Joe

Joe

Joe's Passions

Hiking & Camping
Biking
Climbing

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on July 26, 2014

2 5

Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

The idea driving this design is good: knickers on the light side for truly hot weather. They look sharp and the fabric IS light but totally lacks compression. Mavic's sizing has some real flaws too. At 185 with with 31" waist I'm usually a LG or XL but these had sloppy loose areas even in a medium. That seems to be a fault in the fabric and also the cut which strikes me as imprecise. (I can't imagine any size of these things fitting a 150 lb rider.) Returned. If Mavic does a revised version I'd give those a shot.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on May 15, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

6' 186 lbs size 3X in Castelli. (Years of the iron.) I was pleasantly surprised to find the cut of this thing is athletic just like their other jerseys - accommodates my shoulders without being baggy on a 31" waist. The pockets are perfectly designed - just right for a larger hand and slightly constricted at the top with elastic. The partial zip simplifies things and the wool quality is good but not great - about like thicker Smart Wool stuff. (ArcTeryx being the cashmere standard.) I am also pleased to report you can dry this thing with your jeans until it's toasty; just a touch of shrinkage the first time and none thereafter. Perfect for cool days and at 70 degrees in the sun it's not oppressive. Excellent.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on May 11, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

The only drawback of this stuff is that it can be TOO hot for shorter rides or less-than-brutal cold. I am a big fan of hot lineaments for cold riding and wet spring races and this is no-kidding... If you really lay it on thick, it will last several hours and causes an intense heat. Remember, handle the chamois cream first THEN the lineament. Knee warmers under your longs will prevent dragging that chamois through napalm in route to the grundle. (If you do it wrong you'll know.) It's possible to tone down the heat by cutting this stuff with baby oil. It definitely increases blood flow to the area; great for older cats like me with creaky knees. Enjoy.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on May 1, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

I have a couple different brands but these Garneau shorts are probably my favorite; great value for the $$. I prefer a very compressive fit as opposed to the "naked" sensation of light fabric. These are compressive with reassuringly thick material and they're are holding up very well. The pad is well-proportioned and thick. Recommended. The only drawback I see are the ghastly colors apart from the black & gray. If Garneau would make a skinsuit with the same material and fit, that would work for sure. The Garneau "Equipe" and "Mondo" stuff is sized smaller than the rest of the line.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on October 16, 2013

5 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times
Fit: Runs large

If the goal is to ride in WET: winter wind and drizzle, these are the thing I'd say. For dry cold and temps below freezing I'd do something else. This is basically a half-millimeter wet-suit carefully tailored into cycling bibs. So, they have a very compressive fit and good wind resistance. (Wear them tight as with a wet-suit. I'm 5, 11.5; 182 lb and a MED is perfect.) You'll be wet but less miserable for the same reason a wet-suit works in cold water. This 2013 model of Amfib improves over the older one due to the stirrup and integrated gasket: Stirrup goes inside your shoe and the gasket goes OVER your shoe cover like a gaiter thus directing the water outside your shoe. The back is a cool spot as another reviewer indicated; noticeable in a deluge but NBD to me personally. Pearl runs larger than the euro stuff. I was surprised to take a MED as I have other Pearl bib shorts in a large.

(1)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on August 8, 2012

2 5

Returned unused. For the retail price, this thing seems cheaply made. The fabric is extremely thin and poorly finished. Construction seems delicate to say the least. Worst of all there is no compressive fit because the fabric is so light. The legs grippers are almost non-existent - definitely the poorest ones I've seen. Looking to a different maker.

(1)

 

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on August 6, 2012

5 5

As a former competitive rider just getting back into it for fun, I am as happy as you could hope to be with rollers. I used the large diameter Kreitlers in the 80's and I recall needing the wind-load simulator fan in order to really work. NOT SO with these. The rollers alone provide an ample workout for me. I estimate these provide 75% of the normal resistance you experience outside for a given gear on a flat road with no wind. It would be interesting to know if Kreitler has a more accurate equivilency.

(1)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on July 13, 2012

5 5

I use these for everything and I have found no down side. As a flyer I have marathon (35+ hr) days getting drenched in sweat and then drying out repeatedly - in a disgusting nomex flight suit. These boxers have dramatically increased quality of life as they dry fast and do not smell. Even at $40 a pair I bought 6 and use them constantly. Stoic's best accomplishment so far.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on June 24, 2012

5 5

I now have three pair because I seem to wear them all the time. The 2011 model improved greatly over the prior year because they added another leg pocket and, they no-kidding sewed the pockets instead of just gluing them on. Yes, "Welded construction" = nothing more sophisticated than glue which comes apart with use. Period. I wrote the company a scathing letter after having a pair put back together by a tailor. I got zilch from Patagonia - no offer to replace and not even a pencil-whipped apology but they changed the pants. The fit is euro-slender. I am 5,11" 180 with a 31" waist and I wear a 34" in these. Muscle types like me take notice. The belt loops (6) are wide enough and sturdy. The fabric is heavier and good in breezy, cool weather. These are equally good for ice climbing or summer bouldering up high. The leg cuffs are very nicely finished and adjust perfectly for boots. As to water repellancy, DWR is a joke so keep spraying them down with the renewer stuff if you care. Bottom line: these are great pants and Patagonia could care less aout your experence with them.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on March 21, 2012

5 5

It seems from the questions here that there is a lot of interest in how these things fit and specifically, differences between the Microlith and the Overhang. I have both and I would say the Microlith fits one size smaller than the Overhang. I have a Med Overhang and a large Micro. Both have a close athletic fit - very nice. I am 5'11 180 with a 31" waist (musclehead...V-shape). The Micro's pull-on and have a belt: very simple and the fabric is great. The Micro is a lightweight/hot weather item whereas the Overhang is a medium weight - good for blustery days. The Overhang belt loops are excellent. The Micro's are great for running in addition to whatever else. Both are unlined. Hope this helps.

(1)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on March 19, 2012

5 5

Got from S & C thinking SHALE would be basically black. Wrong. Very wrong. Awesome fit, feel, fabric, cut, weight and it would be tolerable if I was blind... That photo of the shirt in "SHALE" does not look purple but it absolutely IS; just like it was died with red wine. My five stars is for all things apart from the purple. If BC will ever make this thing in a sane color I will buy another one give this to a homeless vet in Fairbanks who will likely give it to someone else. As is, I wear it as a base layer but the thing is so warm that you have to take off a layer and there's the purple again... Are you reading this BC? Can we do this in a nice black or desert tan?

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a review of on January 28, 2012

3 5

The Horn's stated purpose is supporting the hand and this really applies to leashless climbing. However, the Horn covers up the spike hole needed to attach Grivel's Spring leash so, you are leashless indeed. Also, the Horn's attachment bolts have nuts that seat in recessed sockets thus holding the nut still as the bolt is tightened. Said plastic socket is not molded to a close enough tolerance to prevent the nut from turning inside the hole. Poor design. You might be able to epoxy the nut in place. The Horn is secure and comfortable; supports body weight on one tool but I question the durability especially in real cold day after day. I used these on the Matrix light but for steep ice, recommend using a different tool altogether with an integrated support.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Joe

Joe wrote a question about on December 26, 2011

Has anyone out there tried the Android leash on a Petzl Quark tool using the factory drilled hole in the Quark? (That is, NOT using the hose clamp but attaching the leash directly to the shaft with a bolt just like on the Cobra tool.) I have not yet fully joined the leashless movement and I love the Quarks... Obviating the hose clamp would be a nice touch.

(0)

 

Joe

Joe wrote a question about on November 13, 2011

Just got a pair and I am loving the comfort however...Can anyone speak to the durability of that integrated gaiter? Never having used this style of boot before, I am immediately thinking that this gaiter will not withstand 3 or 4 good talus/scree "descents" i.e., curse, stumble and triple-jump through sharp rocks. The "bottom line" here on the site says "from ice to rock and back to ice" but I am thinking it may be "back in the box and back to the company."

(0)