ros2458423

ros2458423

0 Comments

ros2458423

ros2458423 wrote a review of on January 8, 2011

3 5

i bought 2 of these for my daughters, in small and medium, since the sizing chart indicated those to be the correct sizes to get. wrong. they run pretty big, so the older daughter is wearing the small, and the younger one is wearing last years, and the medium vest is sitting in the closet waiting for somebody to get bigger. overall the design is ok, but i think they should have included some velcro straps on the sides below the armpits, or lower, in order to cinch it in a bit at that level - without that, and with the front protector part (which i did not realize they had attached), the front rides up and is kind of uncomfortable.

(0)

 

0 Comments

ros2458423

ros2458423 wrote a question about on April 30, 2009

i am trying to decide between a few skis. i am the wrong side of 40, 6 ft and 180 pounds, but still manage to ski about 50 days a year, and am about an 8/10. cant get enough powder, but also end up skiing when i can, so i have to deal with all kinds of snow, including chopped up crap and groomers. i already have 3 different pairs of skis with varying underfoot widths from 75 to 93 mm, and that covers most situations. BUT for next season i am looking for a crazy pair with at least 110mm underfoot, to cruise in nearly everything except dedicated groomers, but to really have fun on the handful of days i get lucky in powder. i have been looking at the icelantic shaman 184, the liberty double helix 190, and the pontoons. i have been reading lots of reviews, but cant seem to get a comparitive idea between these 3 skis. can anybody comment?

(0)