Risk-Free Shopping—Free 2-Day Shipping on Orders Over $50* Risk-Free Shopping—Free Returns on Orders Over $50* Risk-Free Shopping—Price Match Guarantee
BzBrian

BzBrian

Cascades,Yosemite, Shawangunks, Adirondacks

BzBrian's Passions

Climbing
Hiking & Camping

BzBrian's Bio

The sound of hammering pitons..

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 22, 2016

3 5

Familiarity: I've used it several times
Height: 6' 2"
Weight: 180 lbs
Size Purchased: Medium

I was super stoked to get the M10. I've always heard super rad things about it, boasting its place as among the lightest 3-layer hardshells on the market. However, the fit really bothers me. Torso is too short, and hood is too small.

I'm 6'2, 180 lbs. I've always been a medium in Patagonia. The chest and arms fit great, it allows me to layer a R1 hoody underneath and if necessary an UL down jacket. However, the torso is too short. I don't have an especially long torso or anything, but my other Patagonia pieces in size medium are longer than this M10. Seriously. When I layer the Patagonia UL down jacket underneath it sticks out on the bottom, or worse, the M10 rides up. It's weird. When I have a harness on, it rides up and out of the harness and has a hard time staying tucked in.

Next, the hood is too small. The description says the M10 has a helmet compatible hood but there's no way I can layer a helmet underneath. Granted, I have a bigger than average head but previous helmet-compatible hoods worked for me (Super Alpine works). I have to layer it awkwardly underneath my helmet but it's in a weird zone between too big to go under a helmet and too small to go over.

Otherwise, the feel of the jacket is really cool. It's really interesting that a 3-layer jacket can be this thin. The lack of pockets doesn't bother me, if it does than you're probably looking at the wrong category of jackets. The single chest pocket is really all you need. How often do you really stick things in your pockets when you're climbing? If you want a place for your gel or phone, just put it in the chest pocket. If you want somewhere to put your hands, then the new M10 (2016) has that.

Overall, if you're able to get a great deal on this (I was) then take it if you can deal with its faults. If you want the best hardshell that is equally light, take a look at the Arcteryx Alpha FL if you can afford it. I'd still stick with this since it's way better value and Patagonia will help repair all the damage you inflict on this jacket (you will tear it up if you use it right).

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on September 23, 2015

2 5

Familiarity: I returned this product before using it

The axe actually weighs 13.5 oz, not the claimed 11.2 oz.
I bought the axe simply because of its low claimed weight so this was really disappointing!
Other than weight, this axe balanced throughout the shaft because of its small head. The pick is short and the adze is really quite small --both of which are to save weight. The adze is welded onto the pick, which looks maybe a little funky, but they did a good job welding it.
This is shortest, lightest, real ice axe you can get (by real I mean a steel head). If you want something lighter, you will be looking at the CAMP Corsa. But the Corsa has an aluminum head that really seems precarious to use and you wouldn't want to arrest on that. For something that you can plunge over and over again, this will be the better bet.
Also, the Corsa Nanotech is definitely a worth checking out. It's somewhere between these two in terms of durability. But keep in mind it does cost a hefty bit more.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on April 8, 2015

5 5

Seriously the best boxers you can buy. Yes, they're expensive but having just one or maybe two pairs for a long trip is all you need. You can wear one for days without any stench or gootch rot and you can wear the second pair when you wash the first. Some even invert the boxers to utilize both sides. I wear a 32 waist in pants and I bought a size S since a slim fit is nice when exercising.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

4 5

If you're not a gram weenie, the non UL version by Patagonia is enough. I asked Patagonia and there is 98g of down in both versions (UL and normal). The only weight savings is in the shell. For me, I thought it would be cool to save a couple of ounces but to be honest, I never noticed anything. Plus, this thing isn't as attractive as the regular version if you're wearing it around town, but hey that's me. The jacket doesn't stuff into itself, it comes with a stuf sack that can be compressed down more, so it's still a bit big. The sizing was the deciding factor for me. It's a slim/athletic fit, which I normally like but for a down jacket like this, it wasn't really comfortable. The shell is also a bit shiny, almost like a black trash bag, though that's not a very pleasant analog. If you know what you want, and it fits your bill, then this jacket does a great job at what it was designed to do. But for the non-UL crowd, the regular down hoody is more than enough.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

5 5

It was made for trail running, but even Steve House uses it for ice climbing on Nanga Parbat.There's nothing you can't use this thing for. With a lot of force, it stubbornly stuffs into its zippered chest pocket that can barely fit a naked iPhone 5. The shell material is light and doesn't feel sticky and clammy if you actively unzip it once awhile for quick venting. The cuffs on the sleeves are a bit odd. The elasticity is only on half of the cuff, (to save weight?), but works just as well so I'm not complaining. The hood had a cinch which is good for the smaller headed folk; I have a scary big noggin' so it's not much use to me. Theres not much else to the jacket With the R1, I can run comfortably in the 30s. I haven't tested it for backpacking, but I can't imagine why you wouldn't since it weighs so little. To the ultralight crowd, you guys probably have this already and can attest to its versatility. Great jacket, highly recommended.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

5 5

It was really tricky for me to get my size, especially since I'm a size 12.5/13. But thankfully La Sportiva makes half sizes even for big foot. But you will need to size up a bit.Mine's a EU 47.5, roughly US 13.5. Besides that, these are versatile enough for trail hiking to backpacking and the approach of a mountaineering climb. If you've followed Andrew Skurka's stuff, he used something like this. I highly recommend it.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

5 5

For some reason I thought this fleece had Polartec Windpro, which it apparently doesn't. It now makes sense because this thing isn't windproof, just a hair more resistant than your average fleece--trace amounts. The jacket is nice and fuzzy people will rub up against you because of it, and is really warm as a mid layer. As an outer layer, it's good on chilly days, but don't be caught wearing this alone on windy days. Great selection of colors! Get the bright ones, don't be plain! I love this jacket and I highly recommend it.

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

5 5

The pockets are all useful, though the one in the front is a bit odd. It's comfortable, but overall I would say that this bag is overshadowed by the Patagonia Chacabuco, which I would recommend over this bag. The Chacabuco has utility shock cords on the outside which are super useful to tack gym shoes/cleats on the outside without having to put it in your bag and get everything inside muddy. Get the chacabuco! But this bag is cool too.

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on March 18, 2013

5 5

Let's be honest now, you don't really need a solar panel. But heck, if you think it's cool (I sure do) and would make your life a bit more fun then go ahead. The system works really well, charges fast,and has it neat little pocket to store your cords/Guide 10 battery pack. I wouldn't bother trying the other solar panels out there, lots of 'em are iffy and unreliable so I'd stick to this. It works very well, simple, and organized.

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on January 17, 2013

4 5

Yes, it's really windproof.
Yes, it's made of recycled materials.
But no, it's not soft. The Patagonia R3 fleece and the Mountain Hardwear Monkey Man look similar to the Retro-X but unlike the Retro-X, they are SOFT AND FUZZY. However, this jacket isn't. The jacket feels like the yellow insulation materials they put in buildings/houses. It's not soft. I'm in college and a couple of girls literally ran up to me to feel my jacket, but leave disappointed in it's roughness. Times like that I wished I chose the R3 or the Monkey Man.
But considering that the Retro-X is windproof unlike its counterparts, it's nice. But keep in mind that the jacket feels a bit stiff even after wearing it for a couple of months and I don't think it'll get any less stiff because of its construction with the inner windproof layer design.

But the jacket is very warm and cuddly looking, but beware it's not soft and fuzzy like how I was hoping.

(3)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on October 30, 2012

5 5

I have the REI Lite Core 1.5 pad, which sucks, but when it was my primary pad, this thing was a great accessory. I think everyone should keep a luxury item when backpacking and this is it. Something like this will weigh very little but will make you comfortable around camp, ready to head out the next morning.

(1)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on October 27, 2012

5 5

I love this thing. Since it's a half-zip, you get maximum versatility. I love dumping out heat with the half-zip, it's very comfortable. I wear this alone as a running top or as a baselayer when climbing or mountaineering. It's a great piece of clothing.
I usually prefer wool for its anti-ordor properties, but I prefer this. Since neither smells, I prefer this for its durability (wool can be fragile).

I'm 6'1, 165 lbs and I wear a M.

Great product. Get one!

(0)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on October 27, 2012

5 5

This bag is slim but will fit most modern crampons if you fit it right. I like this a lot more than BD's crampon bag because the mesh is a lot sturdier than BD's. The mesh on the BD is more like loose string rather than solid mesh on the Fakir. It's durable.

However, compared to BD's, this has fewer attachment points. If you're concerned with ease to attach it to your bag, then get the BD. There aren't many loops to hook this onto your bag but if you're like me, then you'll just strap it on. It's not a big deal.

Good product.

(2)

 

0 Comments

BzBrian

BzBrianwrote a review of on October 27, 2012

4 5

I'm 6'1, 165 lbs and these bibs in size M fit me perfectly. The bibs don't pull on my shoulders too much and the length is great. I never find myself shifting the bib at all. The very bottom of the bib where they cut off at the thigh tends to be a little rough. It's not rough so you feel the need to scratch, but Pearl didn't do a great job at cutting of the ends. It tends to chip and scratch but since these bibs don't shift as I ride, I have no issue.

(0)

 

0 Comments