Rossignol Voodoo Pro BC110 Ski - Women's - 2009 BCS

I rock Marker Griffons on my S7's (basically the same ski) but any of the Royal series will work, or the Rossignol FSK series if your a hard chargin chick. Which most gals who ride this beauty are. If you want something less beefy..Go for something from Salomon, just make sure you've got wide enough brakes to clear these voluptuous girls.

Called Rossi and got the specs for the 159 skis

128 - 98 - 118 with a radius of 15.5

I just got a pair of the 159s and they have the following dimensions:
124-95-114.

96 15.5 turn radius

Hey Kristen,
We had 5 in earlier this year. My guess is we will get some more of the 2010/11 model in this fall. Check back closer to then. As for getting more if this year's model..I don't think you'll get that lucky.

I've been on these almost every day since I bought them, skiing all over the mountain and some backcountry. they do just fine on groomers: super grippy side cut but take a bit more effort to turn over on their wide bases (not bad, just takes getting used to). and yes OUTSTANDING in pow!

First, this is a top of the line womens' powder ski designed for the most aggressive female skiers. That being said and with your height, you will not advance out of this ski. As per the length, either the 166 or 176 will be good. It basically comes down to preference. A longer ski will help float in powder, the shorter ski will be a little lighter and nimble. Keep in mind that the rocker, while making powder skiing really easy also makes the ski ski shorter and therefore you usually want to size up with a rockered ski. That all being said, my best advice, try and demo the 176's and if they feel too long, size down and get the 166's.

The rocker will help the skis float more in deep snow. Since the ski is very wide (110 at the waist) they will still be a little slow going from edge to edge which makes them turn a little bit slower. While a shorter ski can correct this somewhat you should definitely try to get out on a pair of these before making a purchase.

THIS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED
The above answers are incorrect. This ski does chance shape and dimensions in the smaller sizes. The 176 is the size and shape represented in the product listing.

176: 140-110-118
166: 136-105-114
159: 124-96-114

I just picked up the 159 for my girlfriend and these are NOT the S7 shape. They are based off of the S3 mold- there is no hourglass shape on the tip and it does not have the typical S7 pintail. In otherwords, the 159 is a COMPLETELY different ski. I can't speak to the 166 other than the provided dimensions above.

I just measured these before sending them down to Chile and the 166 cm length measured 104 mm underfoot.

Hmmmm.......

Not true; the dimension of this ski change as the length changes. Only the 176 is 140/110/118

I had Lars check the warheouse today, and specifically look at a pair of 159 and 166 Pro 110's. The dimensions are the same throughout the line.

The dimensions are the same for both sizes, they are 140mm in the tip, 110mm underfoot, and 118mm in the tail.

I'd definitely recommend the 176s. They ski short because they're rockered. I'm 5'7", 115 lbs, and an aggressive skier and I find even the 176s a bit short.

If you consider yourself a good skier, and can ski fairly powerfully, then for sure as a powder ski I would say the 176. Longer is always nice for deeper snow. If you aren't an aggressive skier, than the 166 might feel more comfortable to you.

I'll post up a weight for the 166's at the end of the week.

The S7 in size 176 is actually the same dimensions 140-110-118, it's the size 188 S7s that are 145.4-115-123. So at 176, the two skis are the same, just a different top sheet.

The 176 is actually 110 underfoot, so not the same size as the S7. If I am not mistaken Rossi made it for women, and didn't just shrink it and pink it.