No product reviews. Be the first to testify.

Rossignol S110 Ski - Women's - 2010 BCS

Available Colors / Styles

S110 Ski - Women's

Zoom In

Flag This Close

Guru Photos

No photos have been uploaded yet.
Be the first to upload your photo of the S110 Ski - Women's. >

The Rossignol Women’s S110 Ski dominates the slopes, gives you a giant boast of confidence, and leaves you with a big shit-eating grin on your face. Tell the gals they can follow your hootin’ and hollerin’ down the mountain when you slice through pow with this big-mountain rockered ski.

An early rise in the tip and tail provides superb flotation and turn capability in pow, crud, and manky snow
Traditional camber underfoot gives you excellent edge hold on groomers and hardpack
Reverse sidecut allows for a buttery-and-slashy feel in the powder and precision on hardpack
The 30-degree slanted sidewalls improve swing weight, reduce the overall weight of the ski, and increase its durability
Poplar wood core with carbon and KEVLAR® makes for a lightweight ski, and the WRS fiberglass laminate provides stability at high speed
Successor to the infamous 2010 Voodoo Pro BC110 ski

Bottom Line: Satisfaction guaranteed.

Product Wall

Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.

Hi, throw your review on the Product Wall to show your Gear-telligence.

Hi, got a question? Ask on the Product Wall.

Hey write a Review. Be the first. >

Got a question about this product? Other gear freaks might know the answer. >

Be the first to upload your photo of the S110 Ski - Women's. >

Be the first to upload your video of the S110 Ski - Women's. >

That's great to hear that the Rossi S100W is good for tele-ing.

That's great to hear that the Rossi S100W is good for tele-ing. My darling husband has just bought these for me for my 40th birthday. Does anyone know the best position to mount Hammerhead bindings for tele on this ski??

By: Marina Redi Wilson
January 14, 2011

Flag

Answer Marina Redi Wilson's question >

What are the dimensions of the 168s? Anyone tele on these?

By: kkdoit100095426
November 13, 2010

Flag

I bought these this year to tele on and have only skied a few backcountry days but it was fabulous, they are so fun to turn and easily pushed through funky snow. I'd definitely recommend this ski to tele. Plus they're pretty.

By: kat3407194
November 27, 2010

Flag

My husband (whatta guy! ; ) bought these for my birthday/Xmas present to tele on. Skied them for the first time over the weekend in 12-16" powder and couldn't keep the smile off my face! SO floaty, SO fun, and could still turn them just fine on the moguls and groomers due to the ample sidecut and skinny tails that make pivoting easier. HUGE shovel and soft tails/tips but stiffness underfoot keep you floating through pow and agressively plowing through variable condition snow. Was glad for the stiffness of the Hammerhead binding to go with it, and may have to think about a stiffer 4 buckle boot too. The only possible drawback is they are heavier than most tele-specific/backcountry skis, and I probably wouldn't chose them for touring (over other skis I already own). Had to work pretty hard skating around on the cat tracks. I'm 5'6" 135 lbs and think the 168 is the perfect length for me.

All and all, a fantastic ski and beautiful to boot! Fabulous!

By: katinelsal100047185
December 13, 2010

Flag

Answer kkdoit100095426's question >

what is the wieght per ski in grams for this?

By: Max Buerman
October 27, 2010

Flag

Answer Max Buerman's question >

whats the difference....other than graphic between this and last

whats the difference....other than graphic between this and last years Voodoo 110 pro BC??

By: s.c4114663
October 18, 2010

Flag

Answer s.c4114663's question >

I'm in the market for a new ski and I'm really interested

I'm in the market for a new ski and I'm really interested in this one. I ski pretty aggressively and mostly in powder the backcountry in JH (but I'm moving to Tahoe). I have been skiing a 173 length black diamond havoc for the past 3 seasons. I'm 5'7 and about 130lbs and have been skiing for about 26 years. When I looked at these in the shop the 168 looked way short but 178 sounds pretty long. The guy in the shop said they "ski short" and I should go with the the 178 but I guess I'm just a little nervous and don't want to be thrown around on too beefy of a ski. (If I have to get a different ski that is a better size for me, so be it). Advice?????

By: kir3005055
October 17, 2010

Flag

Go for it the turn radius on the BD Havoc (21m @175) sucks compared to the turn radius on there skis (15 @ 178)! The early rise in tip and tail means the 178 of these will ski much shorter like a 168 ski, while providing you with loft in powder and wet heavy crud and ice conditions should be managed by the traditional camber underfoot!
These should ski very poppy..with out being overly hookie!

By: Phil Santala
October 17, 2010

Flag

If you are comfortably skiing the 173 Havoc you will be fine on the 178 S110. With the early rise tip and tail, this ski definitely skis much shorter. I'm a 5'4" and normally ski 177-180 range, and I skied the 188 S7 (unisex version of this ski) with no trouble. It is really easy to initiate a turn with this design, and the ski almost feels pivot-y. I got Volkl Katana's (also early rise tip and tail) in 183 and love them. Don't be intimidated by length with early rise/rocker/reverse camber skis, and have fun!

By: Merebea Danforth x4236
November 19, 2010