Free 2-Day Shipping on all orders over $50*
AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on November 24, 2014

4 5

Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions
Fit: True to size

First off, gcoaster nailed it: the photos show what appear to be reinforced knees (or at least different colored knees). The pants don't actually have this feature. Buyer beware.

That said, I'm keeping the pants because they still seem quite burly and they fit really well.

Fit: I'm 6'2" / 185 and wear a 34/34 in jeans (maybe getting closer to a 35 in the waist, but just don't want to admit it). I bought the Large. The waist and length are perfect -- maybe even a tad on the long side, but not enough that they go below my boot.

These are on the baggy side of the spectrum, but sit high on the waist, so they come off more as baggy work pants rather than saggy-skater pants.

They're lightly insulated (very thin brushed fleese on the inside). They have vents on the inner and outer thigh to dump heat. On super cold days, there's plenty of room for layering.

The material seems very tough and is quiet when moved. Being quiet is important to me, because I can't stand the "crackling" sound some ski pants make. There's no range of motion issues.

All the pockets are in the right place (two hip pockets that are oriented vertically, one butt pocket, and one thigh pocket).

Anyway, that's the extent of my review because I just got these and haven't used them yet. I simply can't imagine that the'll be anything short of awesome. They only lose a star because of the monochromatic knees when two colors are shown in the photos.

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on August 20, 2012

5 5

I'm on my second week with the C-Lite 2.0, and I thought I'd give my impressions. As background, I typically wear an 11.5 (45), but I went with a 12 (45.5) in this shoe, as I think it runs a little small (especially width). I have a high arch, and wish there was a little more arch in this shoe.

First, I think the other commentators nailed it: the sole is superb. I run in New Mexico, where the trails are very rocky and/or sandy and these shoes just bite into the ground and grip the rocks. Nice soft lugs give some cushioning on the downhills, but you can still feel everything under your feet in a way you can't in more shoes with more padding (the only padding is the sole itself).

Second, they're a little hot, as the other guys have said, but not "don't use them in weather over 75 degrees" hot. Compared to my road-running shoes (Asics 2170), they don't breath very well, but it's well worth the extra heat when you consider all the protection from water, rocks, and mud the fairly substantial upper gives you. Also, the 2.0s have a rubber toe guard that's really helpful.

As for lacing, it's fantastic. The shoe opens up when unlaced, so they're easy to slip on and off (there's also a pull tab on the back that's way better than the rear loop on the original C-Lites). When you lace them up, the whole shoe wraps snugly around your foot, which I just love. Be careful you don't tighten them too much, or you'll lose feeling in your feet!

If I have a gripe, it's the fairly narrow toe-box (larger, for sure, than the originals, but still too narrow for my toes to really spread out and provide balance like in the minimalist shoes on the market now). I have a narrow foot in general, especially the heal, and the rest of the shoe fits great.

Maybe another gripe would be what happens when a lace breaks? I've had the original C-Lites for two years and one of the laces is starting to fray. I don't see any easy way to get a new pair of laces in there. I'm thinking it will be like arthroscopic surgery when I have to replace them . . . but that problem is for another day.

Anyway, this is a great running (and hiking) shoe, and I'd recommend it if you like to run on difficult terrain. (It also works great as a golf shoe, like the guy in the video review says). Enjoy!

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on April 23, 2012

3 5

Finely made, lightweight ball cap. Gets 3 stars for fit. I have a 7.5 in. head and bought the large. While it's an easily adjustable hat, the top material is too big and baggy. It looks silly and floppy. I guess it would work if you had a lot of curly hair. Ended up giving it to my dad, who is oblivious to fashion and needed a brimmed hat.

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on March 30, 2012

5 5

Just picked up a pair of the Entrada Pant, and felt compelled to give them a 5-star review. These are my second pair of softshell pants (the other being the Stoic Overhang), so I have something to compare them to. First off, the material on these pants is AMAZING! Very stretchy, very breathable. The pants just move with you and there's no chaffing at all. They seem tough, but I haven't put them in any situation were I could test that theory. The seams all seem very well constructed and the zippers feel solid. The pockets are a little shallow, especially the back one. There are two hip pockets that lie flat and are larger than the hand pockets. As for width and length, I'm a 33x34 in pants, and I went for the 34. They're a little big in the waist, but the Entradas have these great belt-type straps that you pull, and the pants synch up along the waist (totally cool, totally techy). They fit on the slim side, for sure. The length is perfect (I would imagine that the 34 is a 34x33.5). For temperatures, I'd guess they'd do well from anywhere around freezing (in dry weather) up to the 70s (I don't know, I've only worn them for my morning dog walks so far, and those have been in the upper 20s-lower 30s, and they've been perfect). Best way to describe the fabric is that it's on the thinner side of softshell, but not paper-thin by any means. Anyway, hope that helps.

(0)

 

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on March 23, 2012

4 5

The Overhang pant is one nice pair of pants! The fabric is very stretchy, very soft, and the articulated knees let them move with your body as you hike and climb. Very comfortable pant.

In terms of warmth, I've lately been wearing them out for my morning dog walk in temps around 25-30 and am totally fine (the fabric is pretty thick, and the inside seems like it has some fuzzy insulation on it, but nothing dramatic).

They're on the slim side, but I suppose you could layer with some long-johns if you needed to (I haven't).

They loose a star for two reasons: First, they're cut a little low in the waste (that's the style, but I like my pants at my waste). Second, they're a bit too short for my legs. I bought a medium, and I'm a 33x34 in jeans. These are more like a 34x33. I can still wear them up in the mountains where I live, but I don't like to wear them into town because I look like the dork I really am.

All-in-all, I'm happy with my purchase, but wish they were 1-2 inches longer...

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on February 22, 2012

4 5

I only want to comment about the sizing. (Since they run so small, I couldn't wear them out to test them to comment about warmth or quality of construction, but on first impression, they seem well built). Anyway, I'm usually in between an L and XL in gloves, but the large of these wasn't even close due to the shortness of the fingers and body. If you're an in between'er like me, better size up.

(0)

 

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on January 27, 2012

4 5

I bought these off Steep and Cheap a month ago, and thought I'd throw down a quick review here. First, a note on size: they run a little small. I bought the large, and they're a bit stubby in the fingers (I have fairly long fingers, though). They're also a little snug in the body.

As for construction, well, they're OR, which means they're well made. The stitching seems solid and the materials tough and a little bit stretchy. My only gripe is that the palms are really slick and not at all grippy. I own a pair of OR Gripper Gloves, and would love to see that palm on these gloves.

As for warmth, they've got it, especially for their light/medium weight. I've worn these out on pre-dawn hikes in dry weather that's around 20F, and have felt just fine. Very nice and comfortable liners.

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on December 13, 2011

5 5

Great shirt for us skinny folk with long arms! About me: a lithe 6'2" / 175, broad shoulders with monkey-long arms. The large fits perfectly (the arms are even a little long, but after years of showing off my wrists because of shirts too short, I'll take an over-correction). I haven't washed it yet - and I've had some awful luck with backcountry shirts shrinking in the wash - so I'll update this review if things go south on that end. Otherwise, I love the shirt, and I just ordered one of each color...

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on February 18, 2011

Monchichi, baby!
5 5

This jacket is ridiculously cool. It's super fluffy and completely over-the-top, and I friggin love it (so does the woman, who wears it around the house whenever I'm not). Seriously, it makes me feel like one of those Japanese snow monkeys who you always see hot-tubbin on the Nature Channel.I'm not going to comment on its sports functionality, as it appears to be strictly apres-ski, but wear it out to the bar, and I almost guarantee women will be rubbing up on you within a few minutes. As for fit, I'm 6'2" 175 with broad shoulders and monkey-long arms, and the large fits great, if not a bit loose in the body (but I'm pretty thin).Anyway, I wish I were wearing it now...

(0)

 

0 Comments

AlbuquerqueDan

AlbuquerqueDan wrote a review of on April 2, 2010

3 5

I'm 6'2" and sport an athletic/skinny build (6'2" / 180). I purchased a large, and the thing clings to my body like saran-wrap. The fit would be fine (if not still a little too tight) if it were a true underlayer, but the pocket suggests that this shirt should be worn alone. Sorry Stoic, better get back to the drawing board on this one!

(0)

 

0 Comments

0 Comments