Chris Green

Chris Green

New Hartford, NY / Lake Placid, NY

    New Feature

    Browse Your Followers or See Who You're Following

  • #1417of 20321

Christopher's Passions

Camping
Backpacking
Hiking
Snowshoeing
Ice Climbing
Mountaineering

Christopher's Bio

0 Comments

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a review of on January 14, 2014

4 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times
Fit: True to size

I've been using the men's medium since the end of November 2013. I purchased the cinder and white color. I'm 5'10 168 pounds. Medium fits great.

I've used these winter mountain hiking and ice climbing. Great fit, all pockets accessible with a harness. The pants stretch when hiking/climbing and appear very well made.

Only complaint - The integrated belt sucks. When wearing a pack or harness, the belt loosens prematurely and the pants tend to sag. It's a cheap belt/buckle and from the pressure of the hip belt, it loosens.
I wish I could replace the belt with a sturdier one, but the integrated belt feeds through the waist line with no openings, so it would be very hard to feed a new belt through. I wish BD gave us the option of suspenders.

The rear portion of the waist is cut higher to accommodate a harness. I think that's a huge plus and I would never buy another pair of pants without a higher waist.

No integrated gaiters, but I don't miss them. I wish there were metallic grommets at the end of the cuff to really cinch them down, but it's not a deal breaker. There are sewn-in loops inside the pants to remedy this issue.

I would definitely recommend these pants. Shoeller material is bomber. I love it!

(1)

 

0 Comments

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote an answer about on November 12, 2013

Did you mind not having hand pockets? I understand why Patagonia chose to eliminate them - to conserve weight & keep a clean, streamline approach, but I'm a big fan of pockets & using my body heat to take away the cold sting (barfies!)

Also, how is the fit in the lower leg area? I hate when manufacturers attempt to make pants fit mountaineering/ski boots at the same time. All that does for us climbers in leave crampon slashes in expensive fabric! What size do you wear?

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on November 8, 2013

I've been eyeing these pants since September when they were released. I have high expectations for the Power Shield Pro. Has anyone out there used these pants yet? Thoughts?? I'm thinking either these, which I have yet to try on, or the new Black Diamond Dawn Approach pants, which I have tried on and which fit pretty damn good ... :-)

(1)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on July 9, 2013

Can anyone explain what the main difference, beside price, between the Aspect and the Xenon? They both appear to be "all-season" harnesses that specialize in ice / alpine. I'm just not seeing what differentiates the $50 difference at full retail. Thanks!

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a review of on January 13, 2013

2 5

Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Be careful of the integrated belt. The belt is an awesome idea, but on my second trip wearing these pants, I went to re-tighten the belt and the internal stitching snapped, rendering me wearing my pants like I was on the block. Not cool.

The fit on these pants is awesome (when the damn belt works!) I'm 5'10" and 168 pounds. Wish they had hand pockets for when your not wearing a harness and gloves just don't take away the sting! Be careful when wearing!

(1)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote an answer about on November 4, 2012

Its waterproof rating is dependent on its use. This jacket is considered a soft-shell jacket, not a hard-shell. For 100% waterproofing, you want a fully seam-taped Gore-Tex, eVent or Neoshell hard-shell jacket.

This WindStopper soft-shell will stop 95% of the moisture from October through April . The WindStopper membrane will block all but a downpour. This material is made to be more breathable than waterproof. This is more of a 3 season piece than a 4 season jacket. Hope this helps. :)

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote an answer about on May 27, 2011

That's funny that you answered my question today. I was fortunate to be able to try on the M11+'s today and walk around the store. I told the clerk that I was on the fence between the M11+ and the Hyper Tractions, but he couldn't comment on the Hyper Tractions because they don't carry them. I was very impressed by the feel and comfort of the M11+'s and am still not sure which ones to purchase. The only issue I am worried about is warmth. My feet have never been cold in the winter, but some of the conditions in the High Peaks can be brutal, and I think I want the extra warmth the Hyper Tractions offer. I guess I will have to order the Hyper's and decide that way. Thanks for giving me a hand!!

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on May 17, 2011

Does anyone recommend buying a bigger insole because of proper fit? I wear a size 11.5 boot and purchased a pair of green's that fit the boots pretty well with minimal cutting of the insole to make it fit.

After about a week and 10 - 12 miles on them, I am still feeling as if the arch support is still too far back, resulting in painful heels / arches / feet. I love the insoles otherwise, but I just wish the arch support was located more forward than back. Someone stated they have a size 11 foot, but purchased size 13 insoles for better arch fit. Any suggestions?

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on April 15, 2011

I'm going back and forth between the Hyper Tractions and the M11+'s. I called and talked to a Kayland rep and she advised me that the Hyper Tractions are warmer than the M11+'s, but they have the same rigidity. I guess my question is - How are the Hyper Tractions to walk / hike in? Are they capable of being a winter mountain hiking boot that can handle miles of approach with snowshoes? Are they built with the "rocker" effect like the M11+'s are?

I'm basically looking for a step-in capable, eVent lined and PrimaLoft insulated mountaineering boot that will be reasonably comfortable to handle miles of approach. Then once it gets nasty, have a solid boot that handles crampons and is warm enough for the dead of winter summits (Adirondacks). Also, how is the fit? I have an average foot, but a bit wider toe area. Anyone who has the Hyper Tractions...any issues with the toe box? Thanks a lot!

(1)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on April 10, 2011

I am contemplating the M11+ boots for winter mountain hiking in the Adirondack High Peaks. Basically I'm looking for a boot that is insulated, crampon step-in compatible, has an eVent membrane and can be used with snowshoes. I like the reviews of the M11+ from the people who wear them in the White Mountains mainly because the Adirondack High Peaks share some of the same brutal weather and topography. My only question is obviously fit. The closest Kayland dealer is about 4 hours from me, so it's hard to try them on. Do the M11+'s fit tight in the toe box? I have a slightly wider forefoot and have had issues in the past with boots being too constrictive in that area. Also, can the M11+'s be used on snow-covered trails / scramble when snowshoes or crampons aren't warranted? Thanks a lot!

(0)

 

Chris Green

Chris Green wrote a question about on March 27, 2011

How is the room in the toe box? Recently, I have noticed that many hiking boot companies construct their boots with a narrow toe box. I have never bought a wide sized boot until this past summer, but find that I need the extra room only in the toe box. I purchased a pair of Lowa's in a wide size and find that is much better than the "regular" size companies have been putting out. I'm looking to try eVent footwear vice Gore-Tex this year mainly due to breathability and moisture control. Anyone have issues with the fit/toe box area with the Contact Rev's? Thanks!

(0)

 

load more