- Home
- Ski
- Alpine Skiing
- Women's Fat Skis
- Rossignol S7 Ski - Women's
Community Rating
Rossignol S7 Ski - Women's
Available Colors / Styles
Be the first to upload your photo of the S7 Ski - Women's. >
Big mountains and deep drifts require a big, stable plank, and if there's one thing the Rossignol Women's 2011/12 S7 Ski knows, it's how to go big. With a mammoth footprint, a rockered tip and tail, and a traditional camber underfoot, this bad girl is ready to devour virtually any terrain you point it towards.
- Powder Turn rocker tech in the tip and tail provide excellent flotation and easy steering in the deep, fluffy stuff
- Traditional camber underfoot delivers more edging power and grip so you don't skid out on the groomers
- Centered Sidecut features a vertical sidewall that tapers the at the tip and tail for better responsiveness
- Spoon-shaped tip maximizes flotation, and a deep radius increases edge grip and steer-ability
- Sandwich laminate construction features a wood core, carbon laminates, and fiberglass sheeting for increased durability and a lighter feel
Bottom Line: Steep, deep, and ready to charge.
Talk shop with all the gear freaks out there: ask 'em questions, upload/browse photos, and give your 2¢.
Finally getting on the rocker (Rossi S7) and have no idea what
Finally getting on the rocker (Rossi S7) and have no idea what length. 5'-6" 130 pounds, been skiing a 164 cm traditional camber ski. Like to charge but not hucking myself off cliffs. Advice? thanks!
By: chance252338131
October 25, 2011
Sorry, I don't mean to sound know-it-ally, but I totally disagree with Jamie's reply. Here's why...
I've been on the S7's since Spring 2009. I'm 5'7" 130lbs and used to ski 170cm traditional shaped skis, so similar to you. I love to charge really hard and fast and do enjoy hucking off cliffs. A bit different than you, but I still assume you're a strong skier none-the-less.
I started on the 176's (now sold as 178's) due to advice of people speculating what it's like to ski an S7. I mounted them at 0 for freeriding (not park riding). Note their weight was not an issue while skiing. In the end, it was fun and I liked it, but it felt too short and soft. I really felt it when skiing hard and fast through chopped up snow - not as stable as I'd like, tips deflected, not enough effective edge up front to carve through the crud.
Sold them and bought the 188cm's. LOVE! They look huge for someone my size and weight, but they work so well! They're now very beat up and I just picked up a new pair of the same to replace them once the mountains get a bit more snow.
I'm not sure I'd recommend the 188's to someone our size unless they really know how to not let the ski ride them, but I definitely recommend the 178's for anyone our size who is a strong skier. 168's will likely leave you wishing you bought 'em bigger. Good luck!
By: WishfulThinking
November 22, 2011
I would think that the 168 makes sense for your size and what you are coming off of. 178 would feel very big, even with the fact that rocker generally skis shorter.
By: Jamie Preston
November 2, 2011
Do you have the 168 in the Womens s7 and or the 168 in the S7
Do you have the 168 in the Womens s7 and or the 168 in the S7 mancini pro
By: Tele VT
March 21, 2011
Yes for sure in the Lady's - but they sell out quickly. Keep checking back!
By: Elias Littenberg
October 6, 2011
Awesome in the pow pow
By: katz
October 20, 2011
Love it skiing the powder. It's a fat ski so you can rip when it gets deep.
Difference is between the women vs mens version? Does anyone
Difference is between the women vs mens version? Does anyone know exactly what the difference is between the women vs mens version of the S7? They usually make the womens version softer but seeing as how the S7 is already has quite a soft flex, maybe the men's version might be the better choice??
By: wizard604
March 17, 2011
The women are a bit slimmer 140-110-118 and the men version is 145-115-123... So it is more than the graphics... The base is very different too, the men as the black ptex....I think the black Ptex glide better but It is only my 2 cents !
By: julielemi2375449
November 7, 2011
I was told it was just the graphic.
By: Kristy
September 24, 2011
Wondering if marker barons would be good bindings to mount on
Wondering if marker barons would be good bindings to mount on these skis? I know something lighter might be nicer, but I might want to take 'em in the backcountry some too.
By: emyarb2423564
March 16, 2011
They'd be perfect if you're going to def go tour a few times. The added height of the Baron will also help get better leverage on these fat skis and help get them on edge really quick. They'll ski extra nimble.
By: Elias Littenberg
October 6, 2011
I'm deciding between the s7's, JJ's and the Blogs..leaning
I'm deciding between the s7's, JJ's and the Blogs..leaning towards the blogs just because they're about $150 cheaper.
Anyone have any advice on whether the s7's or JJ's are worth the extra cash? I'm mounting with marker barons and will use them mainly for pow - but still want something I can rip groomers with. I've only skied the s7 and loved them, how do the others compare?
By: Josie S
March 14, 2011
Change me.
Research out-of-stock versions:
- Free gift with purchase:
- Backcountry.com Backcountry Backside - Sampler Wax Value: $4.99 Your Cost: $0.00
Please choose an option to order this item.
One Color, 178cm (699.95)
Awesome in the pow pow
Love it skiing the powder. It's a fat ski so you can rip when it gets deep. more...
- Length:
- 168 cm, 178 cm, 188 cm
- Dimensions:
- 140 / 110 / 118 mm
- Turn Radius:
- (178 cm) 14.8 m
- Profile:
- underfoot camber, r rockered tip & tail
- Construction:
- sandwich laminate
- Core:
- wood
- Tail:
- twintip
- Recommended Use:
- western big mountain, powder, advanced to expert
- Manufacturer Warranty:
- 1 year
Comment on Sam P's video >