Snowliker

Snowliker

    New Feature

    Browse Your Followers or See Who You're Following

  • No Ranking

Andrew's Passions

Camping

Andrew's Bio

Snowliker

Snowliker wrote a review of on June 29, 2010

5 5

I looked at about 45 different packs before picking this one. I like the weight and capacity. My only complaint is that the lid pocket is very small. Maybe the next version of this pack could have (a) double or triple the size of that pocket, and (b) increase the capacity of the pack by 2 liters. Then it'd be just about perfect for what I use it for - strenuous day hikes, scrambles, and snowshoes. Definitely keep the side pockets; that is one reason I bought the pack. Each pocket can hold a Platypus watter bottle fine. This means that you don't need the inside sleeve for hydration, and could lose the sleeve and save a bit of weight. On the other hand, the sleeve helps a bit for internal organization, so having it is not all bad (but I'd still prefer not to have it). This pack was the closest thing I could find to exactly what I wanted, when I looked in the winter of 2009-2010. It's very comfortable. Be aware that it doesn't have load lifters. Note the weight - just over 2 pounds; very light for its class.

(3)

 

Snowliker

Snowliker wrote a question about on November 1, 2008

Backpacker Tracker, I'd like to understand more about your exerience with this pad. (Incidentally the specs list this pad as being 2.5" thick, not 2" as you wrote in your article.) With the pad's humongous R-value I cannot understand why you would be so cold with this pad. I would also like to hear specifically why you think the Big Agnes pad was better for you. FYI: there is another version of this pad. It is touted as being eco-friendly and the insulation is made out of bamboo instead of synthetic material. Unfortunately it costs roughly twice as much as this pad. Dunno if the bamboo is more or less comfortable than the synthetic insulation.

(0)