jacket? What if you put this jacket on a scale and found that it weighs 430,000 milligrams, and then put that number up on this site and called it “waterproofness”? This is exactly what happened. A test that doesn’t measure waterproofness was used instead of a waterproofness test because it gave a bigger number, and then customer service reps assured everyone that it had been triple-checked and was completely correct.

Last, I completely agree with people who have observed that the real-world difference between 68,000 mmH20 and 20,000 mmH20 is not important because 20,000 mmH20 is enough. I think 10,000 mmH20 is probably enough. A hydrostatic head of 68,000 is totally unnecessary. Backcountry should have just made this argument instead of posting a falsified waterproofness number.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 15, 2011

One more thing -- Ben Wheeler, a backcountry employee, posted the types of independent testing they used several days ago (including the fact that the Mullen test was used).

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Wet Pits

By:
May 3, 2011

If you hold your arms up and let the showerhead spray directly on the pit zips, water comes in between the two zipper tabs. Likelihood of anything like that ever happening in real life: practically nil.

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag Zoom

2 Comments Last Comment: May 4, 2011 by:

By:
May 5, 2011

Good to know...thanks...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 4, 2011

The best part about that picture is the beer in the background. . . . how all product testing should be done. . .

Flag

Was this helpful? (6) (0)

Rating for this product: 3

Nice Jacket but

By:
November 23, 2011

This is just a great jacket all around. It is a great walk around jacket but it is not 28k it is like 18k buts its still pretty good. The amazing thing is it dose not get clammy in side like other jackets. I have longer arms and this jacket fits me great.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: November 27, 2011 by:

By:
November 27, 2011

The official site says it is 20K.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I got the jacket, and the fit is fantastic. I haven't used

I got the jacket, and the fit is fantastic. I haven't used it in the rain yet, so I can't speak to the waterproofness, but it is extremely breathable.

That said, I'm puzzled by the lack of pockets. Was the rationale in eliminating the pockets merely to shave a couple ounces, or is there some other reason I'm missing?

By:
July 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would agree with Ryan above. The lack of pockets is just to save weight. As far the waterproofing; I would suggest testing it out. The shell performs amazingly!

By:
July 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Most super-light rain shells lack pockets. Generally to eliminate weight. Extra fabric, zippers, additional waterproofing, for zippers, etc.

By:
July 21, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Unreal value

By:
July 1, 2011

For $129 it does get any better than this (unless of course you find it for cheaper on SAC)
Great fabric (slightly soft to the touch), perfect fit (slightly more fitted as per usual STOIC). if you want to layer more than a light fleece or softshell you will have to go up a size. Hood is not as large as some reviewers mention (certainly not as big as some of my arcteryx hoods). The fabric breathes reasonably well- I really cant notice much of a difference between vaporshell and some of my gore tex jackets .Uses bigger seam tape which is only a small detai, and it keeps the water out. zippers are excellent so far (pit zips are small-ish). It really could use 2 more hand pockets, but in its current configuration it works well for camping.
You really cant go wrong on this jacket.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Slightly inconsistent DWR

By:
May 3, 2011

After ten minutes in the shower, it appears that the DWR right on the zipper isn't quite as good as the stuff next to it.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

2 Comments Last Comment: August 1, 2011 by:

By:
September 6, 2011

I agree as well, at least with the women's version... I haven't noticed it with the men's, but the GF's it almost seems like the DWR coating was missed completely in a bunch of areas...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
August 1, 2011

Experienced this, too... also, the DWR on the shoulders is already wearing off after two trips in the rain. Nowhere else on the jacket, just the shoulders. Gonna take it back in person (one of the benefits of living in SLC) and see what they say.

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Rating for this product: 4

Great Rain Jacket

By:
July 2, 2011

This coat will keep you dry from anything on the outside no matter what!! But if you need something breathable this may not be for you. No pitzips is the only reason I knocked off a star. Other than that its a great jacket at a great price

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

3 Comments Last Comment: July 14, 2011 by:

By:
July 14, 2011

and it has great breathability....

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
July 5, 2011

Yeah, mine does too...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
July 5, 2011

Mitch,

Are you sure you have the vapor shell? Mine does have pit zips.

Shawn

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

DOES THE HOOD STOW AWAY?

DOES THE HOOD STOW AWAY?

By:
July 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No it doesnt, its fixed. You could roll it down and tuck it in, but it doesn't velcro or zip away.

By:
July 15, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing Coat

By:
May 16, 2011

This thing is bomb proof
it might not breathe like a $500 gortex coat but damn is it water proof!
I was standing in rain so heavy there was water running off the sleeve and I was bone dry...
fits a bit odd arounf the shoulders but im a broad shoulders guy so its expected
im 6'2" and an XL is perfect
Great for the price and would recommend to anyone

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: May 26, 2011 by:

By:
May 16, 2011

Sounds great, but according to the listed specs, this thing should breathe much better than even a $500 gortex coat.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 26, 2011

Have you used it a lot? I found it breathes significantly better than Gore Tex...

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Pit Zips

By:
May 10, 2011

For temperature and moisture regulation.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

Love/Hate

By:
May 8, 2011

I for one, feel that this is a love it or hate it jacket. As already noted with the reviews and comments below, you take for what it is and love it or complain about its flaw(s) and hate it.
I bought this jacket thinking I could get use to the no pocket situation, considering the price... Personally I think the fit is great and the color ways (all 2 of them...) are awesome; typical of Stoic design (this is my third different Stoic jacket). The material seems rugged for its weight and the breathability has been fantastic (I've yet been able to run around in the rain with it). This all leads back to its lack of pockets. I haven't been able to deal... It might just be the way I'm wired (or 26 years of habit) but every time I put the jacket on I go for the pockets, that don't exist. I would trade the pit-zips in for pockets in a flash. Heck, I'd gladly pay a little more for the jacket if it had pockets. I understand on hot, humid, rainy hikes pit-zips would be a god send. But every rain shell I've owned didn't have pit-zips and I've coped fine. So I've concluded that I'm sending it back and waiting for this years eVent Stash to come out and I'm going to pick that up. Even though at this level weight isn't a huge factor for me, the Stash is even lighter (just barely) has hand pockets, an inside pocket and is guaranteed waterproof and breathable. Sure it cost a fair bit more, but I think the Stash is a more versatile jacket I would use way more often, therefore worth it.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

It's really 3Layer fabric or 2.5?

It's really 3Layer fabric or 2.5?

By:
June 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

yeah, its 3 layer....

By:
June 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Its pretty cool, especially for the price

By:
June 12, 2011

This is my first piece of Stoic gear so I didn't really know what to expect. I got this last week and have run it through a few different situations. Overall, I'm impressed with how its handled everything. Lightweight, breathable as everyone else mentions and I do like the hood. On the downside, I think the wrist enclosures are pretty poorly designed and I wish it had more pockets. I would recommend it if you are looking for a jacket to put through the paces.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Too long

By:
May 16, 2011

My arms are a little short so I can understand it the sleeve were an inch long but they are more like 4 inches too long! Hood is a bit large also. Overall it's a strange fitting jacket.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey does anyone have this as a ski touring jacket? How does

Hey does anyone have this as a ski touring jacket? How does it work and does it have a powder skirt?

Thanks

By:
June 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would second the fact that it is by no means a ski jacket
No pockets and no vents would make it a bit rough to wear for getting hot

By:
July 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

No powder skirt, but I'd use it on day trips -- particularly if you're just going to stash it in your pack. My other shell is an Alpha SV, which I break out for days when I'm really concerned about the elements, but is just extra weight if you're staying relatively close to civilization.

By:
June 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey there! I wouldn't recommend it as a ski touring jacket, its cut shorter then preferred and there is no powder skirt check out my review below for more detailed information...

By:
June 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great rain jacket for the price

By:
July 20, 2011

The jacket is very breathable, and completely waterproof. The material is strong; strong enough not to worry about going bush-whacking. The armpit vents don't have any mesh, which sometimes snags on passing branches. Also, the rubber piece on the end of the zippers tend to come off. Overall I would recommend the product, but not at the advertised price. Watch for it on SAC!!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Oversized Hood

By:
May 10, 2011

Large hood will fit over helmet.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

Jack of all trades

By:
September 7, 2011

Got this for half off on SAC and am very happy with it. Even for full price i don't think this will disappoint most people. In my opinion this jacket sheds water very well, breathes well, packs down pretty small, has decent features for a stripped down rainshell and looks awesome. I'm quite sure you could find a jacket that would do all the things i just mentioned better but you would be hard pressed to find one for less that two bills that comes close. I was worried about the weight and durability of the fabric before i ordered one, usually anything ripstop is ultra lightweight. Not the case here, i was pleasantly surprised by how durable the fabric is. On the other had they could have used a better cinch for the hood, the neoprene fastener is junk. The worst part about this jacket are the wrist closure, it just is so flimsy. Another half ounce to make this jacket a little better would have gone a long way. I am 6foot even and weigh 165lbs and a large fits with a little room to layer. Good buy.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am six foot tall weigh 165lbs and had to make a split second

I am six foot tall weigh 165lbs and had to make a split second decision to get this jacket on SAC. The gear rep online suggested i get a large but after reading reviews i'm second guessing them. Med or Large? won't be layering too much

By:
June 17, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey, I'm 6'2 195-200, I have a medium in this shell, it fits great, with some room for layers underneath. I ordered a large at the same time, it was pretty huge on me, sent it back. Love the medium, but also like things to be a little slimmer.

By:
June 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'd go ahead and get the large, which will mostly likely be the best fit. Backcountry is great to work with on returns so no biggie if it doesn't work for some reason.

By:
June 17, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best rain jacket for the price

By:
July 5, 2011

This jacket is sick. Water rolls right off of it, and it fits really well (if you're tall and skinny and stoic gear normally fits you). I'm 6'3" 190lbs with 36" sleevelength and the large is spot on. The pit zips are nice on the warmer days if it's not raining too hard. Unlike some other jackets, they are completely open in the pits, and don't have the mesh when you open them. It will be interesting to see how it holds up. It's very light so always good to have in the pack. I love it - it's 10 times better than my Marmot one that I bought just last year. My only gripe is that I didn't realize it only had one pocket. It was a surprise the first time I wore it, but it's all good, for the price and performance, it's a win.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Stoic Vaporshell Jacket

By:
May 10, 2011

Black with blue waterproof zippers

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

stoic quality

By:
June 16, 2011

this is my fifth stoic product, and third stoic jacket. this thing can breathe like none other I have the event stash shell and the number one complaint I have had about that jacket was getting too hot while walking across campus. I go to the u of m and mornings can be 10 degrees with a artic wind and by the time I'm out of class its a balmy 30 and sleeting out. This jacket you can unzip the pits once you hop on the bus so you don't overhear and look like you just finished the Boston marathon. If you have nordic blood that boils with any activity this is the jacket for you. I do like that it is a baggier fit it allows me to throw my stoic welder lo softshell underneath. Some people mock the double hood but, they arent laughing when the freezing downpours strike.

This jacket is as advertised very light. The guy at my work is a Patagonia freak and wants to buy a stoic after seeing this jacket.
Should you have any problems give backcountry a call they have way better customer service than TNF.

I have yet to be dissapointed

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

could someone tell me whether this jacket has hood adjustmen

could someone tell me whether this jacket has hood adjustments?

By:
May 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

13.7oz. If I remember correctly anyway.

By:
June 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Thanks James. May I know how much M size weighs?

By:
June 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Go for a medium, I'm roughly your size and I can layer my down sweater under it without a problem. The hood adjustments are really good too, something that is rather unusual for Stoic jackets.

By:
May 26, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

thanks. I'm 158lbs, 39" chest, 5'8" height. I'd like to wear this shell over my down jacket. What size should I choose? How does this jacket fit?

By:
May 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Back of the head*

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

It has 3 hood adjustment chords.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 20, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great rain jacket

By:
May 11, 2011

I really like this material! for everything this jacket offers at the price level say compared to labels like GT or EV this is a steal. I'm about 6'1 175lbs I got a L and the fit is great, I have broad shoulders which fill out the top of the jacket leaving little room for any layers besides a shirt. I tried on a light fleece and it was too tight under the arms unless i opened the pit zips

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

So far so good

By:
May 10, 2011

Jacket just arrived. Light, sturdy, and cool. To echo a few points already made---- the sleeves are long, it has an athletic fit, and the pit zips are relatively small. I will post again once I've taken it on my wales trip.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 11, 2011 by:

By:
May 11, 2011

One thing. I actually like the no pockets. I'm using this as a minimalist rain shell, so my plan is to break it out when it rains and take it off when it's not. I typically use my hands when backpacking or climbing, so I wouldn't use the pockets.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I typically wear a medium in Arc'teryx jackets. I'm

I typically wear a medium in Arc'teryx jackets. I'm 5'10" 145, should i go with a medium or a small?

By:
May 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I ended up getting the small and am happy with the size because i dont plan on layering under it. thanks for the input everyone.

By:
July 29, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm 5-10 and just under 140 and found the Small to be way too roomy (see my review elsewhere on this page and "Comment" in reply). I wear a Small in Arc'teryx, with some fitting nicely and others being too large. I have a runner's body, i.e., no chest, so that needs to be taken into account.

By:
May 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Go for the medium if you plan to use it for layering. However if its strictly a shell to wear in the summer with just a t shirt you can get away with the small

By:
May 13, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Medium. I'm 5'9" and 145, and the medium is the best fit for me.

By:
May 12, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Update #1

By:
May 15, 2011

It was humid and 65 degrees in my area of PA yesterday, with a forecast for rain. I went out for a 40 mile ride and wore this shell to test its breathability. I kept the pit zips open and rode at a mid-aerobic pace -- i.e., sweating, but not soaking. This jacket is fantastic. It breathes better than any hardshell I've used. I did have some sweat buildup on my forearms, but that would have been the case even if I weren't wearing a jacket. Otherwise, I felt as if I didn't even have the thing on, except that it did a decent job of blocking out the wind.

Also, it's worth noting that this jacket stretches a bit with use which, for me, is working out nicely. I bought the L instead of the XL -- I'm 6'2" and 215 -- because I wanted an athletic fit and wasn't planning on using this for layering. It was a bit tight in the shoulders at first, but now it feels like a second skin.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Great Jacket

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 15, 2011

Awesome Jacket! Held up in heavy winds, rain, and blowing sand down at Lake Powell and Moab this last weekend.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Initial review

By:
May 10, 2011

The UPS guy just dropped my jacket off. So I will do a quick initial review.

First Impressions:
I ordered the Black version. I was worried of the bright blue of the zipper in the pictures on backcountry.com, but in person I actually like it. It looks good. Backcountry.com lists the weight as 14.0 oz I weighed it in at 13.88oz. The material for being thin and lightweight has a robust and sturdy feel to it. The material is not too smooth or slippery, it has a rougher feel to it. Seems well constructed and none of the material or zippers seem flimsy or cheap.

Several reviewers and commenters on different sites have complained about the lack of pit zips. I just want to say that this jacket DOES have pit zips. While they are not full length they are ample size for doing their purpose. I didn't measure the exact length of them but they are about 6 inches long or so.

Fit:
I ordered an XL. I am 5'10, and 220lbs with fairly broad shoulders. This jacket has a more athetic cut. So it felt a little tight to me while I was putting it on, but once on I must say that I think it fits remarkably well. So if you have broad shoulders like me this jacket still fits well and provides ample range of motion. I like the extra fabric built into the arms, the jacket doesnt ride and raise up/shift position when moving your arms around. The jacket has a pretty decent length to it, it comes to just below the pocket openings on my jeans. The hood fits snugly on the sides but has ample room for a helmet. The hood is also able to be cinched down tight with two shockcord pulls. The wrists have a velcro tab to adjust the opening.

Performance:
So I have worn the jacket for about two hours so far. Its about 70-75 here today with a mild breeze. Walking around my house for about 30 minutes feeling out the jacket I was very comfy and didn't seem warm. If you move with any force or turn quickly you can actually feel a little air come through the material. I went for about a mile walk in my neighborhood and remained comfortable the entire time, I ran back the last half mile or so and started to work up a light sweat. I could feel the jacket breathing, and when running or when a strong breeze came by you could feel a little airflow come through the fabric, Not much but just enough to be noticeable. When I got back home I did some jumping jacks etc for a few minutes to warm up and start sweating a little. I can say without a doubt this jacket breaths pretty good from first impressions. I hope to get out for a dayhike thursday or friday to give it some more tests. Supposed to have rain sat and sunday also, so testing will be on going.

I stood in the shower for about 10 minutes, and the fabric did not wet out in any spots, and the dwr performed well with water beading and rolling off. I allowed the water to hit on all the zippers for a minute or so. Chest pocket zipper and main zipper have a good seal. Holding my arms up and leting the water hit the pit zips there is very minor leakage where the two zippers on the pitzip meet. So unless you walk around in rain storms with your hands over your head for minutes at a time i don't really think this is an issue.

Will post some updates after a few hikes. But initial impressions are I like the Stoic Vaprshell.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 11, 2011 by:

By:
May 11, 2011

Continued Notes: I would definetly upsize if you plan to layer much under this. I have enough room for my hiking shirt and my patagonia nano puff. Anything more would be too tight to be effective.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Too bad they left hand pockets out of this jacket. Especially

Too bad they left hand pockets out of this jacket. Especially since the weight is around 14 oz anyway.

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Konrad, I hear ya, but I am more concerned about having the hand pockets while at camp. I use hiking poles when I am hiking as well, so that doesn't bother me. But when I get to camp and need to throw this shell on to say, block wind or just to warm up a little, then it is a problem. Also, just because a little rain happens to fall doesn't mean I always have to run and grab shelter, at least not when I am carrying a rain jacket.
I also tend to use some of my hiking stuff when I am not hiking. I wear my rain jackets around home or town also, so that makes it pretty annoying not to have hand pockets then too.
But I completely understand everyone has different needs and I am cool with that. However, IMO if this jacket is as breathable as they say pit zips should be an afterthought, so building in some hand pockets with mesh backings seems to be a smarter, more useable design.

By:
May 14, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Stick, if its 90 degrees out and raining, why are you hiking with a jacket on? You're better not wearing a jacket and getting wet, and than drying off in minutes once the rain stops. 90 degrees is crazy hot. Also, I prefer not having handpockets, because I use trekking poles. My hands never go inside my pockets because they are attached to the poles. Even if I wasn't using poles, I wouldn't want hand pockets on my rainwear. If it's raining, the trail is wet and slippery. You wouldn't want to hike with your hands in your pockets, because if you were to take a fall, whats to stop a full on face plant? Seriously, wet hands is the least of my concerns when the weather is foul.

By:
May 11, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Nice answer Ben, thanks for stopping by!

I like the fact that the sleeves are just a little longer to because I agree, I hate it when the sleeves want to ride up to my elbows! But regardless, I would still love to see this jacket with some hand pockets (not hand zips like I accidentally said in my initial post...doh) At 14 oz though, I would not consider this jacket ultralight. Lots of other hard shells out there are in the same weight range, while others are even lighter, and some with pit zips and hand pockets. Saying that, I wonder how much extra weight would have been added to throw in some mesh lined hand pockets...If this jacket breathes as well as it is stated to, and had pit zips, hand pockets and this sweet price attached to it, this thing would have been a clear winner for me! But, that's me...

Giving the claims on the superior breath-ability of this jacket though, I would love to see for myself how it does, just hard for me to pull the trigger without hand pockets. I have another hard shell which does not have hand pockets and I am not too fond of it...regardless of how well it fits and breathes (which is great so far). I will look forward to the videos demonstrating the incredible waterproofness with air permeability of this jacket. Who knows...

By:
May 5, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

maybe they could use mesh pockets to keep the breathability. Although a jacket with a single pocket is still quite useful when backpacking,

By:
May 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hand pockets limit breathability. I'm not sure if that was their reasoning, but only exposed fabric really breathes on a rain jacket, and so everything you add to the jacket limits how much moisture the jacket can move away from your body.

By:
May 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

This initial Vaporshell Jacket was designed as ultralight rain protection - just what you need in a rain shell, nothing you don't. These design calls were made in order to build a rain shell that offers the outstanding waterproof protection and breathability of this Vaporshell Jacket with a great fit while weighing a scant 14oz - all at a price of 129!

As evidenced in this very thread, there are varying opinions on the need to include pit-zips. We chose to err on the side of breathability in this case - in normal conditions, you probably won't ever need them because the fabric is just that breathable. The air permeability of the fabric also aids significantly in cooling and preventing build up of moisture vapor inside the shell. Look for some video uploads demonstrating this incredible waterproofness with air permeability very shortly.

The sleeves were deliberately built a little longer to compensate for a fabric without stretch. Few things we can't stand worse than sleeves that ride half way up your forearm when "down in it."

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

All good points, but the sleeves are long enough that they should cover your hands, right? On a similar note, as a photographer I'd love to see some fatty chest pockets on this jacket (or any jacket) that I can stuff camera and lenses into when the weather gets foul.

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

That is a good point, but I have found that I prefer pit zips regardless of the claimed breathability...when it is 90 F+ and hiking with a pack on, ain't no material gonna keep me dry...personal preference though I guess. But come on, gotta have hand zips...what am I supposed to do with my hands...stick them in my pants pocket...or just hold them out to get soaked... I cannot understand why some leave hand pockets out...I guess it is just more personal preference too...

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If its so breathable, why the pit zips?

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Wet? Naw......

By:
August 1, 2011

Bought this jacket right before a backpacking/camping/hiking/fishing trip to Alaska. Glad that I did. This thing stood up to everything Canada's left hand could throw at it. It took a full-on rainstorm and kept me dry for hours.

Sizing:
The jacket does have an athletic cut, so size appropriately. I'm 6'0", 175 and a large fits me snugly. If you're anything more than slender, size up. The length seemed a little longer than normal, but I grew to like it instantly.

Material:
Mine came fully seamtaped. The fabric does have a DWR finish, which wore a little bit on the shoulders where my pack rubbed on it, but I have since had it in an all out downpour and it still kept my shirt that I had underneath dry. The zippers are waterproof with good pullstrings/tabs. I had a camera in the chest pocket that stayed dry despite torrents of rain/wind. Also, the velcro around the cuffs doesn't seem to snag on twigs or branches, nor does it pick up dirt like other velcro.

Cons:
1. I thought that the DWR wearing off after one use was a bit fast, but it was a heavy pack.
2. The adjustment tabs for the hood ride right on my cheeks (someone else's review said the same thing). I ended up pulling them off and putting them beneath, where the end of the cord is (sits right beneath my collarbone).

All in all a great jacket. Watch SAC for it!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: August 24, 2011 by:

By:
August 24, 2011

Best backcountry handle ever . . . Tobias Funke.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 3

Disappointingly huge

By:
May 10, 2011

I'll never get close to trying out the supposedly marvelous properties of this jacket because it's ginormous on me. I'll admit that I have a scrawny runner's body, at 5-10 and less than 140, but the Small is like a grain sack on me and the sleeves nearly reach my fingertips. Knowing how the Welder Hi fits me and having read that several other Stoic jackets are cut trim, I was hoping this would be a tight-fitting rain shell, but no chance. The hood can be cinched but still seems unstructured and floppy in front. This clearly is not cut for me so I'll have to pass.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: May 12, 2011 by:

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 12, 2011

the vaporshell jacket does not stretch, so needs to fit slightly larger than the other stoic pieces like welder, and bombshell. both of the these styles have some mechanical stretch, and so can be more athletic fit.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

When someone has a chance to review, can you comment on the length

When someone has a chance to review, can you comment on the length and the hood? Thanks!

By:
May 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Length of M's Large (measuring from center-front neck seam to bottom) is 24.25". Hood is climbing helmet compatible - same hood used on Stoic eVent Stash.

Vaporshell is a Stoic proprietary fabric. Vaporshell contains a PTFE-based membrane - other well known WPF/breathable fabrics also use a PTFE-based membrane. The major difference is the breathability of Vaporshell. Vaporshell also employs a slight amount of air-permeability - i.e. air can pass through the face of the shell, adding further to the venting/breathability of the shell.

The drawback of Vaporshell is that we cannot use our signature welded construction with this fabric - the Vaporshell membrane is not strong enough to hold itself together in a welded seam application. In order to reliably produce this style, we elected to use the traditional cut/sew/tape method long used in the industry.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (5) (0)

Flag

I must say, I'm a little disappointed with the lack of welded seams. I thought that was pretty standard on Stoic stuff. Any reason why, Backcountry?

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Yes Shawn, Stoic is proprietary to Backcountry, because it is their house brand.

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I have zero patience. Rather than wait for you guys to review it, I bought it last night. I'll post a review when it arrives. Anyone find any VaporShell reviews online? Is it Stoic proprietary?

By:
May 3, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Mine's arriving tomorrow and the weather in Boulder has been decidedly poopy, I'll have a review up ASAP.

By:
May 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Sizing Issues

By:
May 22, 2011

Other than really long sleeves, which is a positive and a negative, this jacket rocks my socks. It's water proof, no-nonsense shell. The black is cool, the zippers work, and the hood, well, I wish you could stow the hood somehow, but not a big deal. I have the XL, and the sleeves go out almost past my finger tips. When skiing, climbing, or reaching I can see this as a big advantage. The rest of the time, you have to pull up the sleeves and have some baggy material. Not a big deal, but is a need to know. I am 5'11" 190 lbs. I tried on both the large and the XL. I found the large too tight around the chest and armpits, thus I got the XL. With the XL I can layer and be all good. I would recommend this jacket for anyone looking for a great shell to ski, bike, hike, or do anything in when the weather turns soggy and wet.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

funny fit

By:
November 12, 2011

I really wanted to like this jacket--especially for the sale price! Unfortunately, the cut through the sholders is weird. Makes it tight around the armpits. Had to return it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The W/B ratings on this shell are out of this world, especially

The W/B ratings on this shell are out of this world, especially for the price, and as a result, I'm quite suspicious.

Any insight?

By:
April 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

W/B ratings for Stoic Vaporshell are indeed remarkable - suspicion regarding these ratings is expected.

In order to satisfy our own concerns with these claims before adopting into our line, we performed multiple iterations of fabric testing at an independent lab - SGS.

For those interested in the actual test data:

Water Resistance Test (standard test method ASTM D751:2006 Procedure A; Mullen Method) yields a water column measurement of 68,338.4mm

Water Vapor Transmission test (standard test method JIS L1099 B1 method) yields a measurement of 46,176grams per square meter per 24 hours

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 9, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Those HH numbers are three times the best Gore-tex and eVent fabrics, and the breathability is twice that of eVent, which is demonstrably the most breathable WPB membrane that currently has a significant market share. Polartec Neoshell caused quite a stir this year, and even a bit of buzz in the mainstream media, and it can't match those numbers either. If these numbers were accurate, the outdoor industry newsreels would be exploding. Backcountry.com needs to publish independent test results that support a claim of this kind.

By:
May 7, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Hey everybody, I'm buying one and taking it up to Everest base camp in a few days, and it should be pretty rainy, so I'll post a review after a few weeks about how it breathes and how it performs at altitude, as outside air pressure significantly affects the performance of a membrane.

By:
May 2, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

@Phil, they don't have to actually make a 210' column of water, they can just make effectively a giant syringe with some water, a plunger, and a lot of weight of a hydraulic ram.

@Simon, I got on chat last night and checked with them, and they confirmed it for me too. I'll be buying one in the next few days as soon as my paycheck comes in, and I'll definitely try it out in the shower and then go biking in it to see how it feels. Keep an eye out for a review.

By:
April 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

Hey Guys,

BC says they're accurate, as unbelievable as that may seem. They didn't believe it themselves, and claim to have run their in-house static-water column tests five times to be sure. I obviously can't speak to whether they conducted the test correctly, but that's supposed to mean that they were able to replicate the equivalent of filling a 1" diameter cylinder to a vertical height of 64,000mm (210') before leakage occurred. Buy one and review it for us, Simon. If it works as spec'd, it sounds like we all have a cheap, new miracle raincoat in our futures.

By:
April 28, 2011

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Typo Maybe?

By:
April 27, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Sweet Shell

By:
October 8, 2011

Let me start off by saying I'm not a total gear junky so I don't have too much to compare this to. As far as performance goes, I cannot think of anything negative. It breathes, the dwr repels pretty well and It holds up really well to abrasion. As for fit, Im 6'2'' and about 180. I got an XL. It fits good. I don't like tight clothes but the XL isn't super big. The only thing is that the sleeves are indeed too long. However, the cuffs have the Velcro to keep it from sneaking past the wrists. For what I paid for it, you cant beat this thing with a stick.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

small sizing

By:
July 19, 2011

too small to put anything underneath in the XL size. I am 6'3' 200. Have ordered the XXL ...

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Awesome light shell

By:
August 10, 2011

Great light weight shell. I have been using it this summer as a rain jacket or in the evening when it gets cold. It is very waterproof. Also really like the color. Good looking jacket!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Pretty Solid

By: Backcountry.com Employee
June 3, 2011

I don't pay too much mind into the ratings of a jacket, because I take things at face value and I believed it when the Vaporshell came out with the stats that it did. I was rewarded with the jacket backing up everything it boasts and more.

I had this jacket on while on a boat in the French Caribbean and it stood up to each storm that came through (for those who don't know how had it rains down there, a 1/2 hour storm almost flooded the dinghy we were carrying) while keeping me decently cool for the humidity being 100%.

The fit is pretty good. I took a chance on a LArge with a 5'11", 182lbs build and I'm glad I did. The shoulders/chest were perfect and the arms were a bit long, but they are supposed to be. I would've liked an inch more in the back length, but I do have kind of a long torso.

Overall, if you are looking for a do-almost-everything jacket that keeps water off you and breathes like no other, pick this one. You won't be disappointed. Also, size up if you are going to layer heavy underneath or if you have a much longer torso than normal.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

vaporshell jacket waterproof rating

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 20, 2011

more testing results from independent labs SGS, on the waterproofness ratings on the vaporshell materials:

INTIAL TEST: ASTM D751:2006 Procedure A; Mullen Method, the result from this test was 68000 mm of h20 head of pressure.

NEW TEST: AATCC 127-2008 option 2 Hydrostatic head method, results were 28,000 mm h20 pressure head.

NEW TEST: JIS 1092 - 1998, results were 29,000 mm h20 pressure head.

The waterproofness results in the lab correlate to great waterproofness in the field. in addition the DWR finish and seam taping all contribute to the user staying dry in full on conditions.

The true feature for this jacket however is the breath-ability. the testing has shown great breath-ability, as described as 46000 grams of water being transported through a square meter of material in a 24 hr period. The breath-ability and air permeability allow you stay dry on the inside, by transporting the sweat and vapor given off the body in aerobic activities through the fabric.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: May 20, 2011 by:

By:
May 20, 2011

I love BC.com, from your customer service, to prices/sales, to the actual stoic brand. It's refreshing to see not just a customer service dressed marketing shill but a director/designer respond to this query. It shows that Backcountry.com does care about accountability. Regardless of if this was a simple mistake or a ploy from marketing, you have given the relevant information as asked for and seems that you will be updating the specs on the website accordingly. Honestly that is the biggest failing of BC.com, your product specs are often incorrect on the website, however the staff does update them as soon as they are made aware of the issue.

I commend the effort to address the issues of the community and keep up the good work out there in Utah.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
May 20, 2011

Thanks for posting this Bill. I already bought mine and am very satisfied with it, but it's good to know.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Better shell than an M&M!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
August 14, 2011

Overall a good jacket. Could have some front hand pockets, and could have longer pit zips, but really keep the rain off great! Used it under a serious downpour at Red Rocks this summer and loved it, also makes a great spring stand alone ski shell.

I’m 5’11” 165 lbs, and the M fits me o-so well!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Awesome, but hand pockets would put it over the top.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
August 27, 2011

I thought I'd be able to handle no hand pockets, but realized I just can't. In a torrential downpour, chilly night, or any gloveless conditions, I was just annoyed and uncomfortable. I've worn this in heavy rain for hours and stayed dry, though a couple of drops got into the chest pocket (don't keep a cell phone there). I've been comfortable in weather from 80F to 30F, rain and shine. Great jacket if you can handle no pockets.

*after looking at the pic I uploaded, I noticed I was using my pants pockets for my hands. This was necessary in 30F thunderstorm at 11,000 feet.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Nice Shell!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
August 4, 2011

This is a nice shell that reminds me of the Stoic eVent Jacket, but better (in some ways). The jacket is super waterproof and lightweight! It only has the 1 pocket (which I don't like just 1) and colors are kind of dull for my liking, but setting those little things aside, it is a sweet, portable jacket!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Like it

By: Backcountry.com Employee
June 7, 2011

Initial review: Great fit, the medium fits me perfectly and I am 6'0" 180lbs. The bottom hits right at the waist so it is perfect spring and summer hiking activities. The lack of front pockets is a bit of a downer but I get that they are trying to limit the weight, which is light but not the lightest jacket on the market, but we are talking single digit ounces here. I have not tested the waterproofing out in the wild (totally dry in the shower), but it worked well on a very windy and cool morning on a four day hike on its test drive.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Awesome lightweight shell

By: Backcountry.com Employee
May 26, 2011

This jacket is killing it. The cut seemed a little weird at first, long arms and tight through the shoulders and armpits. Once I got out and hiked and skied in it these issues disappeared and the jacket was extremely comfortable. I have used it to ski tour during some very heavy, wet spring storms that left my partners soaking wet. I was bone dry in this shell. Breathability is great, easily better than Gore Tex XCR and comparable to my Backcountry.com Event shell(while feeling a little more durable). This may not be the perfect technical shell but it is very very good and at this price you can't afford not to give it a try.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

$129.00
Item: SIC0117
Size ?

No questions asked unlimited return policy

Free Shipping

Free shipping on orders over $50

26 in Stock
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Bark/Burnt, M (129.00)
Bark/Burnt, L (129.00)
Bark/Burnt, XL (129.00)
Black/Silt, L (129.00)
Black/Silt, XL (129.00)
Black/Silt, XXL (129.00)

Superb jacket for all conditions

5 star rating

By: James Jenden May 4, 2011

Well I just got it today, and while I will update this review in a month after taking this jacket to the Himalayas, I thought I'd share my first thoughts more...

Its All Right

3 star rating

By: Dean Whitehead May 16, 2011

Well, I have worn the shit outa this jacket over the past 10 days or so while moving all of my stuff from my house to storage.... so here goes:

more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
Vaporshell, 100% polyester ripstop 
Fabric Waterproof Rating:
28,000 mm H2O 
Fabric Breathability Rating:
46,000 g/m˛ 
Hood:
yes, full-time 
Fit:
3-D Ergonomic 
Pockets:
1 chest 
Seams:
fully taped 
Weight:
14 oz 
Recommended Use:
Ski touring, backpacking, hiking, climbing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime