Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 58 Reviews

Stoic Tour Softshell Pant - Men's

Available Colors / Styles

Excalibur/ Deep
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

The highly-breathable, four-way stretch Stoic Tour Softshell Pant puts an end to sweltering skin tracks and restricted motion. Stoic’s winter-weight softshell fabric stands up to storms while the 3-D ergonomic fit ensures an effortless, un-inhibited range movement and the Keprotech cuff reinforcements protect the Tour Pant from ski edges, crampons, and nasty rocks. Extremely breathable and ridiculously comfortable, the Tour Pant wants to be your new touring buddy.

  • Monolith softshell has a tough nylon face with a water-resistant laminate and a polyester fleece lining bonded inside for warmth
  • Backcountry.com is the exclusive US distributor for Stoic products

Bottom Line: For bluebird tours and socked-in summits.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 2

Nice Pants, Funky Fit

By:
November 19, 2010

The quality of these pants are apparent from the moment you take them out of the bag. Great materials and quality construction /stitching will make these solid performers in the backcountry. Unfortunately for me, they won't make it out there. As most reviewers have said, the fit is very weird. I think they would likely fit someone who's legs are disproportionately longer than the rest of their body. I usually wear a 31 waist and 30 inseam. I went with the small and they were too small in the waist and too long in the inseam. Fit like a 29-32. If you're tall and skinny - these pants are highly recommended!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: December 3, 2010 by:

By:
December 3, 2010

I agree I usually fit in a size 29-30 waist easily but these are tight in a small. I can pull them off but it is close! The length seems to be ok for me but we will see how they wear.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 2

Beware pockets and dingleberries

By:
December 21, 2010

I like the material, and the cut is okay but would be better if I were skinny; luckily they stretch. I however, like many other reviewers, cannot get past the MAJOR DESIGN FLAWS... #1 the pockets fill with snow if you're in powder or so much as sit in the snow and worse than that, they are lined with mesh, so there's a perpetual dripping snowball inside your pants - nice. I'm going to try to just sew them shut. #2 The cuffs are also too small, they BARELY fit over my lightweight AT boots. Worse than that, they are secured unnecessarily by snaps, which can come undone and flail through the snow next to your boot, each becoming a dingleberry of packed snow.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

3 Comments Last Comment: January 12, 2011 by:

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 30, 2010

i wanted to clarify on these points. the rear pockets, and the thigh cargo pockets are zippered and closeable. the two front pockets are traditional slash pockets, that are not zipped. some testers have noticed that the Front pockets can collect snow if you are falling a lot or as one tester described 'late night sledriding'. For Touring, skinning up the hill, and skiing down the hill, testers have not noticed snow collecting. the cuffs are designed to fit snugly over the boot - this is intended to keep snow out. the snaps are needed to relieve the stress on the zipper, and to keep the flap over the zipper.

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (2)

By:
January 12, 2011

I understand that in touring snow in the pockets may not be an issue and testers agreed, but I have to wonder at the design of such pockets in the first place. Who thought that non-zippered side pockets would be a good idea on pants designed for active use in snow? I don't put anything in them less because I'm worried about snow and more because I'm worried about things falling out. It just seems like introducing potential problems that would have been better served even by no pockets there at all!

Flag

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

By:
January 4, 2011

I have simply sat down in these pants and have had snow come in the pockets. Snow comes in whether or not you are "falling a lot." I would have to agree with kit. And the leg cuffs are to small.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

How difficult would it be to fit these? My mom is a good seamstress

How difficult would it be to fit these? My mom is a good seamstress and has fixed many pairs of pants and shorts already.

By:
May 19, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It depends on where the pants need the work. If the length needs to be altered then you will have to deal with the crampon/ski patch on the inside of the lower legs, as well as the zipper and snap on the outside of the lower leg.

By:
6 days ago

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Stoic Tour Color

By:
November 19, 2010

The color is slightly different than pictured on the site. Note the darker blue on the zippers and logo

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag Zoom

Waterfall ice

By:
January 13, 2011

The stoics moved nicely and didn't stop my legs from kicking in!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Can't wait to try them out on the slopes

By:
October 27, 2009

I just got those on SAC a week ago and tried them on as soon as they got in: Perfect fit and my wife said they're a very good fit. I usually wear 32 size pants and I got a M. They fit perfectly and going with a L would have been way too big for sure, especially that they are stretchable.
They seem quite warm for just a softshell due to the micro fleece which is nice for skiing. I just can't wait for the season to start now!!!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I have a 33" waist with 26" legs and a squatter's

I have a 33" waist with 26" legs and a squatter's butt. Pants are usually a rough purchase for me. Am I better off upsizing to an L and cinching up the waist-space or are the legs wide enough?

By:
February 8, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The sizing on these is strange and they would not work for me. I would try the Large because I think the Mediums are going to be too snug in the butt.

By:
February 9, 2012

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Fantastic VALUE

By:
January 2, 2011

For the money - these are one fantastic pant. they are not without flaws, but nothing comes close at this price point (great job BC). Materials are nice, wind resistant, stretchy with a nice light fleece backing, and some decent breathability. they fit true to size and have a nice athletic cut. They are very comfy with some fine details in the pants, knee articulation (cut a bit too high unfortunately), zippered rear pockets, covered cargo thigh pocket. Double snap front closure, belt loops. Overall a nice package especially if found on sale. could use powder cuffs- but I didnt plan to use these touring. They are a great all around fall/winter pant. used them hiking and snowshoeing and loved them. Got the Metal and they are a little more grey in person. Highly recommended!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I hope I'm not just dense but I can not find a stoic size

I hope I'm not just dense but I can not find a stoic size chart anywhere and its really annoying. Its not even on stoics website. Please help.

By:
December 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Hey, you would be surprised how many people can't find the sizing, check the pic on how to find it:

By:
December 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Stoic Logo Color

By:
November 19, 2010

The Tahoe color is slightly different than pictured on the site. Note the darker blue on the logo.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 4

Good kit!

By:
February 27, 2012

Paid $65.99 at steepandcheap.com, and for the price these are exceptional pants! I'd go 5-star but the irregular stitching work along a thigh seam and the lack of front pocket zippers precluded that even at this price point. Great materials and design. I have a 36" waist and a 32" inseam, bought the Large. No complaints. The fit seemed distinctly odd at first, but by the end of day 1 (a jaunt up to Mailbox Peak in the Issaquah Alps), they felt like they'd been custom tailored. These are very warm *and* very breathable. Water resistance not yet tested.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Seem great to me.

By:
February 26, 2012

I just used these for two days of powder skiing with temps around 20 F. They worked great. I also use Patagonia simple guide pants. The Stoics protect from wind better, and are more water resistant. The pocket were not a problem at all for me. They also fit fine. I have mediums and I am 5'7" around 165 lbs. Waist is normal 32-33, inseam in jeans is 31".

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Do these offer a build in gaiter?

Do these offer a build in gaiter?

By:
December 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

My pair does not have them - but they do fit pretty snug around your boot.

By:
December 1, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

LOOKS LIKE A WINNER

By:
February 2, 2012

SO FAR SO GOOD. WEAR THEM FOR MOUNTAIN BIKING AND LONG HIKES IN SUB FREEZING TEMPS.,NO L.J'S. THEY FIT CLOSE AROUND MY BOOTS,A GOOD THING,DON'T HAVE TO BE CONCERENED ABOUT HOOKING A CRAMPON WHEN NOT WEARING GAITORS. I WEAR A 32" INSEAM, XL'S LENGTH JUST RIGHT. HAVE'NT GOT RAINED ON YET, WE'LL SEE.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Excalibur/Deep

By:
December 11, 2011

Stretchy, durable, and water resistant. What's not to love? :)

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Warm and durable

By:
February 19, 2012

These are great when I am plowing snow in my bobcat. Super warm and durable construction, mostly wear them at work on sub freezing days. Way more comfortable then carharts or some coveralls. Fit over my work boots with out any issues, have not tried wearing my snowboard boots under them, I could see them being a little tight for that. I am 6'5", 215, got an XL and they fit great. Have not warn them boarding, and I could see open pockets being an issue with that. I love them, and I have two pair.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

will they keep me warm?

will they keep me warm?

By:
November 22, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

the tour pant is good thick material. i used in March on haute route, and used every day, and they were great - but that is a lot of touring, skinning, and climbing, and then some skiing. if inbounds skiing on cold days, a layer inside is good, or a ski pant over is good.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Broad question. If you use them they way they are supposed to, then yes!

By:
November 29, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Favorite new pants for cold weather

By:
December 11, 2011

These pants are awesome. Got 'em off SAC and couldn't be happier. I got the Excaliber/Deep and in person they appear to be a little darker with a hint of purple to them ( I think it has to do with different lighting). But I like them anyway

The microfleece interior makes them so soft! The outside material has some nice stretch to them but are still tough. The pants also have a more athletic fit making them perfect for people who are always on the move.

I'm 6' 1" and 158lbs and I got the medium.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing pants

By:
January 13, 2012

The fit is awesome, I'm 6'2" and 220lbs size 36 and the large are like a glove. They are defiantly for taller people. I have used them for XC skiing, touring, and winter camping/backpacking. They are very waterproof in snow(haven't used them in rain yet) and windproof. They breath very well. I could see if you were falling in deep powder snow could get in the pockets but thats the only negative. If your taller than 6' get them!

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: February 27, 2012 by:

By:
February 27, 2012

Same stats here, same verdict. Great pants.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

How well would these work for alpine climbing?? anybody have

How well would these work for alpine climbing?? anybody have any experience useing them for said purpose?

By:
September 18, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Right thigh pocket

By:
December 11, 2011

Excalibur/Deep

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 3

good material-design flaws

By:
November 18, 2010

The material on these are pretty nice. The material is stretchy and warm. However, there are some design overlooks in my opinion.
The hand pockets are not zippered. WHY? thus when you fall or sit or whatever, snow just gets in the pockets. It seems every other winter tour pant has zippered hand pockets. Arc'teryx gamma sk, Patagonias, Outdoor research pants all have zippers.

The leg cuff barely fits over snowboarding boots. The pants were a pain to zip up. While I understand that most tourers are skiers, I would think you would give more space for skiers as well. The boots fit over my scarpa F1 boots, but not with much space.

lastly, I dont know why there is not a gaiter. why not integrate a mini gaiter of some sort. They are winter pants meant for snow.

If you get the pants cheap, they will do the job. For full retail, I would prefer the Arc'teryx gamma sk or Outdoor research Credo for some extra money.

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: December 13, 2010 by:

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 13, 2010

these softshell pants are designed for backcountry ski touring. we have designed and tested these pants in the field, and have a couple key design features that pertain to your concerns. The bottoms of these pants are designed to be the gaiter. why have another gaiter inside? its just another layer needed to unzip, unvelcro to get to boot buckles. one layer, less is more, faster and more comfortable to use. so, the bottom leg is fit tight over a boot. we have provided some stretch, so that there is a tight fit. we have also added a Silicone strip that holds the pant down over the boot if you lose a ski and have to posthole around to find it.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 4

Great softshell pant

By:
February 22, 2010

These pants are great for hiking for turns. I really like the zippered pockets but am hessitant to keep anything in the front pockets simply due to the fact that they lack any sort of closure mechanism. The slightly flared bottoms fit over a pair of AT boots nicely and I didn't have too much trouble with getting snow underneath them. However, I would probably use my shell pants with internal gators if the snow was really deep! There is a nice stretch to them and if its warm enough - 30's for me - you can wear them without long underwear. I'm 6'4, 180 pounds and normally wear a 34 x 34 pant and went for the large.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: September 23, 2010 by:

By:
September 23, 2010

How is the length? Will they fit over snowboard boots?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

How do these pants fit over AT Boots? They look rather tight

How do these pants fit over AT Boots? They look rather tight around the calf/boot.

By:
January 4, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They fit over my Scarpa Spirit 3s just fine (size M pants, 29.5 boots). They're stretchy and grip the boot like a gaiter, but I like that because it keeps the snow out.

By:
January 5, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great for winter biking

By:
February 12, 2012

I got these for my dad - he says they stop the wind and water pretty well when he is biking to and from work. He tried wearing them when the temperature was down in the teens and said they still kept him warm, even without another layer.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

surprisingly comfortable

By:
October 27, 2011

Picked up a pair off SAC after reading the reviews. The only size they had was the XL when I normally wear L (38" waist) Thinking I would just return them if too big, had no idea how the sizing was as this was my first stoic pant. I gotta say though, after trying them on, I was surprised they fit almost perfectly. The L would not fit what soever. So yes, the sizing may be off a bit but I am happy with them.

Not sure what this ergo fit is really, but the flexibility of these pants is amazing, didn't run up the crotch or pull up off the ankle like many of my snow pants do. I'm not sold on no zippers on the front pockets, but the cargo pocket should fit the things I usually carry in there.

Can't wait to try these out in the field, northern NY is getting snow today (10/27), although it'll be gone tomorrow. If these pants work through the season I'll def be giving them 5 stars

Update: I've been wearing them constantly whilst alpine skiing, this past weekend I even wore them hiking and they performed admirably. Again, the flexibility of these pants is great, water resistant and light insulation, so when hiking in sub freezing temps, you are not sweating when moving, and not freezing when stopped.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How about getting some mediums in stock. I would order then

How about getting some mediums in stock. I would order then today.

By:
December 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

there is one in stock, but that is it for the season

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 30, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

tour pant out in the backcountry

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 13, 2010

Tyler whiting in tour softshell pants, and tele gear.

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 5

Stoic Pants

By:
December 23, 2011

Great fit super breathable. Have used them for ice climbing to days on the lift. Stoic rocks

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing pants

By:
January 13, 2012

The fit is awesome, I'm 6'2" and 220lbs size 36 and the large are like a glove. They are defiantly for taller people. I have used them for XC skiing, touring, and winter camping/backpacking. They are very waterproof in snow(haven't used them in rain yet) and windproof. They breath very well. I could see if you were falling in deep powder snow could get in the pockets but thats the only negative. If your taller than 6' get them!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Is there any change to the fit of this pant from last year?

Is there any change to the fit of this pant from last year?

By:
December 1, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Amazing pants

By:
January 13, 2012

The fit is awesome, I'm 6'2" and 220lbs size 36 and the large are like a glove. They are defiantly for taller people. I have used them for XC skiing, touring, and winter camping/backpacking. They are very waterproof in snow(haven't used them in rain yet) and windproof. They breath very well. I could see if you were falling in deep powder snow could get in the pockets but thats the only negative. If your taller than 6' get them!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Really strange fit

By:
November 11, 2011

Ordered a L and XL off SAC, figured one of them might fit reasonably. I'm 5'11 185, 36 waist, 30-31 inseam in most pant lines. I had to literally yank the large over my legs and could barely button at the waist it was so tight, I thought I ordered the wrong product at first, but confirmed it was a large. Basically forn fitting around the calves, couldnt get around a hiking boot, much less a ski boot, and the scuff guard was small and ineffective. The XL felt like a 40+ waist as it was very loose, even with a belt, and the calve region was still tight enough to not make it possible to fit over ski boots. I must say, the Stoic Overhang pants fit quite a bit better, specially for its intended use, in a Large, for my frame. I'll admit, I'm not incredibly slim, but my body frame is quite common, but these Tour's simply did not fit. I ended up going with the Patagonia Backcountry Guide Softshell pants (in a size 38), and they fit great, FYI (the 36's fit even better, but not around the ski boots, so I sized up).

With that being said, I imagine if you needed to customize or hem the Stoic pants, you'd get a much less pretentious and more down to earth sales rep at BC.com as opposed to Patagonia. People rave about Patagonia, and I will about their gear, but not with their service. Their answer to me was when I asked about hemming pants was "we try to size the product based on the most common size of our customer's. We can't please everyone, but would be willing to hem the pants to your particular size, at a charge of 40$". While I agree you can't make a product for everyone's needs, I find it absurd that some people have to pay extra money for the same product cause of their size. Its a good thing Patagonia gear is so incredibly well made, cause their customer service, more times than not, comes across as so incredibly arrogant and self righteous. On the flipside, the folks at Backcountry.com are a breathe of fresh air among the customer service of the outdoor industry.

Just my 2 cents on the fit of these products and the service that comes along with it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I'm about a 30 waist and 30 inseam. Any suggestions on size?

I'm about a 30 waist and 30 inseam. Any suggestions on size? I'm thinking a small...

By:
November 17, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I wear a 30x32 in jeans. I ordered the small and these fit great with a thin base later underneath.

By:
January 8, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Their size chart is wrong here. I just got a small in the mail, and I have a 30 inch waist. Every pair of pants I've bought in the past four years have had a 30 waist. I couldn't even get these to button. And trust me, I haven't gained weight, and all I was wearing underneath was a pair of boxers.

By:
December 7, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Go with the small. Stoic's size charts are really accurate in my experience, and the XS would probably be constricting.

Full disclosure: I don't have the Tour, but I do have the Overhang, which are a similar design.

By:
November 17, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Softshell tour pant

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 19, 2009

First snow of the season. Getting ready to find some turns.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag Zoom

Rating for this product: 2

Beware pockets and dingleberries

By:
December 21, 2010

I like the material, and the cut is okay but would be better if I were skinny; luckily they stretch. I however, like many other reviewers, cannot get past the MAJOR DESIGN FLAWS... #1 the pockets fill with snow if you're in powder or so much as sit in the snow and worse than that, they are lined with mesh, so there's a perpetual dripping snowball inside your pants - nice. I'm going to try to just sew them shut. #2 The cuffs are also too small, they BARELY fit over my lightweight AT boots. Worse than that, they are secured unnecessarily by snaps, which can come undone and flail through the snow next to your boot, each becoming a dingleberry of packed snow.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

very comfortable

By:
January 28, 2012

Havent had a chance to get them in the snow yet, but so far they seem great. very comfortable! the fleece inner layer is great!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

What is up with the limited size runs....seems the demand is

What is up with the limited size runs....seems the demand is there for these so why not make a decent number of pairs instead of selling out before the ski season even begins to rip?

By:
December 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

the buyers have the best crystal balls we can find! they had to trade out the '8 ball' for something better this year, but its still a tough thing to forecast. try a large? mediums are out for the season.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (2)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Good, Solid Pants

By:
January 5, 2011

I like these pants, they were a good price and they get the job done.

Fit: I'm 6'2", 150lbs, and I got the medium because the size chart said so. When I first tried them on I thought they would be a little too baggy but after wearing them skiing with a base layer underneath they were fine. They're not park-rat baggy, but they're loose enough to allow full range of movement. Length is perfect. They stretch a good amount, too, so they're very comfortable; I didn't notice them while touring or skiing.

Color: check the user pictures here. The stock photo of the "not black" is not right at all, it's a dark gray (which is fine, I wanted dark gray, not black, just be warned).

Pockets are ok; a cargo pocket on both legs would be nice. Also, lack of zips on the side pockets can let in snow on pow days, so that's what keeps it from getting five stars for me.

No gaiter, but silicone leg gripper makes one unnecessary; they stick to my boots and do not let snow in. Also, reinforcement of inner cuffs is great, the material is hardy and holds up to ski edges and crampons reasonably well. I'm still careful, but I breath a bit easier.

Fabric: stretchy, kinda breathable, keeps my dry just fine. It's quality softshell, what more is there to say? Fuzzy interior is nice and warm. These would need some heavier under layers for snow camping, but for touring they're great.

All in all, a good pant that I'm happy with. I've used them for two seasons now and there's pretty much no where on them anyway. I'm hoping they continue to last a long time, I really like them.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

These pants look great! Are you going to get Mediums back in

These pants look great! Are you going to get Mediums back in stock soon? I want a pair.

By:
December 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Check out geartrade.com all of backcountry's returns get resold there

By:
December 13, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

sorry mediums are out of stock for the season.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 7, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Tour Softshell Pant

By:
January 30, 2011

The Stoic Tour pant is a great pant for anything that I have put it through. I have found it to be very waterproof; kept me dry during a dumping day at Keystone. I have not found it to be fully windproof, but with a thin fleece pant underneath, that combo has kept me warm to -10 windchill. For warmer days, just a thin base layer is warm enough. There is a little bit of a fleece interior in the pant. Some other reviews have harped on the sizing and fit; I wear a 30x32 in jeans, a skinny 6' 140lb and I ordered the small. These fit me well. Not tight anywhere and I have enough room in the waist and thighs to fit over a thin fleece pant. I think these pants were well designed and well made. The belt loops and right thigh pocket are nice touches. The Metal color is a little more gray than the picture but a nice color. The fit around ski boots is tight and effective enough to eliminate the need for a gator. I will say they are better than my North Face pants that they replaced, and I am a huge North Face fan. I highly recommend them for any inbounds ripping.
Update: I just wore these for a short hike in a State Park with a foot of snow on the ground and they were great. Breathability is great and kept my legs from over heating. I highly recommend these for most winter activities!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great Pant

By:
January 19, 2012

5'11, 160 pounds and bought the medium. Have used this pant for 5 days of touring in the tetons and 1 day of ice climbing. I have found these pants to be very comfortable and supply a great range of movement. Some others have complained about the lack of zippers on the hip pockets, NO BIG DEAL!, just don't put stuff there. Did keep a pair of thin gloves in the pockets and they never came out. Had no issues with snow going there either. AS far at the button clasp over the boot, no issues there. The pants held up well to wet conditions of ice climbing and powder skiing in the pass. Picture coming later.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Is it me or are these the touring version of the BC.com overhangs?

Is it me or are these the touring version of the BC.com overhangs? Does that mean that they are Polartec Powershield? If so then I'm on board now, 'cause Powershield is second to none and I like having the calf zips as a feature!

By:
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

similar design and cut to the overhang, but a better fabric than the powershield. the overhang powershield it lighter weight and good for spring summer fall. this tour pant uses a heavy stretch woven material, great for fall winter spring. And as you described a key new feature of zipped cuff, and keprotec ski guard.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
November 5, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

highly recommended

By:
January 14, 2011

Have been touring in these pants for the last week and am thoroughly impressed.
With temps. ranging from 0 to -15 celcius I haven't been either cold or overly hot whilst skinning. They insulate really well, while at the same time being breathable to a degree which most shell pants aren't.
I've also been happily surprised with the water repellency of the fabric. I guess only time will tell how durable the DWR finish really is, but so far they have been keeping me completly dry, even when sitting around in the snow over lunch.
My only gibe would be that the cut is rather narrow around the ankles, so that they are stretched tight around my ski boots. Secondly the open pockets (ie. no zip) mean that snow can easily enter, and anything in your pocket is more likely to fall out.
All things considered though I'm stoked on 'em and recommend them to anyone looking for a ski touring pant.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great comfortable pants

By:
April 22, 2010

I used these all winter long snowboarding in in the Inland NW Rockies. You never know what the weather will be like from day to day. I've used these in cold conditions, soggy days and sunny spring days and they performed excellently. They do tend to soak up water if it's more raining than snowing. I really like how well they breath.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Is the water resistance is due to DWR or a membrane? I'm

Is the water resistance is due to DWR or a membrane? I'm suspicious of anything that doesn't have a waterproof rating on it, because "water resistant" generally doesn't mean much.

By:
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

"Sierra-cement day at Baker"
- around here we call that "Cascade Cement" :)
I have the Overhang and I can attest to what Jwhitehouse said. I climbed Shuksan this summer (literally attached to Baker ski area mentioned above) and my friends had the H/H Odin Guide pants and the Mountain Hardware Navigation Pant (I think...they change names frequently). I had crappier pants and a true shell. The weather turned on us into a traditional North Cascades suckfest and the only time I was better off then them was when it was squalling. The rest of the time in cold light rain and mist they were fine, and got to carry and worry about one less thing. Experience inspired me to buy the Overhang, and although I haven't had the chance to test them for days on end like that, they have held up to light Cascades precip just fine so far, and that's the "summer" weight version.

By:
November 17, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How does softshell material really repel water? Check out this article from one of our past Backcountry.com newsletters:
http://www.backcountry.com/store/dc/650/Backcountry-Softshell-Jacket-Buyers-Guide.html?cmp_id=EM_SAL1150a3&mv_pc=r105

The softshell used in the Tour Pant falls under the "stretch-woven" category in the article above.

The softshell material we used in the Tour pant is on the very high-end of softshell water repellency when compared to the wide range represented in the outdoor apparel world--i'm speaking from actual experience. I'd take Tour as my only pant for a week-long hut-to-hut tour despite weather conditions--nasty or bluebird, these pants will suffice. I'd wear the Tour for most tours in the Wasatch no matter how nasty the weather, and the same goes for inbounds days. The softshell material isn't optimal for a rainy day at Whislter, or a Cascade-cement day at Baker(they'll saturate and get heavy if you're sitting still on the lift in steady precipitation for long periods), but they'll fend off moisture in sub-40's temps just about as well as a hardshell--especially if you're moving a lot.

And if I could double-capatalize the 'D' in DWR for the Tour Pant I would, because the water-repellent treatment is SO DURABLE.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 30, 2009

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

I dont think there is a membrane most the time soft shells dont (havent seen any that do). There is a DWR and just the material that the shell is made out of make it water resistant.

By:
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Comment on sizing

By:
December 3, 2010

A few words on sizing.

I'm 6'3" 180 lbs and typically wear 33 waist 33 inseam.

The waist on the medium fit like a 32.5. And there is no range to the waist as the sizing chart suggests.

I exchanged for the large, which I would say have a 34 waist and are perfect over my long johns.

From my experience the sizing chart does not pertain to these pants.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Great material, odd sizing

By:
October 30, 2010

I wear size Small in pretty much all other brands (waist 30, inseam 32, 5'9, 150lbs). I ordered these in small and they were super tight - I could fit in but despite the stretchy fabric, the pants were not comfortable. But I really liked the material,pockets etc.so I exchanged them for medium. Sooo, the medium fit great everywhere except the waist was probably 34''... too big.
Bottom line,if they fit you, they seem like great pants. They just didn't work for me.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am a snowboarder and it is sometimes difficult to find pants

I am a snowboarder and it is sometimes difficult to find pants that fit over snowboard boots. Will these stretch to accommodate a size 12 snowboard boot? I would buy the Mediums...

By:
October 28, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I strechted 'em over my size 12 Salomon snowboard boots this morning

By:
November 6, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Good value

By:
December 10, 2011

Reasonable weight, warmth, and weather resistant. Only negative is some small picing in the fabric and my foot gets hung up in the knees when I put them on sometimes.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Happy Pants

By:
December 10, 2011

when I wear these pants, my body (knees, and crotch) notice how comfortable they are. There is no pulling or pressure when climbing. the gusseted crotch combined with the stretch makes for a happy hang time in a harness. I tried them yesterday without my wool longies underneath, and stayed warm. I am looking to buy another pair.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Since there's still no sizing chart... let's say that

Since there's still no sizing chart... let's say that theoretically someone had a 33 waist and maybe a 33 inseam. Would either the medium or a large be considered the right proportions for this person?

By:
October 24, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Sizing chart is up!
I'd definitely shoot for a M with your sizes.
I'm 34" in the waist and 6' 2" tall and the L fits perfectly.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Just got those on SAC and I think M would be good for ya: I size 32 and am 6'3" tall and M fits me perfectly.
They pretty much fit the same as Prana's pants.

By:
October 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

What sizing problems?

By:
December 1, 2011

I have no idea what people are talking about re: sizing issues. I'm a reliable 32-32 (my fiancee complains about how easy I have it), 6 ft., 160ish pounds. The medium fits perfectly, though I wear a belt to keep from rocking the mountain thug look. I use these for winter hiking, and they've been fantastic so far after a couple of hikes. Super comfy, super breathable, super water/snow resistant, super stretchy. On top of Eisenhower in the NH Whites last weekend, in 40 mph winds at 20 degrees, I felt just fine with no long skivvies underneath. I find myself wanting to put these on and strut around, they're so comfy. Construction is super solid, too. You can almost taste the quality. Highly recommended.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Agree- sizing was perfect for me

By:
December 1, 2011

I just wanted to second nic's review about the sizing. I am 6'0" 160lb with ~32 sizing and the medium fits well. I had been concerned about some of the reviews indicating funky stoic sizing, but these are great. The pockets may not zip, but for mountaineering and winter hiking they seem very good. Better than any of the previous pants I have used in terms of weight/warmth/breathability balance. I like them quite a lot and they are my main snow pant now. Maybe the small is smaller than most are used to, but the medium feels right on.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

who the hell is stoic? =) i can't find anything on the net

who the hell is stoic? =)
i can't find anything on the net about their products besides BC and explore64.
The pants looks great though, how do you think they will do for alpine road biking?
They look similar-ly made, to the cutter knickers. from the stitching,zips,buttons pockets and material. Which would be great because those knickers are some of the best there are.

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

They are a brand of backcountry's, just like cutter. stoicgear.com, if its working.

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

My best warm softshells, skiing on San Gorgonio

By:
November 17, 2011

These have been my tried and true softshells for over a year now. The value is absolutely fantastic, since they have functioned as well if not better than Mammut and Arcteryx pants I've tried. They are warm, with a healthy fleece liner, but breathe so well that they don't overheat easily. The DWR on the fabric has been very effective. I haven't had any trouble with the pockets... no snow buildup or anything like that. I'm 6'0'' 170lbs and size M is right on. They fit with or without layering underneath. They do need a belt though, and they have nice beefy belt loops. Great pants!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Careful with the size

By:
November 3, 2011

I love the pants, but I will have to return them due to the fact that they are too small. I am a 30"x32" so a got the small. Way too tiny!! Im am going to have to switch them out for a medium which is a pain in the butt

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

What is "winter-weight softshell" ?

What is "winter-weight softshell" ?

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

It's warm. How warm? Warmer than non-insulated softshells.

By:
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Stoic Tour

By:
January 12, 2010

Ive used these pants the past week skiing at some resorts in Park City. Temperatures have ranged from 15-35 degrees and the pants have kept me comfortable wearing a cwx insulator pant underneath. When I tele ski and work up a real sweat these breathe great! I usually wear a 31x31 pant. These fit little large in the waist and are too long, however when wearing a belt they fit perfectly.Also the color is a DARK gray, not black (unless somehow the color has faded after the first wash).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great pants!

By:
January 13, 2011

The fit was snug with thermals under, but they are so comfortable and warm! I normally wear 30 x 30 in pants and the size small was perfect. I used them for 3 days of ice climbing in Ouray and 1 day of skiing in Telluride. Great pants.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

How about a size chart for stoic products?

How about a size chart for stoic products?

By:
October 19, 2009

Was this helpful? (3) (0)

Flag

Sizing chart is up!

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 29, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

what's a size chart? There is one on the way, keep your eyes peeled...

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (1)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Stoic Softshell

By:
December 12, 2010

I have only used these for skiing and some touring so far, but my few times they have been great. The fleece is actually pretty warm inside, and they stretch a lot. Would probably be great for hiking or climbing as well.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Stoic Softshell

By:
December 12, 2010

I have only used these for skiing and some touring so far, but my few times they have been great. The fleece is actually pretty warm inside, and they stretch a lot. Would probably be great for hiking or climbing as well.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

great pants, sizing is a little off

By:
April 16, 2010

I originally picked up a pair of smalls of SAC. When they came, I loved them...except that they fit me more like a pair of long underwear than touring pants. The waist was good, and below the knee was fine, but the thighs were almost skin tight. I returned them and ordered a pair of mediums from backcountry instead. Again, I loved them, but they were way too big. The waist had about two extra inches, and they were about two inches too long. They also hung off me like a pair of baggy jeans, not the kind of thing you want when skinning up a mountain or carving down it.

Maybe I have weird sized legs, but the size difference between the medium and the small didn't seem right to me.

If they fit you, they are an incredible pair of pants, the material is tough, but still feels comfortable, and they don't have a lot of frills, just three pockets and belt loops. I'm just bummed they didn't fit me right.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Great material, weird fit

By:
October 10, 2010

These pants have an excellent, heavy woven material that seems very durable - more so than a standard softshell material. The DWR seems excellent too, but haven't had the chance to test them outside yet. I did spill some spaghetti sauce on them and it just slid right off, leaving absolutely no marks. Great pants, just note the price and the drawbacks below before you make a purchase. At the SAC price, they probably make sense to a lot of people.

Cons
- the fit! At 5'11" and 175 pounds, the medium is a good length (although if you are any shorter, they are going to be too long for you). And the width is about right, maybe a little tight at the waist but that is okay for an active pant that you don't want drooping down (I normally wear 33x34). But they are too tight in the upper thigh area, in a way that is really hard to describe. I don't think I could comfortably put much of anything in the front pockets, given how tight the material is stretched there. If you are less than my 175 pounds, they might fit ok. If you are heavier, no way. I have to knock at least 2 stars off the review for this single issue alone - Backcountry designers I hope you are reading this review and can relax the fit in these pants because they are awesome.
- The belt loops are thick and if you have a heavy pack on, you are definitely going to fill the belt loops poking you a little.
- They are probably TOO warm. As you can see when you compare the weight of these to competitors, these are heavier than most everything you can find in this class. If you are using these for ski pants, that is ok. But if you are using these for winter snowshoeing, mountaineering, hiking, then you are probably not going to need any base layer underneath. If these were lighter, you would just use a base layer if it was going to be freezing cold. It is like they built these pants without the concept of layering in mind. I only plan to wear these when it is below 45 degrees F, and even then I will probably be warm until I gain a few thousand feet and get exposed on the mountain tops. Backcountry, please fix this!
- There is only one cargo pocket on the right side. Would be nice to have one on the left as well. I don't see why the cargo pocket is angled forward, other than to look cool different. When I put stuff in there, it doesn't fit as well as if the pocket were straight. Backcountry, please stop designing stoic gear just to look cool. It doesn't.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

the best pants for the money

By:
December 29, 2010

These were my first foray into stoic gear, and I am very surprised with the quality of these. The fit is perfect for what I would call the endurance athlete- otherwise known as skinny people. They are extremely comfortable and breathe better than my last pair of arcteryx softshells. They stretch very well and accommodate movement better as well. They do have a few downsides though- the front pockets do not zip closed (which makes no sense in a winter oriented pant, leading to them becoming filled with snow when you crash) and they lack a ventilation zip on the thigh to bleed heat on warm days. But, for the money these kill it.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great fabric, awesome pant, with minor caveats

By:
February 11, 2011

If these pants fit you (skinny-ish), then they are utterly fantastic. I've practically been living in them all winter in the east. Great for lowland touring and winter hiking (even sitting on your ass in a weakly-heated apartment). The fabric is rad. Durable, super-stretchy, breathable and windproof enough for most below-treeline conditions. A bit fleecy on the inside, which is great for insulation but makes them a bit sticky with certain types of underlayers. Haven't had them on the slopes yet, but they are awesome for lots of motion. The cuff just barely fits a snowboarding boot, and forms a pretty good seal on the instep.The issue with the pockets... meh. Kind of a nuisance, but the fit sort of negates the whole issue, as they are tight enough through the thighs that you don't really want anything in there. Sure, zippers would be great, mostly to keep the snow out. But the open pockets make them a bit more casual and not quite so "ski-panty". Other than that, the design details are well though-out. Shaped edge patches, nice big thigh pocket, bulldog stitching and construction.I think these will be a kickass mountaineering pant, with an added shell for ridgelines or exposed routes. Really good flexibility and warmth, while still very easy to wear them for two weeks straight and never even notice. Perfect for mid-summer in the Cascades or even spring tours in the Sierra.Lastly, I snagged these on SAC late one night, but would definitely be willing to pony up full retail–overall, superb job by Stoic at this price point.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Great pair of pants

By:
February 7, 2011

These pants are really a good deal but fit a specific purpose; backcountry skiing. The stretch fabric is great because it won't tear on caught branches, the microfleece lining is just right for when you spend half your day hiking a bootpack (even without vents), most days another layer underneath really isn't necessary. There's no gaitor which is fine because its a snug fit around ski boots, but you wouldn't want to hike in regular boots with these pants. The Keprotech cuff is super strong and the cargo and back seat pockets have zippers but the front side pockets don't (only design flaw I feel, no benefit comes from open pockets). And the metal is much more grey than the photo shows which looks almost white.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Good enough at the sale price

By:
November 24, 2009

Had to respond to the soccer players gripes, (I am a rugby dude, and we are not as particular about custom tailoring). These pants are great. The winter weight isn't overbearing off the slopes, (I wore them on a 4 hour bus ride to Garmisch on Vet's Day and they were fine). However, don't be fooled on the slopes - if it is a windy or cold day, you will need a light layer. They probably shouldn't be billed as winter weight, because the connotation is uber-warmth, (which they are not). If they are too long, (as many ski pants will be), roll them back onto themselves above the boot or knee and snap them closed. I found the waist to run slightly larger, and I need to wear suspenders, which I like to wear anyway. I like the small belt loop under the large belt loop for me to hook in my cross back suspenders with hooks instead of snaps. The front pockets would be great if they had a zipper so you don't have to worry about loosing stuff when the yard sale occurs, (but at least the pockets are deep and should suffice, unless you really tumble). I like the zippered cargo pocket, but why not put one on the other side as well. The Keprotech cuff is strong enough to stand up to your skis as they try to slice through, as they always do. However, it would be nice if there were snow skirts on the legs, (at the end of the day, snow gathers inside the bottom - and I don't know what it is like when you fall, as I have not fallen yet this year). I was concerned about the yellow pocket zipper nylon cord hanging down and getting caught on something, but it tucks nicely under the zipper flap. If it sounds like I am nip picking, these are the only things I could question about the pants, but these observations are insignificant, if not mitigated all together. I am not as particular about the insignificant, but I would not recommend them at the MSRP of $130. Overall, the fit is great. They are quite comfy. Looks great. Freedom of movement while sitting, standing, skiing. Warm, but not an oven. Great color contrasts. Practical, and very reasonably price when on sale, ($62).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

I really want to like these...

By:
November 6, 2009

I really want to like these, I really do. I like Backcountry.com and their new Stoic line intrigues me...I’ll start off saying that buying pants for outdoor adventures (or even jeans/khakis) can sometimes be annoying for me. I'm normally a 34" waist (33” while training hard, 35” while washing down too many burritos with beer) with a 30-32" inseam. But I'm a soccer player so I'm *ahem* more athletic *ahem* in the butt/thighs... This generally means I have to buy size large pants so they fit right in the waist/seat/thighs. But normally a size large is too long for me so I just have to put up with the extra length.

The cut of these pants is weird ~ for me the M is too small and the L is too big. The M feels like a 32"x32" and fit too tight whereas the L's require a belt/suspenders or they’ll hang loose on my hips. The L feels like a 36" waist and 32-34" inseam. (I easily can pull them off without unzipping/unbuttoning, they could benefit from some more elastic in the waist). Also these pants are cut long, longer than any other pair of size Large pants that I own. When I wear them with my ski boots or snowboard boots, they bunch like a snowboarder. When I wear 'em with just hiking boots (like I would if I were going snowshoeing) I'm walking all over the heels of the pants.Besides the long length.

My other quibble is the zipper cuff. Great feature, but the flap seems like it won't do much to cover the zipper. It kinda has a flap to cover the zipper, but it’s only about 3/8" - 1/2" wide and when you stretch the pants over ski/snowboard boots the flap just sticks straight out, exposing the zipper. Ever had a zipper freeze up while you're out on the mountain? I'm curious if that would happen with these. There’s also no wind/weather flap behind the zipper.

I really wanted some softshell pants for skiing/snowshoeing and I really, really wanted to like these… but I’m afraid I’ll have to send ‘em back…

Was this helpful? (1) (1)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: November 19, 2009 by:

By:
November 19, 2009

They look like great pants. I also have a 34 waist and a 30 inseam for regular clothes. With ski boots the inseam should be fine. the waist and hips are a concern. Thanks for the heads up. I am going to measure before I order.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 4

Great pants for the money

By:
December 31, 2010

First day out in my new pants and I would have to say that they exceeded my expectations. Material - Nice construction as expected, breathable and warm. Fit (Large) - Waist was perfect but length was a bit long, I am 6'0" and 185 and typically wear a 34x32, hope they don't stretch too much! Could be better - Front pocket zippers, gators and slightly larger cuffs. SAC sale price makes them hard to pass up.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

I wanted to like these

By:
December 4, 2010

I snapped these up off of SAC in the "metal" color, which was more of a light gray than the white that the pictures on BC show. The material seems thick, durable, and warm. However, they did not fit well. I wear a 28-29 waist/32 length, and the smalls were a bit too roomy, even with layers underneath. Wanting a pant that did not leave me with a baggy posterior, I ended up sending them back.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: December 7, 2010 by:

By:
December 7, 2010

I'm beginning to wonder if I secretly got an extra-small. Because I normally wear a 30/32, and I couldn't even button up the waist of the ones I got in the mail today.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Fits perfectly!

By:
November 26, 2010

Reading the other reviews here, I was a bit hesitant to buy into the stoic pant line. I'm 5'9" and about 135 lb, and the small fits shockingly well. It's not insulated, but it's not just a shell, either. The knees are VERY articulated, which is great for skiing, though a bit off-putting at first.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Fit comment...

By:
November 11, 2010

Haven't had a chance to evaluate outdoors yet but thought I'd throw in my two cents on fit. I'm about 6'0" 160 and went with medium. I usually wear 32/32 pants and have a pretty lean frame. These fit and feel great. Just enough length to get around ski boots and will probably be awesome for cold-weather shinny

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Like these pants, but size is out of stock

By:
March 10, 2010

The medium was out of stock and the large was a bit too big (I'm 6'2" 190 lbs and a 34 waist, 34 inseam) and by that I mean baggy in the crotch, the length was great. I kind of have skinny legs so this may be the difference between this review and the previous one? The material seems great and all the pockets were in the right place, but I only toured two days in them. Instead of just dealing with the baggyness I opted to return them and wait for next years batch to get the medium, which I will definitely be buying.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Best softshell pant ever!

By:
January 20, 2010

I got these pants for back country snowshoeing and they are perfect. I have been out for hours in temperatures ranging from 5 above to 35 degrees and I have never once felt cold or over heated. The stretchiness of the fabric is amazing. I don't feel restricted in any way. I find that they are more comfortable that even my favorite jeans! So far I've logged about 20-30 hours of shoeing in the woods and even in the thickest brush I've haven't noticed any wear'n'tear. The pockets are useful, but I don't really use them out on the trails.
My only complaint is that I haven't been able to get a Stoic top layer yet and these pants make me hate my current options!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

Too tight in crotch

By:
February 6, 2010

I sent these pants back as they were too tight for me in the crotch area and I'm a normal size guy...so go a bit bigger if you get these. Otherwise, they seem like a great pari of pants.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 2

I was stoked...

By:
January 19, 2010

I bought the Welder Hi Softshell Jacket on SAC and was totally stoked on Stoic gear...probably would have bought the whole lineup if it weren't for these pants. I guess my main concern is the sizing. First I ordered the large, they were too snug. Thought they might stretch a bit but they came in just a bit too small. Returned those and got the XL. The size difference just blew me away...they not only had a ton of room to spare around the waste, but when I put my boots on and snapped up the gators they looked like parachute pants because they were so long. Maybe it's me but I have never had snow pants fit like that. I'm 6'1, 205 and fairly muscular and maybe Stoic gear just isn't for me. I really dig on the jacket though!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great pants

By:
November 29, 2009

So I have worn these pants climbing and skiing. They are fantastic. the cut is spot on, prefect in the waist and just the right length to not step on them and look like I am treading high water. They are warm to the point that if I am standing around I will not get cold but not so warm that while climbing I was over heating.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Anxious for snow

By:
October 29, 2009

Haven't had a chance to try these out yet, but can comment on the great quality and say that they are damn comfortable -- If it wasn't for the cuffs, I'd probably wear them to bed!
The ankle/cuff reinforcements are a nice feature to improve durability -- the material seems very similar to my kevlar kayak spray skirt and could see it holding up very well to abuse.
Both the right front and rear pocket have an additional interior pocket -- wouldn't trust putting anything in the front w/o it falling out, but the rear seems like a good place to keep your phone/multi-tool/etc. in place.
As others have mentioned, they fit true to size. 32" waist here and the M's fit perfectly.

Only gave 4 stars as I have yet to see these in action so wouldn't feel right giving a perfect 5 and also did notice a few stray threads on some of the stitching. The stitches were in no way flawed, just had some excess hanging off the end so I had to nitpick. Otherwise, couldn't be happier with the purchase!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 4

Hard shells easy to leave behind

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 9, 2011

I've been skiing in these pants now for a few weeks and can confidently say that I won't go back to a hardshell unless I find myself in a very wet cycle. The pockets are all great but I do wish that the front pockets had the ability to zip shut in order to keep some snow out while on the lift or after taking a digger. The sizing was pretty perfect for me in the size S (I'm 5'10, 155lb., 28" waist, with fairly muscular legs). They don't feel tight or constricting in the least and they breathe amazingly. The lining is warm enough on days that stay above 30deg but below that I usually wear a light capilene layer or something of that nature.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Love them

By: Backcountry.com Employee
December 21, 2010

So when I pulled these out of the box, my first thought was, 'no way are these going to be able to keep me dry.' The fabric was so lightweight and stretchy (way different from the crusty feel of most waterproof pants). So, i tried it out. I put them on and stuck one of my legs in the shower. The water beaded and ran off without a trace. I took them to a cold day at the Canyons and stayed totally warm with just a baselayer underneath.

I had to order a size up though. I have a 31"-32" waist and big thighs definitely did not fit in the medium. It fit around the waist, but my thighs looked like was in stretch pants. The large fit me much better (had to belt up, they don't have an adjustable waist band).

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Change me.

60%
Reg $139.00
Sale from $55.60
Past Season Colors | 60% Off, Regularly: $139.00 | Item: SIC0031
Size ?

No questions asked unlimited return policy

Free Shipping

Free shipping on orders over $50

177 in Stock
Close This Window

Please choose an option to order this item.

Shale/Vintage, L (55.60)
Shale/Vintage, XL (55.60)
Excalibur/Deep, L (55.60)
Excalibur/Deep, XL (55.60)

Nice Pants, Funky Fit

2 star rating

By: Mike Merrill November 19, 2010

The quality of these pants are apparent from the moment you take them out of the bag. Great materials and quality construction /stitching will make these more...

Beware pockets and dingleberries

2 star rating

By: Kit December 21, 2010

I like the material, and the cut is okay but would be better if I were skinny; luckily they stretch. I however, like many other reviewers, cannot get more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
Material:
[shell] Monolith softshell, microfleece 
Fabric Waterproof Rating:
water-resistant 
Venting:
none 
Side Zips:
yes 
Seams:
not taped 
Gaiters:
no 
Pockets:
2 front, 2, 1 cargo 
Weight:
680 g 
Recommended Use:
touring, alpine climbing, skiing 
Manufacturer Warranty:
lifetime