Free Shipping on Orders Over $50 - Some Exclusions Apply*
  • 1-800-409-4502

  • Live Chat with a Gearhead

  • 100% Guaranteed Returns

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd

Utah, Northern Arizona!

Stephen's Passions

Camping
Snowboarding
Trail Running

Stephen's Bio

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on March 22, 2013

1 5

It's small, light, easy to pack and feels like a pool toy.
I've been looking for a perfect summer sleeping mat, and so far this is the worst I've tried. The welded through baffles and the general stretch of the thin materials make it impossible to get the mat comfortable. Either you can inflate it 100%, and sleep uncomfortably on a hard mat - or you can fill it up 70-90% which leaves your hips on the ground and the skinny baffles poking your side/belly/back.

Notice compared to the Synmat UL 7, this only has 6 baffles (compared to 8) which are welded completely through. Which means basically, don't get this pad unless you're planning on sleeping on your back and not moving. Otherwise your hips and shoulders will hit the ground. I am 5'11" 170 pounds.

Just carry the extra 6 ounces and get the synmat UL 7, which is heads and shoulders above this piece of garbage.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on April 13, 2010

5 5

Good streamlined day pack. Could be used overnight in summer with the right gear(See my upload). Bladder system is amazing, slides in easy even when full. Bite valve seems pretty loose and I think it will leak, hopefully not bad. Light pack with a bunch of pockets on the outside and even an integrated rain cover that comes out of the bottom. Pretty expensive but considering it has a top notch hydration system and rain cover, I don't mind paying that much for osprey. Very happy with the purchase, I have no doubts that the manta will be my go to day pack.

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on December 15, 2009

5 5

Not sure about the 3 star review, this is a great pack. Built with Osprey quality, numerous pockets and dividers in those pockets. Very waterproof, back panel seems to conform to my back while wearing gear, making it unbelievably comfortable. Looks cool, zipper on the right strap for hydration packs works great. Other reviewer said "The hip belt pockets are small, and don't have great ergonomics." Completely disagree, pockets are obviously going to be small to avoid looking dumb, I mean they're hip belt pockets... I can still fit a digital camera+ in them, so I would actually say they are big considering what they are. Ergonomics are GREAT on the hip belt, just like all the other new osprey packs.

Complaints: Back panel zipper would be nice, but only the 30+ have that. Same with the stretchy helmet holder. Straps for holding a board/skis get in the way of the zippers and have to be worked around to get the zipper down, pretty annoying. Overall I would say I wasn't THRILLED with the pack, but very happy I bought it, my #1 snow pack now.

(2)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on October 21, 2009

5 5

Man I love this thing. Light, cheap, fits together like a dream, a lot of good usage. I dig how the carrying bag can double as a sort of wash bag or whatever. Super durable and just a top notch cooking set. Spork seems like it will break within the next few uses, but whatever, no biggie. Only complaint I have is my stove is supposed to fit inside, well it's not happening. I have the pocket rocket, and the set easily has enough room for a fuel canister and a shorter stove when put together, but the MSR pocket rocket is just to long to fit inside the bowl. I've tried multiple different ways to get that thing to fit inside, but it just won't happen. Certainly an annoying downside to the set considering I have a lot of room left for storage then the set is integrated, but I still have to find a case for my stove. Perfect set if pocket rockets could better fit inside, but close to perfect nonetheless.

(1)

 

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on October 21, 2009

3 5

Ok jacket but really not worth the price IMO. Waterproofing is adequate, very light jacket that is warm with the right layers. Burton AK clothing seems to be going downhill as of late, with the price doing the opposite. Had an AK jacket just about every year for the past 5-6 seasons, 2 of them had stitching problems(including last years cyclic), and after trying arc'teryx and oakley jackets I can say with confidence this will be the last AK I every buy. The Velcro cuffs Burton AK jackets have at the moments are garbage, don't count on the velcro sticking after 2+ days on the mountain. I would give this jacket 4-4.5 stars if it was priced around $200, but $300+ is a joke. MUCH better jackets out there.

(0)

 

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on October 13, 2009

5 5

Holy balls this thing is baggy. I usually wear a Medium in burton AK clothing at 5'11" 165 pounds, I ordered a small and it still might be to big for my taste. The arm and torso length are surprisingly good at my size with the small. **Just a notice to anyone buying this, Mystic small = Burton AK Medium, roughly.** Amazing jacket I must say though. I think the material is a little thick for me, but I'm just complaining, it's really no big deal. Magnets are a great idea in my opinion, especially the magnet holding down the hood. I have yet to use the jacket for snowboarding, but I have absolutely no doubts that it would be the perfect terrible(Or good...?) weather jacket. If you can find this thing on steepandcheap like I did, you better buy it, at $150 this is about the best deal you can come across.

(0)

 

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote an answer about on October 13, 2009

The small would be pretty baggy on you, if you wanted a super baggy fit go with the medium. I think the large just might look ridiculous, very close to your knees would be my guess. Backcountry has amazing customer service, if I was you I would order the medium, then go from there if it's not the desired fit.

(0)

 

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote a review of on October 11, 2009

1 5

Osprey packs are amazing but this pack is a POS. The model isn't bad, the new atmos packs are very good, but this years model is a bust. Large aluminum frame(I'm 6ft tall) dug into my shoulder blades regardless of the adjustment, some crazy uncomfortable straps that also dug into me neck. I've had 5 different osprey packs and I would give them all 10/10, this one deserves about a 3/10. Really no idea how this got through ospreys design team because it's just awful. Go out and buy the osprey talon instead, best...pack...ever.EDIT: I forgot, the back mesh panel basically traps all the heat inside like a small greenhouse because when the backpack is against your back, there is not a single place for the warm air to escape unlike the newer models. Ya, I'm not exaggerating on that. I am convinced that anyone who thinks this is a good pack has never tried on anything better than a school backpack. Oh, and good luck fitting 2300 CU IN in this thing...even if you somehow did, with the lightest equipment you could find, it would still be to much weight for the straps and frame.

(1)

 

0 Comments

Stephen Judd

Stephen Judd wrote an answer about on August 12, 2009

I would like to add that it's not completely waterproof even below the draw string hole. About half my pack was submerged for no more than 3 minutes and there was a tiny bit of water in the bottom of my pack after that, not even enough to dump out. So it's fairly close, under rain I have no doubts everything in the pack would stay completely dry.

(1)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

load more