Clothing

Outdoor Gear

Best Sellers

Average Reviews Community Rating | 12 Reviews

Salomon STH 16 Ski Binding - 2009 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

STH 16 Ski Binding
Uploaded By:
Was this helpful?
Flag This Close

Nothing ruins your day like a premature ejection. The Salomon STH 16 Ski Binding keeps you locked in tight during cliff launches and steep descents, so you’ll only come out when there’s a serious risk of injury.

  • High-DIN retention for aggressive freeskiers
  • Stomp pedal in front of toe piece for shock absorption
  • Micro Simultaneous adjustable wings provide precise boot connection for optimal power transfer
  • Brake sold separately

Bottom Line: Slay the steeps.

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.
Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.
Rating for this product: 5

Trusted!

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
October 25, 2009

I have used 916's for the past 20 years. They have gone from metal to more plastic and are very light. Still the lock in factor of these bindings is there. A nice thing is that you can get many different width brakes for the wider skis we have today, and changing them is fast and easy. They work well with Alpine Trekkers, where as others have complications. Full adjustments that some other bindings don't have, toe height, wing adjusters for one. Its a no brainer when it comes to these bindings. They stay on your feet, if they don't their not adjusted properly!

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

5 Comments Last Comment: May 8, 2011 by:

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
May 8, 2011

Yeah they work fin with the Vibram. The adjustable toe height helps due to the added thickness from the Vibram.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
February 24, 2011

So this works well with your new Vibram soled boots? Saw you've been at Sole brothers in Cham.

I would like a rockered vibram sole e.g. Dynafit Titan, and use them in tech and alpine bindings

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
November 8, 2009

Also they don't make the metal ones anymore only in the 920.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
November 8, 2009

I use both.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
October 25, 2009

Write your comment here...Hey Seth are you really using the new sth 16 or the older metal s916?

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

I just got the 182 Shoguns and need a compatible binding. Trying

I just got the 182 Shoguns and need a compatible binding. Trying to decide between the STH14 and STH14 Driver. I'm an agressive skier, 6'2", 195lbs. Sticking mostly in the trees and bowls, not doing anything in the parks. Any recommendations?

By:
January 26, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

sounds like you could go with either the sth 16 or sth 14 driver. If you run your dins 13 or higher go sth16, if you run 12 or lower go with the sth14 driver.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
January 30, 2011

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

916 just lighter

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
September 24, 2009

ask anyone who cares about their skis staying on and they will tell you: Salomon. I've been riding these for a few years now, switched over from the 916s. Best binding, only come off when I want them too. When you need to have utmost confidence in your binders, this is the only way to go. Well you could track down some 916s but these are lighter, better.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I bought some Fischer Watea 101 and now I need bindings. I have

I bought some Fischer Watea 101 and now I need bindings. I have 2 questions: 1) Salomon STH16 or Head USA Mojo 18 X? ; 2) skies are 101 under the foot (waist), should I use stretched 100mm breaks or something bigger?..thanks

By:
May 24, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

IMO, there is no comparison. Sths are the real deal and will serve you well for years and years.

You should not have a problem stretching the 100mm to fit a 101mm ski. The bigger ones will hang over too far.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
May 25, 2010

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Project Genesis

By: Professional Athlete
November 19, 2009

916 performance - Full on Salomon CLICK OF ASSURANCE when you step into them *(as in YOU KNOW you are in the binding because its easy to line up clean and snaps shut like a bear trap) PLUS lighter weight. A genesis of the classic.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I use the Hellbents (122 under foot) and I was going to buy the

I use the Hellbents (122 under foot) and I was going to buy the STH 14. Was wondering should I get the 115 mm. breaks and bend them out a little or get the 130s and have them be a little big.

By:
April 11, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I would go for the 130 brakes. 4mm on each side of your ski is not noticeable at all and though you could bend a 115 it's always easiest not to bend and preserves the strength of the brake just a bit.

By: Backcountry.com Employee
April 13, 2010

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

TOP NOTCH!

By:
April 24, 2012

Salomon STH 16 = bomber binding.

Amazing hold, solid click-in. Never had a pre-release. Driver toe tried tested and true.

Bottom line is that I don't think about the bindings when I am on top of a big line. That speaks volumes

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I am looking to mount some Mantra 177's and I am not sure

I am looking to mount some Mantra 177's and I am not sure if I should use Salomon STH 16's or the Jester's. I am an aggressive skier who is quite built (5'8 190). I am looking for durability and great power transfer between the boot and the ski. Any ideas?

By:
December 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

If your two main benefits are a binding which will transcend the life of your skis and will give you the feeling of micrometric control, Go for the STH 16. The mechanics of the toe piece is unmatchable and provides you at the same time ultra precision and unmatchable safety. regarding your weight, no worry, even at 190 and with a "go charge" skiing style, you've plenty of room and will never release when you don't want.

By:
December 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

I ride the sth because I believe in the binding. They are the gold standard in what an alpine binding should do. The sth will give you years and years of great performance.

By: Backcountry.com Sponsored Athlete
December 12, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 3

Okay, but could be better

By:
August 23, 2011

I've bought STH 16s for the past couple years (since the STH 14 Driver wasn't available in the US until recently), and there is a good reason for it, but there are also a couple reasons that I won't be buying them anymore.

So, lets start with the good. The adjust-ability is awesome on these. Toe-height is a screw on the top, wing adjustment is a screw on the side of one of the wings etc. Everything is exactly where you would think it should be, and it is really helpful if you ever need to adjust from a boot with more wear on the toe, to a newer boot with less wear, to an AT boot etc. Also, Salomon makes nice wide brakes, which is very convenient when compared to, say, FKS, where the widest brake is only 115mm.

Durability-wise, the bindings are pretty good. So far, I've had no catastrophic binding explosions, which is more somewhat reassuring. However, over time, the brakes become extremely loose and wobbly (not a huge deal) but the heel piece developes a little play foward and back, and a LOT of play left to right. This is definitely cause for concern, but so far, hasn't been a huge problem as far as i can tell.

Also, I've noticed that I prerelease out of the heel (especially when landing switch) with these bindings, but the problem is remedied with a very slightly higher DIN setting for the Heel piece (like 0.5 to 1 higher).

Finally, Over time, My STH 16s seem to prerelease more and more often. I've owned 2 pairs on 2 different skis (4frnt VCTs and ON3P caylors) and I've experienced the problem with both. I found that the problem was resolved however when I loosened the toewing adjustment, raised the toe height, backed up the forward pressure, lowered the DINs, and then reset everything correctly (as determined by a qualified shop technician, of course). I know for a fact that the toe-wings and toe-height become loose naturally, while the forward pressure remained spot on.

All that said, these are good bindings, and I know people much better than me who will swear by them. However, in my opinion, when compared to FKS 18s, or Deabolt/tyrolia 15's or 18's, they just aren't as reliable in the long run, which is why I give them 3 stars.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

I heard these come in black. Any chance Backcountry will carry

I heard these come in black. Any chance Backcountry will carry that color?

By: Backcountry.com Employee
October 21, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Matthew, they exist in black, but I don't know if BC carry them. Check the video out on our Salomon website with Simon Dumont's presentation of the STH 16
http://www.salomon.com/us/?#/ski/bindings/bindings/sth-16

By:
December 27, 2009

Was this helpful? (2) (0)

Flag

I ordered these from BC last winter in Black so I'd imagine that they will

By:
October 22, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Keep me locked down

By:
January 25, 2011

These bindings are great. That salomon "snap" is just so reassuring. I am 5' 9" about 135# and I rock my DIN at a little over 12. At this setting I have never come out when I haven't been in serious risk of knee or other injury. It's like they know when I eat shit and they know when I'm tryin to hang on for dear life, if these bindings think I can land it then they are gonna stay on and I'm prolly gonna nail it! Salomon rocks, I wish these were as light as my marker jesters....

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

i just purchased some STH 12 bindings from backcountry.com, what

i just purchased some STH 12 bindings from backcountry.com, what is the difference btwn the STH 12 and STH 16? Peter

By:
October 8, 2009

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

The DIN on the STH 16 goes from 9 to 16 while the DIN on the STH 12 goes from 4 to 12. The 16 is for more aggressive skiers. The 16 is not for light skiers since the DIN cannot be set lower than 9.

By:
October 10, 2009

Was this helpful? (1) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Great bindings

By:
June 29, 2010

Great lock in factor on these bindings with plenty of adjustment.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

I trust these

By:
July 20, 2010

Three seasons with these and no problems at all, durable as hell. Just make sure to check the adjustment on the toe wings & toe height.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

Legit

By:
July 25, 2010

I have the 14s and 16s... the 14s toe piece scares me sometimes (releases early) so if you are a hard skier pay a little more and get these... my 4 roommates and I have these bindings and nobody has broken a pair yet... a tough feat for our house as everyone skis like a mad man. definitely worth the cost.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The best bindings around

By:
December 4, 2009

You can't go wrong with these. Classic Salomon performance, and BC.com lets you pick your brakes.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

2 Comments Last Comment: December 27, 2009 by:

By:
December 27, 2009

... right, but pay attention to your ski underfoot width before ordering the brakes!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

By:
December 27, 2009

... right, but pay attention to your ski underfoot width before ordering the brakes!

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Rating for this product: 5

Salomon STH 16 Ski Binding

By: Backcountry.com Employee
June 4, 2010

These go on skis that I think I might be shouldering often or for any sort of park applications. They are super light compared to the all metal binders, which is a really good thing in the park. I would echo everything Seth says about these guys - super burly and not necessarily an inferior option to the old all-metal version, just a little different.

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

Rating for this product: 5

The Best

By: Backcountry.com Employee
January 14, 2010

I have mount these babies on any ski in which I will be tucking it and hucking it. They are super burly and I trust my life with them. Currently I have them mounted on my Jah Loves. Nothing but the best. Steel Toe and Heel!

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Flag

1 Comment Last Comment: January 20, 2010 by:

By:
January 20, 2010

It's too bad ski manufacturers' are limiting which bindings can go on certain skis. If they can't hold metal Salomons, I won't ski on them.

Flag

Was this helpful? (0) (0)

Change me.

Out of Stock

Item: SAL1819

2009 Model No Longer Available

We have a lot more Alpine Ski Bindings than that

Alpine Ski Bindings

Research other out-of-stock versions:

Trusted!

5 star rating

By: Seth Morrison October 25, 2009

I have used 916's for the past 20 years. They have gone from metal to more plastic and are very light. Still the lock in factor of these bindings more...

916 just lighter

5 star rating

By: jamey parks September 24, 2009

ask anyone who cares about their skis staying on and they will tell you: Salomon. I've been riding these for a few years now, switched over from the more...

Add this to my Wish List  
This product has been added to XX List
DIN Range:
9 - 16 
Recommended Skier Weight:
>209lb (>95kg) 
Brake Width:
100mm 
Weight:
[Pair] 5lb 12oz (2322g) 
Recommended Use:
Aggressive freeski, park and pipe competition, expert skiers