Free 2-Day Shipping on Orders Over $50* - Limited Time Only
debidoson646529

debidoson646529

Wasatch Mountains

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on February 22, 2015

5 5

Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Even better after krypton shell redesign a couple years ago. With proper liner cooking and fitting, this boot becomes a velvet vice. It does require a foot and appetite for narrowness. People love to say how stiff it is, but I dialed it back to my taste with the softer tongue and lower flex control, and it's perfect. Couldn't be happier.

(0)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a question about on January 16, 2015

Maestrale RS or Freedom SL?

For my foot shape, Scarpas fit best. Plan to use with BD converts and Kingpins. I put equal importance on weight up and performance down. Initially favored Maestrale, but wondering if it's enough for my size, 6'3", 190#. Lifetime downhill skier, usually take it a little easier when touring. Thanks, Chris

(0)

 

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a question about on December 10, 2014

Good shorter?

Looking to get another touring kit, for old snow day trips, and dawn patrol resort cardio laps before work. My other skis are long and fat, but thinking of getting these in 177. I'm 6'3", 185#. Too short?

Some folks seem to like these shorter, and the tail is pretty flat, and K2 does tend to run a bit longer than the stated size. Or maybe Wayback 88 in 181? Thanks, Chris.

(0)

 

0 Answers

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on December 4, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times
Fit: True to size

Perfect shape for taller guys without having to size up. I'm 6'3" 190#, size L has plenty of sleeve and body length.

Almost exactly same garment dimensions as Arcteryx Alpha SV in L, except this has longer sleeves and body. Construction is top notch. Arm movement, cuffs, hood, zippers, general fit, all superb. The chin placket is unique and a nice touch. Really cool brand, new to me, glad BC.com is carrying it.

(0)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on March 24, 2014

5 5

Managing skins on the trail is totally painless with these. See video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVGeME_aZC8
It doesn't bother me to pay for a simple idea. The fabric and the function of this little gadget are totally worth it.

(0)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on March 11, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Have had many days on this now. 190 cm, mounted -2.5 cm from true center, 190#, 6'3", lifetime West skier.

Incredibly fun ski: light, great balance with more centered mount, plenty of energy at speed, super stable in chop, turns when you want, floats and smears nice, and even carves fine. Yup, it's a quiver.

Unlike comments below, I don't find the 190 to be unwieldy, in fact I think it's perfect match for my size and style of skiing. I'm not "charging in AK" but I like to go everywhere, like to play, and like to go fast. The progressive flex is genius and gives it huge versatility. Except for the deepest days, which are rare, this ski pretty much does it all for me.

(1)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on January 9, 2014

5 5

Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
Fit: True to size

Got this as a mid-layer for skiing. 6'3", 185#, large is a perfect fit. Pulls on easily over a medium base layer, and is very comfortable with great mobility. Not a heavy duty mid-layer and maybe a bit pricey, but nice wool materials, and just right for my needs.

(1)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on January 9, 2014

3 5

Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

I'm fairly thin (6'3", 185#) so thought it would be OK despite other reviewers' comments of the sleeves being small. Large was OK fit for torso although a bit baggy at shoulders and upper arms, and nice long sleeves. But the tight elbows/forearms were a deal-breaker. I wanted it for a mid-layer for skiing, which by definition means wearing over a base layer. It's uncomfortable and too much work to pull the sleeves on over a medium base layer. The materials are very nice, though, so 3 stars for that.

I might have also tried the Marmot Variant, but maybe it has the same sleeve design. I ended up with the SmartWool PhD Divide, which is a similar hybrid jacket, maybe not quite as warm, but easy to wear and very comfortable with great mobility.

(1)

 

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on January 9, 2014

5 5

For the 190s, here's what I learned: The ERIC line is generally regarded as the optimal place to mount boot center. Apparently some batches of the ski have a topsheet error, including mine. The Line/K2 spec sheet gives a single mounting site for this line at 933 mm from the tail, as measured along the base underside. Because of the topsheet error, Line also put out a tech note confirming where the line should be, although for that tech note they said 919 mm straight pull of tape from the tail instead of along the base. Either number should put you in the sweet spot.

(2)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on December 6, 2011

5 5

An Arc tech shell in tall? Yahoo! Fits just like my old Alpha, except now my gorilla arms and belly button stay covered. Don't know where BC.com got these, but I'm pretty sure Arc doesn't make talls for the regular US retail market. Plus it's fabrique au Canada. What's not to like? (except that I'm out another 6 bills). If you're a bean pole like me, get yours while you can. You might not see these again.

(1)

 

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on January 31, 2011

4 5

This model is actually NOT the I.D. version. This one comes with the stock Dalbello liner, as shown in the photo. Still a fine boot, but only 4 stars without the Intuition liner. I have last year's which was the real I.D. model and did come with the Intuition liner. Some people prefer the Pro to the Il Moro boots because of the upper buckle, but I really like it. Good idea to have a couple spare ladders (the belt-like plastic tongue that inserts into the ratchet buckle) because they can break--I broke one after about forty days.

(0)

 

0 Comments

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on December 7, 2010

4 5

I have tried a few Norrona technical shells (thanks to BC for outstanding return policy). Great quality stuff, but sizing is tricky. The chart for Norrona is generic and I think refers to body size. Actual garment dimensions vary quite a bit, presumably based on design/usage considerations. I am 6' 4", 195#. I compared the actual garments to see how they differed.

Lofoten is probably the best fit for me for skiing, with longer arms and body, and athletic fit; I liked how the XL fit, if they had any good colors left; L is a little too trim for insulation.

Falketind is the trimmest model I tried, very slim, and shorter in body. Falketind XL is quite a bit smaller than the Lofoten XL in body width and length, and also shorter sleeve length.

My favorite in terms of quality build is the Trollveggen (pro shell version). Best fabric, great zippers, designed for mountaineering. It's a technical fit, but Trollveggen L is wider than Lofoten L, almost exactly the same as Lofoten XL. The Trollveggen L is a good fit for me in the body, but I wouldn't mind the sleeves a touch longer. The front on the Trollveggen is short, designed for harness access, which may not be ideal for skiing. There is a long drop back hem.

I didn't compare to the soft shells or insulated models. I do own the Svalbard soft shell in XL, which is one of my all time favorite jackets for less intense ventures.

What would be great would be a Norrona garment measurement chart by model and size. I had one once from Arcteryx years ago, and it was interesting how different the specs were between models.

(1)

 

0 Answers

debidoson646529

debidoson646529wrote a review of on March 2, 2010

5 5

Best fit I've ever had. Between the intition liner and the 3-piece design, comfort and performance finally come together. Still good to size down. I am 10.5-11 street shoe, skinny foot, 27.5 is perfect. Easy to customize, plenty stiff with optional tongue that came in box. This is my first Dalbello, won't be my last.

(0)

 

0 Comments