Free 2-Day Shipping on Orders Over $50* - Limited Time Only

Description

Any day on snow is a good day.

No matter how the day shapes up, there's just no stopping you when you're riding your Rossignol Women's Savory 7 Skis.  A generous 106mm waist gives you plenty of ski to surf the powder, but the centered sidecut makes sure the Savory 7 is no slouch on hardpack as well. Your guy friends all chickened out, so you decided to step up and hit the chute first, the only problem was the rock about halfway down that was buried just under the snow. Luckily, these skis have a traditional sidewall construction, so that glancing blow isn't going to ruin your edges any time soon. Paulownia and diago help to lighten up the core, so even at 106 underfoot, these beasts aren't too shabby on the skintrack either. 

  • Powder Turn Rocker (50% low camber underfoot, 50% progressive tip and tail rocker)
  • Minicap sandwich laminate
  • Paulownia and diago core
  • 106mm width underfoot
  • Centered sidecut (136/106/126)
  • Flat binding mount area

Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

Rossignol Savory 7 Ski - Women's

? Share a...

Reviews

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

    Add a:
  • Share a photo
  • Share a video

Familiarity:

Only jpg, jpeg, png, gif or bmp files please.

SubmitCancel
Now review from the App.Download

Here's what others have to say...

5 5

Great skis

I have the 13-14 model, and I just LOVE these skis. I'm 5'3" and got the 162 size, with my Aattack binders. They're great on groomers and in powder. When I ski in the glades, and over soft snow (6"+), I just feel like I'm floating on butter.

They have rockers, so they ski shorter than they really are. I normally ski my Nordica Hell's Belle (154) as my all mountain ski in the east. Bought them to bring to Utah to ski last year. All mountain ski there. And they're my "powder" skis in the east.

Unanswered Question

I am 5'0, 115 lbs, expert skier I have a pair of 159cm S3's which I love. I do feel like they could be longer. Was wondering thoughts on the best size for savory 7 162cm or 170cm. Would full rocker make the 162 feel super short? Thanks.

5 5

Great skis!

  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I got these because I wanted easy-going powder ski to improve my powder and crud skiing. These skis are a lot of fun, very forgiving and have great float in powder and slushy snow in spring, they can also handle non-icy groomers very well. They are super light too! I enjoy them very much.

Anyone know the turning radius on the 162cm size?

Responded on

I do believe that the radius is still 17 on the 162. Someone please correct me if I am wrong!

hey do you remember the roxy helter skelters? How do you think these would compare to those? (their specs were 124-92-114 with 16m radius I think). They were my favourite ski's ever and Im looking for something similar - I know the savory 7's are not a twin twip, but do you think they would ski similarly?

Responded on

Between any of the Rossi S series skis, I'd say the Saffron 7 would ski most like that Roxy Helter Skelter! 128 / 98 / 118 mm and 16m turn radius... One main difference between that Roxy ski and either of these... The S7 series is made with that SUPER lightweight paulownia material - super maneuverable and forgiving. Either way, these are really fun skis! The Savory and Saffron 7 both have raised tails - of all potential differences you might want to weigh in, that one is really subtle.
Roxy skis were produced by Dynastar - so I checked out current models that you might like and can't really find any women's specific ones... The Slicer Pro would be similar. Rossignol/Dynastar are the same company though so it's really easy to compare across both brands - so I'd say that Roxy ski was probably super similar to the Rossi Sassy 7. Or the Rossi Storm.
Hopefully that helps!
Hit me up if you have any more questions!
lfeasler@backcountry.com

I am 5'6" / 135lbs expert skier, some backcountry but mainly ski lift access terrain looking for powder/trees -- does this ski short? would I be 170 or 178? I currently ski the salomon czar 174.

Responded on

Hi there,
yes this ski will ski shorter. If you are comfortable with a bigger ski, I would recommend you go with the 178- the rocker will definitely reduce the effective edge of the ski, so the 170 would probably feel way too short. Feel free to contact me with any further questions or concerns, kweiser@backcountry.com

Best Answer Responded on

I agree with Kayla! I skied a 175 prior to this ski and would have been comfortable had this been a 180+! Go for the 178, you will love the playfulness!

5 5

Best Yet

  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I can't say I was a fan of the old Star 7 style but with the new honeycomb tip and flattened tail, these skis RIP.

A lot of ripping female skiers will stray from a female ski- DON'T stray from these. This ski has an amazing swivel weight and a rip-able shape for groomers, pow or crud.

This ski is almost too fun.

Best Yet
Responded on

Monica how do you feel about durability on these?
The honeycomb tips seem really flimsy to me!
I've seen a pair peel apart like a banana before - and it made me a little skeptical.

Responded on

I skied them for over 100 days last season and didn't have any problems-- even in the rocky terrain at Jackson Hole they held up just fine. Just like with any ski-- if you hit a rock or feature hard enough you will end up with some delimitation or peeling but with regular wear-and-tear these were durable as any other ski on the market.

Responded on

Awesome picture Monica - thanks again !!!

I selected this image to feature on the Community Hub at the bottom of the Backcountry.com homepage! Congrats on being utterly GOATWORTHY !!!