Free Shipping on Orders Over $50 - Some Exclusions Apply*
  • 1-800-409-4502

  • Live Chat with a Gearhead

  • 100% Guaranteed Returns

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050

Gerald's Passions

Road Cycling
Sport Climbing

Gerald's Bio

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on December 11, 2013

2 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times

This is an excellent example of clothing NOT designed for an athletic body type. It fits in the shoulders, chest and arm length but hangs like a garbage bag around my middle. It's short in the waist and the pockets are too shallow. (I'm 5,11 180, 31" waist.) The pullover sweatshirt has a better cut and pockets. The cotton fabric is nice and heavy. Not worth $60.

(0)

 

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on October 16, 2013

5 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times
Fit: Runs large

If the goal is to ride in WET: winter wind and drizzle, these are the thing I'd say. For dry cold and temps below freezing I'd do something else. This is basically a half-millimeter wet-suit carefully tailored into cycling bibs. So, they have a very compressive fit and good wind resistance. (Wear them tight as with a wet-suit. I'm 5, 11.5; 182 lb and a MED is perfect.) You'll be wet but less miserable for the same reason a wet-suit works in cold water. This 2013 model of Amfib improves over the older one due to the stirrup and integrated gasket: Stirrup goes inside your shoe and the gasket goes OVER your shoe cover like a gaiter thus directing the water outside your shoe. The back is a cool spot as another reviewer indicated; noticeable in a deluge but NBD to me personally. Pearl runs larger than the euro stuff. I was surprised to take a MED as I have other Pearl bib shorts in a large.

(1)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote an answer about on August 15, 2013

Having used the fan, and as one who does hard sessions on the smaller rollers myself, (no fan) my opinion is that the blower is way overkill with the smaller roller. You would wind up riding small gears which is of course less stable on rollers. I have used the blower with the 4 inch drums and that works very well because the larger drum provides significantly less resistance on it's own. The key piece of this, and a major detail missing from the BC description, is that the blower provides variable resistance. There is a little door on the side of that turbine that regulates how much air it's able grab. Full closed = not much harder than no fan at all. Full open simulates the kind of headwind that makes you use every swear word ever heard. "Kreitler Killer" is the perfect product name. Again, just my opinion but the blower is really FOR doing HARD roller intervals where a partner is opening and closing the little door for you based on time, heart rate scream volume, time between dry heaves.... Anyway I would forget about the fan cooling you off and consider the blower if you want to do masochistic interval sessions. (I once got so trashed doing "blower intervals" that I fell off the damn rollers and broke a bone in my hand.) For cooling, there's a great home fan called a "Vornado"I can recommend.

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on August 8, 2012

2 5

Returned unused. For the retail price, this thing seems cheaply made. The fabric is extremely thin and poorly finished. Construction seems delicate to say the least. Worst of all there is no compressive fit because the fabric is so light. The legs grippers are almost non-existent - definitely the poorest ones I've seen. Looking to a different maker.

(1)

 

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on August 6, 2012

5 5

As a former competitive rider just getting back into it for fun, I am as happy as you could hope to be with rollers. I used the large diameter Kreitlers in the 80's and I recall needing the wind-load simulator fan in order to really work. NOT SO with these. The rollers alone provide an ample workout for me. I estimate these provide 75% of the normal resistance you experience outside for a given gear on a flat road with no wind. It would be interesting to know if Kreitler has a more accurate equivilency.

(1)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on July 13, 2012

5 5

I use these for everything and I have found no down side. As a flyer I have marathon (35+ hr) days getting drenched in sweat and then drying out repeatedly - in a disgusting nomex flight suit. These boxers have dramatically increased quality of life as they dry fast and do not smell. Even at $40 a pair I bought 6 and use them constantly. Stoic's best accomplishment so far.

(0)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on June 24, 2012

5 5

I now have three pair because I seem to wear them all the time. The 2011 model improved greatly over the prior year because they added another leg pocket and, they no-kidding sewed the pockets instead of just gluing them on. Yes, "Welded construction" = nothing more sophisticated than glue which comes apart with use. Period. I wrote the company a scathing letter after having a pair put back together by a tailor. I got zilch from Patagonia - no offer to replace and not even a pencil-whipped apology but they changed the pants. The fit is euro-slender. I am 5,11" 180 with a 31" waist and I wear a 34" in these. Muscle types like me take notice. The belt loops (6) are wide enough and sturdy. The fabric is heavier and good in breezy, cool weather. These are equally good for ice climbing or summer bouldering up high. The leg cuffs are very nicely finished and adjust perfectly for boots. As to water repellancy, DWR is a joke so keep spraying them down with the renewer stuff if you care. Bottom line: these are great pants and Patagonia could care less aout your experence with them.

(0)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on March 21, 2012

5 5

It seems from the questions here that there is a lot of interest in how these things fit and specifically, differences between the Microlith and the Overhang. I have both and I would say the Microlith fits one size smaller than the Overhang. I have a Med Overhang and a large Micro. Both have a close athletic fit - very nice. I am 5'11 180 with a 31" waist (musclehead...V-shape). The Micro's pull-on and have a belt: very simple and the fabric is great. The Micro is a lightweight/hot weather item whereas the Overhang is a medium weight - good for blustery days. The Overhang belt loops are excellent. The Micro's are great for running in addition to whatever else. Both are unlined. Hope this helps.

(1)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on March 19, 2012

5 5

Got from S & C thinking SHALE would be basically black. Wrong. Very wrong. Awesome fit, feel, fabric, cut, weight and it would be tolerable if I was blind... That photo of the shirt in "SHALE" does not look purple but it absolutely IS; just like it was died with red wine. My five stars is for all things apart from the purple. If BC will ever make this thing in a sane color I will buy another one give this to a homeless vet in Fairbanks who will likely give it to someone else. As is, I wear it as a base layer but the thing is so warm that you have to take off a layer and there's the purple again... Are you reading this BC? Can we do this in a nice black or desert tan?

(0)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote an answer about on February 5, 2012

The metal band makes no sense to me either. I never removed it from my Grivels but I considered doing so. I don't get what that thing is accomplishing. (If the toe bail detached from the crampon it would probably be broken so you would have bigger problems than losing it.)I now use the Newmatic style. Anyway I could see getting it off of there with a Dremel tool or a file very carefully.

(0)

 

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a review of on January 28, 2012

3 5

The Horn's stated purpose is supporting the hand and this really applies to leashless climbing. However, the Horn covers up the spike hole needed to attach Grivel's Spring leash so, you are leashless indeed. Also, the Horn's attachment bolts have nuts that seat in recessed sockets thus holding the nut still as the bolt is tightened. Said plastic socket is not molded to a close enough tolerance to prevent the nut from turning inside the hole. Poor design. You might be able to epoxy the nut in place. The Horn is secure and comfortable; supports body weight on one tool but I question the durability especially in real cold day after day. I used these on the Matrix light but for steep ice, recommend using a different tool altogether with an integrated support.

(0)

 

0 Comments

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a question about on December 26, 2011

Has anyone out there tried the Android leash on a Petzl Quark tool using the factory drilled hole in the Quark? (That is, NOT using the hose clamp but attaching the leash directly to the shaft with a bolt just like on the Cobra tool.) I have not yet fully joined the leashless movement and I love the Quarks... Obviating the hose clamp would be a nice touch.

(0)

 

gjw0232922050

gjw0232922050 wrote a question about on November 13, 2011

Just got a pair and I am loving the comfort however...Can anyone speak to the durability of that integrated gaiter? Never having used this style of boot before, I am immediately thinking that this gaiter will not withstand 3 or 4 good talus/scree "descents" i.e., curse, stumble and triple-jump through sharp rocks. The "bottom line" here on the site says "from ice to rock and back to ice" but I am thinking it may be "back in the box and back to the company."

(0)

 

load more