Phil M wrote an answer about POC Receptor Bug Adjustable Helmet on August 14, 2014
Browse Your Followers or See Who You're Following
Graphic Designer, photographer and adventurer. On most days you'll find me either on skis, a mountain or road bike or on my two feet walking down a trail. I love the outdoors, adventure and the gear that goes along with it.
Connect with me on instagram! @pmollenkof
Is the only difference between this and the normal Receptor Bug the fact that it can be adjusted?
Awesome. Thanks so much RJ. This is really helpful.
Checking out this ski for next season. I'm 5'8", 160lbs. East coast but plan on pulling this guy out mostly on pow days here and my trips out west. Any recommendations on size? I would lean towards 176, but not sure if these ski short or not.
Hey there, I haven't, but I'm pretty sure I'm going to mount these up with an A/T setup this coming winter. They are just so lightweight that they'd be a breeze on the uphills.
Update from my original review:
This past weekend I was about to jump off a high rock into a swimming hole. I took these babies off and set them on the ground next to me. Unfortunately I didn't secure them very well and next thing I saw was the glasses cascading down the rocks into the pool of water, and sinking to the bottom. After about 20 minutes of trying to search the bottom I gave up.
I just bought my second pair because even at this price, they are totally worth it and I can't seem to live without them in the summer.
I love this fork. I mounted it on a Yeti sb95 carbon and kept it at the 140mm setting even though Yeti specs this same fork but at a 120mm on the stock sb95. I haven't noticed any penalty so far in terms of climbing or bob, and the fork makes descents just insanely fun. Whether bombing through a rock garden, or taking a few feet drop, it feels incredible smooth and stable.
In my opinion, the CTD function is just enough to be able to control the fork depending on what terrain you're riding, but not so many controls that you'd rather just ride and not change anything. I usually hover between trail and descend, unless I'm on a long fire road climb, where I'll set it on climb.
I set these up on my Yeti sb95 carbon, and so far have been loving them. For a non carbon wheel, they are pretty lightweight, and have kept my bike weight down to 26lbs, which is pretty awesome for a trail bike 29'er.
These wheels are super easy to mount a tubeless tire on, and also switch between axle sizes really easily by just popping out one part of the hub with your hand (no tools) and adding one of the other sizes that are included with the set.
I'm seriously in love with this bike. I came from riding a Niner RIP 9, so I had pretty high standards, but this bike just blows everything out of the water I've ever ridden. It's incredibly responsive and stiff- it just goes the second you push the pedals down, and you feel like everything you put into it while climbing gets transferred so well. It seriously flies up hills.
The slightly slacker head angle is something I wasn't sure how I'd like, but it makes for super fun descents. I feel very confident tackling all sorts of terrain on this thing. I'm running a 140mm fork, which I think just makes the bike all the more fun.
For me (I'm 5'8"), the shorter top tube and chain stays make the bike super playful, but the slacker head angle also gives the bike a ton of stability and confidence when going down. I'm riding a size medium, and it fits me so much better than the Niner Rip 9 medium, which just always felt a tad too large.
Can't say enough good things about this bike. I wish I could ride it every day for years on end. Way to go, Yeti!
Agreed, I'd go with 172 all the way. I'm 5'8" and I ski a 180 in this and it feels great.
This jacket always makes it on a trip with me where I'm going to be doing anything high intensity, winter, fall or spring. It's pretty thin, which I like because it gives me a lot of options for layering. It also breathes incredibly. I've never felt manky or sticky while running or climbing up steep terrain while I have this jacket on. It also blocks the wind beautifully which is so key in the mountains. Finally, it stretches so well that you barely feel like you're wearing anything.
Hugely recommended because of the great fit, breathability and thickness.
I've experimented with a number of ways to carry my DSLR into the backcountry, and I've found this is one of the best solutions for having my camera and an extra lens available at short notice. It fits well over my shoulders and actually doesn't feel too bulky when it's on.
I will say that there are a few times it does seem to get in the way- when you have a super heavy backpack on and are naturally leaning forward a bit to compensate, or when you are doing something pretty physically demanding such as steep climbing, etc.
Overall though, one of the best ways to carry your camera long distances while having it close by.
I love this boot. First of all, my foot just seems to fit into a Lange very well. I'm right in between a 25.5 and 26.5, and I can do a Lange 25.5 where I feel like my toes aren't hurting in the front.
I've found that the boot stiffens up pretty well in the cold, and that it's not too heavy for a resort boot. I've skinned as well as hiked around rocks on these and love the rubber sole as it's kept my traction well.
When my family of four goes on a ski trip, we have a lots of gear and lots of junk. This bag, however, can carry an enormous amount of ski clothing, gear, and of course, skis. This last trip I was able to fit two adult pair of skis, one kid pair, one kid pair of boots, skins, and almost all our ski clothing. I could have fit our boots in there as well, but I'm pretty sure it would have put us over the airlines weight limit.
This bag is big. But the wheels are very sturdy and function well as you navigate through the airport. Zippers are bomber, and everything seems to be made very well.
If it helps as well, I'm 5'8" and I ski the 180 with absolutely no problem. These things turn on a dime and are super lightweight. If I were in your shoes I would go for the 188.
Hey Mihow, yes, I would try this ski, based on what you are describing. It actually does really well on powder as I just got done skiing days of calf deep pow in Jackson hole, and it was a blast.
these may fit the bill for you. They are super fun, easy to maneuver and wide enough for powder, but also can hold their own on groomers. I would shoot for either the 170 (easier to maneuver) or the 180 (more stable at high speeds).
What can I say, except this is a classic Arcteryx piece of gear. Durable, super well thought out, technical superior, and bomber to have with you in the snow and cold. Keep in mind that these are on the baggy side compared to their other pants. I like this since it makes them super comfortable and keeps options open for layering, but if I was doing something super technical like ski mountaineering I would maybe want something a tad more slim fitting.
If you want a hard working pair of pants that are super comfortable, look great and have amazing craftsmanship, look at these.
I just got back from a week of skiing this at Jackson Hole/Grand Targhee and wanted to slightly revise my review from before. I still love this ski- on the soft powder days it was super playful, easy to turn and very fun. I had a blast. However, we did have a day or two with slight warmer temps, which made the snow heavier and turned the tracked out sections more into crud. Going through that snow at any speed, the Souls felt unstable and easily knocked around. I think it's mostly because of their light weight (which makes them fun in softer stuff), but I think it's just helpful to know that if you're looking for a hard charger that can handle crud and variable conditions at high speeds with ease, you may want to look elsewhere.