Limited time only! We are offering Free 2-Day Shipping on orders over $50 shipped within the contiguous United States….that’s the lower 48 to you and me. It will take two business days from the date of shipment for your qualifying order to reach you. The items that don’t qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping are kayaks, boats, paddle boards, rocket boxes & and car racks—anything that has to ship via freight methods. If you add a non-qualifying item to an order, your order will not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you are shipping to a PO Box, your order does not qualify for Free 2-Day Shipping. If you order a rack it will still qualify for Free Standard Shipping if the pre-tax value of the order is over $50. If your order is received before 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, we will make every effort to get it out the same day. Make sure to take Free 2-Day shipping into account when comparing prices. 2-Day Shipping must be selected inside the shopping cart.
The Men’s XT Hawk Trail Running Shoe features Salomon’s Agile Chassis System Lite, which cushions and supports your foot as you run through the woods behind your house. This chassis system also rebounds your energy, so when your heel strikes the ground, the shoe springs you forward. These lightweight shoes’ Contagrip soles give you traction on loose dirt and rocks.
Bottom Line: The trail runners for when your priorities are speed, agility, and comfort.
I run the local trails here in MN a few times a week and these have yet to let me down. They have great ankle support despite being a shoe (as opposed to high top/boot) and the traction has been terrific even on loose dirt. Sadly they are out of stock, but if they come back, don't hesitate to buy. From my experience they fit pretty true to size, perhaps SLIGHTLY narrow but not bad. Enjoy!
The Salomon Hawk seems like a good shoe, but it is too narrow for my just a bit wider than average foot. And, I don't care for the Salomon lacing system - it doesn't permit you to adjust the tightness in different places of the shoe. However, the shoe seems to have a grippy tread and good structure. It's also light weight for a trainer. Overall, it's probably a good shoe, but it just doesn't fit my foot.
As the center of gear knowledge, Backcountry.com wants you to be as informed as possible when buying high-end gear, and we've compiled price listings from some other reputable retailers for you to compare. Although we take steps to confirm this information is accurate and updated, we assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the price and shipping information provided by other vendors.
After five years of running mountain trails in Salomons, I'm still surprised by how well their shoes perform. The XT Hawk is very light and offers good ankle support, which I need because I have weak ankles. Also, the Quicklace system is still the most outstanding lace system I have come across, creating a quick and easy way for loosening and tightening the shoe. The only reason I gave this shoe four stars is because I like the Salomon Speedcross 2 better as an all around trail-runner. The Speedcross 2 gives more traction on rocky trails and has a little more support for the sole of the foot than the XT Hawk. The XT Hawk, as I saw pointed out in another review, can sometimes feel like a street-running shoe, depending on the terrain you're on. I would recommend this shoe for runners that use the same shoes for street and light trail runs. If you need something for intense mountain trails, I would recommend the Speedcross 2. For anyone debating what brand of shoe to buy, Salomon is the right choice.
Have you never slept on books to absorb it's information overnight? Well the same concept applies to shoes. Not that these need it, they're already fairly smart shoes. I had some dumb shoes shoes once, I borrowed a grip of books from the library spanning topics from calculus, Italian Art 1250-1550 and some Rachel Ray cookbooks.
My favorite attribute of the shoe is how light and comfy it felt. My 8.5's weighed in at 11 oz. even. It felt like a running shoe, not a trail shoe, and as a consequence the XT Hawk offered little protection under foot on technical rocky terrain. The forefoot felt close to the ground but the heel was little more elevated than I prefer for trail running. The forefoot of the shoe feels completely disconnected from the mid to rear part of the shoe, and flexed considerably more than I am used to, giving me a blister at the flex point in the arch of both feet. The shoe felt right at home on the pavement that I used to connect to a separate section of trail and would serve someone well that needs a shoe for non-technical trails and occasional road running. Pros: lightweight, lacing system, nice insoles, toe protection. Cons: no protection under foot, considerable mid-sole flex.
I have another pair of Salomon's and have gone through a pair before that, I am just wondering is this a heavy shoe like those or is it a lighter show?
It's definitely a lighter shoe. The Hawks is the most versatile all terrain shoe Salomon has created so far. On the other hand, their lighweight makes them less protective and less durable for an heavy duty type of use. Our athletes love to use it even on technical rocky terrain, mostly for the weight benefit, but they are very skilled and don't need the extra stability or protection most trail runners need. The Hawks is the ideal shoe to make your first steps on easy trails if you're a recreational trail runner, or to attack the chrono if you're an advanced trail runner. I recommend it for runners below 170 pounds
Like the look, feel, features, and craftsmanship. Initial use on the trail lives up to its billing -- stable, light, and good traction. There's a lot of slippery clay here in Guam, but these shoes are handling it better than anything else I've tried.
Only complaint is that the toe-box is a bit big for my foot. My foot size is pretty standard, so this was a bit of a disappointment.
The jury is still out on durability. The rocks and coral here usually rip up shoes in less than 20 outings. Two mild tests so far, and still good to go.
I have size 13 and a pretty narrow foot. I have short Achilles tendon and flat feet. my orthotics fit perfectly and the shoe fits great on my foot and is very comfortable. I am standing all day in them and hiking in them alot and they have been marvelous! wish i would have gotten some water proof hiking boots for my trip to yosemite though.
The difference between XA and XT series is simple. XA segment can be described as the "mountain goat family": Superior protection and stability for usage on technical terrain, on and off trails. Because of the focus on these two benefits, the XA family is also less "runable". Why? Because of the added layers of protection on top and at the bottom. These layers make the shoe a little bit stiffer than the XT and a little bit heavier as well. There's nothing better on the market for mountain running where you have to alternate run and walk. Besides these prorection features, we have developed the XA with a low to the ground geometry to provide the extra stability you need when you are on an uneven terrain. For the XT family on the other hand, we use to call them the "trail experts family". Very performing on all type of trails, lighter, more flexible they are definitely more runable. This feeling is mostly due to the extra cushioning of the bottom unit, but also to the innovative ACS (for Agile Chassis System) which provides at the same time stability and rebound effect. Comparable to a car suspension which adapts to the terrain and the speed of the vehicle. In the XT family, you'll find the XT Wings and the lighter Hawks and Whisper (women's version of the Hawks). The main differences between XT Wings and Hawks are the level of protection (more on Wings) and the stability (same comment)
I used to wear the xa pro 3d's all the time. I bought a pair of xt wings and thats all I wear. They are so much more stable, much lighter and more responsive than the xa series. I am eager to try the xt hawk.
I don't know what the technical differences in the XA and XT series are, but I have used a pair of Salomons from each. I think that the XT Hawks are a better pair of shoes than the XA Pro 3D Ultras. They are lighter, provide more ankle support and fit more snug around the entire foot. While I was pleased by the XA Pro's, the XT Hawk's are an all around better shoe.
My second pair of Salomon's and very pleased with cusioning,weight,and overall performance.Fairly deep heel pocket which seems to lock my foot in for a perfect fit,really liteweight,which is awesome compared to other trail shoes I've owned.Wish more were available @ this price in big sizes,I'd snag another pair.Love my XT HAWKS,THANKS B/C.
These shoes are awesome. Great support and cushioning. I've only used them on the trail but they grip well and clean up easily after the runs. The easy lace up is a bonus.
These shoes are my third pair of Salomons. I like them more then any other pair I have had. The size is perfect and they feel amazing. The Hawks have a great arch that you can really feel and are also exceedingly breathable. They are also exceptionally light and feel great for running or walking - highly recommended.
These are pretty good shoes. I love the lacing. I love the colors, the fabric has been durable. I really like the lightweight, stable outsole with the mini-wings architecture. The only problem is the forefoot; it's too big. I have big feet, (12/13) but the forefoot on these shoes (I ordered a 13) is loose and lets you slide around. They toebox is the right width, and the shoes fit true to length, but the forefoot is "tall." There is a lot of room above my feet, which is really disconcerting. Everything else is great, but the weird forefoot sizing has me all thrown off.
These are pretty good shoes. I love the lacing. I love the colors, the fabric has been durable. I really like the lightweight, stable outsole with the mini-wings architecture. The only problem is the forefoot; it's too big. I have big feet, but the forefoot on these shoes is loose and lets you slide around. They toebox is the right width, and the shoes fit true to size, but the forefoot is "tall." There is a lot of room above my feet, which is really disconcerting. Everything else is great, but the weird forefoot sizing has me all thrown off.
I run the local trails here in MN a few times a week and these have yet to let me down. They have great ankle support despite being a shoe (as opposed more...
The Salomon Hawk seems like a good shoe, but it is too narrow for my just a bit wider than average foot. And, I don't care for the Salomon lacing system more...