Free 2-Day Shipping on all orders over $50* | See all Christmas Ordering Cutoffs

Description

An advanced helmet for advanced freeskiers.

Since most impacts to the head occur while you ragdoll down a slope, POC designed the Receptor Backcountry Helmet to protect against hard shocks as well as the brain-jostling that happens during high-speed crashes. Thanks to the award-winning MIPS technology, your vital gray matter doesn’t get jostled nearly as much as with standard helmets.

  • MIPS technology employs a small plastic piece that breaks during harsh impacts and allows the liner and outer shell to rotate separately, which reduces the stress of ragdolling on your brain
  • Tough ABS/PC outer hardshell withstands encounters with rocks and branches, and an aramid barrier between the shell and PC liner further reduces shock
  • Equipped with RECCO avalanche rescue system in case of an emergency


Share your thoughts

What do you think of the

POC Receptor Backcountry Helmet

? Share a...

Write a review

No file chosen

Rather attach a photo from another website?

Rather attach a photo from your computer?

  • Product review:
  • Share a video
  • Share a photo

How familiar are you with the product?(Optional)

Only jpg, jpeg, png, gif or bmp files please.

Save

Here's what others have to say...

5 5

Great Helmet

  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

Well my ski season is just kicking off so I just have a few initial impressions on the helmet, so to start the helmet runs a bit tight but as most helmets do the soft foam will pack out. the tightness of the helmet isn't uncomfortable in anyway just noticible. The actual finish of the helmet is ultra glossy and looks like it belongs in a museum but sadly it appears to show scratches and fingerprints really easily which isn't a big deal but it could be better with a matted finish. In the box you get a basically useless goggle clip which is removable anyways so thats no big deal, a microfiber helmet bag (like the ones you see for goggles), a series of pamphlets on RECCO and MIPS and a bag with a replacement MIPS pin set and a helmet fit kit. The neck roll is very comfortable and comes with a RECCO reflector installed, which is a nice touch. The MIPS system, is noticeable right when you pick it up because if you press against the outer or inner shell you can notice the shells slide just a bit. obviously in a bigger shock the foam pin would break causing a larger shift reducing impact. overall the helmet is great but ill be looking at doing a more in depth review as the season goes on and PS the helmet fits great with Smith I/O's

I already have canopy and airwave, but never ride with helmet. So the questions were more directed at the helmets, thank you for timely response. If you own either, any person input? Also in your opinion what is the better purchase, with money not being a factor?

Best Answer Responded on

Oh ok gotcha. I had a receptor bug - same helmet without any cool features - and the Shane McConkey Canopy. Loved that combo- fits great.
I've demoed the plus and the backcountry, but don't currently own either. Basically the Backcountry is the Plus, with those extra features. Between the two, I would go with the Backcountry. That MIPS technology is REALLY cool - it significantly reduces forces on the brain from oblique impact. I think the added protection is fully worth that slightly higher price.
RECCO is a cool addition to the Backcountry as well, although it definitely is NOT an adequate substitute for a beacon.
A couple other things - POC helmets seem to run on the smaller side. Also, the Backcountry is reportedly about 40 grams heavier than the Plus.
Bottom line, you can't really put a price tag on your brain. MIPS technology is scientifically proven to increase protection, so I would definitely go with that one.

Responded on

Laura, you mention you owned a "Receptor Bug", do you not own it anymore because you upgrade or don't like what POC has to offer? Also my bud bought the Plus+ he's having fitment issues with Oakley canopy set ups , any input?

Major differences besides MIPS and recco between backcountry and plus? Also compatibility with Oakley airwaves or oakley canopy style set up?

Best Answer Responded on

Hey Hot Snow,
The Receptor Backcountry MIPS is based on the Receptor + shell and core, and has double shells, a multi-impact EPP liner and an Aramid Penetration Barrier. It also has Recco, like you said.
Other than that, they look identical side by side and fit the same.

POC helmets are made to integrate perfectly with POC goggles, but most helmets will fit fine with most goggles. I really like the Canopy with this helmet! Both of those are MASSIVE, so be sure you are into that before you go with that kit. Also, the new frameless Flight Deck will be a similar fit to the Canopy. Hopefully that helps!

5 5

POC problem solve well by BC & POC

  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

POC Receptor Backcountry – BC and POC took care of it.

Congratulations to Backcountry and POC for following-up and solving my dissatisfaction about the POC Receptor Backcountry poor product manufacturing quality.

Earlier, I received a POC BR and was shocked by the poor quality of manufacturing because Velcro fasteners were both missing or misplaced in the helmet liner. I posted and copied POC about my disappointment. POC-NA (UT) replied to my e-mail with 24-hours and provided a contact phone number to a sales-service manager (fast and impressive response. Thanks, Ryan); POC asked questions and pledged to make my purchase right, and requested a follow-up about my satisfaction about the replacement item.

My re-ordered POC arrived quickly from BC and included the high quality POC helmet that I expected from the premium priced-feature product. I am excited about the MIPS technology and wish the best for POC’s success.

Thanks – you’re developing a loyal customer.



Update: Used POC BC several times. Great helmet: comfort, weight and window. Picked-up POC goggles that also have great quality and fit, and provide best fit for PCO helmet. I'm in!

2 5

Swedish engineering undermined in China

  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Was so excited to finally get one of these today at the premium price for a little extra brain insurance. . On unboxing, the grommet which holds the MIPS pin was lying loose in the box. This is under a glued on piece of center rubber, not supposed to be loose even if the pin was broken. I took the rubber out to inspect the MIPS element and it just fell out the back of the helmet (yellow Mips pin). I could see a small chink near there as well.
Goes to show that the best engineered product in the world is of no use if its not put together well.
Unhappy camper.

5 5

Trust this Helmet!

  • Familiarity: I've put it through the wringer

Been skiing for 35 years...Owned this helmet for the last two...Two major accidents, broken tibia both times, major surgery...no concussion...Previous to that destroyed a Smith Vantage with expected outcome, major concussion...These POC guys do safety, we are a family of six...we own eight POC helmets (ok, three of them are mine :), Bike helmet is next on the list!!!!
And BTW, goggles stayed on without the clip both times...

Responded on

I've done a lot of research on the MIPS technology and it's a great concept. But because it's new, there isn't a lot of 3rd party research into the real-world applications of the product. Your experience is only one trial, but it's good enough for me! I'm glad you're okay man! SOLD!

looking for black large in this helmet. ...

looking for black large in this helmet. Any chance you'll be getting anymore in?

Any more sizes coming in soon?

Any more sizes coming in soon?

4 5

POC Receptor Backcountry

  • Familiarity: I've used it several times

After a recent head on collision with a block of ice while skiing (in a Poc Synapsis which worked perfectly) I replaced my broken POC with the Receptor Backcountry. It's a little heavier but you can see where the extra protection is coming from. In theory the MIPS will offer a greater level of protection than a regular helmet. I'm deducting a star because the google clip just sucks and there is no excuse for that. I've duct taped the goggle strap instead.

is this adjustable from the back with a...

is this adjustable from the back with a dial the way the pocito kids' helmets are?

4 5

So far so good

  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

This helmet fits my head well and I think the most important thing when shopping for a helmet is the fit. It's key to try it on before you buy. My head measured slightly in between sizes and I opted for the smaller size. Pads packed out slightly after wearing a few times and it still feels good. I wear my helmet when touring and haven't used it with the vents closed yet and probably won't. Only had it out on cool days so far and its worked well at keeping my head at a comfortable temperature. The goggle clip is pretty much useless, it sits too low on the helmet and slides into the helmet from the bottom up. If you use goggles that have some type of non slip on the inside of the strap you shouldn't have a problem unless you slam hard, tomahawk, or something like that. The interface between this helmet and my Iris goggles is seamless...Nobody wants gaper gap.

So far so good

The Formex POC is less expensive. it...

The Formex POC is less expensive. it says it is not audio compatible. is the POC Receptor Backcountry audio compatible, and have y'all fixed the goggles strap issue? I am interested in MIPS. Why is the baccountry more expensive? What's better about it?

Responded on

Regarding the difference between the `ordinary' Receptor and the backcountry one, the latter seems to have the RECCO avalanche rescue system as well as MISP technology for further safety.

3 5

Goggle clip useless

  • Familiarity: I returned this product before using it

I ordered the POC Receptor Backcountry and a Smith Vantage and ended up keeping the Smith and returning this one. I liked the styling of the POC better, but I had trouble paying $50 more knowing that I would likely have to reposition my goggles, etc., if I wiped out. Just makes zero sense to me why they'd do that. Otherwise, I would've stuck with the POC. But the Smith Vantage was better bang for the buck.

Responded on

Originally I had purchased a Smith Vantage helmet before getting my POC Receptor Backcountry helmet, and got it out for one run when I caught an edge at the bottom of a run being careless in my riding and went backwards and smacked the back of it, that impact alone was enough to destroy that Smith Vantage completely cracked into 2 pieces. I switched over to the POC Receptor Backcountry based on a suggestion from a buddy I snowboard with who owns one and have loved it since.I dont even bother with that goggle clip as my goggles stay on the helmet pretty well without it, but honestly if you really wanted it to stay in place you could epoxy it down pretty easily.

Is the white helmet a glossy/shiny paint...

Is the white helmet a glossy/shiny paint or is it a matte paint? I can't tell from any pictures

5 5

Initial impressions

  • Familiarity: I've used it once or twice and have initial impressions

So I just got this in the mail and took it up to Breck this weekend (not enough for backcountry yet in CO), and I really like this helmet a lot. I am not going to say it is more comfortable than my Smith, and it is certainly not warmer, because it isn't plain and simple. What benefits it does provide is it has the MIPS (huge bonus) and it is multi impact, which as an avid backcountry skier, I really appreciate. So how do I get around the warmth and comfort? Right now I am wearing a light headband around my ears which makes up for the warmth issue. That worked beautifully and a little rearrangement of the padding on the inside accommodates the headband and ensures I still have a snug fit because if your helmet does not seat properly, you lose all of the protective benes. The chin strap is very soft under the chin and the helmet itself seats nicely, so no complaints there. Goggles fit great over this one. I roll with some Smith IOs and they fit perfect. aside from the above mentioned this is an absolutely awesome buy. I am happy that I won't have to replace this one for quite a while. I hope this helps some of you out.

Responded on

I also want to mention this helmet runs small so if your in between definitely size up!

I measure 58 cm, but long and narrow. Own...

I measure 58 cm, but long and narrow. Own a Skull Light, L, that needs replacing. But bought my kid a Receptor + , S, that I can get into. Tight fit, but doable. So that suggests a M. Do the Receptors fit really differently than the Skull or Comp series?

Responded on

POC lists the same sizing for those models

http://www.pocsports.com/en/content/view/Snow_size_guide

Is this a fully adjustable helmet, or are...

Is this a fully adjustable helmet, or are you limited? I am back and forth from smalls and mediums, if I am on the in between should I go up and or down with this?

Responded on

No, it's not adjustable. Use the sizing guide and measure carefully. I was on the edge and went for smaller size, because it's so important it fits snugly. There is no point paying for all this protection and then having your skull bang around inside it..

Unanswered Question

how does the Receptor Backcountry with...

how does the Receptor Backcountry with MIPS compare to the normal Receptor in terms of the thickness of the foam ? Does one have a lower profile than the other?

hello, i have the dre communications...

hello, i have the dre communications system from my old POC receptor bug communication helmet. if I buy the POC receptor back country, can i put in the dre neck band and earpieces that I got last year? thanks.

Best Answer Responded on

got this from POC's page on the DRE Communication Neckroll;

Compatible with Receptor BUG, Receptor +, Receptor Backcountry and all Receptor Pro Models.

got this from POC's page on the DRE Communication Neckroll;  <br/>  <br/> Compatible with Receptor BUG, Receptor +, Receptor Backcountry and all Receptor Pro Models.